Compare Road to Perdition to Dumbledore.

Each ending has Harry talking and seeking guidance from Dumbledore after his sufferings. Little advice is given or help because he is written by a woman. Emotional support is offered only. Dumbledores character is never proven until the 6th film and his character insists upon itself because the Leftist Feminist that Rowling is couldn't fathom responsibility or a real leader. Dumbledore is innocent and vanilla.

Now consider John Sullivan, an enforcer hitman who has to coach his son. He displays masculine traits and is polite, teaches through experience and firmness with little words or feelings. It's how he is and what he does that the boy learns being a man from. Johns loyalty leads to his family dying and he accepts responsibility. The boys pain is answered by his father. They are strong together and grow quietly.

Men know how to write men, because men know morality, leadership, character. Women do not know what makes a man or they would pick a good one and grow quietly together. A real son never tries to replace his father, but seek approval. Johns character is deeper in 2 hrs than 6 movies of Dumbledore.

No approval of women from men is sought fairly in social affairs, with instead women converting the throne they imagine we sit on. If women can't imagine men properly, they won't be able to replace us or become equal. The red pill goes deep into the pixels of the full blue pill world, and reality is tearing back the script of feminism as a dud.