So, a lot of news outlets have begun to say “Projected” President-Elect, and in the case of Sky News (Australia); they’re discussing going to the SCOTUS and getting a “recount.”

Question: wouldn’t a “recount” prove fuck all??? The SCOTUS said very clearly: all ballots received after election night, like 8PM, has to be “separated and segregated.”

Shitlibs are trying to meme that “only a few thousand ballots” were received after election night —— yet in some cases where ~2M ballots were sent out; only ~500k was returned by Sunday Nov 1 for instance!

What happens if the SCOTUS takes the Deep State easy way out and says “do a recount” (like that means SHIT?!?) I want them saying INVALIDATED or at LEAST “electors should consider the potential for fraudulent activity” to get them to most likely [justifiably] defect or SOMETHING! (?)

As it stands, this almost feels like it could be another part of this rammed-through “Sting” Coup????

WHAT THE FUCK IS HAPPENING ——- Literally people SAYING Trump has proof of Ballot harvesting in states that don’t allow it; plain old ballot stuffing scan machines; “curing” their own votes while invalidating Trump’s; USPS “drops” @ 3,4,5 AM memes; Hammer Scorecard shit ———> is it all just to make us look like Schizos? Are they gonna magically “find” Trump votes and let him come back??? Election fraud was literally a term flooded by thousands of devices all over battleground states because they wanted to know what their punishment could be! WTF THIS CHINA COUP IS FUCKED!