~ archived since 2018 ~

MGTOW is Bigger Than Intersectionality on Google Trends, Interesting Demographics

WildChad

July 9, 2019

12 upvotes

/r/MGTOW2

https://i.redd.it/pw7qy9jg2d931.png

Archived from /r/MGTOW2

r/MGTOW2 is a subreddit for discussions on how MGTOW can (and has) been a good life decision.

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill subreddits and blogs. This page is our copy of the original post.

/r/MGTOW2 archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB

Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Post Information

Title	MGTOW is Bigger Than Intersectionality on Google Trends, Interesting Demographics
Author	WildChad
Upvotes	12
Comments	30
Date	July 9, 2019 11:19 PM UTC (7 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MGTOW2
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MGTOW2/comments/cb8knm/mgtow_is_bigger_than_intersectionality_on_google/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MGTOW2/mgtow-is-bigger-than-intersectionality-on-google.812930 https://theredarchive.com/post/812930

Comments

[–]WildChad 1 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]HotJewishGirl 1 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]WildChad 1 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]HotJewishGirl 1 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]WildChad 1 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I can rationally justify some parts of the idea, that yes, perhaps statistically as a group, indeed some are more favored and privileged in raw numbers, but the problem is that it is never left alone on a group level and it is eagerly drawn to individual level.
For example, if you are a white heterosexual male, who is a poor coal miner or truck driver, you are automatically more privileged and less oppressed than a lesbian black woman, who lives off of her wealthy lesbian wife.

Marxism used to be just about social class, which makes actual sense, because class is majorly about wealth, but now this hypothesis is baking race and sexual orientation in it, whereas victimhood becomes a perverted status symbol of sorts in oppression Olympics.

It's especially problematic as it is routinely used to erode individual responsibility and worse yet, individual aptitude and achievement

[–]HotJewishGirl1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]WildChad1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]Jake4523 1 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]HotJewishGirl 1 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]WildChad 1 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]HotJewishGirl 1 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]WildChad 1 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]Jake4523 1 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]csehszlovakze 1 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]WildChad 1 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]30203forever 1 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]WildChad 1 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]30203forever 1 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]WildChad1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Well, Russian men are quite commonly real men and it is true Russia is not as nearly as emasculated as the West. That is all true.

I have been into army myself and I have got to say it is more of a privilege than a sentence if you take it the right way. It was one of my best years in my life due to who I became in such rough conditions. That is what builds men up compared to a foam rolled vanilla pampered lifestyles of an average male today.

Besides, mandatory army duty usually is pretty low age bracket for those who change their citizenship into one of the countries that have mandatory conscription laws. Not sure about Russia though, but in some others you no longer need to serve at around 30+ years of age...

And finally, would I rather go to serve two years in a Russian army than marry an American woman?
Any day, any week, any month, any year!

[–]WildChad1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Additionally, if you are a type of guy who is well off, independent, etc. and you enjoy more traditional, feminine women... Russia or any other Slavic country might not be such a bad idea.

This doesn't exclude sexually active MGTOW whatsover.

What you have is a population of women who are:
A) Interested in Western men
B) Adhere to more traditional mating ideas that feminists are against
C) Having far fewer fat and ugly women, while average women more feminine overall
D) Due to C, more competition among beautiful women, therefore less entitlement i.e. appreciation for a real man

And just because the culture overall is more traditional, it does not necessitate that you cannot just stay at dating level with them. I've had a few past relations with Balkan / Slavic women and those have been truly some of my best experiences with women among some Latin American women. They've been nothing like the manipulative low self esteem negative butthurt triggered Western women. I've felt I've been with an actual Woman instead either just a mannequin shell or a rotten to the core hellbeing.

While retirement age difference and conscription laws are clearly unfair and abide by old fashioned societal ideals, I'd still give it a positive view overall in terms of CULTURE.

[–]30203forever2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]WildChad2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

That's a great argument a point, thanks for bringing that up!

I know well this to be very correct.Russian women L O V E their oligarchs and is one of the reasons why they have been able to retain their culture old fashioned. I'd like to remind us here that hypergamy is one of the key elements which keeps a traditionalist system intact and running.

Feminists of course despise this "patriarchy" where sure, highest power and wealth men get to choose whatever they want, while forgetting it is the beautiful women who get the ultimate highest status pass. Feminists in this equation are basically just female incels to put it bluntly, who cannot compete with the beautiful women and are thus bitter to the core... Along with abusive, neglecting, absent (wonder why) lack of positive father figures in their lives.

While Western women are much more after Chad factor on looks, Russian women are much more after money.That is a very sober and honest observation and a great thing to point out.

Yes, indeed, Slavic women are really, really good at charming you into marriage.I had one "friend" girl from a Slavic country who tried to swim her way to do that for me...From my part I was lucky that she wasn't beautiful enough, point blank.

All that interest in cooking, being a good girlfriend/wife material while looking feminine, lingerie etc.For a Westerner it feels like too much of a lottery win to pass on, so yes, absolutely, great point!

[–]WildChad2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]30203forever2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Have you ever through about going back just even to check it out?

No, but my sister & brother in law did visit it last year. Keeping suspiciously quiet about it since then. P.S. You're absolutely correct about the feminists. To me, they're just the bottom of the barrel women who can not possibly hope to secure the resources for reproduction through the usual way (i.e. by manipulating the men into the state trap called "marriage", then robbing them of their $$$ and subsequently disposing them for the new victim). So they are playing that victimhood card (because it pays) into the perpetuity to force the government's hand to give them the usual handouts and benefits. They will never stop their phony "struggle for equality" for that reason, methinks. Because guess what, it's next to impossible to make someone understand something when their income depends on NOT understanding it. That's the #1 reason to NEVER argue with one.

[–]WildChad2 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]WildChad1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]reinaldo866 1 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]WildChad 1 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link