TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Someone sent me this. I just wonder how much of it is true. Some of it seems a bit exaggerated.

DraganTehPro

June 1, 2021
10 upvotes
/r/MensRights
https://www.mic.com/articles/88277/23-ways-feminism-has-made-the-world-a-better-place-for-men
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Someone sent me this. I just wonder how much of it is true. Some of it seems a bit exaggerated.
Author

DraganTehPro

Upvotes 10
Comments 17
Date June 1, 2021 6:59 PM UTC
(5 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/nq1n00/someone_sent_me_this_i_just_wonder_how_much_of_it/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/someone-sent-me-this-i-just-wonder-how-much-of-it.827088
https://theredarchive.com/post/827088
Red Pill terms in post
feminism
Top posts by DraganTehPro

Apparently men can't even walk past a woman nowadays

434 upvotes
April 22, 2021
/r/MensRights

Have you had a discussion with a feminist about feminism? If so, how did it went?

14 upvotes
May 15, 2021
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]ApprehensiveMail8 13 points14 points15 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

It's mostly true but acts as though feminists have been running the world in a vacuum with nobody else working toward justice (even though they claim the patriarchy has been running the world):

1) It ignores the contributions of men's rights activists to men's rights issues.

2) It gives feminism credit for things that were invented by non-feminist women.

3) It gives feminism credit for ideas that were promoted by, and work that was done by, non-feminist organizations, following a thought process that was not rooted in feminist theory.

4) It fails entirely to thank men for their contributions to women's rights and women's issues.

5) It fails entirely to criticize self-proclaimed feminists for actually standing in opposition to many of the things now being credited as feminist successes.

6) It fails to point out that we are really only scratching the surface of solving many of the men's issues brought up and feminists are actively telling MRA's to stop making progress.

For example, men can now technically be considered rape victims in many places, but not everywhere. A victory lap would be very premature.

And nowhere are sex crime laws written and enforced in a way that affords males and females equal protection and equal burden. Hardly any males feel like they can come forward to claim they are victims and be taken as seriously as women. It would be like, instead of granting all women the right to vote, that privilege had been granted to only a handful of women and the rest were told they have lost the right to complain because they might now be lucky enough to vote under specific circumstances, while men enjoy universal suffrage.

\****But the absolute biggest problem with the article is the following******

The article tells men to admire the progress made by feminists, but not to admire or emulate their tactics. They spoke up and didn't care whose feelings it hurt, but you should shut up, listen and empathize. They fought for their rights, but you should check your privilege. They demanded equality and never apologized for who they were, but you should try to change your own human nature for the benefit of others.

[–]DraganTehPro[S] 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Thanks!

[–]ApprehensiveMail8 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You're very welcome!

[–]pudgebone 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well said

[–]rabel111 7 points8 points9 points 5 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

I started this list and realised quickly the article was aimed at women who already believe that being female make you superior, and that men only have relevance when their existance impacts women. Each and every one of the claims made are false, or at best, misleading.

  1. It gave our economy a huge, long-lasting boost: no evidence to suggest feminism was responsible for any improvement in the economy.

  2. It helped men achieve better relationships and more satisfying sex: wrong, feminism was only ever concerned with women's sexual satisfaction, and arrogantly assumed that men are easily satisfied by any woman. Divorse rates have skyrocketed, and people are having less sex and less satisfying sex.

  3. It successfully overturned laws that discriminate against men: feminists are aggressively opposed to antidiscrimination laws being used for the benefit of men.

  4. It made life a little easier for single men: climbing suicide rates and emergence if the INCEL and MGTOW memes suggest otherwise.

  5. It expanded the possibility of more sexy time opportunities: men and women enjoyed sex before feminism.

  6. It gave men more reproductive control through abortion legalization: feminism is for women having the only say, and the only valid opinions about abortion.

  7. It triggered the FBI to change the definition of rape to include men.: feminist aggressively opposed this change, and continue to claim that only men can rape.

  8. It gave men some well-deserved time off from work: actually miners unions fought for and gained this work condition. Men continue to work longer hours, experience more workplace related injuries and deaths compared to women.

  9. It helped male survivors of violence in the military pursue justice: so stupid it does warrant response. Feminism only aggitated for women's rights in the military, has shown no iterest in the rights or welbeing of men in uniform, and appears confused, but hostile to trans generally.

  10. It ensured that the burden of war doesn't only fall on male shoulders: as above, really!

  11. It made the struggle for civil rights a reality: claiming the honor due to those who really fought these battles? Sounds like feminism.

  12. It kept prisons safer for male inmates: except all the initiatives advanced by feminists are for women in prison only. Feminist actually want more men in prisons for thought crimes (misogyny) against women.

  13. It enabled men to spend more time with their children: record numbers of men are now alienated from their children.

  14. It expanded the definition of hate crimes to include all identities: all identities except heterosexual men.

  15. It helped shatter stereotypes about HIV/AIDS patients: gay men and good people did this, not feminists. Princes Diana who? Oh, the born rich entitled woman who did a bit of charity work for HIV, and is now some kind of icon?

  16. It ensured that men get the vital reproductive health services: only if male infant genital mutilation is considered a therapy.

  17. It built a more inclusive world, one feminist celebrity at a time: the world has never been more divided by identity, and more exclusive of particular identities.

  18. It protected men's precious marbles during sports: deep into the feminist bubble that believes women invented everything.

  19. It made men's lives better and happier: magical thinking. It's true because "believe all women".

  20. It demanded that the media change its representation of men: the only male stereotype that feminism relates to men is "toxic masculinity". Hate speech is not making the world better for men or anyone.

  21. It fought for men's right to become nurses and teachers: women are more likely to discriminate against men in female dominated professions and workplaces.

  22. It encouraged men to rethink outdated masculinity standards: this isn't about making the world a better place for men, its about making men conform to women's demands.

  23. It pushed for immigration reform to help countless American families: ?????????????

[+]DraganTehPro-1 points 5 years ago [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

They did help in getting the FBI to change its laws. Now I don't believe that ALL of them are false, but I do think that a good portion of the article might be exaggerated or false.

[–]suzuki1369 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

First, they still protested it, so they were against it. And second, it still is very hard to be recognized as a victim of rape if you were not penetrated, so it effectively means women can't rape unless they penetrate a man. They definitely got the FBI to change its laws, but it did not benefit men.

[–]bufedad 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They got the FBI to drop men raped by women explicitly from its definition of rape.

They've fought to keep women raping men legal in countries trying to make rape gender neutral.

[–]dukunt 14 points15 points16 points 5 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

I stopped reading at the first one.

Feminism gave the economy a boost?

Prior to women joining the work force one breadwinner could support a family, own a home, have a car and take vacations. After feminism it now requires 2 breadwinners to make ends meet. Inflation has continued but the rate of pay has stayed the same. The work force doubled practically overnight.

They got the first one wrong. I doubt that they will redeem themselves with the rest.

[–]ArgueLater 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

I wouldn't blame this on feminism at all though. I don't think feminism pushed it either direction in any provable way.

Sure, I can come up with half-assed social theories about it. But... nah, the two are at best correlated; definitely no direct causation.

[–]ApprehensiveMail8 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

What do you mean you wouldn't blame this on feminism?

Are you saying feminism isn't the cause of women entering the workforce?

Or are you saying the economic consequences of having twice as many people in the workforce are not directly caused by having twice as many people in the workforce?

[–]ArgueLater 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

The latter. Having twice as many people enter the workforce could just as easily create a boom as a bust. It all depends on how it's handled, and the powers that be have been corrupt as fuck for a while now.

[–]ApprehensiveMail8 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Ok. Fair enough. I don't really believe there is such a thing as a "good" and "bad" economy. Any economic development will benefit some people and burden others. Women in the workforce is certainly having a big impact.

[–]TheConnoissuer 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If there isn't a doubling of available jobs then it creates a bust....which it did. Its simple economics. Women are competing with men for alot of the same jobs now. Especially since they are pushing women into stem fields. The evidence is already here doesn't take a genius to see it.

[–]SewageFace 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is all nonsense inferring that feminism is the only driving force for good

[–]Yoramus 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't have time to read all of that but I'll say two things

  1. The jockstrap was not invented by a woman, nor the computer. This is the only sentence I read and cross examined and it proved to be false. I cannot know how much of the rest is false but really I literally focused on one sentence and already found two errors!

  2. If only 30% of that is true it would make me very happy. Sadly my opinion is that feminism brought some good for men too when it was liberating (say in the 60's in the west) and afterwards it started to actively bash men for little benefits to women or even no benefit at all. I like to have sex with free women who enjoy it too and that is a good thing that feminism brought. I don't like to be hated, bashed and feared because I have a sexual desire, which is what feminism became now.

[–]ArgueLater 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Feminism is made of chaotic humans, who -- like all people -- are self serving and lazy. The outcomes of it can neither be entirely good nor entirely bad, such a feat would require unprecedented levels of control and understanding.

So yeah, ofc some good is going to come out of it. And overall I'm glad that a lot of guys got called out for being true misogynists. But now it's overstayed its welcome and is painting monsters onto decent men just to keep a myth alive.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter