Also if you go to the edit conversation history for pages like that for the slanted MGTOW article, you see that they basically accept any bias from hitpieces reported in media as factual because if it was reported by a "reputable" or "trustworthy" source it is judged to be true.
[–]Ody_ssey 19 points20 points21 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheNerdWonder 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Ody_ssey 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]sandiboijamie 8 points9 points10 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheNerdWonder 4 points5 points6 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[+]person_w_personality2 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
Also if you go to the edit conversation history for pages like that for the slanted MGTOW article, you see that they basically accept any bias from hitpieces reported in media as factual because if it was reported by a "reputable" or "trustworthy" source it is judged to be true.
[–]TheNerdWonder 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link