Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.
It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.
I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.
Support the archive
[–]alphastrike212 6 points7 points8 points (3 children) | Copy Link
The Guardian... no click.
[–]NotherThrowaway284 4 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
Scrubbed:
https://archive.md/wip/hAHCn
Fair warning, though: it absolutely is as stupid as you think. Right in the title it says "Women Have Less Ego." Not sure which women she's talking about, but that certainly has not been my observation.
[–]alphastrike212 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
Hey many thanks!
[–]jasperXL 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?
[–]tallgirl266 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
Women feel the pain more than men but can endure it longer than the opposite gender. Also, they forgot the pain[which explain why a lot of womens go throught pregnancy many times even tho it's really painfull] but men do not forgot pain. So, everytime they go througt the same level of pain, it feel worse than the last time.
You can search it if you want to lazy to list source and sorry for any gramatical error, english is not my first language.
[–]vonthe 3 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
Initial quick research indicates that this may not be true, or at least that the central claim may not be true.
I have some peripheral familiarity with this area, as I have worked with two people, one male and one female, who participated. The area of competition is so small that one athlete being injured, or sick, or having an off day(s) can affect things pretty dramatically.
The linked article above on Wikipedia shows the standard 5-15% difference in performance, at least at ultra-endurance running.
Race times converted to minutes for easy calculation. I didn't do all lengths because I just don't have that kind of time.
The 100 km and 1000 km seem like outliers, but as I said above, the field is so small that the loss of a single athlete can change things pretty dramatically.
[–]shit-zen-giggles 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
now, that's a solid reply.
Insider experience + data + sources.
Thank you very much, sir.
[–]JohnDoethan 3 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
Does it matter?
A female beat a male at a "sport" so niche its never been spoken of... Congrats I guess??
[–]JakeryPaule 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
I mean I seriously don't think this victory is based on gender or anything and I don't care. No one cares or says man power when a man wins.
[+]menstruatrix1 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
It's appears to be true in much the same sense as the claim that the USWNT is better at soccer than the USMNT.
[–]CaramelMonkey12 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
The USWNT lost to a u-15s team lol.
[–]iainmf[M] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
Please remember to use descriptive titles.
It makes the sub easier to use because people know what something is without clicking on it, and it makes it easier to search for specific things on the sub.
[–]RoryTate 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
I don't know much about this specific event, but this reads similar to the old claim that "women sweat more efficiently" than men. I've heard this "fact" about women not losing as much water as men when exercising asserted many times to support the idea that women are better in endurance-focused activities. This article is almost a cut-and-paste of those pieces (though this one tends to read more like a stealth marketing campaign, filled as it is with slick images and advertiser-friendly descriptions of the activities). The problem with this idea of female advantage is that the claim – when actually stated objectively in sports science – only exists under very specific conditions: "Women sweat more efficiently than men when both are exerting maximum effort". Yet when you think about that statement for a moment, it's a meaningless distinction and almost a tautology, because of course a machine is less efficient when forced to run in its highest gear. And men can achieve a much greater speed than women on average (running, swimming, cycling, etc), despite having more mass to move. So it stands to reason that they have to generate more heat, since they are expending more energy.
The truth it that when the two sexes are normalized, and run at a comparable speed for their weight, then there is no measurable difference in how the two groups sweat. And when properly pacing themselves, men perform better on average in all sport than women. So this is likely just more ideological propaganda and biased interpretations of science by the media.
[–]goodmod[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children) | Copy Link
Your post was removed due to rule 14, titles must be descriptive.
Titles must describe the content so that:
Users know what the link they are clicking on content before they click it
Users who are searching for specific material can easily find the post they are looking for
Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people.
When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check if there are any words you can cut out without losing any important information.
It's a good idea to pause for a few moments before hitting the "Post" button. Check for typos, ambiguous phrasing, redundant words - and of course for unintended meanings!