TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Female police officer, 44, quits force ahead of disciplinary hearing after she had sex on duty with abuse victim she was meant to be looking after

JohnKimble111

December 10, 2019
587 upvotes
/r/MensRights
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7775973/Police-officer-44-quits-having-sex-vulnerable-abuse-victim.html
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Female police officer, 44, quits force ahead of disciplinary hearing after she had sex on duty with abuse victim she was meant to be looking after
Author

JohnKimble111

Upvotes 587
Comments 79
Date December 10, 2019 4:36 PM UTC
(6 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/e8sy26/female_police_officer_44_quits_force_ahead_of/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/female-police-officer-44-quits-force-ahead-of.863217
https://theredarchive.com/post/863217
Top posts by JohnKimble111

Women Should Have to Register for the Draft, Congressional Commission Says

6700 upvotes
March 25, 2020
/r/PussyPassDenied

BBC admits its viral “women write better code” story was fake news

6298 upvotes
December 28, 2016
/r/MensRights

Gender pay gap in modelling sees men paid 75% less than women

6153 upvotes
February 8, 2018
/r/MensRights

Toxic Masculinity

5904 upvotes
March 10, 2018
/r/MensRights

After feminist cry sexism over BBC pay, official review uncovers more underpaid men than women

5789 upvotes
January 31, 2018
/r/MensRights

Controlling girlfriend, 22, who starved and stabbed her partner, banned him from her bed and took over his Facebook account is jailed for more than seven years

3826 upvotes
April 16, 2018
/r/PussyPassDenied

'If you tell anyone I've cheated, I'll ruin you': Cambridge don is cleared after his PhD student fiancee accused him of assault 'to get back at him' for calling off their wedding after she had affair in Galapagos Islands

3770 upvotes
September 16, 2017
/r/MensRights

Amber Heard loses bid to get $50 million defamation suit by her ex Johnny Depp thrown out

3737 upvotes
March 28, 2020
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–][deleted] 108 points109 points110 points 6 years ago (35 children) | Copy Link

Wtf was her thought pattern which led her to do something so stupid?

[–]xNOM 114 points115 points116 points 6 years ago (31 children) | Copy Link

It's almost always the same. Women are control freaks, so they find weak males that they have power over.

  1. students

  2. mentally retarded males

  3. prisoners

  4. boys in juvenile detention

  5. incapacitated males (drugs, alcohol)

  6. children in day care

This is why we have to listen to this feminist insanity that "rape is not about sex, rape is about power." It's true. But mainly when women do it. Getting a 14-year old student drunk and giving him a blowjob in your car has very little to do with sexual gratification. It has to do with finding someone you can manipulate and force to put up with all your emotional drama and bullshit. Like a lapdog that can talk.

[–]Tkx421 6 points7 points8 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

They like having the power and control, it's not even fully about the sex part. Look at how many male pedophiles have female accomplices. It's hard to even wrap your head around the mentality. It's something like "I love him and he loves me because I give him this and I control it(kids) so I control him and he fucks them so I'm fucking them". I mean the mental gymnastics involved will hurt your brain.

[–]xNOM 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Even normal female sexuality is fucked up. There is almost no brain-vagina connection

https://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/25/magazine/25desire-t.html

Women almost always need a reason to have sex, other than having sex. Spend 10 minutes with the "baddest" red-pilled women on reddit /r/FemaleDatingStrategy/. What do they want? The same thing as women in Saudi Arabia. To manipulate some "high value" man.

So it's not surprising that when women rape, it's also not mainly about the sex. Instead of crossing the line to forcibly or manipulatively take sex like most male rapists, women use sex to cross the line to manipulatively take relationships.

[–]Tkx421 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Pretty easy to explain. Women like to say men always think with their little head. Implying that women think with their brains. However that's a misnomer because women fuck with their brains. So they are actually thinking with "their version" of their little head. However it gets more complicated because THEY DON'T KNOW THAT but a man does. A man knows he's thinking with his dick. A woman does not.

[–][deleted] 16 points17 points18 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

that’s why they call them ‘Care-n’

[–]TiredRick 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Women manipulating men with sex, especially targeting vulnerable men or boys, is about power and it should be considered rape. There is very little difference between that (other than biological sex) and a man manipulating a vulnerable woman or girl with money, attention or power in order to take advantage of her sexually - which should also be considered rape. The definition of vulnerable was well captured by your list.

But rape is always about sex AND power. Vulnerable women are (generally) influenced by the power, because the man wants the sexual factor and vulnerable men are (generally) influenced by the sexual factor, because women want the power.

Attempting to excise sex from sexual assault and rape is a fools errand - the feminists are motivated to do it however because it removes the discussion of CONTEXT. When a girl goes on a date with a man dressed in a sexually provocative way, flirts heavily with him while he is purchasing her things, manipulates him for a long period of time with the promise or lure of sexual favors - and is then "raped" when she comes back to his house it seems absurd in the context of the whole transaction.

You can see the hypocrisy when the roles are reversed (say a female police officer uses sex to manipulate a vulnerable male) and all they want to do is talk about CONTEXT with zero focus on the act itself. Feminists aren't trying to remove sex from rape, they are trying to remove all CONTEXT when it is an allegation against a male.

[–]xNOM 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

But rape is always about sex AND power.

Not in the rapist it's not. Plenty of male rapists did it for the sex. Not so much for the females. Women hardly ever have sex for the sex anyway. So why would they rape for the sex?

EDIT another thing to think about: On average, how many times are these female rapists having sex with their victims before they're busted? Compare this to the male number. Female rape is relationship rape.

[–][deleted] -3 points-2 points-1 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

So what about men in those positions? Literally that has all happened if you replace the second sentence with Men/females. Women are control freaks? For a subreddit that complains about women generalizing all men, you guys don't give a shit about generalizing all women.

[–]shit-zen-giggles 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

you guys don't give a shit about generalizing all women.

Do you recognize the irony of complaining about generalizing while employing a generalization yourself in the same post?

[+]rahsoft -39 points-38 points-37 points 6 years ago* (22 children) | Copy Link

mentally retarded males

Its mentally disabled, or learning difficulties etc .. NOT retarded( very inappropriate)

​

and for all the muppets out there who voted this down, you are part of the problem. Would you like feminists to refer to all you MRAs as mentally retarded??

[–]Babyglockable 21 points22 points23 points 6 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Retarded is a official word used in documents, not an insult.

[+]rahsoft -14 points-13 points-12 points 6 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

no its not and yes it is

[–]Babyglockable 8 points9 points10 points 6 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Calling someone a retard, in an attempt to insult them, is obviously an insult. When you have an iq test and your score is so low that you are levelled as mentally retarded, it is not.

[+]rahsoft -15 points-14 points-13 points 6 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

"When you have an iq test and your score is so low that you are levelled as mentally retarded"

Again . its not.

its mentally disabled or learning difficulties etc

repeated attempts to justify your screw up on reddit and support those who most likely by your above description of an IQ test also screwed up and failed the test( including their brigading- a truly feminist trait) only makes you( and them as you are now describing them) look more and more...r**** ( yours words not mine)

[–]Babyglockable 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

What? This makes absolutely no sense as a paragraph. First and second but was okay, but holy crap, what are you saying in that part. Do you look over your own writing to make sure it doesn’t sound like someone who barely speaks English? And by the way, you using retarded as an insult is kinda... idk... stupid? If I was making an argument about how the n word was an insult and offensive, I wouldn’t call that person a n word, even if the letters are blanked.

[–]rahsoft -2 points-1 points0 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

wow

Do you have any coherent thought?

I'm sorry was my language too complex for you to understand?

​

Trying to argue that I sound like someone who barely speaks English is the behaviour of someone who is losing the argument. Being American doesn't give you the superiority of language over anyone..( and I'm speaking as a dual national by the way, so quit showing up the Americans)

​

Neither is trying to use an IQ test as an example either.

Perhaps it is you who should be looking over your choice of words when you are so blinded by the need to be right.

​

I work in this industry, so I know the terms of what can and cannot be used

​

.. and I did not use it as an insult to you or anyone, I merely pointed that your own behaviours and responses and that of your supporters makes YOU the exact example of the very thing you think is ok to do..

Like I said your words not mine

[–]Babyglockable 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well, a lot more coherent, I must say, but you make a few assumptions and mistakes right off the bat. I’m not American, well I am an American citizen but I am from a different country, a none English speaking one. Using “too complex language” is a bit insulting. You had made comments that made complete sense in the past, and had thought you were capable of doing it again (maybe you got a bit angry and typed before thinking). And for your ‘I’m using it like I think is okay’ part, I don’t think that it’s okay to be used in the way you used it, you used it as if it was an insult, something I don’t think is ok. As a bit of a post script, what industry do you work in? Mental health, gp, carer? Wide range of jobs you could have.

[+]Tarrantinooooo1 points 6 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

dont go full retarded on us

[+]rahsoft -12 points-11 points-10 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

reported

[–]that-guy-with-art 6 points7 points8 points 6 years ago* (9 children) | Copy Link

Retarded is the medical word. Or it was, like obese

[–]rahsoft -5 points-4 points-3 points 6 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

no its not

[–]Onithyr 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intellectual_disability#Terminology

Read it, maybe you'll learn something.

[–]rahsoft -3 points-2 points-1 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

no thanks its wikipedia which has zero credibility

[–]that-guy-with-art 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It does, professionals edit it, and editing yourself requires an account. There are sources listed at the bottom. Its credible, but then again, you seem the kind of person to call the Earth flat

[–]that-guy-with-art 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Maybe not medical, but it means mentally disabled. There are plenty of words that are "insulting" but only mean something completely fine.

[–]rahsoft -1 points0 points1 point 6 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

again its doesn't

stop paddling yourself deeper into the mire

[–]that-guy-with-art 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

It does in this context

[+]rahsoft1 points 6 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

It does in this context

no it doesn't and never has, unless you are now referring to yourself since you are only digging yourself deeper into a hole

[–]that-guy-with-art 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm speaking about mental disabilities. So is the other person. You know the context, because you "corrected" them. Just drop it and stop loosing karma.

[–]bomomma 3 points4 points5 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Mental Retardation was a scientific term until people like you make a huge deal about everything. Also it's intellectually disabled... I'm offended.

the words of the great Joe Rogan: "if you don't want me using the word gay then what do you want me to call gay shit?"

[–]rahsoft -2 points-1 points0 points 6 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

I'm offended.

good since you did exactly that to a lot of people

either learn from this or not .. its your choice

Or you can stay on your path, and keep being a sad pitiful internet troll ( Arnold Schwarzenegger )

[–]bomomma 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Haven't you learned your lesson yet? Ffs and GTFO

[–]indoorimp 6 points7 points8 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She wanted to make him feel 'better'. ;3

[–]matt271202 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Recently I was talking to a mate of mine and in year 6 his teacher was at his house (family friend) and she got drunk made out and felt him up he was 11 at the time, his mum saw eveything reported it to the school, the Christian school yes Christian school turned a blind eye to it. That lasted until she hit another 11 year old and caused injuries.

[–]liztu_june 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Biology

[–][deleted] 23 points24 points25 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She should not be a cop every again, but she will go to the next town.

[–]iDidntCatchTheJoke 13 points14 points15 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Imagine manipulating someone at one of their weakest moments just to have sex with them. That's disgusting.

[–][deleted] 33 points34 points35 points 6 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

First teachers, no cops. Is any profession safe from female predators??

[–][deleted] 16 points17 points18 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

easy answer: no.

but that’s a quota hire for you.

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Mining, logging, long haul truckers, roofers...

[–]liztu_june 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Predators usually victims choose profession where they have easy access to victums. Hince the reason we hear about priests, teachers and police officers abusing their power all the time.

[+]antilopes -10 points-9 points-8 points 6 years ago* (8 children) | Copy Link

How could there be a profession safe from sexual predators of either sex?

"Predator" is not necessarily what happened here. The evidence we have is she allowed an unethical and potentially exploitative relationship to develop with a vulnerable adult she had a professional duty of care for for.

That is not the same thing as seeking out such a relationship.

[–][deleted] 16 points17 points18 points 6 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Abusing your power to have sex with a vulnerable individual is predator behavior. Plain and simple.

[–]antilopes -1 points0 points1 point 6 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

We are arguing over a definition. There is a mens rights angle to this though, since in e.g. Illinois a 17yo boy is classified as "sexual predator" for anything illegal with a girl under 17 e.g. swapping nudes or having a consensual blowjob. I think it best to keep a distinction between sexual abuse / exploitation, vs hunting for or actively setting up a situation in the hope it will enable such abuse.

The term "sexual predator" is often considered distinct from "sex offender". For example, many U.S. states make legal distinctions between these categories, defining a "sexual offender" as a person who has committed a sexual offense. The term "sexual predator" is often used to refer to a person who habitually seeks out sexual situations that are deemed exploitative.

However, in some states in the U.S., the term "sexual predator" is applied to anyone who has been convicted of certain crimes, regardless of whether or not there is a history of similar behavior. In the state of Illinois, for instance, a person convicted of any sex crime against a minor is designated a sexual predator, no matter the nature of the crime (violent versus statutory, or perpetrated against a young child versus a teenager), and regardless of past behavior. This has led to criticism that the term is being misused, or overused, and thus has lost its original meaning and effectiveness.[5]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_predator

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

This kind of thinking is why we have the MR issues that we do. Stop making excuses for predatory women. You’re not helping anyone

[–]antilopes -1 points0 points1 point 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I didn't make an excuse for anyone. There are different things in the world, it is useful to call them by different names.

Are you in favour of the Illinois labeling policy?

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You are doing it. You don’t realize it. You’re being told and you’re arguing. No point in engaging. You want to be right rather than recognize your own bias. It’s fine

[–]WikiTextBot 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sexual predator

A sexual predator is a person seen as obtaining or trying to obtain sexual contact with another person in a metaphorically "predatory" or abusive manner. Analogous to how a predator hunts down its prey, so the sexual predator is thought to "hunt" for his or her sex partners. People who commit sex crimes, such as rape or child sexual abuse, are commonly referred to as sexual predators, particularly in tabloid media or as a power phrase by politicians.


[ PM | Exclude me | Exclude from subreddit | FAQ / Information | Source ] Downvote to remove | v0.28

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It seems like anything not 100% anti women is downvoted to hell

[–]antilopes 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

We have always had a few women haters but I suspect it is more in the last year or two. Or maybe they are just more vocal now.

Every time Reddit bans or quarantines subs like MGTOW, RedPill or the Incel subs then some of them turn up here.

TheDonald was quarantined in June, we might even have picked up some of their less motivated members. They are four times our size so a small % of them would make a difference here.

[–]Trogdor_a_Burninator 10 points11 points12 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

adblock detector

[–]rahsoft 7 points8 points9 points 6 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

She should be prosecuted for abusing her position of authority.

​

since the article described the man as vulnerable she can and should be prosecuted for abuse.

​

Before anyone jumps in and says no. I work in an industry where we work with people who are "vulnerable" and we were warned right from the beginning that any abuse of any such person leads to prosecution and prison time. Its considered extremely serious.

​

I think the police( and the CPS) don't want to do this because it will demonstrate that women are also perpetrators of abuse, not to mention whether this vulnerable person is in a position to give consent..

​

​

she also gets to keep her pension....

[–]RyansPutter 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Those eyes. These kind of women always have eyes like that.

[+]-AcodeX1 points 6 years ago* [recovered] (6 children) | Copy Link

I don't quite get what was really terrible of her here. It was unprofessional, sure, but the story could be a nice one or a terrible one depending on the details.

If she made this man feel safe and loved and they developed feelings for each other, that sounds nice to me.

If it were a really terrible situation like it was a mentally undeveloped special needs man or it was a child, then yeah sic the hounds on her. I didn't see anything like that in article, though.

This is the same treatment a man would be given in the same situation, sure, but I don't see it as a good outcome in either case (unless, of course, I'm forgetting or missing some facts here)

[+]TidusXFinal1 points 6 years ago* [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link

Definitely wouldn’t be the same treatment a man would receive. If a man in a position of power and authority had sex with AN ABUSE VICTIM!? Man, that would be turned into the biggest “abuse of authority ever”.

Feminists would be coming for his ass on ALL platforms, crying about how he abused his power and authority, took advantage of a woman in a weak psychical, and mentally vulnerable situation, and how he should have known better. “You’re here to protect and serve, no sleep with the person you’re suppose to be protecting”

[–]Canttakethewhyfromme 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don’t know, cops tend to get more protection that regular civilians against this kind of stuff. But, you have this same scenario reversed and not a cop, they would say rape instead of “coerced sexual relationship” or whatever bullshit verbiage they use to elevate certain privileged groups above the law.

[–]rahsoft 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't quite get what was really terrible of her here.

she abused her position of authority of a police officer( its means people could not trust the police)

would you agree if the police officer had been male and the vulnerable person female?

[–]BiToPlay 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This thread is a bit hostile. There's a lot of hate with very few details divulged. If I'm being honest a lot of this is hurting the cause. Let's calm down and speak with some objectivity, and not just say things like "women are control freaks." If you do believe that, you should be saying "many women tend to be control freaks" so as to avoid absolutes that make you sound as asinine as the "feminists." I'd be more focused on the ways this would be handled differently if the officer was male, or the gross protection she is receiving on account of being a cop. These facts are far more odious than that a woman comitted some form of rape.

[–]TopcodeOriginal1 -2 points-1 points0 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Alright time to grab my gun /s

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well she grabbed his Gun.....

[+]Wh4rrgarbl -35 points-34 points-33 points 6 years ago (21 children) | Copy Link

I wish she abused me. I sure as fuck wouldnt be complaining

[–]Empress_Rach 21 points22 points23 points 6 years ago (19 children) | Copy Link

And this is why they get away with it ...

[+]Wh4rrgarbl -12 points-11 points-10 points 6 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link

Why wouldnt she get away with giving me free sex??? Lol

[–]Empress_Rach 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

You said abuse. ABUSE. This is why women who rape men or abuse.men get away with it. Cuz others say "oh they wanted it."

[+]Wh4rrgarbl -11 points-10 points-9 points 6 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

Women can't rape men, except very weird 0,0001 situations where she has a gun and ties you down and forcefeeds you viagra and thats not gonna happen, get real.

For a woman to "rape you"...

  • You need to get your dick up
  • You need to let her (most men can beat the crap out of most women, and no, neither gina carano nor ronda rousey are gonna rape you)

So the guy wanted to fuck, then regreted it (why?!?) and went crying about it... He probably asked for his men rights while at it... Damn this shit is hilarious.

[–]Empress_Rach 5 points6 points7 points 6 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Which can rape men. It's easy. A few strokes and it goes up on its own sometimes. And as someone who HAS been raped. It isn't always a physical thing. You can peer pressure or trick someone scared into doing it.

Most men are too scared to fight off a woman seeing as most men go to jail for fighting back even if it's a small hit. Miss me with ur idiot self.

[–]Wh4rrgarbl -4 points-3 points-2 points 6 years ago* (6 children) | Copy Link

So basically you are too scared to fight for not having sex (man that made me chuckle). I hope you learnt your lesson, a man needs to stand up for himself.

I guess you are gay, otherwise i still don't see the big deal. I mean, if you are straight you are actually complaining you got laid??? Pardon my disbelief but i'm 38 and never ever heard that in my life.

I want to add that most men don't hit women because you do not hit women unless you are a fucking asshole, not because they are scared to go to jail. It's pretty common for assholes to beat the crap out of women and pretty much nothing happens to them. ALSO: you can always like... Push her? Or i don't know man, if i was gonna get RAPED i would definitely punch.

PS: you know what you call people who peer pressure you into fucking a girl? GOOD FRIENDS, thats what.

[–]Empress_Rach 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago* (5 children) | Copy Link

I'm a woman...so...also women drug men all the time. Also no l, women hit the fuck outta men all the time. My friend was thrown down the stairs before he finally hit back. And it was a push and a slap. He went to jail. And he had scars and recent wounds proving it was self defense.

[–]Wh4rrgarbl -3 points-2 points-1 points 6 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Oh if you are a woman that changes.

I had 2 girlfriends, a neihgbour, a sister and at least 3 friends that got beat by assholes (some several times) and nothing happened to the guys.

So maybe you had that experience but it's far from the norm (you can easily google it). You are aware that of what you say was the norm there wouldnt be an issue with domestic violence right?

[–]Empress_Rach 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I do. The majority of cases of domestic violence the man is fighting back or getting abused. Just cuz there is issue with one thing doesn't stop the other. Correlation doesn't equal causation.

I mentioned drugging. And honestly I'm a lesbian so lemme tell you. If an u healthy crazy lady or ugly woman is trying to force me in drugs or peer pressure to have sex. Damn right I'd regret it.

And to assume all men want sex..is just asinine.

[–]Razorbladekandyfan 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Are you really justifying rape when it happens to men?

[–]that-guy-with-art 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Its rape, weather pleasurable or not. In this case, it seems like she had forced sex upon him. Not legal

[–]Wh4rrgarbl -2 points-1 points0 points 6 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

How is it rape if you like it???

Hahahaha...

Also: how does she force you? If you don't want to fuck your dick will be limp.

Also: you can always beat the crap out of her.

I legit don't understand.

[–]that-guy-with-art 3 points4 points5 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Rape isnt based on enjoyment, it's based on concent. I'm pretty sure not wanting to fuck and being aroused naturally are two different things.

[–]Wh4rrgarbl 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I'm pretty sure that if i'm aroused it means i want to fuck?

[–]that-guy-with-art 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Aroused is the wrong word. I'm fairly sure men will naturally get hard if presented with sexual suggestion, weather aroused or not

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

A hard dick is a biological response, not a logical one. I’m a woman and I was raped. I was wet because my body responded to stimulation. I DID NOT WANT OR ENJOY IT.

I’m not a dude but I’m quite sure dicks get hard even if you don’t want them to. Men can absolutely be raped and can even orgasm from it (as can women). It’s the body responding, not the brain or heart.

[–]excess_inquisitivity 6 points7 points8 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Poof. Now she's pregnant with your child. You'll never see it because of reasons she'll dream up and convince a sympathetic judge are true. And child support is due, based on your imputed income which is 130% of what you're making now.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter