Which is more useful for getting our message across? "Misandrist of the Month" or "Double Standard of the Day"

bulletholeteddy · 2018-09-01T18:15:17+00:00

I'd say double standard of the day would be better

Clemicus · 2018-09-01T18:16:41+00:00

You shouldn't act on their character but instead focus on what's happening with men.

When you go the deplorables route all you do is give these people something they can point out as examples of toxicity to anyone ready enough to consume their content.

Which then can be used as [these people] have no point because instead of presenting issues they're targeting us, our characters, and so on.

Then you've got the psychology of it. When you've got a group or demographic whose followers associate themselves with the vocal elements within it. You're not going to change any hearts or minds when you attack these people. These followers will perceive any and all of those attacks as personal attacks due to that association.

mwobuddy · 2018-09-01T17:41:32+00:00

Double standard sounds pathetic. Misandrist makes people question what that means, and exposes them to new ways of thinking.

goodmod · 2018-09-02T01:49:58+00:00

I favour "Double Standard of the Day".

"Misandrist of the Month" makes it look like a personal attack, while the other one is more generic.

lurkinatworkin · 2018-09-03T12:53:39+00:00

Why not both?

kartu3 · 2018-09-03T08:57:13+00:00

The latter.

Title	Which is more useful for getting our message across? "Misandrist of the Month" or "Double Standard of the Day"
Author	Imnotmrabut
Upvotes	10
Comments	6
Date	September 1, 2018 5:39 PM UTC (7 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/9c4yo2/which_is_more_useful_for_getting_our_message/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/which-is-more-useful-for-getting-our-message.895016 https://theredarchive.com/post/895016

Comments