You know how they have the terms SWERF, and TERF? Terms they came up with specifically to distance themselves from feminists they view as prejudiced and call them out when necessary?

They haven't bothered with one for men. If they want us to take them seriously when they claim to be "Not that kind of feminist", then shouldn't they make the effort to distance themselves like they have with these other types? Otherwise it seems insincere. They're willing to be specific and outcast other types of feminist, but they haven't done so for the type that is sexist against men, which seems to speak volumes about them. They haven't even made the barest minimum of effort necessary to fight sexism against men in their movement, that of categorizing it. So if a feminist pulls the "Not that type of feminist" argument, you should point out they've made absolutely no effort to distinguish themselves, so yes, they would appear to be of the same category, and if they don't like that, maybe they should do something about it. Without that effort, "Not that kind" appears to be solely a defense of the status quo, not a declaration of intent to actually help.