THE BILL OF FAMILY RIGHTS #2: Befriend the financial donors of your state House of Representatives, state Senate, and state Governor. Collectively the donors can change the law if organized. Start with the largest economies first: CA, TX, NY, and FL. (Crosspost from TheRedPill)

theothermod · 2017-07-11T08:38:57+00:00

Stickied as an example of possible activism. MensRights moderators do not necessarily agree with every detail.

I suggest that you join MHRAconnect and start a project there. It's very small right now, but active members will build it up.

When you sign up, please try to assist with two other projects to help get the ball rolling. Pass this message to any men's rights activists you know.

RageLionRising · 2017-07-11T08:32:48+00:00

Here is a list of specific laws that I suggest enacting within your state Bill of Family Rights.

SUGGESTED REFORMS TO PROVIDE TO YOUR LEGISLATURE

A. REPEAL & REPLACE THE STATE FAMILY CODE

• Implement the Bill of Family Rights within each state’s constitution.

B. ELIMINATE THE FAMILY COURT PROFIT MOTIVE

• 4 year and 7 year length marriage contracts with renewal options to provide easy outs for BOTH spouses.

• Default 50/50 child custody mandatory. Some exceptions allowed for young babies and toddlers due to nursing requirements.

• In cases of dispute:
• Juries mandatory.
• Lawyers provided free in order to financially discourage states from allowing cases to go to court in the first place.
• Judge/lawyer double duty and collusion banned.
• No fault divorce eliminated. Fault must be assigned in divorce cases where marriage is terminated early.

• Alimony for lower earning spouses limited to 4 years and 10%-20% of Net Income (after taxes).

• Adultery by wives punished with severe financial penalty and forfeiture of all assets from the marriage. In the same way sexual harassment in the work place is seen as more severe when done by a man, cheating in a marriage should be seen as more severe when done by a woman.

• Paternity Fraud carries severe long term financial, criminal, and hard labor penalties.

• Paternity Fraud against members of the military; local, state, or federal police; firemen; and ambulance services punished with mandatory prison sentences.

C. BEST INTEREST OF FAMILY & SOCIETY

• Family Court must act in the best interest of the family and society — not just the child.

• Family Court must recognize that nuclear families are the bricks of society. "Best interest of the child", Title IX-D child custody funding, and "no fault divorce" legislation erodes society, promotes separation, and eliminates the incentive of men to protect society. The low birth rate is rapidly becoming a national security concern. (Unlike MGTOW, I am against societal collapse. No one wants a power vacuum in a country that is stocked to the teeth with nuclear weapons. It leaves us open to foreign invasion and subjugation.)

• Additional child custody awarded in the best interests of the breadwinner.

• Geography restrictions must be placed on primary custodians who are non-breadwinners. Low earning mothers (or fathers) must stay within a reasonable radius of a breadwinning father (or mother).

• Child support expenditures must be recorded, and must be restricted to items relevant to the child. Child support is not alimony.

• Child support reduced when financial waste can be proven.

• No additional child support awarded for increased custody beyond the 50/50 default. Eliminate profit motive.

• Child support limited to 15-20% of Net Income (after taxes) per child.

D. CRIMINALIZE

• Frivolous family court filings — financially penalized.

• “Antagonizing with Special Protection” — financially penalized.

A.S.P. a person who antagonizes a stronger person with the intent of getting the stronger person to physically assault so the weaker person may play victim in public or the courts. Behavior consistent with Borderline Personality Disorder.

• False domestic violence claims in Family & Criminal Court.

• False sexual assault claims in Family & Criminal Court.*

Addendum: To prevent false sexual assault claims, it would be best to address the women’s motivation behind them. Consider legislation for women concerning “regret sex”. We have the option to bring back “seduction & abandonment” laws.

If some jerk has consensual sex under color of a relationship and a promise of financial commitment to your daughter , but then bails on her, it would be in the best interest of society to not refer to this as rape, but to its older legal term “seduction & abandonment”. Just a thought. I would like to see thoughts on this from fathers out there.

• Parental alienation and other forms of legal based harassment consistent with Borderline Personality Disorder.

• Viral accusations in the media. This is where women engage in hive mind “piling on” behavior. Typically targeted at men who are wealthy or public figures to extract their money. — Prosecute under anti-harassment laws.

• Slander and libel in the public sphere — Prosecute under anti-harassment laws.

• Slander and libel in Family Court — Hold offending exes in contempt.

• Paternity Fraud — severely criminalized. This crime is an epidemic affecting 3-10% of men. Given enough time, paternity fraud against a man is the moral equivalent of violent penetrative sexual assault against a woman.

Where rape takes away reproductive choice of a woman through quick violence against her body, paternity fraud takes away the reproductive choice of a man through long term, insidious deception against his wealth and genetic line.

In the same way sexual assault has different degrees of severity based on the amount of violence used, paternity fraud has different degrees of severity based on time and breadth of deception. This act is a disgusting, heinous, vile, and sexually perverted act. The Family Courts encourage this national and legal atrocity. It must be stopped. Legally enforced paternity fraud demonstrates that Family Courts are nothing more than unelected shadow governments, and that they are the enemies of all Western civilized men.

This crime must be met with the full fury of the executive branch.

Mayors and District Attorneys must get involved to impose employment restrictions, geographic restrictions, and multiple decade long financial penalties against any woman who commits paternity fraud. Hard labor repayments would save tax payers from having to use prison space.

Social death and extreme poverty within their community should be recognized as the “prison” for women who engage in paternity fraud. Letting them hide behind a brick wall in many instances could be seen as too generous. Let the community hate them in the open.

In extreme cases of paternity fraud, an actual prison sentence should still be an option. But regardless of whether we use severe financial penalties or prison, these women should be treated the same as any male rapist.

Tax dollars should be used to publicly shame and humiliate paternity fraudstresses. Place their faces on billboards and websites for all to see. These women are perverted sex offenders, and they lurk amongst all of us.

E. CHEAP ALTERNATIVES PROVIDED

• Alternative dispute resolution encouraged by the Family Courts.

• Shared parenting / custody sharing default.

• Simplification of legal processes.

atheist4thecause · 2017-07-12T06:08:46+00:00

Btw, some people may get confused. There are many different names for state legislatures. That's why you see House of Representatives in Florida and Texas and State Assembly in New York and California. These are all equivalent chambers, though.

Also, Senators are fewer and tend to be elected for longer terms, so convincing a Senator would carry more weight than convincing a Representative.

For more info: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_legislature_(United_States)

mymonster8u · 2017-07-13T19:53:56+00:00

Why do you call women psychotic? Why do you assume there is massive fraud? Isn't it in the communities best intrest to protect the weak and poor (children)? Should the government stand by while children grow up in poverty in need of social services and their fathers live a middle class life free of any burden that a child entails? Their own children? Is it fair to burden women with 100% of the 18 year 24 hour care and all of the financial costs from a child it takes 2 to create? A cost of approximately $250,000 over the 18 year span. Children who grow up in poverty have a higher chance of every bad thing imaginable poor health poor school outcomes increased incarnation rate less chance of financial success more drug use more exposure to violence more mental illness the list just goes on and on. Your suggestions will protect men at the expense of our nations most vulnerable. Men can avoid all costs through court by taking their children 50% of the time or independently providing for them. Fucking over your own children. Half of whom are young girls you refer to as psychotic. How cruel. You may be a pissed of person who is in debt with the courts but i can tell you dont know anything about the social ramifications of the actions you suggest over time on society as a whole. You are thinking only of yourself. And thats why you are not in your kids life any more. Because of the selfish behavior. Children require sacrifice. Its too bad you cant man up and take proper care of your own children. Your baby momma chose very poorly.

Santaball · 2017-07-13T23:29:49+00:00

Amazing and very detailed... But too much work for probably like pay off. Relax, lay back and just go MGTOW

PIG_CUNT · 2017-07-15T20:42:20+00:00

Thanks for proving my point. The court is not driven by profit. It is driven by expediency and sees no profit.

You also failed to refute the other claim, that attorneys drive money into their own pockets by working as judges, LOL

PIG_CUNT · 2017-07-12T11:09:27+00:00

Stopped reading at "the profit-driven family court."

Family court is not driven by profit, nor does the court receive anything other than a pittance for filing fees and such.

My guess is that you meant that people's choices in family court are driven by personal financial gain. And that's incorrect.

People's choices in family court are driven by their desires. Some people desire financial gain. Others desire to get the hell away from their spouse and will incur significant costs to do so. Others desire to tell themselves they got a fair deal. Others desire to inflict suffering upon their spouse. Others desire to minimize the trauma their children experience.

Comments