TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

The Economist:"states ruled by queens were 27% more likely to wage war"

DamTheTorpedoes1864

June 7, 2017
124 upvotes
/r/MensRights
http://www.economist.com/news/europe/21722877-european-history-answer-queens-especially-married-ones-who-gets-more-wars-kings
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title The Economist:"states ruled by queens were 27% more likely to wage war"
Author

DamTheTorpedoes1864

Upvotes 124
Comments 12
Date June 7, 2017 1:48 AM UTC
(9 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/6fqe6b/the_economiststates_ruled_by_queens_were_27_more/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/the-economiststates-ruled-by-queens-were-27-more.921047
https://theredarchive.com/post/921047
Top posts by DamTheTorpedoes1864

Woman in Australia fabricates domestic violence to steal house and another man moves in; photograph metadata exonerates husband

190 upvotes
April 7, 2019
/r/PussyPassDenied

Indian politician gifts weapons to brides; suggests female-on-male domestic violence is not illegal

1 upvotes
May 3, 2017
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]DamTheTorpedoes1864[S] 37 points38 points39 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

They studied how often European rulers went to war between 1480 and 1913. Over 193 reigns, they found that states ruled by queens were 27% more likely to wage war than those ruled by kings.

Women in power sending men to suffer and die on their behalf.

[–]cymrich 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

even women without power send men to suffer on their behalf... not at all surprising to see that the more power they have, the more men they send to suffer on their behalf...

[–]Vaeon 19 points20 points21 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Good fucking article. History is a great place to hang out. Never know what you'll find.

[–]Dembara 13 points14 points15 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Though, it does not have to do with women being evil or anything, in case some feminist is looking for something we said. It is because of a few things, the women feeling less secure in their power and relying less on advisors (who tend to advise against war) and they tend to lack on the ground experience with war.

[–]CountVonVague 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This division of labour, the authors suggest, freed up time for queens to pursue more aggressive policies.

While unmarried queens seemingly got attacked more often it seems married queens often had military husbands who got delegated numerous tasks which left the monarch ample time to plan national expansions..

[–]Honztastic 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There night actually be validity to arguing that a woman ruler would act purposefully aggressive and martial to quell any notions of her being weak for being a woman.

Which is an easy "blame the patriarchy" excuse for any feminists that take issue woth women rulers being more responsible for war.

But like all history, it is NEVER that simple. It'd be more worthwhile to examine the cause of each war and assign blame if started for shallow reasons or if a morally righteous war with deep, justified causes.

I mean, if Pearl Harbor was attacked and Francis Delany Roosevelt was President, that's not on her for being a woman.

[–]Blutarg 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Don't make excuses.

[–]Dembara -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It is not something that needs excusing...

[–]JoelTLoUisBadass 9 points10 points11 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

That's because queens are the most entitled bitches in history. There's a reason Guinevere was written as the reason Arthur's Kingdom went to shit.

[–]number4ty7 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So we can expect an invasion from Ireland? Panty bliss ruled their marriage referendum.

[–]goodbeertimes 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Just head over to /r/JUSTNOMIL. There are battles every day.

[–]goodfoobar 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

The theory I have heard about this is when a married king was the ruling monarch he generally covered both foreign and domestic issues. When a married queen was the ruling monarch she covered foreign or domestic issues while he covered the other issues. When they were both sharing the work load they were more able to carry out big projects like war.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter