TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Half-witted actress Zoe Saldana claims that sexism (the anti-female kind, of course) is much worse than racism in America.

ThePigmanAgain

May 6, 2017
22 upvotes
/r/MensRights
http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/05/05/zoe-saldana-trumps-election-taught-sexism-much-aggressive-racism/
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Half-witted actress Zoe Saldana claims that sexism (the anti-female kind, of course) is much worse than racism in America.
Author

ThePigmanAgain

Upvotes 22
Comments 28
Date May 6, 2017 10:19 AM UTC
(9 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/69kim0/halfwitted_actress_zoe_saldana_claims_that_sexism/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/half-witted-actress-zoe-saldana-claims-that-sexism.923320
https://theredarchive.com/post/923320
Red Pill terms in post
feminism
Top posts by ThePigmanAgain

Clever cartoon on what can happen when a man DOES talk about his feelings.

4092 upvotes
October 19, 2019
/r/MensRights

Man is found NOT guilty of rape, but the cops keep telling his prospective employers that he "might" have done it anyway. Another reason why false allegations are so evil.

4018 upvotes
August 6, 2018
/r/MensRights

"First Alaska woman charged with possessing child pornography gets no jail time." Well, of course she doesn't...

3985 upvotes
July 5, 2017
/r/MensRights

"Homeless father of five can't find shelter that takes men with children." Ah, that sweet, sweet male privilege!

3680 upvotes
September 5, 2019
/r/MensRights

Feminist Uses NZ Terrorist Attack Which Killed Mostly Males To...er...Vilify Males

3545 upvotes
March 16, 2019
/r/MensRights

Psycho woman claims she killed her BF in self-defence, footage emerges showing she is the aggressor. Pussy pass about to be revoked, methinks.

3333 upvotes
August 11, 2022
/r/PussyPassDenied

Sad but true. Society doesn't REALLY want men to be "vulnerable."

3074 upvotes
April 19, 2020
/r/MensRights

Male feminist reacts to vile scumbag who murdered his kids by telling ALL men to, you know, stop killing women and kids...

2658 upvotes
February 22, 2020
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]Mens-Advocate 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

No, Zoe, your ignorance of history shows. Spoilt, high-status women like yourself are and have always been the worst enemies of human rights for low-status men. Status, not gender, determined quality of life.

Excavations from ancient graves show high-status women living to a ripe old age (e.g., Roman citizens), while the low-status men serving them died young (e.g., Roman slaves).

And, of course, we all know of the ten thousand or more black men who died in barbaric, sadistic, and bloody lynchings in the US South to satisfy the blood lust of the white women alleging sexual impropriety.

MRA John Gordon, in his Myth of the Monstrous Male, details how white women have brutalised black men throughout history, up to and including appropriating "ism" and affirmative action for their own purposes, turning society's attention from the vicious racism against black males to the fabricated sexism against well-off white women, and turning positive discrimination from poor, black male beneficiaries to well-off, white females.

But little can top the hypocrisy of Gloria Steinem and the NYT which rushed to print her drivel:

http://archive.is/afgFT

Gender is probably the most restricting force in American life, whether the question is who must be in the kitchen or who could be in the White House. ... Black men were given the vote a half-century before women of any race were allowed to mark a ballot, and generally have ascended to positions of power, from the military to the boardroom, before any women ....

Of course, every schoolchild knows any black male who dared to try to vote in the South was risking his life, for one full century after the 15th Amendment.

All Saldana and Steinem show by their loudmouth declarations is a combination of gynocentrism, ignorance, and rank hypocrisy.

[–]the_unseen_one 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She also conveniently neglects to mention that those black men bought their votes with the draft, something women to this day have not done. They have no place to complain.

Makes my stomach turn that these high class women actually claim their lives are harder than black men's lives. They have no idea.

[–]ThePigmanAgain[S] 11 points12 points13 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It would certainly explain why jails are full of white women. Oh, wait...

On the good side of things, the commenters are pretty much roasting her carcass over a slow fire.

[–]Ndvorsky 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Since you brought up jail, the difference between men and women is actually much larger than blacks and whites. So technically she's right. in that aspect.

[–]electricalnoise 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What a shame. I really liked her too.

[–]belil569 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh ya that system of oppression she faces... I mean as a black woman who can prove her wrong that equality is a thing.... oh, her fucking career.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (24 children) | Copy Link

Breitbart; the Germaine Greer of the Alt-Right. Why do you keep embarrassing yourselves by quoting this garbage...?

[–]thatisjustaninsult 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (23 children) | Copy Link

What's wrong with the posted article? It's mostly quotes and the video itself.

[–]ThePigmanAgain[S] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Ignore the troll. And block it.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (21 children) | Copy Link

Check out the headline the OP picked out. "Half-witted actress Zoe Saldana". How does that not literally prove the point she's trying to make? By belittling her as just a 'half-witted actress', the OP is trying to invalidate her opinion by invalidating her as a person.

Plus, it's Breitbart, the literal scum of the Earth.

[–]thatisjustaninsult 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link

Calling an individual woman a name is not sexism. I can't believe I need to explain that.

Plus, it's Breitbart, the literal scum of the Earth.

I don't know too much about them, but I see nothing wrong with this post.

[–]ThePigmanAgain[S] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Ignore the troll. In fact, just block it as i did months ago. The only reason i temporarily unblocked it was because the comment count on this was much higher than the comments i could see so a blocked troll was the likely cause. Fact is, this turd knows it's wrong so there is no way you can set it right.

[–]thatisjustaninsult 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Hmm, I fell for it, eh?

[–]ThePigmanAgain[S] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Meh, these people pretend to be idiots in a world full of idiots. Not a hard thing to fall for.

[–][deleted] -4 points-3 points-2 points 9 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

Calling an individual woman a name is not sexism. I can't believe I need to explain that.

The motivation is what makes it sexist, honey. I can't believe I need to explain how sexism works to grown adult; it's not what you say, it's why you say it.

I don't know too much about them, but I see nothing wrong with this post.

Maybe you should investigate the steaming garbage pile before you tell people it smells nice.

[–]thatisjustaninsult 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

You're seeming to me to be a half-wit now:

The motivation is what makes it sexist, honey.

The motivation was she said something stupid. "It's why you say it" , honey. You are saying stupid shit non-stop and I called you a half-wit without knowing your race or sex or whatever. If you tell me you're black, does that make me racist suddenly?

Maybe you should investigate the steaming garbage pile before you tell people it smells nice.

I never said it "smells" nice, only that nothing seems wrong with the post. Why do you keep missing that point? I want you to tell me if you think there is anything particularly wrong with this post.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

The motivation was she said something stupid.

I can plainly tell you insult anything you don't agree with, so it doesn't surprise me that you'd regard her personal opinion to be "stupid".

You are saying stupid shit non-stop and I called you a half-wit without knowing your race or sex or whatever. If you tell me you're black, does that make me racist suddenly?

It just makes you ignorant, insulting, over-opinionated, self-righteous, over-entitled, and a rip-roaring asshole.

I never said it "smells" nice, only that nothing seems wrong with the post. Why do you keep missing that point?

Because you keep trying to refute me with a point not relevant to my assessment. Maybe if you'd bother to use your brain for thinking instead of dreaming up new insults, you'd have seen that.

The OP decided to quote Breitbart and insult an actress for having an opinion. I guarantee you that if Omar Epps had said that sexism is worse than racism, you wouldn't be so flippant.

[–]thatisjustaninsult 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Utter nonsense and lies. But I see what you're doing, you don't want to answer the question so you're clouding the discussion.

What is wrong with this particular post?

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

I've answered your question several times. OP resorted to insulting Saldana to devalue her position. He also presumed her position on sexism being "the anti-female kind" only. And he posted a link to a Breitbart article, which is the equivalent of showing up at a family Thanksgiving, dropping a fat steaming diaper right on the turkey, and telling people that the earthy aroma will be good for their sinuses. -- I honestly don't believe that the OP even bothered reading it, since he just copied and pasted the article title and tossed in some grossly presumptuous and insulting addenda to it.

[–]thatisjustaninsult 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Sorry, I used the wrong terminology there, I meant what is the issue with the article itself.

[–]thatisjustaninsult 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Now that I got you to (indirectly) answer my initial question, I'm going to refute your lies about me:

The motivation was she said something stupid. "I can plainly tell you insult anything you don't agree with, so it doesn't surprise me that you'd regard her personal opinion to be "stupid"."

What she said is stupid and I called her stupid and so did the op. I think you are implying an Ad Hominem fallacy commited on my part, which isn't the case. She is not wrong because I insulted her, she is wrong because of the content of her ideas, which I disagree with. We can talk about those ideas, but I doubt I'll get anywhere with you since you think disagreeing with or insulting a woman is sexist. By the way, that makes you a rascist since I'm black.

You are saying stupid shit non-stop and I called you a half-wit without knowing your race or sex or whatever. If you tell me you're black, does that make me racist suddenly? "It just makes you ignorant, insulting, over-opinionated, self-righteous, over-entitled, and a rip-roaring asshole."

Doesn't take much to rile you up. You are either dumb or just purposefully missing the point every time. Your criteria for sexism are rooted in fanatical delusion. You can call me names, but according to your logic, you are now racist.

I never said it "smells" nice, only that nothing seems wrong with the post. Why do you keep missing that point? "Because you keep trying to refute me with a point not relevant to my assessment.

I was refuting what, exactly? I asked you what was wrong with the content of the article itself and you still have not directly addressed it.

But I did make a point about insulting a single person is not the same as being sexist. Your insults do nothing to dissuade me from maintaining that stance.

"Maybe if you'd bother to use your brain for thinking instead of dreaming up new insults, you'd have seen that."

Lol, like "ignorant, insulting, over-opinionated, self-righteous, over-entitled, and a rip-roaring asshole.". You're a fucking stupid hypocrite.

The OP decided to quote Breitbart and insult an actress for having an opinion.

Ok, but that's not sexist.

I guarantee you that if Omar Epps had said that sexism is worse than racism, you wouldn't be so flippant.

HAHAHA, cause we all hate women, huh? Who the fuck are you to guarantee what I would or wouldn't do. Fuck off.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Now that I got you to (indirectly) answer my initial question

I answered your question multiple times! You just enjoy being a shit and ignoring what I write so that you can text-dump presumptuous nonsense.

I'm going to refute your lies about me

Oh boy. I can't wait.

She is not wrong because I insulted her, she is wrong because of the content of her ideas, which I disagree with.

Apparently you need to have ad hominem fallacies explain to you. See, insulting someone doesn't make them wrong. It robs them of credibility in the eyes of other observers. By summarily calling her a Half-witted Actress and presuming her views on sexism against men, you are manipulating how others will interpret that information artificially, to produce the response from them that you desire.

We can talk about those ideas, but I doubt I'll get anywhere with you since you think disagreeing with or insulting a woman is sexist.

Assuming she believes only in sexism against women because she's a woman is sexist! So... yeah. Can't help ya there.

Your criteria for sexism are rooted in fanatical delusion.

Your criteria for fanatical is what's delusional, cupcake.

You can call me names, but according to your logic, you are now racist.

"Asshole" isn't a race, puddin'.

I asked you what was wrong with the content of the article itself and you still have not directly addressed it.

OH MY FUCKING GOD YOU AREN'T SERIOUS.

Lol, like "ignorant, insulting, over-opinionated, self-righteous, over-entitled, and a rip-roaring asshole.". You're a fucking stupid hypocrite.

Oh, I'm sorry. I didn't realize that I was supposed to read your insults at me and then not say anything back. Get fucking real. You're not that special, princess.

Ok, but that's not sexist.

It is when you assume what she believes because of her gender! Your brain needs replacement, son.

HAHAHA, cause we all hate women, huh? Who the fuck are you to guarantee what I would or wouldn't do. Fuck off.

I'm someone who has been actually paying attention to your responses and have developed an idea of the kind of person you are based on those responses. You react on a knee-jerk. You attack what you don't agree with instead of using logic and rational thought. And when confronted with your own faults, you double down on them, hoping that you can guard your Achilles' Heel until you've badgered your counterparts into leaving the conversation in disgust.

Well, now's your chance.

[–]ThePigmanAgain[S] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

LOL! Calling her a half-wit does not invalidate her person-hood, only her intellect. If you weren't a half-wit you would know that.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Where do you think someone draws their opinions from? Their liver? Jesus Christ, for someone who likes insulting women's intelligence, you sure don't have a lot of spare brains.

[–]ThePigmanAgain[S] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Thanks for giving me an opportunity to block you again. LOL! What a dumbass!

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You're welcome! Funny that you talk shit at me, but when I retort, suddenly you're the victim. (-b'-')-b

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Women sure are oppressed with their shorter sentences and longer lives filled with less violence, more rights, and fewer obligations.

[–]KicksButtson 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I would say that both racism and sexism have an equally significant impact in America... That is to say that both are the subject of constant allegations, and only about 15% of the time do the allegations prove accurate. The other 85% of the time it's proven to be paranoia and baiting.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter