TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Divorcees don't need to afford lifestyle they were accustomed to in marriage, Court of Appeal judge says as he rules against ex-wife

odb281

February 15, 2017
344 upvotes
/r/PussyPassDenied
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/02/13/divorcees-dont-need-afford-lifestyle-accustomed-marriage-court/
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Divorcees don't need to afford lifestyle they were accustomed to in marriage, Court of Appeal judge says as he rules against ex-wife
Author

odb281

Upvotes 344
Comments 15
Date February 15, 2017 10:01 PM UTC
(9 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/PussyPassDenied
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/pussypassdenied/comments/5uam5m/divorcees_dont_need_to_afford_lifestyle_they_were/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/PussyPassDenied/divorcees-dont-need-to-afford-lifestyle-they-were.931865
https://theredarchive.com/post/931865
Top posts by odb281

Mizzou prof. under 'review' after video of her berating police surfaces

414 upvotes
February 15, 2016
/r/PussyPassDenied

Comments

[–]chambertlo 75 points76 points77 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Good. To expect a man to continue to pay for a woman's "lifestyle" completely after they are divorced spits in the face of gender equality.

[–]faded_jester 68 points69 points70 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I've never understood the "I'm accustomed to this lifestyle!" argument for a massive divorce payout.

It's like quitting your job and telling your boss that you're "accustomed" to a paycheck and expect to still receive one.

[–]Newbosterone 28 points29 points30 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I got accustomed to free housekeeping and regular sex during my marriage, but forgot to ask for that in the divorce.

[–]devolka 8 points9 points10 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It made more sense in a world where women were expected to quit their jobs and permanently raise children when they married. It addressed an unbalance between men and women that has long since been remedied by leveling playing fields in education and much more equality in job opportunity.

In this case I have some sympathy for her if she felt pressured to leave her career to but they've been together 15 years, where she has lived as a young retired person.

[–]ShiningConcepts 28 points29 points30 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Family court system is gynocentric man-hating bullshit and is in and of itself a great reason for would-be breadwinners not to engage in long-term romance (not just marriage, even de facto marriage bullshit). Sad!

[–]BasedBrexitBroker 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Everyone should watch the documentary Divorce Corp. It lays bare how the family court system strips everybody particularly men of all of their assets

[–]ShiningConcepts 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That should be taught in sex ed so men stop getting baby trapped (or at the very lest, know the risks of it before it happens).

[–]Evil_Mini_Cake -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

While I generally agree, doesn't this grant a bit too much power to the richer party? I'm thinking of cases where the woman gives up her career to have kids.

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points12 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah the poor gold diggers, that's so unfair!

[–]Zokalex 21 points22 points23 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

It was her choice to do so. It would be naïve to do such a thing in this era.

[–]Moojay points 9 years ago [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link

It was most certainly the couple's choice to have kids, not just the mother's.

[–]clayton_ravine 9 points10 points11 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

So it's the couples choice when they have kids but it's the woman's choice when she wants to abort. Funny how that works out.

[–]Moojay points 9 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

why even bring abortion into this arguement?

[–]jdgalt 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Because when it doesn't happen, it's another way for women to unfairly collect from men.

[–]dan-syndrome 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes but I think aid until the wife can get a job would be ideal.

It's just this concept of opportunity cost is nuanced and the courts don't view it that way.

Say the wife was making 30k before marriage (then she quits her job to take care of kids). Let's say the man makes 100k when they split. It's not really justified to pay her 50k a year when she would most likely be making 30k. There's no expectation she gets her old job back when there is expectation the man continues his same job with same salary.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter