Husbands Are Deadlier Than Terrorists: The New York Times continues its proud tradition of red herrings and misandry. All the nonsense that's fit to print.

-redditardation- · 2017-02-13T06:34:16+00:00

... I mean wives are also deadlier than terrorists.

It is just a matter of magnitude there are millions of husbands for every terrorist.

I'd wager that if you only use Western death tolls and ignore 9/11 & other huge terror attacks the way the 'terrorist realists' like to that toddlers are deadlier than terrorists.

splodgenessabounds · 2017-02-13T11:44:26+00:00

I have to hand it to the ~~author~~ sappy sop who ~~got their 10 year old to type~~ wrote this: they managed to get Trump and guns and t3rror1sm and *MEN* all into one indigestible op-ed piece. That's some journalistic elasticity right there, so much of it you that could make more than enough foundation garments for all the world's women 9 times over.

ralphswanson · 2017-02-13T18:34:08+00:00

The Times is so righteous when it vilifies men and teaches women that they are victims and ought to be scared of men. What great work.

2017-02-13T14:53:26+00:00

Cupboards are deadlier than terrorists. So what?

Title	Husbands Are Deadlier Than Terrorists: The New York Times continues its proud tradition of red herrings and misandry. All the nonsense that's fit to print.
Author	DougDante
Upvotes	79
Comments	9
Date	February 13, 2017 5:15 AM UTC (9 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/5tr4os/husbands_are_deadlier_than_terrorists_the_new/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/husbands-are-deadlier-than-terrorists-the-new-york.932041 https://theredarchive.com/post/932041

Comments