We aren't feminists.

Second-wave feminism was spawned by middle-class communists; like all class warriors, they wanted to manufacture conflict between identities (except it was no longer proletariat vs. bourgeoisie; to manufacture statism they had to co-opt an identity the purveyors of individuality could never oppose: women. Thus the debate is no longer big state vs minimal state, it's women vs. men, non-white vs. white, etc.). Prejudices were officially reversed, state-sponsored and deemed socially acceptable.

Betty Friedan's propaganda, that of the tired and frustrated suburban housewife, has been proven to be a sham of the highest order; she was a communist, with the intent to divide people along arbitrary, biological lines for her own political ends (in the same manner liberals play reductionist in most debates: they don't want to talk issues, they want to talk identities).

International Men's Day? Are we slowly manufacturing a similar narrative to that of the feminists? eg, you can only pass judgement on women if you are a woman; you can only pass judgement on men if you are a man. This is the same form of cultural relativism - advocated almost universally but not explicitly by liberal politicians and mimicked by their followers - which erodes social unity, creates virtue out of weakness and creates preferential treatment and conflict in the context of ethnicity, sexuality, gender and religion.

It's the same form of morality which would have determined interfering in the holocaust was an act of racism (it determines passing judgement on another's culture is a form of 'ethnocentrism').

It's why we've got a segment on 'Black Heroes' (white heroes?) and 'black culture' (white culture?) on the homepage of the BBC today; it's why Trump exists. I've written so much more about it here http://www.thelastcitizen.com/ and here http://www.thelastcitizen.com/the-liberal-wall-of-hate/

It's all relativist nonsense. Why don't we be genuinely radical and propose something that resembles, you know, ACTUAL liberalism (not Marxism) and assign rights and responsibilities to PEOPLE, not identities? That would be TRULY revolutionary; in a world where everyone has an identity, being an individual is a TRULY revolutionary act.

How about, rather than international men's day we call it international people's day? Better yet, how about we just don't have a day?

Better yet, how about on the day we refer to as 'international men's day' we do something even more radical: we talk about issues affecting humanity, a humanity which is divorced from the dehumanising forced categorisation it is forced to assume under the dictatorial, socially acceptable religion colloquially referred to as identity politics?

How about we talk about suicide rates of people; workplace deaths of people; rape and sexual assault of people; domestic violence against people; homelessness among people; education of people; and, most importantly, the liberty of the people?

Because guess what...while we continue to live under the tyranny of identity, we don't have any!