TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Prostitution in France made legal under new laws, but paying for it ruled illegal

Ketomasterrace

April 7, 2016
4 upvotes
/r/MensRights
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-04-07/prostitution-in-france-made-legal,-but-paying-for-it-illegal/7307058
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Prostitution in France made legal under new laws, but paying for it ruled illegal
Author

Ketomasterrace

Upvotes 4
Comments 13
Date April 7, 2016 1:36 PM UTC
(10 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4dr21n/prostitution_in_france_made_legal_under_new_laws/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/prostitution-in-france-made-legal-under-new-laws.952372
https://theredarchive.com/post/952372
Top posts by Ketomasterrace

How to check for testicular cancer

5 upvotes
April 7, 2016
/r/MensRights

Favorite plate just asked "so what are we"? Alluding to whether we or dating or not. I don't want anything exclusive. What's the most gentle way to say we're just banging?

4 upvotes
April 3, 2016
/r/askTRP

Comments

[–]omegaphallic 4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is so stupid, its makes the clients out to be monsters and the prostitutes out to be childern, its outright sexist against both groups, and it violates their basic human rights, especially the Clients.

[–]ttnorac 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So then they said regular dating is legal?

[–]LeHappyTrader 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So you can get it for free?

[–]thrway_1000 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

https://archive.is/x2h76

[–]whos_the_king 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

It seems they're trying to throw gas on the Muslim-infiltrating culture war going on in Europe

[–]Ketomasterrace[S] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

But the Muslims aren't paying for hookers. They just rape random women. This is a ploy to punish men while absconding women

[–]Mitchell78 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

O yes Muslims pay for hookers a lot of them do, walk through a european red lights district late at night and its full of immigrants (locals tend to come in the day time)

[–]Ketomasterrace[S] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I've been wrong before.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Once back in 1995

[–]Swiggy 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Some prostitution supporter groups said the new legislation would provide sex workers with greater powers, and help to encourage the reporting of crimes against them.

Wait, but I thought 90% of them were already victims of human trafficking? Why aren't the police rescuing them from this victimization instead of putting them back out there on the street?

[–]Leinadro 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"If customers are penalised, they will be scared, the girls will have to hide in order to practice their trade, which is legal, and as the one who might get into legal trouble, the customer will be able to even more impose his choices, including unprotected sex."

So now the customers have been driven underground and the sex workers will have to follow them. Which puts them in more danger.

This law may reduce the number of sex workers but the ones that remain will be left in even more danger because they will be forced to go to more dangerous lengths to meet customers.

I get the noble intent of helping trafficked people get away and get help. But by criminalizing the customers the assumption has changed from the "the sex worker is a criminal" to "the client is an abuser". And it also assumes that no one would be a sex worker of their own free will and that anyone who does it MUST be a trafficking victim.

And heres another thought.

Construction work, maid/bulter service, fishing boat workers, sex work, miners, etc....

Why is it that despite trafficked labor being used in all of these industries why isnt there a similar presumption that "anyone that hires a maid must be hiring trafficked labor"?

What makes sex work so uniquely special that that is the only industry where customers are criminalized for a consensual activity and all providers are assumed to be victims?

And one more thing.

Why isnt there more effort put into busting trafficking rings, you know, the only actual bad people that are bad by definition of what they are doing?

[–]KimJongMilhouse 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's a growing tend that I'm honestly worried about.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If the "act" or "transaction" is the problem, then what sense does it make to punish only one side of that transaction?

Just reinforces the pussy on a pedestal mentality.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter