Samantha Bee Investigates The Ridiculous Battles Over Custody Rape Victims Must Face.

Rex9 · 2015-04-09T15:48:45+00:00

32K pregancies by rape a year? Is this true? Seems like a CRAZY large number.

DavidByron2 · 2015-04-09T14:39:13+00:00

More anti-liberal moral panic feminist hate.

What it boils down to is does the state have the right to punish a criminal by removing their rights as a parent? By striping them not only of their kids but even to access? The answer is obviously that they do not and this is a strange and unusual punishment.

Contrast with the article the other day about women campaigning for criminal women to keep custody (not mere visitation) of their kids even as they are still in prison.

Contrast with the way male rape victims are forced to pay child support (indentured servitude) to their female rapist while she denies them access to their kid, if she chooses.

Feminists pretend this is making the rape "victim" (and god knows rape is about the most uncertain conviction of any crime - most of these "rapists" will have been young men on a date, falsely convicted by laws designed to deny them due process) be forced to have contact with her rapist, and that is simply not true. Visitation can and is conducted under controlled circumstances if necessary, if one or both parent has been ordered to stay away from the other. Child visitation is not about the other parent, except in as much as one parent might try to jealously block the other.

Due process? Checks against cruel and unusual punishments? Throw them out. Let's go on a witch hunt again. That's anti-liberal but it's very much how feminists think.

EyeRedditDaily · 2015-04-09T18:25:25+00:00

I watched this last night and it was driving me nuts because I thought (as is typical for feminists) that they were playing with statistics again. I can't load the video at work or I'd point you to the time stamp, but there is one point where the activist lady says something like "we've even had situation where rapists coerce the victims into dropping the charges because the rapist tells them if they don't, the rapist will pursue custody/visitation".

Now what's the problem with that statement? Pretty obvious, isn't it?

You can't drop charges against a RAPIST, you can only drop charges against someone ACCUSED of rape. So their whole movement is bullshit. They aren't talking about taking away the parental rights of convicted rapists (after all, those guys would be in prison anyway). They are talking about women saying "this guy raped me, take away his parental rights" - full stop.

I think very few would disagree with removing a convicted rapist's parental rights. That's what they lead you to believe they are advocating for and talking about here. It's not.

Title	Samantha Bee Investigates The Ridiculous Battles Over Custody Rape Victims Must Face.
Author	CrackHeadRodeo
Upvotes	4
Comments	6
Date	April 9, 2015 2:22 PM UTC (11 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3201bx/samantha_bee_investigates_the_ridiculous_battles/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/samantha-bee-investigates-the-ridiculous-battles.983548 https://theredarchive.com/post/983548

Comments