Most blatant anti-male wikipedia lie yet?

DavidByron2 · 2015-03-27T20:31:10+00:00

Female-on-male rape appears to be extremely rare: a study carried out in the United States in 2010 by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found that out of men who reported having been raped at some point in their lives, 93.3% reported that all the perpetrators were male

The facts: female on male rape seems to be about 40% of all rape, and about 80% of the rape of men. The really funny thing is that they actually quote as their "source" the study that proves they are wrong.

Not even a note that the content of the page is controversial or disputed. Blatant lying along ideological lines by an ideological group that Wikipedia pays to edit their pages.

yoduh4077 · 2015-03-27T23:38:14+00:00

Mostly, male victims try to hide, and deny their victimization, unlike the female victims

And yet the common feminist rhetoric is that "most rapes go unreported". So such is it?

TheRealMouseRat · 2015-03-27T21:46:02+00:00

The rest of the part about female on male rape seemed pretty good though, pointing out double standards in sentencing, social stigma around male victims, and explaining myths about that kind of rape.

expert02 · 2015-03-28T06:52:45+00:00

The feminists have control of Wikipedia. That site doesn't uphold the truth, or care about bias. They care about what claims have the most number of reputable citations.

samsc2 · 2015-03-28T01:49:33+00:00

The reasoning all these studies drop this amazing amount of bullshit is because almost all sections of our government do not consider non-penetrative sex rape. With these statistics it's easy to lie about the amount of rape from female on male. When they include non-penetrative sex as rape the statistics jump up significantly to roughly 1-3 males, which matches with the 1-3 females. I actually got into a major argument with a group of feminists the other day about this and I showed them time after time where it says in the documentation that the stats do not include non-penetration. It's just sick to see so much misinformation that's spread about, as it just continues to falsely justify the actions of numerous evil people.

PatriarchyDrone · 2015-03-28T15:34:05+00:00

Interesting that in the section above they mention that

fewer than 1 in 10 male-male rapes are reported

yet, for female-male rapes, they quote reported rapes as if that's a reliable way to gauge actual numbers.

GenderNeutralLanguag · 2015-03-28T16:23:43+00:00

Hell no this is not the most blatant anti-male page. The section linked to is actually very fair and reasonable and properly follows wikipedia's neutral perspective rule well.

It properly cites the findings of the CDC study. I am not going to fault wiki editors for quoting the findings from the CDC, finding that do say 93.3% of perpetrators of male rape where male. I find this reasonable because it is only ONE sentence (though a long sentence) in the write up. The other 80% of the write up is about "Made to Penetrate" with 80% female rapists. It cites a legal case and the "Hot for Teacher" myth. While this could be better, it is far from being blatantly anti-male.

Title	Most blatant anti-male wikipedia lie yet?
Author	DavidByron2
Upvotes	48
Comments	29
Date	March 27, 2015 8:27 PM UTC (11 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/30j3pd/most_blatant_antimale_wikipedia_lie_yet/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/most-blatant-anti-male-wikipedia-lie-yet.984686 https://theredarchive.com/post/984686

Comments