I rejoiced when I saw a post that actually claimed to have proof supporting their position. I then did the opposite of rejoice when I started reading the first study and it became immediately apparent that the person who did this research was either the stupidest person to have ever opened a legitimate scientific journal or a prolifically dishonest character who hoped nobody would actually check.

So naturally I tried to bring the dishonesty to the OP's attention who analysed my work carefully and weighed up how to respond that would indicate how much he values facts and evidence.

If you guessed that he blocked me and kept his post containing disinformation up, wow. I mean you're correct, but damn.

Anyway, it would also be dishonest for me to say that everything in that big post is some flavour of bullshit. So I won't do that. I'm happy to let the result of the of my singular inquiry speak for my position. That said, if you are dead sure any of those sources are cited accurately and you're willing to say out loud that you stand by the information, I'll give it a read.

Thanks for reading this and getting really defensive.