TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

BlindMaestro Archive

View 82 posts and 882 comments by BlindMaestro on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1466

FeminismBlindMaestro/r/MensRights03/12/22 04:09 PM
765

FeminismBlindMaestro/r/MensRights01/12/22 01:40 PM
498

DiscriminationBlindMaestro/r/MensRights03/12/23 04:04 PM
480

DiscriminationBlindMaestro/r/MensRights25/12/22 01:35 PM
398

ScienceBlindMaestro/r/TheRedPill01/12/22 02:20 PM
390

FeminismBlindMaestro/r/MensRights24/04/24 11:50 AM
379

MisandryBlindMaestro/r/AntiFeminists05/11/22 06:43 PM
370

FeminismBlindMaestro/r/MensRights16/06/22 04:25 PM
363

FeminismBlindMaestro/r/MensRights04/08/23 09:18 AM
362

ScienceBlindMaestro/r/TheRedPill09/02/22 10:40 PM
325

ScienceBlindMaestro/r/TheRedPill10/02/22 10:39 PM
316

ScienceBlindMaestro/r/TheRedPill05/08/23 08:19 AM
303

ScienceBlindMaestro/r/TheRedPill29/07/21 06:26 PM
281

HealthBlindMaestro/r/MensRights19/02/22 05:57 PM
268

ScienceBlindMaestro/r/TheRedPill25/07/24 10:39 AM
265

ScienceBlindMaestro/r/TheRedPill21/03/22 02:07 PM
256

FeminismBlindMaestro/r/MensRights04/12/23 04:43 PM
250

DiscriminationBlindMaestro/r/MensRights22/10/23 10:00 AM
248

ScienceBlindMaestro/r/TheRedPill29/04/22 03:55 PM
246

discussionBlindMaestro/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/21 12:46 AM
245

BlindMaestro/r/PussyPass17/01/23 03:44 PM
182

ScienceBlindMaestro/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/21 10:50 PM
163

Legal RightsBlindMaestro/r/MensRights02/12/23 01:28 AM
154

DiscriminationBlindMaestro/r/MensRights05/04/24 10:31 AM
148

BlindMaestro/r/MGTOW28/04/21 11:56 PM
132

ScienceBlindMaestro/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 09:17 AM
125

MisandryBlindMaestro/r/AntiFeminists12/11/22 01:44 PM
109

Social IssuesBlindMaestro/r/MensRights21/03/22 11:28 AM
102

Social IssuesBlindMaestro/r/MensRights27/09/22 05:02 PM
99

BlindMaestro/r/AntiFeminists10/02/22 02:44 PM
97

BlindMaestro/r/BlackPillScience01/11/23 10:31 PM
92

CMVBlindMaestro/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/21 12:26 AM
88

DiscriminationBlindMaestro/r/MensRights07/09/24 08:37 AM
85

DiscriminationBlindMaestro/r/MensRights18/12/23 07:25 PM
74

social mediaBlindMaestro/r/EverydayMisandry06/09/24 09:06 PM
73

ScienceBlindMaestro/r/TheRedPill25/11/23 08:47 PM
71

HypocrisyBlindMaestro/r/AntiFeminists01/12/22 01:47 PM
70

DiscussionBlindMaestro/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/21 01:34 AM
66

BlindMaestro/r/AntiFeminists10/02/22 10:22 PM
61

ScienceBlindMaestro/r/TheRedPill09/11/23 11:53 AM
57

DiscussionBlindMaestro/r/AntiFeminists30/06/22 09:28 AM
50

Social IssuesBlindMaestro/r/MensRights26/07/23 11:12 AM
50

FeminismBlindMaestro/r/MensRights19/11/23 01:04 PM
50

FeminismBlindMaestro/r/MensRights09/11/23 11:33 AM
43

ScienceBlindMaestro/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/21 02:17 PM
41

HealthBlindMaestro/r/MensRights23/06/22 04:20 PM
40

BlindMaestro/r/AllPillDebate31/08/23 11:06 AM
38

FeminismBlindMaestro/r/MensRights11/07/22 10:00 PM
38

BlindMaestro/r/AllPillDebate25/10/23 12:36 PM
37

DiscriminationBlindMaestro/r/MensRights25/11/23 08:58 PM
37

ScienceBlindMaestro/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/21 08:06 PM
32

MisandryBlindMaestro/r/AntiFeminists12/07/22 04:53 AM
32

ScienceBlindMaestro/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/21 05:13 PM
27

DiscussionBlindMaestro/r/AntiFeminists23/06/22 04:27 PM
27

ScienceBlindMaestro/r/TheRedPill10/12/22 06:19 PM
27

FeminismBlindMaestro/r/MensRights25/12/22 01:03 AM
23

DiscussionBlindMaestro/r/AntiFeminists03/12/22 04:16 PM
21

DiscriminationBlindMaestro/r/MensRights06/12/23 02:50 PM
20

Redpill DiscussionBlindMaestro/r/AllPillDebate18/03/23 07:21 PM
18

BASEDBlindMaestro/r/AllPillDebate09/11/23 01:32 PM
17

BlindMaestro/r/AllPillDebate02/08/23 10:32 AM
14

BlindMaestro/r/askTRP21/04/21 11:58 PM
14

Legal RightsBlindMaestro/r/MensRights20/02/22 08:57 PM
14

ScienceBlindMaestro/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 08:30 AM
9

BlindMaestro/r/MGTOW24/04/21 02:52 PM
9

BlindMaestro/r/AllPillDebate27/09/22 07:05 PM
6

Free For All DiscussionBlindMaestro/r/AllPillDebate04/11/22 05:03 PM
6

BlindMaestro/r/askTRP22/04/21 04:49 PM
3

BlindMaestro/r/AntiFeminists11/05/21 04:05 AM
2

misandryBlindMaestro/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/11/22 04:14 PM
2

Redpill DiscussionBlindMaestro/r/AllPillDebate11/11/23 04:25 AM
1

DiscriminationBlindMaestro/r/MensRights03/10/21 11:39 PM
1

FeminismBlindMaestro/r/MensRights05/11/22 04:49 PM
1

ScienceBlindMaestro/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/22 02:22 PM
1

FeminismBlindMaestro/r/MensRights15/04/21 06:02 PM
1

BlindMaestro/r/ExRedPill27/09/22 07:39 PM
1

Social IssuesBlindMaestro/r/MensRights22/06/22 11:13 PM
1

BlindMaestro/r/AntiFeminists02/08/21 10:17 PM
1

ScienceBlindMaestro/r/TheRedPill22/05/23 07:53 PM
1

BlindMaestro/r/askTRP14/05/21 02:14 AM
1

Question For MenBlindMaestro/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/21 07:13 PM
0

BlindMaestro/r/ExRedPill23/12/21 12:23 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
12

If the statute of limitations expired, I don’t think a man would or even could be charged. There’s definitely a double standard in terms of social repercussions though.
/r/MensRights23/11/24 05:42 PM
2

I do.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/24 03:47 AM
2

It’s like when women lie about their body counts.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/24 01:41 PM
-1

Some college fraternities get a tad rapey
/r/MensRights17/11/24 10:47 PM
76

The left has been dehumanizing men for years and then has the gall to act surprised at this outcome.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/11/24 04:49 AM
1

Men are considered an expendable resource by the political elite.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/24 03:41 AM
3

There already is. I highly recommend these books and articles which directly challenge the prevailing feminist orthodoxy. Critical of feminism’s ideological framework around domestic violence Dutton, D. G. (2006). Rethinking Domestic Violence. University of British Columbia Press. Jackson, N. A. (Ed.). (2007). Encyclopedia of domestic violence. Routledge. Critical of the modern concept of patriarchy: Baumeister, R. F. (2010). Is there anything good about men?: How cultures flourish by exploiting…
/r/MensRights01/10/24 06:49 AM
103

Women’s fear of crime does not correspond to their actual rates of victimization. There’s even a name for it: the fear of crime gender paradox. Feminists pretending that women are at higher risk are just lying and fear-mongering. Although fear of crime is a concern for people of all genders, studies consistently find that women around the world tend to have much higher levels of fear of crime than men, despite the fact that in many places, and for most offenses, men's actual victimization rates …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/09/24 12:33 PM
47

Most women are repulsed by bis and even the dudes who’ve dabbled including bi women. If women can lie about body count, you’re allowed to deny that you’ve ever sucked a dick.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/09/24 11:54 AM
123

Women aren’t interested in bisexual men or even men who’ve sexually experimented with other men, exhibiting far higher binegativity than men. In 2019, the BBC interviewed a bisexual student named Matt, who relayed, “One girl I was dating suddenly said that the thought of me being with a man made her physically sick. Then she blocked me on everything.” That same year, Lewis Oakley wrote of a similar experience in Cosmopolitan: “Once, I had been Tindering with a girl for weeks. The banter was good…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/09/24 06:50 AM
3

It would have and it does.
/r/MensRights09/09/24 01:08 AM
36

Aaron Taylor-Johnson met his future spouse Sam Taylor-Johnson in 2009 on the set of Nowhere Boy, her directorial debut, when he was 18 and she was 42. A blogger pointed out the lack of scrutiny from the women’s magazines that defended her: “there was both the general power imbalance that was exacerbated by his age and the precise power imbalance of Taylor-Johnson's role as his director. Instead of at least acknowledging that, though, most women's mags just… glossed over it completely”. Speaking …
/r/MensRights09/09/24 12:55 AM
1

Of Boys and Men by Richard Reeves Stand by Your Manhood by Peter Lloyd Is There Anything Good About Men? by Roy Baumeister The Second Sexism by David Benatar
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/09/24 11:15 PM
2

Also, they think men who sleep around are more likely to cheat. Which is true for both sexes.
/r/MensRights08/09/24 09:20 PM
2

Either that or men who can’t do better and have to scrape at the bottom of the barrel.
/r/MensRights08/09/24 08:12 PM
0

Research has shown that women are as judgmental (or more) when it comes to evaluating prospective partners with extensive sexual histories. Jacoby and Williams (1985) found a consistent preference by both genders for partners with no more than moderate sexual experience (pg.1064). O'Sullivan (1995) found little evidence of the sexual double standard and that women didn’t receive more negative evaluations than did men when described as having had high numbers of casual partners (pg.175). Sprecher…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/09/24 12:19 PM
1

Research has shown that women are as judgmental (or more) when it comes to evaluating prospective partners with extensive sexual histories. Jacoby and Williams (1985) found a consistent preference by both genders for partners with no more than moderate sexual experience (pg.1064). O'Sullivan (1995) found little evidence of the sexual double standard and that women didn’t receive more negative evaluations than did men when described as having had high numbers of casual partners (pg.175). Sprecher…
/r/MensRights07/09/24 11:41 AM
6

Their fear of crime doesn’t correspond to reality. Although fear of crime is a concern for people of all genders, studies consistently find that women around the world tend to have much higher levels of fear of crime than men, despite the fact that in many places, and for most offenses, men's actual victimization rates are higher.[1][2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women%27s_fear_of_crime
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/09/24 10:12 PM
25

Yeah, I take these “real men do X” and other shaming language to be an obvious manipulation tactic, and it’s a good way to get me to disregard what you’re saying. Imagine the outrage if men tried to direct women’s behavior by denying their femininity for not behaving in a certain way.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/09/24 10:09 PM
2

Would be surprised if she ever saw the inside of a cell.
/r/MensRights06/09/24 06:47 PM
16

They’re shamed to disregard their evolutionarily-instilled anxieties.
/r/TheRedPill26/07/24 01:37 AM
21

You are correct. Men preferred more chaste partners to assure paternity. Men apparently assess and evaluate levels of sexual activity by a woman prior to long-term commitment—behavior that would have been observable or known through social reputation in the small-group lifestyles of our ancestors. Past behavior is a good predictor of future behavior, and having a large number of sex partners prior to marriage is a statistical predictor of infidelity after marriage (pg.92) https://imgur.com/rM3iF…
/r/TheRedPill25/07/24 08:07 PM
54

In her essay “Prosecuting Mrs. Robinson? Gender, Sexuality, and Statutory Rape Laws,” Carolyn Cocca, a professor at SUNY Westbrook, writes about radical feminist opposition to gender-neutral statutory rape laws: “radical feminists were concerned that gender-neutral statutory rape laws could not acknowledge that adolescent males and females in particular were not similarly situated in regard to psychological needs and sexual power. The problem was one of 'social inequality, of sex aggravated by a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/06/24 11:17 PM
6

It’s nice to see justice being served to predators who prey on children irrespective of the sex of the predator.
/r/MensRights20/05/24 10:32 PM
5

Peer-reviewed articles discussing lifetime number of sexual partners consistently show that body count is a strong predictor of infidelity, relationship dissatisfaction and divorce. Most men and women care about sexual history, and, in some respects, women care even more than men do. Promiscuity and Infidelity Factors found to facilitate infidelity Number of sex partners: Greater number of sex partners before marriage predicts infidelity As might be expected, attitudes toward infidelity specific…
/r/MensRights20/05/24 04:20 AM
-1

a woman
/r/MensRights08/05/24 05:13 PM
1

She should hang around with bears instead.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 04:35 PM
-41

Men should be willing to fight for their own country. I say this as an anti-feminist.
/r/MensRights25/04/24 05:55 PM
5

Yeah, I too think that would be ridiculous. Oftentimes, guys who want partners who haven’t been with a lot of blokes are straw-manned as being only into virgins. And the guys too afraid to walk away from actual whores usually don’t because they lack options.
/r/MensRights24/04/24 06:43 PM
6

It’s absolutely fine for a dude to prefer women who haven’t been with a lot of dudes. Unfortunately, they’re several times more likely to cheat and divorce.
/r/MensRights24/04/24 06:35 PM
29

Every study that’s ever been conducted on this shows that women care as much as men. It boils down to women thinking that only they’re entitled to having preferences. Hypocrisy, thy name is woman. Jacoby and Williams (1985): Clearly, one's desirability as a date or marriage partner does depend, in part, on one's previous sexual behavior... Although virgins are consistently desired as partners, this preference is expressed as frequently by females as by males. Thus, the traditional double standar…
/r/MensRights24/04/24 06:31 PM
1

Feminists would be screeching if men reversed the “real men X” manipulation tactic on women.
/r/MensRights14/04/24 04:51 AM
10

Peer-reviewed articles discussing lifetime number of sexual partners consistently show that body count is a strong predictor of infidelity, relationship dissatisfaction and divorce. Most men and women care about sexual history, and, in some respects, women care even more than men do. Promiscuity and Infidelity Factors found to facilitate infidelity Number of sex partners: Greater number of sex partners before marriage predicts infidelity As might be expected, attitudes toward infidelity specific…
/r/MensRights05/04/24 11:51 AM
12

Every study that’s ever been conducted on this shows that women care as much as men. Jacoby and Williams (1985): Clearly, one's desirability as a date or marriage partner does depend, in part, on one's previous sexual behavior... Although virgins are consistently desired as partners, this preference is expressed as frequently by females as by males. Thus, the traditional double standard finds no support here. Neither does the "egalitarian" standard (the supposed tendency to choose someone of app…
/r/MensRights29/01/24 08:45 PM
61

Deanna’s comments touch on a common debate: Would Are We Dating the Same Guy be considered appropriate if the sexes were reversed? Interestingly enough, this thought exercise was put to the test when a male-centric group called Are We Dating the Same Girl NYC materialized. The Facebook group used the same community guidelines nearly verbatim, and even added a disclaimer that the group was directly inspired by its predecessor. But when the original group caught wind of its male counterpart, an ov…
/r/MensRights05/01/24 01:14 PM
7

This info is for men, not feminists.
/r/MensRights29/12/23 10:11 PM
6

When you have the hard facts at hand, it’s nearly impossible to gaslight a person. A person tells you to your face that there’s no strong correlation between bc and negative outcomes, and you have dozens of peer reviewed studies indicating otherwise. You realize that the person that’s trying to mislead you and outright lie has a vested interest in doing so. Read the studies yourself. Come to your own conclusion.
/r/MensRights29/12/23 08:22 PM
10

Stick to your convictions.
/r/MensRights29/12/23 07:19 PM
17

Thanks, bro. Men need to be made aware of these things. The propaganda is strong.
/r/MensRights29/12/23 05:48 PM
25

Here are hundreds of peer-reviewed publications linking promiscuity to: Infidelity Relation Instability, Dissatisfaction and Divorce Paternity Fraud Mental health and substance abuse disorders Physical ailments like STDs, cancers and other long-term illnesses
/r/MensRights29/12/23 05:40 PM
40

Here are hundreds of peer-reviewed publications linking promiscuity to: Infidelity Relation Instability, Dissatisfaction and Divorce Paternity Fraud Mental health and substance abuse disorders Physical ailments like STDs, cancers and other long-term illnesses
/r/MensRights29/12/23 05:39 PM
32

Studies show that members of both sexes care. Even 2x, which regularly condemns men for caring about sexual history, has women openly claiming that they care about sexual history and getting upvoted for it. It’s like the bisexual double standard and the cheating morality double standard. A lot of women have the mentality, “when we do it, it’s fine. when you do it, it’s misogyny.” Condemnations Why does a body count matter? (+5.7k) (9/19/2022) I hate how men value my body count (+7.2k) (4/3/2022)…
/r/MensRights29/12/23 05:38 PM
11

Her name is protected She was 16. The media typically does that with juvenile offenders afaik. They’re legally allowed to, but a lot of them refrain from doing it. https://www.rtdna.org/identifying-juveniles https://splc.org/2020/01/naming-names-identifying-minors/ https://www.tampabay.com/archive/1999/07/19/media-guidelines-vary-for-naming-juveniles/
/r/MensRights13/12/23 03:52 PM
7

Men lack in-group bias, and we really need to start caring about eachother because no one else will. Although men, historically and cross-culturally, are the dominant sex, they possess remarkably weaker in-group bias than do women. In four experiments, we found this sex difference persisted using both implicit and explicit measures, despite using a gender attitude IAT that was unconfounded with gender stereotypes… Thus, we can claim with confidence that even when men are responding automatically…
/r/MensRights12/12/23 05:55 PM
1

She is getting her way. The law already treats women differently.
/r/MensRights06/12/23 04:54 PM
16

You’re missing the broader point, which is that feminists don’t want equality and never did.
/r/MensRights04/12/23 05:19 PM
33

Hypocrisy at its finest.
/r/MensRights03/12/23 08:47 PM
92

Women will never hold themselves to the standards that they hold men to.
/r/MensRights03/12/23 05:38 PM
11

Welcome to the ever-widening Gender Education Gap In recent years, women have consistently surpassed men in earning bachelor's (2021: 58%), master's (2021:62%), and doctoral degrees (53%, 2020), as well as outnumbering men in medical schools (50.5%, 2019) and law schools (55%, 2021). In 1972, when Title IX was passed to help improve gender equality on campus, men were 13% more likely to get an undergraduate degree than women; today, according to the National Center for Education Statistics, it's…
/r/MensRights02/12/23 11:55 AM
9

Women generally possess an extremely high level of in-group preference while men generally do not possess any (Rudman and Goodwin, 2004; Patterson-Neubert, 2004). In fact, research has shown that society at large holds an anti-male/pro-female bias (Connors et al., 2023; Whitley and Kite, 2009). Graso et al. (2023) found that women are generally very accepting of instrumental harm (IH) befalling men to achieve some purpose, but are not so tolerant of IH befalling women. High in-group preference h…
/r/MensRights27/11/23 04:31 PM
45

Women generally possess an extremely high level of in-group preference while men generally do not possess any (Rudman and Goodwin, 2004; Patterson-Neubert, 2004). In fact, research has shown that society at large holds an anti-male/pro-female bias (Connors et al., 2023). Graso et al. (2023) found that women are generally very accepting of instrumental harm (IH) befalling men to achieve some purpose, but are not so tolerant of IH befalling women. High in-group preference has been correlated with …
/r/MensRights26/11/23 09:46 PM
2

Multiple sexual partners are associated with lower sexual quality, communication, and relationship stability. Several studies posit that this is due to heightened expectations stemming from varied experiences, which undermine marital satisfaction. Moreover, individuals with more sexual partners are more aware of alternative partners, making it challenging to maintain commitment and satisfaction in their current relationships. This awareness of alternatives is a significant predictor of extradyad…
/r/RPChristians25/11/23 08:18 PM
3

Thank you for reading it.
/r/MensRights19/11/23 07:38 PM
1

53% of men consider it always wrong for a woman to have an affair, while 61% feel the same about men. Young women, at 73%, express a higher moral objection to men having affairs compared to the 51% who say the same about women. Among ever-married adults aged 18 to 29, women are slightly more likely than men to be guilty of infidelity (11% vs. 10%). This moral double standard is especially pronounced among liberal women, where only 36% deem it always wrong for a woman to engage in an extramarital…
/r/AllPillDebate11/11/23 10:47 PM
9

Most people care about their partner’s sexual histories. Men and women are more or less equally reluctant to enter into relationships with prospective partners that have extensive sexual histories or who lack sexual experience, both preferring instead partners with moderate sexual histories (4-8 partners). Evidence suggests that the traditional sexual double standard is no longer a significant phenomenon in contemporary western culture. However, heterosexual women are more unwilling to enter int…
/r/AllPillDebate09/11/23 01:32 PM
1

Most people care about their partner’s sexual histories. Men and women are more or less equally reluctant to enter into relationships with prospective partners that have extensive sexual histories or who lack sexual experience, both preferring instead partners with moderate sexual histories (4-8 partners). Evidence suggests that the traditional sexual double standard is no longer a significant phenomenon in contemporary western culture. However, heterosexual women are more unwilling to enter int…
/r/AllPillDebate09/11/23 01:30 PM
1

Most people care about their partner’s sexual histories. Men and women are more or less equally reluctant to enter into relationships with prospective partners that have extensive sexual histories or who lack sexual experience, both preferring instead partners with moderate sexual histories (4-8 partners). Evidence suggests that the traditional sexual double standard is no longer a significant phenomenon in contemporary western culture. However, heterosexual women are more unwilling to enter int…
/r/AllPillDebate09/11/23 01:29 PM
1

Most people care about their partner’s sexual histories. Men and women are more or less equally reluctant to enter into relationships with prospective partners that have extensive sexual histories or who lack sexual experience, both preferring instead partners with moderate sexual histories (4-8 partners). Evidence suggests that the traditional sexual double standard is no longer a significant phenomenon in contemporary western culture. However, heterosexual women are more unwilling to enter int…
/r/TheRedPill09/11/23 11:55 AM
8

Most people care about their partner’s sexual histories. Men and women are more or less equally reluctant to enter into relationships with prospective partners that have extensive sexual histories or who lack sexual experience, both preferring instead partners with moderate sexual histories (4-8 partners). Evidence suggests that the traditional sexual double standard is no longer a significant phenomenon in contemporary western culture. However, heterosexual women are more unwilling to enter int…
/r/MensRights09/11/23 11:38 AM
3

Most people care about their partner’s sexual histories. Men and women are more or less equally reluctant to enter into relationships with prospective partners that have extensive sexual histories or who lack sexual experience, both preferring instead partners with moderate sexual histories (4-8 partners). Evidence suggests that the traditional sexual double standard is no longer a significant phenomenon in contemporary western culture. However, heterosexual women are more unwilling to enter int…
/r/BlackPillScience06/11/23 10:02 PM
13

Most people care about their partner’s sexual histories. Men and women are more or less equally reluctant to enter into relationships with prospective partners that have extensive sexual histories or who lack sexual experience, both preferring instead partners with moderate sexual histories (4-8 partners). Evidence suggests that the traditional sexual double standard is no longer a significant phenomenon in contemporary western culture. However, heterosexual women are more unwilling to enter int…
/r/MensRights06/11/23 07:15 PM
25

Bingo. Women have much higher levels than of in-group preference and solidarity than men do. They’re able to coordinate together en masse for their own benefit far better than men can. Men do not nearly have as much group consciousness as women do. In-group preference tracks with out-group derogation and a tolerance for double standards. That’s why body-shaming is only tolerated when it’s directed at men (“small-dick energy”). That’s why men are the only social group with immutable characteristi…
/r/MensRights28/10/23 07:16 PM
20

Peer-reviewed articles discussing lifetime number of sexual partners consistently show that body count is a strong predictor of infidelity, relationship dissatisfaction and divorce. Most men and women care about sexual history, and, in some respects, women care even more than men do. Promiscuity and Infidelity Factors found to facilitate infidelity Number of sex partners: Greater number of sex partners before marriage predicts infidelity As might be expected, attitudes toward infidelity specific…
/r/MensRights28/10/23 04:23 AM
1

Women do compare their current partners to what’s essentially a composite of all their previous partners. The more she’s had, the less likely you’re the one who arouses the most passion, was the best lay, etc. In the sexual quality area, where the association with the number of sexual partners is the strongest, the negative association may be a result of multiple partners and sexual experiences raising expectations that undermine the current sexual quality in marriage. Rather than providing more…
/r/AllPillDebate23/10/23 11:30 PM
49

Society (both men and women) have a pronounced bias in favor of women and against men. Women have a significantly higher in-group bias than men, who have virtually no in-group preference. . Across five studies (N = 5,204), we investigated implicit evaluations of targets varying in race, gender, social class, and age. Overall, the largest and most consistent evaluative bias was pro-women/anti-men bias… An integrative data analysis highlighted a number of moderating factors, but a stable pro- wome…
/r/MensRights22/10/23 01:01 PM
21

Most of feminism is hypocritical today.
/r/MensRights16/10/23 09:17 AM
1

No problem. Share it as you please.
/r/MensRights22/09/23 04:42 PM
4

This study finds dramatic unexplained gender gaps in federal criminal cases. Conditional on arrest offense, criminal history, and other pre-charge observables, men receive 63% longer sentences on average than women do. Women are also significantly likelier to avoid charges and convictions, and twice as likely to avoid incarceration if convicted. There are large unexplained gaps across the sentence distribution, and across a wide variety of specifications, subsamples, and estimation strategies. T…
/r/MensRights22/09/23 08:26 AM
3

When it’s convenient for them to do so.
/r/MensRights20/09/23 04:24 AM
4

You are scared of the truth. The scientific consensus is that the number of lifetime sexual partners is a strong predictor of future infidelity.
/r/AllPillDebate31/08/23 11:26 PM
2

You didn’t disprove anything with those quotes.
/r/AllPillDebate31/08/23 11:25 PM
1

Body count is a strong predictor of infidelity and divorce. Promiscuity and Infidelity Factors found to facilitate infidelity Number of sex partners: Greater number of sex partners before marriage predicts infidelity As might be expected, attitudes toward infidelity specifically, permissive attitudes toward sex more generally and a greater willingness to have casual sex and to engage in sex without closeness, commitment or love (i.e., a more unrestricted sociosexual orientation) are also reliabl…
/r/MensRights10/08/23 01:35 AM
3

It does matter.
/r/MensRights10/08/23 01:29 AM
2

My husband is religious and I told him I’d only been with one guy before him. My brother’s friend told him everything when they got drunk together on my brother’s stag do. He came back very angry and told me he knew everything and asked me if I was seeing anyone else. I told him no and md he said he can’t trust me. Horror story if true.
/r/MensRights10/08/23 12:41 AM
4

Which is why men need to share this info with eachother. https://archive.ph/mPOLf https://archive.ph/3grGe
/r/MensRights06/08/23 10:05 AM
6

Indeed. That’s what the theory points to In the sexual quality area, where the association with the number of sexual partners is the strongest, the negative association may be a result of multiple partners and sexual experiences raising expectations that undermine the current sexual quality in marriage. Rather than providing more meaningful experience, understanding, and eventually higher levels of quality in the sexuality area, having multiple sexual partners appears to be associated with poore…
/r/TheRedPill06/08/23 10:02 AM
8

Multiple peer-reviewed journal articles and books by academics attest to what’s being said.
/r/MensRights04/08/23 11:46 PM
6

Other dudes need to be made aware. https://archive.ph/mPOLf https://archive.ph/3grGe As it stands, men are instructed to subordinate their own interests to those of women by ignoring their histories. Women already discriminate based on men’s histories and yet modern society deems any similar preference exhibited by men to be deeply misogynistic.
/r/MensRights04/08/23 11:14 PM
8

Previous research pointed to a variety of individual and social variables to explain the relationship between premarital sex and divorce, including nontraditional views on sex and marriage, weaker religious attachments, and lower-quality family relationships (Kahn & London, 1991; Paik, 2011). We find no support for these explanations, and show that the effect of premarital sex remains highly significant after accounting for a wide range of individual and social differences between respondents. (…
/r/MensRights04/08/23 08:42 PM
11

The West only seems to be outraged when it’s a woman who’s executed.
/r/MensRights28/07/23 11:37 PM
2

Women have higher in-group preference than men. High in-group preference is associated high out-group derogation. Couple that with a society that condemns misogyny but celebrates misandry, and you’ll understand why men have insanely high suicide rates. Although men, historically and cross-culturally, are the dominant sex, they possess remarkably weaker in-group bias than do women. In four experiments, we found this sex difference persisted using both implicit and explicit measures, despite using…
/r/MensRights26/07/23 10:53 PM
43

If a man was the main breadwinner, paying the brunt of the costs, and he refused to pay for his wife’s vacation costs because she split her time evenly between work and hobbies, he’d be raked over the coals.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 09:53 PM
48

TwoX is a misandrist shithole. We live in a society where you are allowed to demonize certain groups but not others. Remember: women are murdered by men every day. No one will protect you from men except yourself. [+12.6k] https://archive.ph/FohLf From the bottom of my heart, I hate men. [+156] I hate men and I always will… I hate men and I don’t care if that makes me a bigot or sexist. I hate all of them. https://archive.ph/NA53a My boyfriend thinks reddit is the reason I hate men [+1.6k] https…
/r/MensRights18/06/23 10:46 PM
3

Men have been conditioned to not look after their own interests.
/r/MensRights18/06/23 10:43 PM
10

Liberal women cheat more. Nevertheless, “extremely liberal” women (23.6%) are more than twice as likely to have engaged in extramarital affairs as “extremely conservative” (10.0%) or “conservative” (8.8%) women. Kanazawa, S. (2012, November 18). Why Are Liberals Twice As Likely to Cheat As Conservatives? Big Think. https://web.archive.org/web/20121123075923/https://bigthink.com/e-pur-si-muove/why-are-liberals-twice-as-likely-to-cheat-as-conservatives . This moral double standard varies among wom…
/r/MensRights23/05/23 07:44 PM
2

They are never convinced. They lie to themselves and to others. Send this wisdom to your fellow man.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/04/23 07:45 PM
24

Body Count and Infidelity: https://archive.ph/H9cJM Body Count, Dissatisfaction and Divorce: https://archive.ph/lgwYz Paternity Uncertainty: https://archive.ph/bRSMC Sociosexual Orientation: https://archive.ph/FtwFW Body Count, STDs, and other negative health correlates: https://archive.ph/Ti7VK Pareto (80/20) rule: https://archive.ph/BiYBo Desire for alternatives: https://archive.ph/uL5U5 Women discriminate based on sexual history too: https://archive.ph/or4GF Women’s Sexual Strategies: https:/…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/03/23 08:02 AM
6

To you. I’d bet that most people would find blocking those who demonstrate from the fore that they’re unwilling to engage with you in a civil and mature fashion to be a reasonable course of action.
/r/AllPillDebate18/03/23 10:42 PM
2

I don’t see it that way.
/r/AllPillDebate18/03/23 10:38 PM
5

Nah. Just insta-block people who engage in ad hominems right off the bat because they generally aren’t interested in engaging in good faith, in my experience. Also, this line should’ve tipped you off that he was unwilling to engage the sources. My initial plan was to read all the sources and do big owns, epic style on losers. I don’t waste my time engaging with people like this.
/r/AllPillDebate18/03/23 10:30 PM
0

For the record, I blocked OP because his first replies were uncivil when I didn’t say anything to disrespect him or anyone else. As a rule, I don’t engage with people who are hostile right out of the gate. I just block and move on. Yes it was an approach to citation and referencing I hadn't encountered before. Luckily I was able to parse it and jumped on in to learn about why I should be a hysterical loser about body counts and immediately discovered why the style of citation and referencing was…
/r/AllPillDebate18/03/23 10:12 PM
5

There are 16 peer reviewed articles in the first link alone.
/r/AllPillDebate18/03/23 08:36 PM
14

Surveys and peer-reviewed articles published in scholarly journals have shown that both men and women have preferences when it comes to the sexual histories of their partners. Men and women are more or less equally reluctant to partner up with people possessing extensive sexual histories, and heterosexual women are far less likely than men to date partners with few-to-no experiences or same-sex experiences. For the most part, however, only men’s preferences in this regard are subject to social s…
/r/MensRights18/03/23 06:38 PM
31

Body count is the strongest predictor of infidelity, divorce, dissatisfaction, in addition to STDs, substance abuse disorders, mental health issues, etc. Those with unrestricted sociosexual orientations (considered by psychologists to be a stable personality characteristic) tend to separate sex from intimacy, find it more difficult than commit to monogamous relationships, and have higher rates or relationship dissatisfaction, making infidelity significantly more likely. Men historically avoided …
/r/Divorce_Men13/03/23 11:47 PM
11

Body count is the strongest predictor of infidelity, divorce, dissatisfaction, in addition to STDs, substance abuse disorders, mental health issues, etc. Those with unrestricted sociosexual orientations (considered by psychologists to be a stable personality characteristic) tend to separate sex from intimacy, find it more difficult than commit to monogamous relationships, and have higher rates or relationship dissatisfaction, making infidelity significantly more likely. Men historically avoided …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/03/23 10:27 PM
1

It would be a miracle if she saw the inside of a cell.
/r/MensRights11/03/23 05:28 PM
156

Body count is the strongest predictor of infidelity, divorce, dissatisfaction and STDs. Factors found to facilitate infidelity Number of sex partners: Greater number of sex partners before marriage predicts infidelity As might be expected, attitudes toward infidelity specifically, permissive attitudes toward sex more generally and a greater willingness to have casual sex and to engage in sex without closeness, commitment or love (i.e., a more unrestricted sociosexual orientation) are also reliab…
/r/MensRights28/02/23 11:43 AM
4

Unsurprising
/r/MensRights16/01/23 09:27 PM
5

Women possess a remarkably strong in-group bias. Men posses virtually no in-group bias, and large swathes of men are biased in favor of women. This translates to men and women seeing infidelity perpetrated by women as generally less bad, and how the overwhelming majority of both men and women support men always paying for the first date. Both sexes generally prioritize women. People with high in-group preference is correlated with high out-group derogation, which is why feminists endorse stateme…
/r/MensRights30/12/22 04:26 AM
9

59% of women said that promoting an inclusive society is more important than protecting free speech, whereas 71% of men said that protecting free speech is the more important value. Moreover, 58% of college men said it is never acceptable to shout down a speaker, whereas only 41% of women agreed that it is never acceptable to do so… a majority of men believe that colleges should not protect their students from offensive ideas, whereas a majority of women believe colleges should. Male students ra…
/r/MensRights26/12/22 06:48 AM
2

Damn. Telegraph could be an immensely useful website to rapidly disseminate information. Reddit blocking it would be an extreme shame.
/r/MensRights26/12/22 06:29 AM
9

Just added it. Thanks. Interestingly enough, it’s female researchers who expose these double standards and inequities disfavoring men, while it’s men who reinforce those inequities.
/r/MensRights26/12/22 06:26 AM
3

Telegraph or archive?
/r/MensRights26/12/22 04:36 AM
-3

Salvation comes from the right
/r/MensRights25/12/22 02:15 PM
3

Kill with a borrowed knife (借刀殺人, Jiè dāo shā rén) Attack using the strength of another when in a situation where using one's own strength is not favourable. For example, trick an ally into attacking them or use the enemy's own strength against them. The idea is to cause damage to the enemy via a third party.
/r/MensRights25/12/22 02:00 PM
9

Men need to have higher group preference like women already do, or we’re fucked. Although men, historically and cross-culturally, are the dominant sex, they possess remarkably weaker in-group bias than do women. In four experiments, we found this sex difference persisted using both implicit and explicit measures, despite using a gender attitude IAT that was unconfounded with gender stereotypes… we can claim with confidence that even when men are responding automatically, their in-group bias is s…
/r/MensRights24/12/22 07:14 PM
1

Generally speaking, yeah.
/r/MensRights24/12/22 09:16 AM
1

“Physics strongly values male-socialized traits such as independence, competition, and individual victories,” they write, adding that “objectivity and rationality themselves, the foundations of scientific ideology, are also male-socialized traits.” Unironically based.
/r/MensRights24/12/22 03:25 AM
12

They inflate the problem for strategic reasons.
/r/MensRights23/12/22 01:01 PM
13

If you understand that this is a zero sum game—only a finite amount of resources can be allocated to and attention can be directed at any given cause at a time—then it makes sense to minimize the influence of those competing causes and to maximize concern for your own cause. The only real exception to this is when you form coalitions (intersectionality), which tend to benefit the causes belonging to that coalition. Also, these social justice movements rely on narratives of hierarchies, with domi…
/r/MensRights08/12/22 07:32 PM
3

Crazy bitch
/r/AntiFeminists04/12/22 07:19 PM
43

Women don’t want to lose their monopoly on victimhood.
/r/MensRights03/12/22 11:35 PM
7

I don’t actually care to make women care about men’s issues. It’s evident that most are incapable of actually feeling empathy for men. Men’s salvation is in other men. There’s really no reason to give a fuck about women’s issues for the aforementioned reasons.
/r/MensRights03/12/22 11:28 PM
6

That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence. Blocked.
/r/MensRights03/12/22 09:12 PM
24

Both men and women are judged for their looks
/r/MensRights03/12/22 09:10 PM
14

Can you source that this is a common phenomenon or do I just have to accept your anecdotes?
/r/MensRights03/12/22 09:08 PM
18

How do you know they didn’t?
/r/MensRights03/12/22 08:50 PM
11

By artificial, I mean that they didn’t achieve their positions solely through merit like men. The Vox article below describes how there were 6 million women in positions they otherwise would not have without affirmative action. That was in 1995, so I imagine the number is in the tens of millions now. Likewise, in STEM, female candidates are given preferential treatment. We’re transitioning from a meritocracy to a femocracy where less competent women get positions they don’t deserve. Contrary to …
/r/MensRights03/12/22 08:40 PM
18

Even with that artificial boost, men still outcompete women. If the game was decided by merit alone, significantly less women would occupy the positions they currently occupy.
/r/MensRights03/12/22 08:21 PM
20

Women are no longer oppressed. Instead, they’re coddled and propped up in the modern milieu.
/r/MensRights03/12/22 05:58 PM
23

You need to only read the first two paragraphs. The rest (after the bolded print) are just sources.
/r/MensRights03/12/22 04:19 PM
105

Maybe feminists should stop pretending that women are the perpetually oppressed class then when that’s clearly not the case.
/r/MensRights03/12/22 04:14 PM
7

Women have never followed the rules they’ve imposed on men. That’s why I don’t care when men are hypocrites too.
/r/MensRights02/12/22 05:53 PM
24

We live in an era where people deny fundamental truths. This needs to once more become widespread knowledge amongst men.
/r/TheRedPill01/12/22 03:03 PM
17

The point is that there is a percent increase in the likelihood of infidelity for every additional dick. What that increase is depends on the study, but it definitely adds up. If she’s been with 20+ guys, it’s safe to assume that she’s incapable of staying faithful and will cheat down the line.
/r/TheRedPill01/12/22 02:45 PM
20

Nearly three-quarters (73 percent) of young women say it is always morally wrong for a man to have an affair, while only about half (51 percent) say the same for a woman. Gray, K. (2022, October 12). A moral double standard on marital infidelity. The Survey Center on American Life. https://www.americansurveycenter.org/a-moral-double-standard-on-marital-infidelity/ . Although men, historically and cross-culturally, are the dominant sex, they possess remarkably weaker in-group bias than do women. …
/r/MensRights29/11/22 09:38 PM
1

No.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 06:04 PM
8

Piggybacking, surveys and peer-reviewed articles published in scholarly journals have shown that both men and women have preferences when it comes to the sexual histories of their partners. Men and women are more or less equally reluctant to partner up with people possessing extensive sexual histories, and women are far less likely to date men who have little-to-no experience or same-sex experiences than men are to date women with those same qualities. For the most part, however, only men’s pref…
/r/MensRights16/11/22 03:10 AM
14

The answer is fraternal organizations.
/r/MensRights14/11/22 03:43 AM
11

It’s almost like they don’t care about men…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/11/22 01:17 AM
4

Surveys and peer-reviewed articles published in scholarly journals have shown that both men and women have preferences when it comes to the sexual histories of their partners. Men and women are more or less equally reluctant to partner up with people possessing extensive sexual histories, and women are far less likely to date men who have little-to-no experience or same-sex experiences than men are to date women with those same qualities. For the most part, however, only men’s preferences in thi…
/r/MensRights09/11/22 01:00 AM
2

Statistically speaking, a high number is a strong predictor of relationship dissatisfaction, instability and infidelity. It’s the second best predictor of future infidelity aside from a history of cheating. Factors found to facilitate infidelity Number of sex partners: Greater number of sex partners before marriage predicts infidelity As might be expected, attitudes toward infidelity specifically, permissive attitudes toward sex more generally and a greater willingness to have casual sex and to …
/r/AllPillDebate08/11/22 07:40 PM
11

double standards are okay if they only hurt men That’s literally the case. That’s why feminists don’t have a problem with gender disparities in criminal sentencing, and why they rally against gender neutral rape laws in Britain and India. Why oppose inequities that favor your in-group? They know what’s up. We don’t. Women discriminate against promiscuous partners at similar rates as men Thus, contrary to the idea that male promiscuity is tolerated but female promiscuity is not, both sexes expres…
/r/AntiFeminists05/11/22 08:26 PM
46

Women have preferences too. Preferences are only sexist when men express them. Women discriminate against promiscuous partners at similar rates as men Thus, contrary to the idea that male promiscuity is tolerated but female promiscuity is not, both sexes expressed equal reluctance to get involved with someone with an overly extensive sexual history. (pg.1097) Stewart-Williams, S., Butler, C. A., & Thomas, A. G. (2017). Sexual History and Present Attractiveness: People Want a Mate With a Bit of a…
/r/AntiFeminists05/11/22 08:22 PM
0

If you’re a straight male, why would you think?
/r/ExRedPill06/10/22 05:05 PM
1

This isn’t a fight against women. You’re just deliberately and dishonestly framing it this way.
/r/ExRedPill06/10/22 08:50 AM
1

Psychology
/r/ExRedPill06/10/22 08:03 AM
0

I have a master’s in this shit.
/r/ExRedPill06/10/22 07:49 AM
0

If I posted statistics about men being physically abusive, would you accuse me of hating men?
/r/ExRedPill06/10/22 07:42 AM
0

Women are allowed to weigh men’s histories already. Only men are discouraged from doing so.
/r/ExRedPill06/10/22 06:17 AM
1

It’s because women with higher counts are several times likelier to cheat on a man, to divorce him, to be miserable in a monogamous relationship, and to give him a std. You can keep lying and pretend that’s not the case. I know the futility of providing statistics to people who blatantly lie about and deny these things. You want an answer? There’s your answer.
/r/ExRedPill05/10/22 11:32 PM
-1

Then explain how they’re being misinterpreted. Left-wingers just lazily make a claim as their refutation with no examples to back it up, or they just say, “correlation doesn’t equal causation,” thinking they’ve made an argument. If you’re mentally incapable of forming an actual argument with premises leading to a conclusion, just say so. Don’t just mindlessly parrot critiques you’ve heard elsewhere.
/r/ExRedPill05/10/22 08:40 PM
1

The majority of studies correlate body count to infidelity, divorce, chronic illnesses, relationship dissatisfaction, etc. You are simply lying that they’re not out there because you disagree with the scientific consensus.
/r/ExRedPill05/10/22 08:28 PM
-3

If it’s cherry-picked, pull up studies demonstrating the opposite. As to your ad homs, it may be that you’re too dumb to realize that you’re not making an argument.
/r/ExRedPill05/10/22 08:26 PM
1

I just hate dishonest fucks who constantly lie about this shit. It’s sociopathic.
/r/ExRedPill05/10/22 08:14 PM
1

Literally a lie. There are stats correlating her body count with infidelity, divorce, chronic illnesses, stds, relationship dissatisfaction, etc. Ehy do you guys just fucking lie about these things?
/r/ExRedPill05/10/22 08:10 PM
1

Here is what the scientists say: Factors found to facilitate infidelity Number of sex partners: Greater number of sex partners before marriage predicts infidelity As might be expected, attitudes toward infidelity specifically, permissive attitudes toward sex more generally and a greater willingness to have casual sex and to engage in sex without closeness, commitment or love (i.e., a more unrestricted sociosexual orientation) are also reliably related to infidelity (pg.71) Fincham, F. D., & May,…
/r/ExRedPill05/10/22 08:09 PM
0

Factors found to facilitate infidelity Number of sex partners: Greater number of sex partners before marriage predicts infidelity As might be expected, attitudes toward infidelity specifically, permissive attitudes toward sex more generally and a greater willingness to have casual sex and to engage in sex without closeness, commitment or love (i.e., a more unrestricted sociosexual orientation) are also reliably related to infidelity (pg.71) Fincham, F. D., & May, R. W. (2017). Infidelity in roma…
/r/ExRedPill02/10/22 09:34 PM
-1

Factors found to facilitate infidelity Number of sex partners: Greater number of sex partners before marriage predicts infidelity As might be expected, attitudes toward infidelity specifically, permissive attitudes toward sex more generally and a greater willingness to have casual sex and to engage in sex without closeness, commitment or love (i.e., a more unrestricted sociosexual orientation) are also reliably related to infidelity (pg.71) Fincham, F. D., & May, R. W. (2017). Infidelity in roma…
/r/ExRedPill02/10/22 08:38 AM
-7

Counterintuitively, women with colorful pasts tend to have better relationships This is the opposite of what just about every study says.
/r/ExRedPill02/10/22 08:34 AM
-10

It doesn’t matter because it’s in the past. Such an idiotic mindset.
/r/ExRedPill02/10/22 08:32 AM
0

You are responsible for this. Activist and author Cyrus Krohn appeared on Tucker Carlson Tonight to discuss H.B. 2288, which is currently in committee in Washington State. It deals with the establishment of school-based health centers. This bill will provide easy access to confidential physical and mental health services that children aged 13 and older can access without their parents’ consent. https://pjmedia.com/columns/stacey-lennox/2020/12/10/washington-state-bill-is-the-final-step-removing-…
/r/ExRedPill28/09/22 06:08 PM
0

Like lefties trying to give your sons hormones.
/r/ExRedPill28/09/22 01:37 PM
1

Cuckoldry is forbidden by Islam, brother.
/r/MensRights28/09/22 01:34 PM
2

I want people to do this.
/r/MensRights28/09/22 01:33 PM
-1

You can find most of these PDFs online for free. Read’em yourself. Find contrary evidence if this upsets you.
/r/ExRedPill28/09/22 01:59 AM
-5

The downstream effects will eventually come to your home. No man is an island. Ignore this at your own peril.
/r/ExRedPill27/09/22 11:26 PM
-3

First bullet point In Fincham they mention a well-substantiated concept known as sociosexual orientation, which explains why high-n women tend to cheat—promiscuity is a strong proxy for sociosexuality, which in turn predicts infidelity, dissatisfaction and relationship dissolution. Women with unrestricted SOs are capable of having sex without emotional attachments, and they tend to be unfaithful in committed relationships, having affairs while married. sociosexual orientation a dimension of pers…
/r/ExRedPill27/09/22 11:22 PM
1

I meant to respond to you, but a response to what I think your query was would take some time and effort. DM a link to the comment you want me to specifically respond to.
/r/ExRedPill27/09/22 10:41 PM
0

Studies—plural. Every study points to a correlation between the two.
/r/ExRedPill27/09/22 10:39 PM
-1

People are getting hurt. It’s an insanely unhealthy lifestyle that’s being promoted by sex-positives. When compared with their peers who report fewer partners, those who self-​report 20 or more in their lifetime are: Substantially less happy with life (p < 0.05) (pg.88-89) https://i.imgur.com/rxkpWM4.jpg Regnerus, M. (2017). Cheap sex: The transformation of men, marriage, and monogamy. University of Texas-Austin sociology prof. Mark Regnerus . There was a strong association between number of sex…
/r/ExRedPill27/09/22 10:34 PM
0

Shame and judgement are what keep the majority of people from relying on the public dole. It’s why people dress well and keep good hygiene. It’s why people don’t act like spazzes in public. It’s why we filter ourselves in conversation. Everyone judges. Everyone discriminates. Anyone who claims not to is either a liar or an idiot.
/r/ExRedPill27/09/22 10:23 PM
-2

People have strategically equated anti-communism to fascism. It’s a dirty, dishonest tactic, but it’s extremely effective.
/r/ExRedPill27/09/22 10:17 PM
2

That’s what I’m saying. Unfortunately, men are.
/r/ExRedPill27/09/22 10:16 PM
-3

Anti-leftism isn’t exclusive to the alt-right. Neither is anti-feminism.
/r/ExRedPill27/09/22 10:01 PM
-3

People are already shamed and judged, and more than that, judgement and shame are what keeps society functioning absent coercion. We’re just selective in who it’s ok to shame, and this generation has decided that women shouldn’t be, but men continue to be because we know it would all come crashing down if we weren’t. Shame has a function and utility.
/r/ExRedPill27/09/22 09:26 PM
-8

I want guys to know their preferences are as valid as women’s.
/r/ExRedPill27/09/22 09:08 PM
-9

The alt-right is a white supremacist/Neo-nazi movement. I have nothing in my history suggesting that I support white nationalism. Please don’t idiotically use words you’re unfamiliar with.
/r/ExRedPill27/09/22 08:33 PM
6

https://pastebin.com/swaMZ77k
/r/MensRights27/09/22 07:23 PM
7

Spread the good word. I’ll send you a pastebin if you’re interested. Or you can check out the pinned post in my history.
/r/MensRights27/09/22 06:55 PM
2

How is this a link/text post?
/r/MensRights09/08/22 09:30 PM
4

Western countries are female supremacist.
/r/MensRights06/08/22 01:55 AM
1

Do you have a low count yourself?
/r/ExRedPill21/07/22 12:23 AM
1

I would too.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 04:25 AM
2

Promiscuous women cheat. https://pastebin.com/j4xnut3D https://imgur.com/a/hPBWccf Factors found to facilitate infidelity Number of sex partners: Greater number of sex partners before marriage predicts infidelity As might be expected, attitudes toward infidelity specifically, permissive attitudes toward sex more generally and a greater willingness to have casual sex and to engage in sex without closeness, commitment or love (i.e., a more unrestricted sociosexual orientation) are also reliably re…
/r/MensRights11/07/22 03:59 AM
0

Leftists are inherently liars. Spread this word to your dear ones.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 05:47 PM
2

True. Our generation was the guinea pig for social media, dating apps, easily accessible high res porn, immersive online gaming—the obvious casualties being our attention spans, impulse control, sense of purpose and happiness.
/r/AntiFeminists08/07/22 02:42 AM
17

They’re still coddled
/r/AntiFeminists05/07/22 07:50 PM
10

Feminists rally against gender neutral rape laws, which is why female rapists don’t get charged for rape in the UK. In a previous issue of the Seattle Journal for Social Justice, Patricia Novotny discussed the issue of gender neutrality within rape statutes and its implications for women, men, and the relations between the two sexes.2 Gender neutrality within rape statutes is the concept that the criminal law should recognize that both men and women can be rape victims as well as perpetrators. G…
/r/AntiFeminists05/07/22 07:48 PM
6

https://pastebin.com/j4xnut3D https://imgur.com/a/hPBWccf Factors found to facilitate infidelity Number of sex partners: Greater number of sex partners before marriage predicts infidelity As might be expected, attitudes toward infidelity specifically, permissive attitudes toward sex more generally and a greater willingness to have casual sex and to engage in sex without closeness, commitment or love (i.e., a more unrestricted sociosexual orientation) are also reliably related to infidelity (pg.7…
/r/AntiFeminists05/07/22 03:57 AM
21

https://pastebin.com/6aeD21nf https://imgur.com/a/36bMnph “Contrary to conventional wisdom, when it comes to sex, less experience is better, at least for the marriage,” said W. Bradford Wilcox, a sociologist and senior fellow at the Institute for Family Studies (and an Atlantic contributor). In an earlier analysis, Wolfinger found that women with zero or one previous sex partners before marriage were also least likely to divorce, while those with 10 or more were most likely. https://i.imgur.com/…
/r/AntiFeminists05/07/22 03:56 AM
3

A lot of feminists just ignore the federal sentencing gap where guys are 2x likelier to go jail and receive 63% higher sentences when controlling for everything else; they rally against a gender neutral legal definitions of rape so that female-on-male rape won’t be recognized as rape; they downplay, minimize, and conceal the levels of female-on-male domestic violence, etc., etc. They’re not just ignoring men’s issues. They’re actively trying to fuck men over because they hate men. very few femin…
/r/MensRights05/07/22 03:43 AM
59

If we lived in an equal society, she wouldn’t be described as a “glamorous heiress” (should read “rapist”) who “had sex” (should read “raped”) a fourteen year old boy 4 times. I wonder if Australia is like the UK where feminists like Anabelle Mooney and Patricia Novotny rally against gender neutral definitions of rape so that women who rape men and boys won’t be charged for rape. In a society actually concerned with equality between the sexes, that wouldn’t be the case, but we know that was neve…
/r/MensRights01/07/22 10:09 PM
1

https://pastebin.com/j4xnut3D https://imgur.com/a/hPBWccf Factors found to facilitate infidelity Number of sex partners: Greater number of sex partners before marriage predicts infidelity As might be expected, attitudes toward infidelity specifically, permissive attitudes toward sex more generally and a greater willingness to have casual sex and to engage in sex without closeness, commitment or love (i.e., a more unrestricted sociosexual orientation) are also reliably related to infidelity (pg.7…
/r/AntiFeminists30/06/22 08:45 PM
6

Sluts cheat. It is crucial to your well-being that you understand this. https://pastebin.com/j4xnut3D https://imgur.com/a/hPBWccf Factors found to facilitate infidelity Number of sex partners: Greater number of sex partners before marriage predicts infidelity As might be expected, attitudes toward infidelity specifically, permissive attitudes toward sex more generally and a greater willingness to have casual sex and to engage in sex without closeness, commitment or love (i.e., a more unrestricte…
/r/AntiFeminists30/06/22 10:38 AM
11

It’s not just about you learning it. It’s about your brothers learning it, their brothers learning it and so on and so forth. If men are going to have any hope in the coming century, it’ll be through developing a shared consciousness and sense of brotherhood that women already possess. Every 21st-century man should know this, so spread it far and wide.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 09:02 AM
8

Pass it around. The more men who become aware, the better. https://pastebin.com/UsYHk7s3 the odds ratio of 1.13 for lifetime sexual partners obtained with the face-to-face mode of interview indicates that the probability of infidelity increased by 13% for every additional lifetime sexual partner (pg.150) https://i.imgur.com/ZhxoqNv.jpg Whisman, M. A., & Snyder, D. K. (2007). Sexual infidelity in a national survey of American women: Differences in prevalence and correlates as a function of method…
/r/MensRights30/06/22 08:13 AM
4

https://pastebin.com/6aeD21nf “Contrary to conventional wisdom, when it comes to sex, less experience is better, at least for the marriage,” said W. Bradford Wilcox, a sociologist and senior fellow at the Institute for Family Studies (and an Atlantic contributor). In an earlier analysis, Wolfinger found that women with zero or one previous sex partners before marriage were also least likely to divorce, while those with 10 or more were most likely. https://i.imgur.com/ryafAmP.jpg Khazan, O. (2018…
/r/MensRights30/06/22 04:06 AM
10

https://pastebin.com/j4xnut3D https://imgur.com/a/hPBWccf Factors found to facilitate infidelity Number of sex partners: Greater number of sex partners before marriage predicts infidelity As might be expected, attitudes toward infidelity specifically, permissive attitudes toward sex more generally and a greater willingness to have casual sex and to engage in sex without closeness, commitment or love (i.e., a more unrestricted sociosexual orientation) are also reliably related to infidelity (pg.7…
/r/MensRights30/06/22 04:05 AM
51

Slutty women cheat. https://pastebin.com/j4xnut3D https://imgur.com/a/hPBWccf Factors found to facilitate infidelity Number of sex partners: Greater number of sex partners before marriage predicts infidelity As might be expected, attitudes toward infidelity specifically, permissive attitudes toward sex more generally and a greater willingness to have casual sex and to engage in sex without closeness, commitment or love (i.e., a more unrestricted sociosexual orientation) are also reliably related…
/r/MensRights30/06/22 03:47 AM
23

My friends call it Cuck Theory. Television and media normalize women’s infidelity which in turn causes it to rise irl. Tony Soprano, Walter White, Marty Byrde, the cast of Vikings—all cucks. Women in younger generations are cheating more than men nowadays. Every day, more women are having sex with men other than their husband. Younger women, under 25, and women over the age of 60 are cheating more than ever before… female infidelity has progressively increased, to the point where current estimat…
/r/MensRights28/06/22 07:55 PM
8

Know her history. https://pastebin.com/j4xnut3D Factors found to facilitate infidelity Number of sex partners: Greater number of sex partners before marriage predicts infidelity As might be expected, attitudes toward infidelity specifically, permissive attitudes toward sex more generally and a greater willingness to have casual sex and to engage in sex without closeness, commitment or love (i.e., a more unrestricted sociosexual orientation) are also reliably related to infidelity (pg.71) https:/…
/r/MensRights23/06/22 03:19 PM
2

Spread the good word, brother.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/06/22 05:08 PM
71

She did highlight an especially fucked up and unsurprising aspect of U.K. law where women who force men to penetrate them aren’t guilty of the crime of rape. If the gender roles were reversed, Dave’s experience – being forced to have penetrative sexual intercourse against his will – would be legally classified as rape. But the Sexual Offences act in England and Wales makes a key gendered distinction on rape. Current legislation states that a person can be found guilty of rape if “he intentionall…
/r/MensRights20/06/22 06:55 PM
25

She was found guilty of evidence tampering after cleaning up the scene of the killing at their Winter Park home, and will be sentenced for that offense in September. Danielle claimed that Michael stabbed himself on January 11, 2019, after finding flirty text messages from another man on her phone. She later said he had a heart attack. She then changed her story, to insist it was self defense, admitting she stabbed him in the shoulder but saying he was strangling him at the time. Images and video…
/r/MensRights19/06/22 02:11 AM
7

Hatred of men is culturally permissible and encouraged even. Female chauvinism is currently more pervasive than male chauvinism. It’s hard not to notice the current reversal and yet leftists still have the gall to lie to your face and pretend it’s just equality.
/r/AntiFeminists16/06/22 04:30 PM
17

This isn’t for them. This is for your fellow man. All sensible men need to be made aware of this. Pass it along.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/06/22 12:17 PM
65

https://pastebin.com/j4xnut3D Factors found to facilitate infidelity Number of sex partners: Greater number of sex partners before marriage predicts infidelity As might be expected, attitudes toward infidelity specifically, permissive attitudes toward sex more generally and a greater willingness to have casual sex and to engage in sex without closeness, commitment or love (i.e., a more unrestricted sociosexual orientation) are also reliably related to infidelity (pg.71) https://i.imgur.com/vCvZm…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/06/22 09:21 PM
1

Humans can experience all of the above-mentioned varieties of pair bonds. These bonds can be temporary or last a lifetime. Pair bonding is a behavioral and physiological bond between two mated individuals, and is rare among non-human primates.[3] Humans also engage in social pair bonding, where two individuals will form a close relationship that does not involve sex.[4] In humans and other vertebrates, pair bonds are created by a combination of social interaction and biological factors including…
/r/ExRedPill29/05/22 08:18 PM
4

Having a new species of worm named after you is considered an honor. The article is lamenting the fact that so few are named for female scientists compared to male scientists. Quit being a moron.
/r/MensRights14/05/22 04:22 AM
17

The feminist movement is fundamentally an idpol movement: Identity politics is a political approach wherein people of a particular gender, religion, race, social background, social class, environmental,[1] or other identifying factors, develop political agendas that are based upon these identities. Such groups often have support from allies outside the respective identity groups. The term is used in a variety of ways to describe phenomena as diverse as multiculturalism, women's movements, civil …
/r/MensRights29/04/22 03:04 AM
28

It was never about equality. Almost a mantra at this point.
/r/AntiFeminists06/04/22 06:41 AM
4

Becoming a doctor is “going all in on academics.”
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/22 01:09 AM
8

Those who would consider dating a trans person versus those who would not differed significantly on three additional variables: sexual identity, gender identity, and religion. To assess differences across sexual identity, participants were grouped into three categories: gay/lesbian, heterosexual/straight, and bisexual/queer/two-spirit. Those identifying as queer, bisexual, or two-spirit were most likely to indicate a willingness to date trans individuals (55.2%), followed by gay men and lesbian …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/22 11:02 AM
-7

Lesbians are hot
/r/AntiFeminists23/03/22 03:08 PM
2

While the studies do prove that marrying a woman with a history of cheating will lead to a marriage ending in infidelity *with a history of promiscuity are likely to cheat
/r/MensRights22/03/22 05:02 AM
2

How does this relate to mens rights? Men aren’t allowed to express these preferences while women are. Just cause someone, male or female, has a lot of partners doesn’t mean they won’t stay faithful. Do you understand the difference between a probability and a certainty? And it sure as hell doesn’t diminish their value as a partner. If anything having a little experience makes them a better partner cuz they’ll know what they like and what they don’t. Study after study shows this is not true. You …
/r/MensRights22/03/22 03:13 AM
3

The fact that men aren’t allowed to express the preferences.
/r/MensRights22/03/22 03:09 AM
5

They’re linked.
/r/MensRights22/03/22 03:08 AM
1

They lie. All they do is lie.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 06:21 PM
1

Cope
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 06:18 PM
1

Trust yer gut, not yer mind. Let’s invade Iraq.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 06:18 PM
4

Women are allowed to weigh a man’s history. Men are not allowed to do so in turn. It was never about equality.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 06:16 PM
1

There’s no obvious ways of detecting if a woman’s a cheater. Women are evolutionarily adapted to be better at hiding their infidelities to their providers. https://phys.org/news/2019-04-bare-faced-women-infidelity.html https://nypost.com/2019/04/17/women-are-better-at-hiding-their-cheating-study The reason why you got “wrong” is because you’re desperately grasping in the face of overwhelming contrary evidence indicating that your position is wrong. You didn’t deserve this response.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 06:11 PM
1

Only 1/3 of women lie and they’re mostly sluts. You need to be attentive to the other cues and tells.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 05:56 PM
1

More ad homs pls 😂😂😂. Demonstrate to others that you’re incapable of mounting any meaningful counter-argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 05:54 PM
1

Wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 05:50 PM
8

Men looking after their own interests instead of subordinating them to women’s in every situation gives MRAs a bad name, according to mattgk39.
/r/MensRights21/03/22 05:07 PM
1

These preferences aren’t expressed with receiving ridicule, male expresser’s history nonwithstanding. That’s why ALL men need to understand that their feelings are worthy and not to be discounted with prejudice as they are now.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 05:04 PM
1

You’re accusing men of being insecure for desiring faithful partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 04:55 PM
3

Within sex levels of infidelity are greater than between sex levels. Promiscuous women are more likely to cheat than non-promiscuous males.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 04:30 PM
1

The fact that men are accused of insecurity for wanting faithful partners is surely a sign of the end times.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 04:28 PM
3

Pretending that there’s no in-between for virgins and high n women is the oldest strawman in the world. Not worth responding to other than pointing out it’s a strawman.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 04:25 PM
2

But the OP does not include in his post that, in the studies and articles says that, still men are more likely to cheat than women and still over 10 percentile points ahead of cheating women numbers. Are you making up shit?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 04:23 PM
3

This person you’re responding to is a gaslighter methinks.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 04:22 PM
3

if all women are sluts and all sluts are cheaters This guy can be safely ignored as he’s perfectly willing to erect stawmen and completely distort your views until they resemble nothing of what you said. I’ve already blocked him.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 04:21 PM
1

Women judge based on no history, too much history, history with other men and a history with prostitutes. They don’t see the individual in any of those cases. These are extremely useful heuristics (rules-of-thumbs) in determining if someone would make for a suitable LTR.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 04:19 PM
2

Feminism is just one face of Leftism, and the ultimate goal of Leftists is to undermine the nations in which they live. That’s why they try to get rid of the meritocracy, why they try to subvert the family unit, why they sympathize with criminals more than their victims, why they simp(ed) for dictators like Stalin, Mao, Pot, Castro, etc., why they denied and facilitated genocides abroad like the Cambodian, Bosnian, and, currently, the Uighur Genocide. In practice, there’s little difference betwe…
/r/MensRights21/03/22 04:09 PM
0

I’m *hoping people do actually read them. Then they can easily see that you’re making shit up.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 03:54 PM
4

7-13% per additional partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 03:51 PM
2

Only LVMs go for sluts (LVFs).
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 03:12 PM
1

They are closely related however. Some authors defend that infidelity may come as a consequence of promiscuity, and that frequently both concepts go side by side (Feldman and Cauffman 1999, Mark et al. 2011). Pinto, R., & Arantes, J. (2017). The Relationship between Sexual and Emotional Promiscuity and Infidelity. Athens Journal of Social Sciences, 4(4), 385–398. https://doi.org/10.30958/ajss.4-4-3 Sluts cheat. It’s what they do. Sluts cheat. It’s what they do.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 03:10 PM
7

Other men need to become aware of this. That’s why included the pastebin link. Spread the good word.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 03:07 PM
2

No one is suggesting that one should marry a virgin, just not a slut.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 03:05 PM
5

Welcome to the Evolutionary Social Psychology (ESP) Lab at Michigan! We conduct experimental research on a variety of psychological topics that are informed by evolutionary thinking. In doing so, we ask not only what people do, but why and how our ancestral histories might have influenced such behaviors. That’s EvoPsych. I suggest that you become slightly acquainted with this field before doing the usual millennial thing where you screech at and deny all upsetting pieces of information. https://…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 03:02 PM
5

This is why I don’t date men. Thank god.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 02:48 PM
6

Are you seriously struggling with understanding why infidelity is bad for marriages?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 02:47 PM
2

You admitted to hating us modern men: So whine about us hating you more, you did it to your fucking selves. https://archive.ph/FVypt We know that there are a lot like yourself who hate men for simply existing.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 02:41 PM
5

And yet all elite universities have evolutionary psychology labs. https://psychology.fas.harvard.edu/research-themes/evolutionary-psychology https://www.cep.ucsb.edu/ https://sites.lsa.umich.edu/esplab/ https://labs.la.utexas.edu/buss/ https://esclab.tulane.edu/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolutionary_psychology_research_groups_and_centers I guess you have greater insight than all the Ivy League PhDs that have higher IQs and more degrees than you have 🤣🤣🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 02:37 PM
10

So whine about us hating you more, you did it to your fucking selves. https://archive.ph/FVypt I’m just grateful that you’re willing to admit that you hate men and hold modern men accountable for historical oppression. That’s the key component of racist hatred, national hatred, sexist hatred, etc.—you hate individuals belonging to that group because you see them as part of the collective and not as individuals. Modern men are deserving of any cruelty directed to them because historically men hav…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 02:27 PM
7

Sexually active woman bad don’t trust woman? There’s a difference between limiting sexual activity to LTRs and sleeping with a new guy every week. The latter makes you unlikely to remain faithful in relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 02:20 PM
7

More women are cheating than ever before, rising by more than 40% between 1990 and 2010 while men’s infidelity remained constant, and where millennial women have surpassed millennial men in infidelity, being the first cohort of women to do so, men need to know who to trust if they want their kids to be theirs. Men are averse to these women due to evolutionarily ingrained fears of paternity fraud. The cavemen that didn’t care got cucked. evolutionary psychologists (e.g., Buss and Schmitt 1993; Sy…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 02:16 PM
9

It does affect you. Even in a broader sense, it affects you. Infidelity is the number one cause for divorce across nations. Single parent households that result from divorce result in suboptimal rearing settings for kids producing suboptimal outcomes. Kids from single parent homes are more likely to engage in recreational drug use and crime. These downstream effects are felt by everyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 02:12 PM
3

No disagreement there. But the prerogative that men should have is discouraged and frowned upon by modern society while the prerogative for women is encouraged.
/r/MensRights21/03/22 02:04 PM
11

the risks range from ostracism to death. If you’re suggesting that this is still the case in Western nations, this conversation shouldn’t continue because you’re obviously incapable of arguing in good faith. But FTR, a man who is obsessive is not a desirable partner. It just reeks of insecurity and controlling behavior which women find as repellent In a few years, you’ll be arguing that men who care about their partners cheating on them are repellent and undesirable. When the information is lite…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 01:44 PM
6

They still cheat because that desire for variety and novelty never goes away. That’s why you’re always hearing about the wives of NFL players stepping out and why Ben Goldsmith got cucked. Sluts cheat. It’s just their nature and they shouldn’t be chastised for it.
/r/MensRights21/03/22 01:33 PM
15

men who aren’t obsessed with infidelity fantasies. The statistics would indicate these are more than just fantasies. Women will just spread the word This is definitely an arms race between the sexes, and most men aren’t even aware of how great women’s in-group preference is or just how much a lot of women hate men. This information is too great to possibly ignore for men, and it’s really just a matter of getting men to spread this to other men. Women will adjust and become more discreet in their…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 01:29 PM
7

Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 01:22 PM
3

Women have upper and lower limits of what’s acceptable. Women with restricted SOs tend to reject high n dudes. The majority of women reject no n dudes and dudes that have sucked dick in the past.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 01:07 PM
14

In a few years it will be if that’s not already the case. That’s why good men need to spread this info to other men. That’s why the pastebin has been included.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 01:04 PM
11

They have the chance to pursue open relationships and yet many don’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 01:03 PM
6

It’s their MO to lie and deny. The only recourse is to bury their lies with overwhelming evidence to the contrary. This information needs to become widespread and yet there are only a few men willing to spread it.
/r/MensRights21/03/22 01:01 PM
5

Women don’t get bullied and ridiculed for their preferences.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 12:46 PM
12

The only predictor for future infidelity is a history of infidelity The experts, scholars, academics, scientists and statisticians say otherwise and yet you deny reality in typical millennial fashion.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 12:20 PM
12

But this isn’t as apparent to our slower brothers, so we need to make them understand with cold hard statistical fact.
/r/MensRights21/03/22 12:09 PM
19

Date/marry quality women who are unlikely to cheat/divorce.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 11:45 AM
15

Only 7% of women exceed 20 by 25. Not everyone has stds.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 11:44 AM
22

These are life-saving heuristics for men. They may not be perfect on every occasion but they are useful in most.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 11:30 AM
32

She is less at risk compared to a girl with 20+ partners. These aren’t certainties, just probabilities. Someone with a 90% chance of winning still has a 10% chance of losing, but they’re more likely to win than someone with just a 10% chance of winning. Understand?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 10:58 AM
46

This tells you which women you can’t trust but it presupposes that there are plenty of trustworthy women. Low n (<10) women are generally faithful. High n (>20) women, according to university professor Mark Regnerus, are more likely to cheat on you and divorce you than not. In an era where more women are cheating than ever before and where millennial women surpassed millennial men in infidelity, being the first cohort of women to do so, men need to know who to trust if they want their kids to be…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 10:45 AM
6

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nsfg/key_statistics/n-keystat.htm https://www.businessinsider.com/average-number-of-sex-partners-2015-4 https://www.stadafa.com/2020/07/this-week-we-take-look-at-number-of.html?m=1 https://theconversation.com/other-people-are-having-way-way-less-sex-than-you-think-they-are-101153 https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Median-number-of-opposite-sex-sexual-partners-in-lifetime-by-age-and-sex_fig6_7517094 https://ifstudies.org/blog/promiscuous-america-smart-secular-and-somewha…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 10:38 AM
25

Behaviors are a better predictors of infidelity than attitudes. This has been determined and replicated over and over in studies.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 10:35 AM
26

They cheat at lower rates. Would you rather marry someone who has a 90% chance of cheating or a person with just a 9%?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 10:25 AM
7

It’s not unrealistic to expect her not to have been with 10+ dudes. If I told you that you were being unrealistic for desiring an attractive partner, would you start pursuing fatties?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 10:24 AM
13

It’s not unrealistic to desire a partner that hasn’t been with more people than their age in years. The majority of women don’t exceed double digits, so 10 is a good cutoff for a man who desires not to be cheated on.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 10:12 AM
16

These stats are only relevant to those who desire sexual exclusivity in their relationships, not to polyamorous and voluntary cuckolds.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 09:33 AM
1

Idgaf about the masturbatory musings of a non-scientist. A truism in psychology is that the best predictor of future behavior is past behavior. This is no less true in the realm of sexual behavior. Indeed, one of the strongest predictors of marital infidelity is one’s number of prior sex partners Haselton, M. G., Buss, D. M., Oubaid, V., & Angleitner, A. (2005). Sex, Lies, and Strategic Interference: The Psychology of Deception Between the Sexes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(1)…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 05:09 AM
0

oh
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/22 10:39 AM
2

Why were you single in your forties in the first place?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/22 06:15 AM
6

10 or 100 or 1000 guys If a woman told you that she’d been with 1000 guys, you truly would think nothing of it?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/22 06:10 AM
1

Haselton et al. (2005) wrote: A truism in psychology is that the best predictor of future behavior is past behavior. This is no less true in the realm of sexual behavior. Indeed, one of the strongest predictors of marital infidelity is one’s number of prior sex partners (excerpt). Buss and Schmitt (2018) would later affirm this: Men apparently assess and evaluate levels of sexual activity by a woman prior to long-term commitment—behavior that would have been observable or known through social re…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/22 06:07 AM
1

UVA sociology professor W. Bradford Wilcox told award-winning writer of Atlantic Olga Khazan (2018): Contrary to conventional wisdom, when it comes to sex, less experience is better, at least for the marriage (screenshot) UofU sociology professor Nicholas Wolfinger (2018) wrote: The residents of Promiscuous America are predictable in many ways. They’re less likely to be married and more likely to be divorced. (screenshot) In addition to being a strong predictor of women’s infidelity, women’s num…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/22 06:06 AM
1

Because there’s a strong relationship between one’s number of lifetime sexual partners and infidelity/divorce. Suffering a little discomfort now instead of wasting years of your life and potentially losing half of your income seems to be the best course.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/22 06:03 AM
1

UVA sociology professor W. Bradford Wilcox told award-winning writer of Atlantic Olga Khazan (2018): Contrary to conventional wisdom, when it comes to sex, less experience is better, at least for the marriage (screenshot) UofU sociology professor Nicholas Wolfinger (2018) wrote: The residents of Promiscuous America are predictable in many ways. They’re less likely to be married and more likely to be divorced. (screenshot) In addition to being a strong predictor of women’s infidelity, women’s num…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/22 06:00 AM
1

Statistically, it’s a bad idea regardless.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/22 05:59 AM
6

Haselton et al. (2005) wrote: A truism in psychology is that the best predictor of future behavior is past behavior. This is no less true in the realm of sexual behavior. Indeed, one of the strongest predictors of marital infidelity is one’s number of prior sex partners (excerpt). Buss and Schmitt (2018) would later affirm this: Men apparently assess and evaluate levels of sexual activity by a woman prior to long-term commitment—behavior that would have been observable or known through social re…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/22 05:57 AM
2

Apparently, only the histories of men should matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/22 05:55 AM
1

The 2018 Dr. Ed survey found some 29% of people said you should never have to tell your number to your partner, whereas 54% of people said you must tell your number to your partner. https://amp.mindbodygreen.com/articles/the-ideal-number-of-sexual-partners-for-men-women
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/22 05:49 AM
1

Leftists try to remove meaning from words. That’s what you’re witnessing rn.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/22 03:32 PM
3

As a bad ltr prospect.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/22 06:18 AM
11

I think you’re just repeating words you’ve heard elsewhere but have no solid grasp of.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/22 06:11 AM
9

It’s not irrelevant. You’re saying that men should fight because men are the ones starting these wars. By that logic, a woman should never be a head of state because heads of state need to make these decisions. Are you still not comprehending?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/22 05:32 AM
11

Are you arguing that women shouldn’t be heads of state because individuals in those positions must make military decisions?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/22 05:19 AM
1

Tests detect diseases after the fact and not before. It’s not preventative when you’ve been with tons of casual partners. The fact that you haven’t denied it is a soft confirmation that you have at least one crotchular disease btw.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 01:29 PM
2

Most men don’t want a std.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 12:43 PM
2

Women tend to enumerate while men approximate. You would still exceed the number of the overwhelming majority of men (85%). It is unlikely that you haven’t contracted at least one venereal disease. Your husband is a braver man than I.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 12:30 PM
1

You would be in the 97th percentile, according to the Slate sex calculator. Median number of opposite-sex partners in lifetime among sexually experienced women aged 25-49 years of age: 4.3 Percentage distribution of sexually experienced women 25-49 years of age with 15+ opposite-sex sexual partners in lifetime: 12.9% https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nsfg/key_statistics/n-keystat.htm The median means half above and half below.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 06:31 AM
-5

Improbable. Statistically, most people (>50%) want to know and it is usually divulged within the first five months.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 02:48 AM
41

Men are disposable
/r/MensRights11/03/22 09:30 PM
2

Don’t you forget it
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 10:59 AM
1

Still baseless. Produce a study. From what we know, high n women are significantly more likely to cheat and divorce.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/22 07:44 PM
1

I’m not trying to distress you. That was never my intent. If that happened, I’m sorry.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/22 07:08 AM
1

If that’s true, that was pretty shitty of your ex.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/22 04:54 AM
1

You’re fixating on word choice. You still would not want to date such a person which is the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/22 04:41 AM
1

Plenty of women cheat after years of a dead bedroom where their husbands wouldn’t touch them. They too have my sympathies. Spousal neglect in all its forms is unfortunate. This is evidence of a severe lack of empathy and human emotion. You are deeply disturbed and either need help or jail. Do armchair psychologists bill after a psychoanalyzing other people’s comments? Do you charge by the word?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/22 04:40 AM
1

Sexually repulsed. Romantically repulsed. Are you capable of carrying a conversation in context?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/22 03:31 AM
1

Baseless claim
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/22 11:33 PM
1

Middle-aged single mother is still single because she falls below the standards of guys who meet her standards. If you’re in the market and no one’s interested in buying what you’re selling, 1) Your goods are overpriced or 2) No one is interested in buying your goods at any price. This logic can just as easily be applied to a man. If you don’t have a relationship but you want one AND you’ve been putting yourself out there, it means your standards cannot be justified by your own personal value. Y…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/22 11:17 PM
1

Would you date a person with poor hygiene? Are you not repulsed by the notion?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/22 10:42 PM
1

It’s called pair bonding. And the scientific consensus, which you’re simply just ignorant of, is that it’s a strong predictor of infidelity and divorce.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/22 09:56 PM
1

I’m assuming there were more hits than misses.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/22 09:53 PM
1

People who value anecdotal experiences that are subject to cognitive bias/illusion/distortion over objective and empirical studies should just be ignored at this point.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/22 08:10 PM
2

Most women are <10, so it’s fine to have this hang up. Especially when it’s the case that you’re more likely than not going to be cheated on/divorced by a woman that’s past a certain threshold.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/22 08:06 PM

These are questions, not conclusions. I’m asking them because I don’t know. In this question, you are suggesting that it was my own personal worth that was at fault for the fact of a bad person being attracted to me. You also assume that I should have known this maniac was a maniac even though we all know maniacs hide that shit. You take all the blame for him being a bad person and put it on me. You presumably were attracted to him as well, and women usually settle for the best guys they can get…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/22 07:13 PM

Why were you only capable of marrying trash? Are you bad at selecting partners or…? Why did he start fucking prostitutes in the first place? Why was he sexually unfulfilled? Why are you unable to secure a high value partner now? I can’t comment on your specific circumstances other than to say that you probably aren’t as high value as you think you are, and I’m not trying to hurt you by saying that.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/22 07:22 AM

There’s a reason you’re a single mom at 44.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/22 03:30 AM
1

Have you ever cheated on a dude?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/22 12:22 PM
0

Practically a virgin
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/22 03:51 AM
-1

Women with unrestricted sociosexual orientations predominately report a sexual motive and not a relationship motive when it comes to infidelity. Those with unrestricted SOs generally need novelty and variety, experiencing steep declines in satisfaction while in monogamous relationships. You are literally an uninformed arrogant dumbshit that thinks he knows better than academics who devote years of their lives to studying this shit. You and low IQ arrogant dumbshits like yourself who try to speak…
/r/MensRights20/02/22 09:49 PM
1

Instead, you come back with women are whores, I never stated this. What I have an issue is you posted it in a way to look men look good over women. Work on the sexism a bit before you throw stones bud. You’re interpreting this as an attack on women because you’re an illiterate moron. It’s not.
/r/MensRights20/02/22 09:08 PM
5

Peer-reviewed publications cited: Athanasiou, R., & Sarkin, R. (1974). Premarital sexual behavior and postmarital adjustment. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 3(3), 207–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01541486 . Busby, D. M., Willoughby, B. J., & Carroll, J. S. (2013). Sowing wild oats: Valuable experience or a field full of weeds? Personal Relationships, 20(4), 706–718. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12009 . Cohen, J., & Manning, W. (2010). The relationship context of premarital serial cohabitation. I…
/r/MensRights20/02/22 08:58 PM
5

This is a dude who doesn’t want to be made to feel bad for his choices. So much so that he encourages others to repeat his mistakes, which is despicable.
/r/MensRights20/02/22 04:03 PM
2

Men are taught to not look after their own interests. They need to understand that their feelings are perfectly valid on this.
/r/MensRights20/02/22 09:09 AM
11

It says that a high count is a strong predictor of infidelity, which is an empirical fact.
/r/MensRights20/02/22 09:06 AM
3

You appear to tolerate the notion of getting cheated on, so you’re a cuck in addition to being an idiot. In any case, it’s best that you don’t reproduce.
/r/MensRights20/02/22 08:19 AM
6

130+ upvotes, so it’s pretty well received. If you’re a guy that thinks this info is immaterial, you’re so fucking stupid that I don’t see a point to continue this conversation.
/r/MensRights20/02/22 08:02 AM
-2

but wtf does this have to do with men’s rights Everything.
/r/MensRights20/02/22 05:46 AM
3

Happy sluts still cheat
/r/MensRights20/02/22 05:45 AM
2

Peer-reviewed articles cited: Athanasiou, R., & Sarkin, R. (1974). Premarital sexual behavior and postmarital adjustment. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 3(3), 207–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01541486 . Bailey, J. M., Kirk, K. M., Zhu, G., Dunne, M. P., & Martin, N. G. (2000). Do individual differences in sociosexuality represent genetic or environmentally contingent strategies? Evidence from the Australian twin registry. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(3), 537–545. https://doi.…
/r/MensRights20/02/22 03:34 AM
3

Cite specifically what you’re referring to. Btw, here are the divorce stats: UVA sociology professor W. Bradford Wilcox told award-winning writer of Atlantic Olga Khazan (2018): Contrary to conventional wisdom, when it comes to sex, less experience is better, at least for the marriage (screenshot) UofU sociology professor Nicholas Wolfinger (2018) wrote: The residents of Promiscuous America are predictable in many ways. They’re less likely to be married and more likely to be divorced. (screensho…
/r/MensRights20/02/22 03:32 AM
2

https://m.imgur.com/rxkpWM4 50% divorce rate + 33% infidelity rate = >50% divorce and/or infidelity rate Dumbass
/r/MensRights20/02/22 03:19 AM
2

Why are you talking about divorce when this post is about infidelity?
/r/MensRights20/02/22 03:13 AM
28

Honestly, a guy who invests in learning lie tells, who pays attention to what she says in the long run, who knows the correlates and pays attention to her friends can probably figure it out. People are willfully ignorant.
/r/MensRights20/02/22 01:38 AM
5

Women with 20+ partners have over a 50% chance of cheating on you and/or divorcing you per UT Austin prof. Mark Regnerus’ book.
/r/MensRights20/02/22 01:08 AM
6

They are more likely to cheat. If you bothered to read any of the papers linked, you’d know that the consensus is that those feelings were adaptive.
/r/MensRights20/02/22 12:07 AM
10

That’s fine. But if you LTR a girl that’s been with with 50, 100, or 1000 guys with the expectation of sexual exclusivity then you’re simply a fool. In the same way that a guy who’s forgiven an adulterous wife for the umpteenth time with the expectation that she won’t reoffend, you’re simply a fool. You’re gambling and you suck at it.
/r/MensRights19/02/22 11:38 PM
11

You find the content of the message distressing for what I assume are personal reasons. The method of “delivery” isn’t what bothers you so much as the fact that it’s being delivered at all. This is crucial information that is in men’s best interests to know. Men need to understand that their preferences aren’t invalid in the face of a society that expects them to subordinate their own interests to those of women in every situation.
/r/MensRights19/02/22 11:10 PM
13

Ridicule and ostracism.
/r/MensRights19/02/22 11:03 PM
0

No one’s arguing for virginity. Obvious strawman is obvious.
/r/MensRights19/02/22 10:59 PM
12

Here's Why Women Are Bad Deliberate misconstrual.
/r/MensRights19/02/22 10:57 PM
10

I didn’t have to read the post to know it’s bullshit You dismissed 17 peer review studies and numerous blog posts by college professors, researchers, and doctors because what they said made you upset. You’re a person who espouses pseudoscientific views and denies the expert consensus on topics that you have zero background in.
/r/MensRights19/02/22 10:55 PM
21

Mods removed it
/r/MensRights19/02/22 10:53 PM
27

These preferences are always framed as illegitimate, illogical and misogynistic. It’s usually emphatically stated that it has no bearing on the person when that simply isn’t true. Men are ridiculed for possessing preferences that prioritize their own interests and security. They are expected to subordinate their interests to those of women.
/r/MensRights19/02/22 08:02 PM
43

Guys are socially penalized for possessing these preferences while women are not. Men need to understand that their feelings are not invalid.
/r/MensRights19/02/22 07:33 PM
5

Nah. Women already have different expectations of men than they do of themselves. A guy can screen out trash with his own history not withstanding.
/r/TheRedPill11/02/22 06:45 PM
5

Women prefer guys who are taller than them and who make more than them. Asymmetrical preferences are normal. Slutty dudes can marry chaste women.
/r/TheRedPill11/02/22 02:53 PM
11

Women who’ve only been with their husbands are statistically the least likely to cheat and divorce.
/r/TheRedPill11/02/22 01:33 PM
7

Guys who marry women with 20+ partners have an over 50% chance of getting cheated on and/or divorced.
/r/TheRedPill11/02/22 12:56 PM
1

Because even if the answer is 'only' 3, she know knows that you know shes banged 3 other dudes. A good girl wont be proud of even banging 3 dudes, you being the 4th. So what now? 3 would be ideal. A guy having a problem with 3 is an idiot. while doing damage to even the good girls with potential. If she’s fucked 20+ dudes, there was no potential to begin with. I get that you’re a pussy that would rather blindly invest years of your life and tens of thousands worth of resources in a girl, but any…
/r/TheRedPill11/02/22 06:53 AM
49

Guys with high counts are more likely to find girls with low counts than guys with low counts. Guys with low counts usually have less options, so when they settle they have to do so with trash. That’s why you’re seeing this phenomenon of guys who are virgins settling with women that have 30+ bodies. Most of them will be miserable and be cheated on. So it goes.
/r/TheRedPill11/02/22 04:27 AM
30

In their moments of honesty, the women this applies to admit to this. Most of them aren’t capable of loving people in the long term or exclusively. What’s interesting is that academics also say this, and our ancestors already knew this.
/r/TheRedPill11/02/22 04:21 AM
17

A guy in a position to filter out high n girls has options. You only settle for one if you can’t do better in which case you deserve to be cheated on.
/r/TheRedPill11/02/22 01:17 AM
1

≥10
/r/AntiFeminists11/02/22 01:06 AM
1

I never advocated that you shouldn’t investigate further. Like I said elsewhere on this post, a high number answer is a confirmation of a high number but a low number answer isn’t a confirmation of a low answer.
/r/TheRedPill10/02/22 11:49 PM
1

Still, reading your other replies in this thread leads me to believe you can’t discuss this objectively or in good faith. It sounds like you have a personal stake in this being wrong, so you’re willing to lie your ass off and employ any dishonest argument you can use against it. Thing is, this isn’t even controversial among academics.
/r/AntiFeminists10/02/22 11:38 PM
40

Probably. But if you’re in the market for a LTR that you intend to spend years of your life with, this information is more precious than gold.
/r/TheRedPill10/02/22 11:10 PM
7

If you want kids and family, you should marry. Otherwise, there’s no point. They aren’t all sluts, statistically speaking, but from what I’ve read the slut-to-non-slut ratio is tipping in favor of the sluts. Behave accordingly.
/r/TheRedPill10/02/22 11:09 PM
3

Life is rife full of uncertainties. Realizing you have to work with probabilities instead of guarantees is an important part of maturation.
/r/TheRedPill10/02/22 11:04 PM
1

His reasoning is that we shouldn’t investigate because an accurate answer isn’t guaranteed. This is the perfect solution fallacy. The perfect solution fallacy is a logical fallacy that occurs when an argument assumes that a perfect solution exists and/or that a solution should be rejected because some part of the problem would still exist after it was implemented. https://en-academic.com/dic.nsf/enwiki/358573 Just because you aren’t guaranteed to get the honest answer doesn’t mean you shouldn’t …
/r/TheRedPill10/02/22 10:59 PM
5

Peer-reviewed articles cited: Athanasiou, R., & Sarkin, R. (1974). Premarital sexual behavior and postmarital adjustment. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 3(3), 207–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01541486 . Bailey, J. M., Kirk, K. M., Zhu, G., Dunne, M. P., & Martin, N. G. (2000). Do individual differences in sociosexuality represent genetic or environmentally contingent strategies? Evidence from the Australian twin registry. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(3), 537–545. https://doi.…
/r/TheRedPill10/02/22 10:43 PM
32

Peer-reviewed publications cited: Athanasiou, R., & Sarkin, R. (1974). Premarital sexual behavior and postmarital adjustment. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 3(3), 207–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01541486 . Busby, D. M., Willoughby, B. J., & Carroll, J. S. (2013). Sowing wild oats: Valuable experience or a field full of weeds? Personal Relationships, 20(4), 706–718. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12009 . Cohen, J., & Manning, W. (2010). The relationship context of premarital serial cohabitation. I…
/r/TheRedPill10/02/22 10:40 PM
12

Peer-reviewed articles cited: Athanasiou, R., & Sarkin, R. (1974). Premarital sexual behavior and postmarital adjustment. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 3(3), 207–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01541486 . Busby, D. M., Willoughby, B. J., & Carroll, J. S. (2013). Sowing wild oats: Valuable experience or a field full of weeds? Personal Relationships, 20(4), 706–718. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12009 . Cohen, J., & Manning, W. (2010). The relationship context of premarital serial cohabitation. In So…
/r/AntiFeminists10/02/22 10:25 PM
1

No one claimed it was similar to having a criminal history. You’re either low IQ or incapable of discussing this in good faith. In any case, I advise others not to feed this troll.
/r/AntiFeminists10/02/22 10:02 PM
1

It’s a bad bet.
/r/AntiFeminists10/02/22 09:55 PM
-4

I really hate dumb people who speak out of their asses.
/r/TheRedPill10/02/22 01:34 PM
8

Forgotten wisdom.
/r/TheRedPill10/02/22 11:54 AM
1

You’re using a probability that you just pulled from your own ass.
/r/TheRedPill10/02/22 10:55 AM
5

A high number answer is a confirmation of a high number but a low number answer is not a confirmation of a low number. If she provides a low number answer, further investigation is required if you’re considering investing in her. This is pretty simple, dude. Why do you want to invest in a girl that’s fucked a hundred dudes? Why would you take no precautions to avoid that?
/r/TheRedPill10/02/22 09:38 AM
4

Who cares if your girlfriend is cheating on you? That shouldn’t concern you!
/r/TheRedPill10/02/22 05:06 AM
8

Instead of calling people cucks for not drinking his well researched thesis, OP should be asking himself why his post reads like it's been written by magnetradio. I’m calling people cucks for thinking this isn’t worth asking about or knowing if you intend to invest in a girl. If you don’t want to invest in a girl, that’s fine. This post isn’t for you. If you are, you should ask. Stats show that the odds that a higher count girl will tell the truth is 50/50. If she tells the truth, good. Now you …
/r/TheRedPill10/02/22 05:05 AM
6

What was your point in posting this? Everyone cheats at some point or another. You’re right. You should ltr the girl that’s cheated in every previous relationship. If you find her in bed with another dude, forgive her. Humanity will be better off with such an immense pussy like yourself not reproducing.
/r/TheRedPill10/02/22 02:24 AM
10

Not all high count women lie. If even half told the truth, the question’s worth asking. There are hundreds of posts per day of dudes feeling sick after learning their girlfriends hooked up with 50+ guys in college. If women were are lying, these posts wouldn’t exist. Just because you get off on the idea of your girl fucking other dudes behind your back doesn’t mean you should push it on other guys. Take that cuck shit elsewhere.
/r/TheRedPill10/02/22 02:19 AM
2

These guys get off on the idea of being cucked.
/r/TheRedPill10/02/22 01:51 AM
15

If it’s 100, you would and should reconsider. Just like if she were to tell you that she used to let homeless guys run trains on her. If you wouldn’t reconsider whether she’s marriage material in light of that knowledge, you’re a braindead moron who shouldn’t be reproducing.
/r/TheRedPill10/02/22 01:50 AM
0

Not all women lie. It’s stupid not to ask.
/r/TheRedPill10/02/22 01:48 AM
32

Statistically, this isn’t true. Women who’ve been with a ton of dudes are more likely to lie. Those who’ve been with a handful or less are less likely to lie.
/r/TheRedPill10/02/22 01:10 AM
1

You can ask for context too. You’re not limited to one question.
/r/TheRedPill10/02/22 12:46 AM
86

This is a mindblowingly stupid take if you’re looking for a suitable LTR.
/r/TheRedPill10/02/22 12:21 AM
2

They import mail order brides from Eastern Europe or Southeast Asia who spend inordinate amounts of time with their very attractive “siblings.”
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/21 08:00 PM
1

Statistics. I must have statistics.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/21 04:56 PM
1

I had one guy I was chatting with online talk about my 3 sexual partners as if it was so disgusting I don't understand his mentality. If everything else checked out, I'd be ecstatic to if provided with this information and I somehow knew it was true.
/r/ExRedPill23/12/21 10:27 PM
1

I just lost interest after you started your anthropology lecture.
/r/ExRedPill23/12/21 07:33 PM
1

Subtract the religious girls, low sex drive/asexual women, and women who marry young and likely permanently off market and it's significantly larger. As you get older, the dating pool increasingly becomes dominated by women with baggage and those bags are filled with a lot of dicks.
/r/ExRedPill23/12/21 04:26 PM
1

Thank you
/r/ExRedPill23/12/21 04:14 PM
1

Further, this study has also place that thresholds in 13 partners among people with LOW Sociosexual Orientation, which is telling. Specifically, which part?
/r/ExRedPill23/12/21 03:52 PM
1

The Wolfinger source says 18% of married women are over 10. Can you read tables? The CDC has the number at roughly 25% (11.6+12.9) for women between 25 and 49. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nsfg/key_statistics/n-keystat.htm
/r/ExRedPill23/12/21 03:43 PM
1

No, because most women aren't promiscuous. When you eliminate the religious/regular churchgoers, you start to realize this isn’t so much the case. The percentage of women marrying with a double digit number of partners is roughly an order of magnitude (10x) more than it was during the seventies. Women’s infidelity has increased by 40% in the last thirty years while the men’s rate has remained stable, and younger generations of women have closed and reversed the infidelity gap, with married mille…
/r/ExRedPill23/12/21 02:50 PM
1

This is about selecting partners who are less likely to be unfaithful and are better disposed for monogamous, stable and happy relationships. Promiscuous women generally don’t make for good LTR material because they’re significantly likelier to cheat and divorce.
/r/ExRedPill23/12/21 12:44 PM
1

https://twin.sci-hub.st/6703/81810101db1d3e5891fec6afaeb1cd0f/stewart-williams2016.pdf
/r/ExRedPill23/12/21 12:36 PM
-1

Why is your focus just on women though? Because I don’t fuck dudes, consider them prospective partners or really care if they get around. This information to me is only useful when determining if a girl I’m interested in would likely (because this is a probabilities and not a certainty game) make for LTR material. A lot of dudes use the “double digit dicks” as an arbitrary cutoff. If the number of dicks that she’s voluntarily allowed inside her (obviously sexual assaults don’t count because they…
/r/ExRedPill23/12/21 12:32 PM
1

I actually reference the first study you mentioned in a later part where I refute the “you’re either a prude/virgin or a slut” myth. Guys (and girls) usually want some experience but not too much. TRPers are NOT normal people and the obsession with promiscuity as well as the glorification of virginity has to come from other source, that source being that promiscuous women remind them of their feelings of inadequacy and jealousy for slut's lifestyle. It is a fact no matter how much decontextualiz…
/r/ExRedPill23/12/21 12:20 PM
-1

Okay, fine. But guys who get around usually get around because they’re sexy. Good luck convincing women that they’re not worth pursuing. If I were a woman with a restricted sociosexual orientation, I likely wouldn’t pursue a partner like that. Unfortunately, I don’t fuck dudes and aren’t into them, so I couldn’t care less what it says about guys.
/r/ExRedPill23/12/21 12:12 PM
1

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anecdotal_evidence
/r/ExRedPill23/12/21 05:17 AM
0

I may not agree with you, I may get frustrated by what you post, but if there's one point I hope to get across to you, it's that I genuinely sympathize and want your life to be better, whoever you are. Lol. Fuck you. My main criticism here, as with so much of TRP, is that these studies give you an easy way out of actually grappling with your humanity. Instead, it boils down all the richness and complexity of the human experience into an X and a Y axis -- into "these people can be trusted, and th…
/r/ExRedPill23/12/21 05:13 AM
2

Women are welcome to have whatever preference they want. In fact, women with restricted sociosexual orientations prefer partners with lower body counts. This is called assortative mating, and they’re usually not bullied for their preferences. Only men get shit for not wanting to date promiscuous women and only men get bullied for having preferences and standards. Only men are called insecure and misogynistic for not wanting a partner that is significantly more likely to cheat on them, make them …
/r/ExRedPill23/12/21 04:46 AM
-4

Because I don’t fuck dudes and because heterosexual dudes pursue relationships with women and not dudes. Also, they don’t fuck dudes.
/r/ExRedPill23/12/21 04:34 AM
0

I never argued in favor of a causal relationship. My only point is that it’s not remotely controversial that it’s a strong and useful predictor of infidelity among social scientists. Summarizing the current state of research on the prediction of infidelity, Fincham and May (2017) listed a greater number of sexual partners in their list of demographic factors found to facilitate infidelity, writing that permissive attitudes toward sex, a greater willingness to have casual sex and to engage in sex…
/r/ExRedPill23/12/21 02:11 AM
0

There’s a lot of research suggesting that the anxiety caused by investing in promiscuous women is inherited and evolutionarily adaptive. Due to paternal uncertainty, the men who invested in non-promiscuous women were less likely to be cuckolded (raising kids that weren’t theirs) as part of a paternal assurance strategy. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/1-Human-paternal-assurance-tactics_tbl1_232525537 Interestingly enough, a site that teaches guys to deal with retroactive jealousy provides a …
/r/ExRedPill23/12/21 01:40 AM
-5

If I told you that at least half of individuals belonging to X category cheat in any given relationship while only 5% of people belonging to Y cheat in any given relationship, you’d be a fool to not take that into consideration. As Buss said, men did not invest in those types of women because of their increased risk of infidelity. A woman with an unrestricted sociosexual orientation seeks variety and novelty in partners and can have sex without intimacy or closeness (decreasing the threshold to …
/r/ExRedPill23/12/21 01:21 AM
0

There’s a dearth of factual information pretty much everywhere. This topic like so many others is dominated by uninformed, anti-intellectual arrogant dumbfuck ideologues who can give less of a shit about the expert consensus even when they have zero background on a topic.
/r/ExRedPill23/12/21 12:41 AM
-3

Heritage Foundation studies do not count any subsequent marriages after a divorce Nothing cited is from heritage. I have neither the time not energy to look at every source, but even amongst academic sources not all are created equal and the parameters of what counts as extramarital and the (very common in conservative papers) 'lifetime partners' being used instead of 'pre-marital' which is quite different are all things worth considering when looking at this sort of data. Or even a single one i…
/r/ExRedPill23/12/21 12:36 AM
1

Peer-reviewed articles cited: Athanasiou, R., & Sarkin, R. (1974). Premarital sexual behavior and postmarital adjustment. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 3(3), 207–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01541486 . Busby, D. M., Willoughby, B. J., & Carroll, J. S. (2013). Sowing wild oats: Valuable experience or a field full of weeds? Personal Relationships, 20(4), 706–718. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12009 . Cohen, J., & Manning, W. (2010). The relationship context of premarital serial cohabitation. In So…
/r/ExRedPill23/12/21 12:23 AM
1

Peer-reviewed articles cited: Athanasiou, R., & Sarkin, R. (1974). Premarital sexual behavior and postmarital adjustment. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 3(3), 207–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01541486 . Bailey, J. M., Kirk, K. M., Zhu, G., Dunne, M. P., & Martin, N. G. (2000). Do individual differences in sociosexuality represent genetic or environmentally contingent strategies? Evidence from the Australian twin registry. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(3), 537–545. https://doi.…
/r/ExRedPill22/12/21 11:18 PM
34

Correct. They’re more honest feminists who simultaneously want to preserve all of women’s gains in the last century while also preserving many of the benefits conferred to women under the patriarchy. Men must court, pay for dates (going Dutch is derided), invest heavily in terms of labor, time, and resources before physical relations are even on the table (even when they’ve been easy for other dudes in past), earn more, etc. “Leveling up” doesn’t mean self-improvement, but rather greater entitle…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/21 09:03 PM
27

The adultery sub is majority women on a male majority site. This is why n is so important.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/21 06:11 PM
1

Peer-review articles cited: Athanasiou, R., & Sarkin, R. (1974). Premarital sexual behavior and postmarital adjustment. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 3(3), 207–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01541486 . Busby, D. M., Willoughby, B. J., & Carroll, J. S. (2013). Sowing wild oats: Valuable experience or a field full of weeds? Personal Relationships, 20(4), 706–718. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12009 . Cohen, J., & Manning, W. (2010). The relationship context of premarital serial cohabitation. In Soci…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/21 01:04 AM
1

Women are allowed to care about sexual histories while men are not.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/21 01:56 AM
1

TRT
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/21 03:45 AM
2

It was graciously restored by the mods upon appeal.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/21 08:10 PM
1

It’s a smart move if you want a long, stable relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/21 06:15 PM
3

High libido monogamous women exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/21 06:14 PM
2

Also not looking for a "spouse" and don't care about something as inferior as men, I am letting them entertain me with their clownish ways. 😂😂 . Why would women want an inferior creature as a "man" around? These are things that you’ve said. I almost didn’t respond because I know I’m taking the troll bait, but I’m only doing so because it’s so obvious. In the scenario that you actually believe this, you’re not a person to be taken seriously. If you’re not serious, then by default you shouldn’t be…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/21 11:31 AM
2

Troll elsewhere. I’m 75% sure that you’re a dude pretending to be a chick.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/21 10:51 AM
2

People like to act like those who value n aren’t interested in context. The line of inquiry doesn’t need to stop there.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/21 08:35 AM
3

If you say so. The reason why guys who are only looking for an easy lay skip out on these types of girls is because, and you’re going to have to forgive my language, think they’re not considered “ruined” or “spoiled” yet. It’s the same reason why guys who sleep around treat a lot of the easier girls they sleep with like dogshit. You may think it’s shitty, but the simple logic is that what makes a “loose” woman a great short-term partner is the exact same thing that makes her a poor long-term one…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/21 07:36 AM
3

Yeah, stop doing that.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/21 06:34 AM
3

relationship_advice, dating, dating_advice—all trash, but I can tell you what they’d say in this situation, which is what I agree with. Delete all her contact info, block her on social media, and move on with your life.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/21 06:17 AM
11

No. Also, wrong sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/21 06:08 AM
8

To be fair, most of the studies that are linked here don't say what they are purported, have flawed methodology, etc. I’ve seen this lazy hand-waving so, so many times. It’s done by people who don’t know what they’re talking about, repeating things they’ve heard with others, like “flawed methodology” or “sampling error,” but they refuse to indicate which studies are actually flawed or go into depth about how that is. It is a very common Leftist tactic to be lazily dismissive of upsetting or cont…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/21 05:20 AM
22

That’s not it. There are plenty of dudes here who will wait for a girl with a low-to-no body count. If she had 2-3 boyfriends before that also had to wait, meaning she only puts out in LTRs, she’s basically going to be a virgin in the eyes of most rp dudes. N is a good proxy metric for fidelity in the long haul that must be looked at in tandem with other metrics when determining if someone is ltr material.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/21 05:11 AM
1

Yes. Guys can be hypocritical about this because women are hypocrites about a host of other things. If women won’t date guys who make less than them, guys can filter out women who’ve been with many partners irrespective of their own histories.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/21 05:07 AM
9

To be fair, most of the studies that are linked here don't say what they are purported, have flawed methodology, etc. You know what’s funny about leftists? They make these arrogant pronouncements that all the studies are flawed, but they’re always too lazy to actually point to a specific one and explain how that is. Most don’t even look at the sources because contradictory information is so upsetting that it must be false, so they’re basically lying when they say “faulty methodology” or “somethi…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/21 05:00 AM
2

This argument is addressed directly in part 6, which addresses and refutes common arguments people bring up, and indirectly in part 3, which dives heavily into sociology, sociobiology, biology, and evolutionary psychology behind why promiscuity and infidelity—part of a mixed short-term/long-term mating strategy—was so adaptive for the women who employed this strategy. Essentially, it is very difficult to gauge “cheating types” or the mate-poaching phenotype in women. Both men and women can succe…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/21 04:55 AM
1

Part 2 deals with marital dissolution, relationship stability and happiness. Everything had to be broken up because there were too many sources supporting each “prong” of this argument. I used to include divorce rate stats, but eventually hit the 10k limit, so breaking it into parts and narrowing their scopes became necessary.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/21 04:40 AM
3

You can be a hypocrite about it though. Most women won’t date shorter men or seriously date men who make less than them. Most don’t have a problem with the sentencing disparities between the sexes because they’re on the beneficial end of that. Most women still expect men to approach and to pay for dates. Guys therefore can have asymmetrical preferences like how women do.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/21 03:06 AM
9

That “yuck” factor is literally because of their high infidelity rates. Your ancestors who also had that yuck factor were significantly less likely to be cuckolded and more likely to have spread their genes into the next generation. Your aversion to dating one, which is actually quite common, is both hereditary and adaptive. That’s what guys here don’t understand.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/21 01:46 AM
1

The women who lead this kind of lifestyle tend to be significantly unhappier than the women who don’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/21 01:43 AM
7

It’s a myth that women are unconcerned. This will be addressed in part 5.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/21 01:40 AM
3

What we find sexually attractive is independent of what we consciously desire in life. Millions upon millions of evolutionary processes don’t suddenly stop working.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/21 12:27 AM
3

Desires that are evolutionarily programmed for millions of years don’t suddenly evaporate just because of a change in material conditions. You see this script in other mammals too. The females of a species prefer dominant males as mates to ensure the higher fitness of their offspring.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/21 12:24 AM
3

I don’t agree. I’ll delve into this more in part three with a ton of sources, but the consensus among evolutionary psychologists is that men placed a premium on low-to-no count women due to what’s referred to as a Paternal Assurance strategy in the face of paternal uncertainty. Effective contraception is a modern day development, and promiscuous wives significantly increased the chances of cuckoldry (male provider raising kids that weren’t his own). When women were engaging in a short-term matin…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/21 12:20 AM
5

I’ve looked for this actual study on their site: https://www.norc.org/NewsEventsPublications/Pages/published-research.aspx https://archive.is/SDVEU 7.8.2014 http://web.archive.org/web/20120212023730/http://www.statisticbrain.com/percent-of-female-infidelity-based-on-number-of-premarital-partners/ 8.2.2011 I couldn’t find it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/21 11:48 PM
9

That’s not what I’m saying. I’m saying that the higher the number, the higher the likelihood of infidelity when evaluating group trends.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/21 11:02 PM
5

Non-monogamous people should honestly be banned from these discussions. “We’ll it isn’t a problem in my relationship!” Yeah, no shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/21 10:32 PM
6

She is the vacuum in this analogy.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/21 09:27 PM
9

That’s fair. I personally care because I don’t like the idea of being with someone that would likely have sex with other dudes while we’re dating, but a lot of dudes find that kinky.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/21 08:53 PM
0

Feelings should never override facts, bro. I wish these truths never existed. I would happily marry a girl that let 600 guys inside of her every which way if it made no difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/21 08:47 PM
8

It’s due to a mixed mating strategy that is meant to maximize the evolutionary fitness of one’s offspring. This will be explained in part 3.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/21 08:37 PM
13

Peer-reviewed articles cited: Athanasiou, R., & Sarkin, R. (1974). Premarital sexual behavior and postmarital adjustment. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 3(3), 207–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01541486 . Bailey, J. M., Kirk, K. M., Zhu, G., Dunne, M. P., & Martin, N. G. (2000). Do individual differences in sociosexuality represent genetic or environmentally contingent strategies? Evidence from the Australian twin registry. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(3), 537–545. https://doi.…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/21 08:30 PM
1

I care about numbers more than visceral images. If she was having gangbangs with Somali pirates and letting homeless strangers run trains on her every weekend, I wouldn’t have a problem with it if it wasn’t so highly correlated with infidelity, relationship instability and mental illness. Unfortunately, these things don’t exist in a vacuum.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/21 08:24 PM
20

This is the gayest shit I’ve ever read
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/21 04:36 AM
1

A lot of wgtow are bi women who pretend they’re lesbian which can be hot from a certain viewpoint
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/21 02:44 AM
2

I’ve been around the block enough to know that isn’t the case. A lot of detractors of movements will just repeat common criticisms of those movements rather than investigating them themselves. And those common criticism are very often just wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/21 11:35 PM
6

People often mistake stereotypes and caricatures for the real thing
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/21 09:45 PM

So I'm a straight female. Me and this guy at work have a crush on each other and it's no secret to either one of us. My question is why do guys absolutely have to sleep with the girl? Why can't they feel validated just by knowing she is/was attracted? I would be fine if we never hooked up but I know he really wants it. I'm already hooking up with someone else exclusively and it has potential to go long-term and become serious. I hate women.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/21 11:05 PM
1

For how much?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 08:45 PM
1

It’ll be tough. You might have to compromise if you’re not in your late teens/early twenties.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/21 06:50 AM
1

Don’t interpret that as my being critical of your choices, though a stranger like myself’s opinion on the internet means little and less. Statistically, your choice leads to the happiest marriages and the lowest divorce rates. It’s just rare to see and not something you’d expect. I think the figure is like 1 in 20 women successfully hold out until marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/21 06:40 AM
-3

tmi
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/21 06:21 AM
2

As long as you adhere to the same standards and are not a hypocrite.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/21 05:24 AM
1

Honestly, they vary so wildly that I don’t think a single accurate representation is possible.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/21 09:57 PM
1

With the widespread availability of prophylactics and access to paternity testing, the risk of cuckoldry is low. The risk of infidelity is significantly higher, and infidelity is leading cause of marital dissolution. Sluts also make unhappier marriages.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/21 02:11 AM
1

I tend to cringe when people reduce religion to the worship of “magical sky daddies” even though I lost my own faith during my teens. People tend to fixate on the regressive aspects of organized religion in their condemnation of it at the expense of its adaptive benefits—a sense of purpose and fulfillment, belonging and identity, community, chastity, charity, temperance, moderation and opposition to vice, monogamy, increased lifespan, etc. It’s hard to contest its utility, which I’m not suggesti…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/21 01:01 AM
1

There’s something especially contemptible in prioritizing self interest over what appears to be the scientific consensus—especially in regards to forming healthy relationships. They’re trying to corrupt an entire generation because the opposite would be admitting that they’re less-than-adequate partners. They have a stake in perpetuating this lie, so they’re willing to push unhealthy lifestyles on kids. Fuck’em. I know I just repeated a lot of what you said, but this was already my thought proce…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/21 11:45 PM
1

They don’t need evidence. This info is unlikely to sway dumber people. People belonging to different rungs of intelligence need different routes of persuasion to change their thinking. Some just require platitudes that appear to have substance but really don’t. Others need for it to be the popular viewpoint, and they simply change their thinking to follow the crowd and not be unpopular. Others are swayed by the expert consensus and appeal to authority. Others carefully examine what’s out there a…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/21 11:07 PM
1

An entirely egocentric take. No one proclaims themself to be cheater. Most people who end up cheating in relationships don’t enter them intent on committing infidelity. It’s their permissive attitudes towards sex, ability to separate sex and love, and lower threshold to engage in sex (sans commitment) that makes them more likely to be unfaithful. There is no mark of a cheater or observable personality characteristic to distinguish them from non-cheaters. And the people who personally take offens…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/21 10:59 PM
1

He’s fucked hundreds of completely willing sex workers. That doesn’t bother you?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/21 05:18 PM
1

A history of infidelity wouldn’t concern you? Or of barebacking strangers? What if he’s had sex exclusively with prostitutes up until meeting you? If you found out he’d had been with 2000 women, would that bother you?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/21 04:55 PM
1

Well, you should… unless you have an extensive history yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/21 04:19 PM
0

Who’s attacking women? Imagine thinking self-preservation and not being a doormat = “attacking women”.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/21 03:26 PM
3

I won’t tell anyone what their dating preferences SHOULD BE. I don’t get to judge their lives and what attracts them as long as it doesn’t hurt anyone else. I expect the same. If your friend had the self-destructive habit of dating toxic guys, you wouldn’t speak up for her sake? Or if she was having unprotected sex with strangers? Am I not allowed to think someone’s being a dumbass for doing that? Am I not allowed to think that a girl who routinely gets into bed with a new guy only to be ghosted…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/21 05:27 AM
5

When men express hesitation at the notion of dating women with extensive sexual histories, aside from being ridiculed, they are met with men and women insisting that the past is the past. Is that the case? In practice, women seem to only apply this rule one direction. Dr. Helen Fisher of Rutgers University and evolutionary biologist Dr. Justin R. Garcia of The Kinsey Institute led a comprehensive study with Match.com, discovering over half (51%) of women would not date a male virgin (Match surve…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/21 04:53 AM
1

It must have been your crowd. Statistically unrepresentative as women in the eighties weren’t as promiscuous as they are now.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/21 04:45 AM
5

This false dilemma that women and left-wing men present when discussing the subject should tip you off that they’re unwilling to discuss this topic honestly or in good faith. false dilemma, also referred to as false dichotomy, is an informal fallacy based on a premise that erroneously limits what options are available. The source of the fallacy lies not in an invalid form of inference but in a false premise. This premise has the form of a disjunctive claim: it asserts that one among a number of …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/21 04:11 AM
1

Overall, our results suggest that the proportional split in males slightly favours an unrestricted (short-term) mating strategy, with a 57 : 43 split on average for the three datasets, whereas females have a reversed split (47 : 53). However, the mixing proportions in the 2D : 4D digit ratio dataset suggest that a slightly higher proportion of the unrestricted phenotype is present in both sexes (males approx. 62%, females approx. 50%). Wlodarski, R., Manning, J., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2015). Stay …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/21 03:58 AM
1

Based off of the CDC’s NSFG data: https://files.catbox.moe/334cva.png Roughly 10x as many married women in the last decade had a double digit number of lifetime sexual partners compared to the seventies. Assume everything I say is carefully sourced and not carelessly said or completely pulled out of the ass like 98% of the rest of this site. Over 40% of women during the 70’s married their one-and-onlies. Now it’s roughly a fifth.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/21 03:44 AM
1

They are. I never claimed that wasn’t the case. But guys with those numbers tend to be very attractive and enticing. There is a minority of women that does steer clear of those types, but these guys still have plenty of options. Personally, idgaf if women stop vying for those guys, but there are evolutionary reasons why they won’t. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexy_son_hypothesis Strategic pluralism is a theory in evolutionary biology that suggests that women have evolved to evaluate men in two…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/21 03:32 AM
1

The latter group is minuscule compared to the former.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/21 03:02 AM
1

Generally speaking, sluts are bad for LTRs. It could be the case that a particular woman that’s slept with hundreds and of dudes can make for a loving, faithful and monogamous partner. Generally speaking, this is very rare, but it does happen. But if I told you that only 9 out of 10 blue-skinned individuals are asymptotic carriers of an incurable venereal disease that cannot be tested for, would you really take that risk with that hot blue-skinned guy that’s eyeing you from across the bar? I wis…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/21 02:58 AM
1

Roughly half of all women are sluts. This is scientifically proven.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/21 02:43 AM
1

Thus, for example, approximately half of the men and women in the top (within-sex) quintiles of sociosexuality had been sexually unfaithful to a steady partner; this was more than a tenfold increase over the corresponding rate for people in the bottom quintiles. https://files.catbox.moe/wq8mq2.jpeg Bailey, J. M., Kirk, K. M., Zhu, G., Dunne, M. P., & Martin, N. G. (2000). Do individual differences in sociosexuality represent genetic or environmentally contingent strategies? Evidence from the Aus…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/21 02:42 AM
1

One, I’m not a ho. Two, I’m not interested in marriage. Three, this is all macro-level stuff. It’s not about any individual person.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/21 02:19 AM
1

The rate of women’s infidelity has increased by 40% since 1990’s while men’s has remained steady, millennial women belong to the first generational cohort that has surpassed men in infidelity (with a possibly larger gap than is believed due to social desirability bias), and women are better at hiding their infidelity. Since 1990, notes the psychoanalyst and writer, the rate of married women who report they’ve been unfaithful has increased by 40 percent, while the rate among men has remained the …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/21 01:36 AM
2

You’re right. It’s mediated by commitment. Unrestricted SO women tend to have low commitment to their partners. This is partially due to their ceaseless need for novelty and variety (there’s an evolutionary bet-hedging reason for this), but also because the men they were attracted to during their “hoe phase” only made up roughly a fifth of the population. 20 percent of men (between the ages of 25 and 50) account for about 70 percent of all self-​reported sexual partnerships with women in the Uni…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/21 01:04 AM
5

I’ve never denied this. Thing is, women don’t get shit for wanting low-n dudes.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/21 12:44 AM
2

You’re right. They (top 20%) were 10x likelier to cheat than those who scored on the bottom 20%. Unfortunately, I can’t find the original SO inventory and am only finding the revised one. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sociosexual_Orientation_Inventory The range I see for married women is 15-25%, so while they (top 20% SO) may be an order of magnitude more likely to cheat than their chaste, virgin bride (or women who’ve only ever slept with their husbands) counterparts, who, incidentally make up …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/21 12:38 AM
3

Think 5% and 50%. Thus, for example, approximately half of the men and women in the top (within- sex) quintiles of sociosexuality had been sexually unfaithful to a steady partner; this was more than a tenfold increase over the corresponding rate for people in the bottom quintiles. Bailey, J. M., Kirk, K. M., Zhu, G., Dunne, M. P., & Martin, N. G. (2000). Do individual differences in sociosexuality represent genetic or environmentally contingent strategies? Evidence from the Australian twin regis…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/21 12:03 AM
2

Well, I suppose we’re going to have to agree to disagree then. If this info becomes more widespread, risk averse men will know which types to steer clear from. I wouldn’t fault them for that.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/21 10:56 PM
1

But what is the practical way to encourage some women to be promiscuous and other women to be chaste? Women’s sociosexual orientations are more influenced by environmental factors. Previous research has found that female sociosexuality is more responsive to environmental shifts than male sociosexuality [4,22], and our data confirm this: while both sexes exhibit a shift (towards a restricted strategy in males, but towards unrestricted in females), the magnitude of the shift is larger in women tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/21 10:52 PM
3

Less likely, but it happens. Probabilities are, by their very definition, not certain. You simply stack them in your favor.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/21 10:41 PM
6

If they are significantly more likely to cheat you have good reason to be insecure.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/21 10:40 PM
5

It’s about probabilities, not insecurity. The research, conducted by Jay Teachman, found that women with 16 or more sexual partners prior to marriage had an 80% rate of subsequent divorce. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_promiscuity#Psychology If you knew a person belonged to a group where 4 in 5 of its members failed to maintain their marriages, it’s not insecurity that makes you steer clear of members of that group when considering marriage. It’s having a brain.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/21 10:36 PM
1

There are women who make for good short-term partners and women who make for good long-term partners. Both exist and need to exist, but the former group necessarily must be a lower proportion of the population. If they become the majority, then the majority of women are no longer marriage material unless guys are made to (falsely) believe that they are just as likely to form long-term, stable monogamous relationships, which isn’t the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/21 10:32 PM
2

Some guys aren’t interested in dating a demographic that’s significantly more prone to cheating 🤷🏿‍♂️
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/21 10:14 PM
3

It’s not a binary. My arbitrary line in the sand is anything in the double digits for LTRs.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/21 10:10 PM
3

There's nothing more loyal than a slut in love. False. Unrestricted SO women cheat even in happy relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/21 10:07 PM
8

Do most of them deny this outright? Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/21 10:05 PM
3

I’m going to need citations on one of your more outstanding claims here
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/21 09:51 PM
1

It matters a shit ton, because I have a low N myself, loyal to a fault, never had an std, and don't want kids. Women with restricted sociosexual orientations place less importance on good gene indicators and more on commitment and dependability. They tend to be low-n because they’re only comfortable with having sex in long-term relationships. They make for better long-term partners as well and are significantly less likely to pursue or accept secondary partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/21 09:48 PM
4

I’m not averse to such women. I sometimes wish I’d never come across this info as ignorance is bliss. But knowing what I know now, it’s just the case that I could never seriously date a woman with an extensive history because of this.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/21 09:41 PM
2

A truism in psychology is that the best predictor of future behavior is past behavior. This is no less true in the realm of sexual behavior. Indeed, one of the strongest predictors of mar- ital infidelity is one’s number of prior sex partners Haselton, Buss, Oubaid, and Angleitner (2000) Contrary to the myth, partners who’ve had many partners have a harder, not easier, time remaining monogamous. They are significantly more at risk of straying than those with little or no prior sexual experience.…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/21 09:38 PM
2

It’s related to sociosexual orientation or, in laymen’s terms, what one’s attitudes, past behaviors, and desires in regard to non-commital sex are. Unrestricted individuals are also more likely to view cheating or infidelity as acceptable under certain conditions (e.g., when involved in a bad relationship), and report engaging in more cheating than restricted individuals. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sociosexuality#Relationship_interactions sex drive is highly and positively correlated with soc…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/21 09:23 PM
6

Yes, indeed. Promiscuous women cheat. He body count matters unless you like the idea of being with someone who is likelier to cheat on you.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/21 09:03 PM
2

where, again, they did not distinguish by gender, found that 79% of promiscuous people did not cheat. 79% of the 4< crowd. But as that number of lifetime partners climbs, the percentage of those who haven’t cheated decreases.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/21 08:55 PM
2

There still needs to be women that are wife material left though.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/21 08:50 PM
-1

Roughly half (though perhaps more as women underreport) of all promiscuous women cheat.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/21 08:50 PM
2

Yes, but specifically women. Her history matters if you’re the type of guy who doesn’t like to get cheated on and/or divorced.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/21 08:47 PM
4

And yet there are people who still deny it so it must be beaten some more.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/21 08:47 PM
8

Who cares what studies says? If the studies said that these types of women didn’t cheat almost an order of a magnitude more than non-promiscuous women, there’d be no reason not to date them other than insecurity. I only care because they’re more likely to cheat than not in any given relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/21 08:45 PM
-1

Promiscuous women cheat.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/21 08:43 PM
-1

Promiscuous women cheat.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/21 08:39 PM
7

That minority of men and women reported higher marital quality than those who had had sex with other partners prior to marriage. We further found that the more sexual partners a woman had had before marriage, the less happy she reported her marriage to be. This association was not statistically significant for men. pg. 6 Rhoades, G., Stanley, S., & National Marriage Project (Rutgers University). (2014). Before 'I do': What do premarital experiences have to do with marital quality among today's y…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/21 08:33 PM
1

This isn’t “wahmen bad.” It just demonstrates that high n women are prone to cheating, and steering clear of them for LTRs is the smart move.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/21 08:28 PM
4

Only 99 women. And there are several studies showing that the more extensive a woman’s history is, the more likely she is to cheat. Why do people ignore science until they find one study that makes them happy?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/21 08:20 PM
1

Kinsey (1953), Essock-Vitale and McGuire (1985), Forste and Tanfer (1996), and Cherkas et al. (2004) are specifically about women. Hughes and Gallup (2003) talks about how roughly half the variance in women’s infidelity can be explained by their number of partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/21 08:18 PM
-4

Promiscuous women tend to be unfaithful is the key takeaway here. Edit: Kinsey (1953), Essock-Vitale and McGuire (1985), Forste and Tanfer (1996), and Cherkas et al. (2004) are specifically about women. Hughes and Gallup (2003) talks about how roughly half the variance in women’s infidelity can be explained by their number of partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/21 05:22 PM
5

Peer review citations Athanasiou, R., & Sarkin, R. (1974). Premarital sexual behavior and postmarital adjustment. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 3(3), 207–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01541486 Bailey, J. M., Kirk, K. M., Zhu, G., Dunne, M. P., & Martin, N. G. (2000). Do individual differences in sociosexuality represent genetic or environmentally contingent strategies? Evidence from the Australian twin registry. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(3), 537–545. https://doi.org/10.103…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/21 05:20 PM
7

If she gets an abortion she wouldn’t make a bad plate.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/10/21 06:44 AM
0

“Autistic Egalitarian” sounds very Reddity.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/21 01:16 PM
0

35F Autistic Egalitarian Wtf is this flair? We truly live in a society.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/21 01:03 PM
1

It’s not. Jerry Sandusky is universally considered a monster, and there are currently reckonings occurring against the Boy Scouts of America and the Catholic Church (victims mostly boys between the ages of 11 and 14). We’re even appalled by the abuse of boys on the other side of the world in Afghanistan. No one thinks it’s fine. Everyone is sickened by it.
/r/MensRights22/10/21 03:33 AM
4

because she was going to carry the child Doubtful it would even be his child. I love how when FDS sees the inherent inequality in male-female relations and decides then to stack inequality in women’s favor, they’re lauded for it. https://www.wsj.com/articles/arming-women-for-the-dating-battlefield-11581138060 (https://archive.is/liSOk) https://www.abc.net.au/everyday/what-is-female-dating-strategy-and-does-it-work/12665322 (https://archive.is/hdcQp) Don’t get married.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 08:56 AM
2

I don’t think I said anything that offensive that most people didn’t already fundamentally know. I didn’t even cast doubt to the existence of rational women. They likely do exist. As for guys being more likely to be the recipients of Darwin awards, the guy you’re talking to linked an article showing how guys have a wider distribution in terms of IQ scores, meaning larger percentages at the tail ends or fatter tails.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/21 09:18 AM
0

Some men have created and built and imagined everything you see around you. Most men didn't do shit other than work to survive, and if we are the sex that formalized logic Did I dispute that? Are you responding to someone else? whinners and complainners and little shits who do nothing but talk about how an imaginary super man(chad) is taking all of the women away from them? *whiners, *complainers They’re just going to have to adjust. They’re men. I’m sure they’ll find a solution.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/21 08:38 AM
1

Men are more productive.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/21 07:22 AM
5

There wasn’t a question. I do think women’s actions can be better explained as being molded by evolutionary pressures rather than being the result of conscious decision-making, just as how men are preoccupied with getting with women at the expense of other pursuits. There’s an aspect of enslavement with regard to these pressures. I’d bet a lot of dudes wish they can redirect some of that energy to what they’d consider to be more productive pursuits.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/21 07:12 AM
2

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feminist_separatism
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/21 07:01 AM
-4

We’re the sex that formalized logic. We should understand by now that we’re trying to understand something that’s fundamentally illogical internally. EvoPsych is the only way forward. Read David Buss.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/21 05:45 AM
1

Andrea Dworkin was right. If she wasn’t such a fat slovenly bitch maybe people would have taken her more seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/21 08:56 PM
3

Men have always invested more in relationships than women. Historically, women directed most of their energies into the kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/21 08:03 PM
-2

Who wants a virgin wife? That sounds boring
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/21 10:37 AM
3

I’m going to assume no amount of evidence can shake beliefs fueled by feelings instead of reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/21 10:00 AM
5

In the sexual quality area, where the association with the number of sexual partners is the strongest, the negative association may be a result of multiple partners and sexual experiences raising expectations that undermine the current sexual quality in marriage. pg.715 https://files.catbox.moe/tl42h9.jpeg Busby, D. M., Willoughby, B. J., & Carroll, J. S. (2013). Sowing wild oats: Valuable experience or a field full of weeds? Personal Relationships, 20(4), 706–718. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.1…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/21 09:47 AM
7

We further found that the more sexual partners a woman had had before marriage, the less happy she reported her marriage to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/21 09:40 AM
6

We further found that the more sexual partners a woman had had before marriage, the less happy she reported her marriage to be. This association was not statistically significant for men. pg.6 One reason that more experience could lead to lower marital quality is that more experience may increase one’s awareness of alternative partners. A strong sense of alternatives is believed to make it harder to maintain commitment to, and satisfaction with, what one already has (Rusbult & Buunk, 1993; Thiba…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/21 09:05 AM
1

This girl is way too young and attractive to be a FDS regular.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 12:56 AM
35

This used to puzzle me. Why are there so many more male women’s activists than there are female men’s activists? This more or less explains it. Both genders exhibit more favorable views towards women compared to men, but women even more so. Four experiments confirmed that women's automatic in-group bias is remarkably stronger than men's and investigated explanations for this sex difference, derived from potential sources of implicit attitudes (L. A. Rudman, 2004). In Experiment 1, only women (no…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/21 09:25 PM
22

This is mental illness.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/09/21 04:47 AM
1

Can I have a source on that stat?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/21 11:49 PM
2

Why can’t the guys who don’t have a problem or visceral reaction with it just shut the fuck up when conversing with guys who do? You might not understand it, but some guys are irreconcilably put off by it. Logic has nothing to do with an instinctual reaction or lack thereof. Just live and let live. Not everyone has to write with their right hands.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/21 11:44 PM
6

It is statistically the healthiest thing a person can do. A higher number of previous sexual partners is associated with marital dissatisfaction and dissolution. “Contrary to conventional wisdom, when it comes to sex, less experience is better, at least for the marriage,” wrote W. Bradford Wilcox, Professor of Sociology at the University of Virginia (Khazan, 2018). A greater number of previous partners is linked to low marital satisfaction and divorce (Teachman, 2003). Using CDC National Survey …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/21 11:33 PM
3

Men are distinguished from women by their commitment to do violence rather than to be victimized by it. Andrea Dworkin Under patriarchy, every woman's son is her potential betrayer and also the inevitable rapist or exploiter of another woman. Andrea Dworkin Marriage as an institution developed from rape as a practice. Rape, originally defined as abduction, became marriage by capture. Marriage meant the taking was to extend in time, to be not only use of but possession of, or ownership. Andrea Dw…
/r/AntiFeminists10/09/21 12:14 AM
1

Well, good on you for standing firm and maintaining healthy values.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/21 06:33 AM
1

It is absolutely jarring that men get shit for having these exact same sentiments. Society is poison.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/21 03:54 AM
1

HOW DARE YOU!? /a But we all know why you wouldn’t get shit for this.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/21 03:51 AM
108

This is a dude.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/09/21 07:55 AM
8

I can’t imagine how guys are capable of dating someone who wouldn’t consider them for a quick lay.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/21 02:17 AM
2

Those with restricted sociosexual orientations are naturally monogamous. They aren’t the problem. The problem is when people pretend promiscuous women make for good LTRs.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/21 09:29 AM
2

I have a low tolerance for people who make claims but refuse to back them up. I see it too often. It’s either because people are lazy or just lying. I’m just going to assume you’re talking out of your ass.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/21 08:43 AM
3

I’m not Muslim or even a theist
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/21 08:28 AM
7

Everything you just said was wrong. that most of those studies are based on people that married before the sexual revolution even happened No. These study were conducted in the last two decades. that the difference between 2 and 21 previous partners is negligible This is very wrong. The research, conducted by Jay Teachman, found that women with 16 or more sexual partners prior to marriage had an 80% rate of subsequent divorce. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Female_promiscuity&oldid=1…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/21 07:11 AM
7

Indeed, one of the strongest predictors of marital infidelity is one’s number of prior sex partners. Deception about past sexual promiscuity would have inflicted greater costs, on average, on men than on women https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0146167204271303 They read this but it goes in one ear and out the other.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/21 06:59 AM
4

But no, the solution apparently is to imply women shouldn’t have sex before marriage. No it isn’t. It’s just that those types aren’t LTR material for men who don’t like the idea of their SOs having sex with other guys while claiming to be exclusive.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/21 06:51 AM
2

The highest five-year divorce rate in the research—33% during the 2000s—was associated with women having more than 10 sexual partners
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/21 06:41 AM
2

Which ones?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/21 06:21 AM
2

https://www.readcube.com/articles/10.1111/pere.12009 http://nationalmarriageproject.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/NMP-BeforeIDoReport-Final.pdf
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/21 06:17 AM
3

Use sci-hub.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/21 04:58 AM
77

reddit markup formatting The academic consensus is that one’s number of lifetime partners is a strong predictor of infidelity: “A truism in psychology is that the best predictor of future behavior is past behavior. This is no less true in the realm of sexual behavior. Indeed, one of the strongest predictors of marital infidelity is one’s number of prior sex partners. Deception about past sexual promiscuity would have inflicted greater costs, on average, on men than on women” (source). After inte…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/08/21 04:51 AM
12

I know two women at the moment who have both had 300+ sexual partners but have now settled down in very happy, monogamous relationships (one of which is a marriage). Pray to Allah for another flood.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/21 04:42 AM
6

Busby et al. set out to determine whether the number of sexual partners was associated with poor relationship outcomes while controlling for relationship length, education, race, income, age, and religiosity. The results, using a sample of 2,654 married individuals, indicated that the number of sexual partners was associated with lower levels of sexual quality, communication, and relationship stability (source).
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/21 02:51 AM
5

Busby et al. set out to determine whether the number of sexual partners was associated with poor relationship outcomes while controlling for relationship length, education, race, income, age, and religiosity. The results, using a sample of 2,654 married individuals, indicated that the number of sexual partners was associated with lower levels of sexual quality, communication, and relationship stability (source).
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/21 02:20 AM
6

They control for religiosity in these studies. It doesn’t confound the results. Promiscuous women cheat often while non-promiscuous ones do not, religious status non-withstanding.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/21 02:17 AM
3

Often times when confronted with multiple studies that contradict their views, lefties lazily and vaguely attack sample size or representativeness without pointing to a specific study. Or they will claim bias without even clicking a link. They think they sound smart when they repeat words that they remember from community college when it’s obvious they don’t understand their meanings. Or they say “correlation doesn’t mean causation”, thinking they’ve contributed something worthwhile.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/21 01:58 AM
5

They’re still the least likely to cheat on you and divorce you whereas more than half of women in the double digits are likely do both.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/21 01:55 AM
130

Praise Allah that she advertises her falseness
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/08/21 08:19 AM
3

It actually makes things awkward when you’re looking for a counterpart to, say, “male redditor”. Woman redditor sounds weird. Most people are comfortable saying male but are uncomfortable saying “female” in the same context. It was never about equality.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/21 02:16 AM
32

The academic consensus is that one’s number of lifetime partners is a strong predictor of infidelity: “A truism in psychology is that the best predictor of future behavior is past behavior. This is no less true in the realm of sexual behavior. Indeed, one of the strongest predictors of marital infidelity is one’s number of prior sex partners. Deception about past sexual promiscuity would have inflicted greater costs, on average, on men than on women” (source). After interviewing thousands of wom…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/08/21 07:20 AM
11

Take the anti-hyperbole pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/21 05:04 PM
11

Take the empirical research pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/21 04:47 AM
1

Birth control juice mixing into the water supply. Ted Kaczynski said this would happen and they threw him in jail because of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/21 09:17 PM
1

We should get rid of “probably-s” and speculation. There are numbers out there.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/21 10:52 PM
1

How does this work? If the population mean is 100, but a subgroup’s mean is 85 with a SD of 15, assuming it’s a normal distribution and the 68–95–99.7 rule applies, that would mean roughly 84% of the subgroup falls below the population mean. So if you select someone from that subgroup completely at random, what do you think the odds that they’d exceed 100 be?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/21 03:02 AM
11

The end goal is women getting paid more than men for less work.
/r/AntiFeminists12/08/21 04:00 AM
1

Schizo posting for a sec there.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/21 02:18 PM
1

Pay me
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/21 09:09 AM
2

But it’s not locked. You can edit it now so that the 15 people who visit that page a year won’t be misinformed.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/21 08:36 AM
2

Change it then. I may have red sympathies, but false info is false info. I don’t care if it further bolsters our point if it’s wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/21 06:57 AM
1

You should edit the wiki article and take it out tbh. Why don’t you do it? Both you and I know the figure’s not in the study, so why do I have to do it when you want it done? I’ve already done my part by shining a light on it.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/21 06:53 AM
1

Find it please.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/21 06:50 AM
1

Allah weeps
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/21 06:50 AM
1

Men who prefer partners with light histories are frequently shamed and ridiculed. These numbers can vindicate those persecuted.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/21 05:32 AM
1

Tell that to Kate Beckinsale, who still looks as though she’s in her twenties in her mid-forties.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/21 04:47 PM
1

Growing old is overrated. Why not build your body to physical perfection and beyond?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/21 09:00 AM
1

I’m slowly starting to realize that social media isn’t conducive for thoughtful, source-driven discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/21 08:45 AM
1

That’s an interesting interpretation by the guys who say that. The popular interpretation, especially among women’s activists, is that it’s bad behavior on men’s parts that spur women to do this. I don’t care for self-serving speculation from either camp. I’m doing some googling and haven’t found any numbers or convincing arguments that would allow me to comfortably assign blame to one sex or the other.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/21 02:02 AM
20

Modern culture is degenerate.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/08/21 06:37 PM
5

Best guesses : decreasing religiosity, media-society feed forward loop, relaxed attitudes, widespread availability of porn. Interesting: Looking at 3,232 full-page ads published in 1983, 1993 and 2003 in popular magazines Cosmopolitan, Redbook, Esquire, Playboy, Newsweek and Time, researchers found sexual imagery in 20 percent of the ads. Using sex to sell everything from alcohol to banking services has increased over the years: 15 percent of ads used sex to sell in 1983; that percentage grew to…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/21 05:25 AM
2

Ironically enough, this too qualifies as ignorantio elenchi: a logical fallacy which consists in apparently refuting an opponent while actually disproving something not asserted. What annabeelongx replied was a non-sequiter and an irrelevant conclusion. It’s a relevance fallacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/21 04:38 AM
3

Bad arguments need to be called out.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/21 04:32 AM
2

If you don’t disagree with what I just said then yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/21 01:14 AM
1

Between one in five and one in four Americans above the age of 18 suffer from mental illness in any given year, and roughly half will experience it in their lifetimes (link, link). We’re having a pointless semantic argument and have strayed from the point. It’s normal in the sense that it’s common, like obesity, but not in the sense that it’s healthy.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/21 12:57 AM
1

By normal I meant common. Splitting (also called black-and-white thinking or all-or-nothing thinking) is the failure in a person's thinking to bring together the dichotomy of both positive and negative qualities of the self and others into a cohesive, realistic whole. It is a common defense mechanism.[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Splitting_(psychology) You have to understand that a lot of people of fundamentally stupid and prefer simple explanations and narratives. Edit: Or their existence i…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/21 12:31 AM
3

Ignorantio Elenchi
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/21 09:38 PM
6

There’s a mountain of research on short-term and long-term mating strategies that men simply aren’t aware of. And even without the conceptual background, LTRing women with extensive histories empirically leads to undesirable outcomes. The academic consensus is that one’s number of lifetime partners is a strong predictor of infidelity: “A truism in psychology is that the best predictor of future behavior is past behavior. This is no less true in the realm of sexual behavior. Indeed, one of the st…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/08/21 09:30 PM
1

Black and white thinking is not normal. It’s normal. Reductive thinking and oversimplification are very normal. Non-nuanced approaches? Super normal.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/21 05:33 PM
2

Don’t even go.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/21 04:38 PM
2

and I’m being cranky right now Understandable. A good troll might get it out of your system. Though it’s gotten me banned from many a subreddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/21 04:31 PM
1

Tell him it was a prank afterwards. Then shine a flashlight in his eyes.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/21 04:19 PM
2

Yes. I, among others, often just mindlessly cite Wikipedia. Upon further investigation, it appears this figure doesn’t appear in the paper. You’re acting as though what I might have said might have negative ramifications.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/21 04:17 PM
5

When presented with the data that women initiate the vast majority of divorces, we must assume, without evidence, that it must still be the man's fault. Appeal to probability Base rate fallacy
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/21 04:15 PM
2

Divorce him too for shits and giggles.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/21 04:13 PM
1

To see if others could find it. It’s a juicy stat if it’s true. Notice I didn’t include it in the main body of my post the other day.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/21 04:10 PM
1

Yes. And the title of the post indicates my dubiousness of the figure. The content of the post is that it seemed implausibly high and that the figure’s not even present in the paper. Check your biases because they’re affecting your reading comprehension. I didn’t make anything up. And I linked the paper to see if others could find it. They can’t either. Therefore, my actions can indirectly lead to someone deleting what’s probably misinfo on Wikipedia.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/21 04:02 PM
1

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=QQvM8Gkx2uI
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/21 03:45 PM
2

I’m not speaking to this specific instance. I mean this general tendency of a lot of people to dismiss info that counters their beliefs without any sort of consideration.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/21 07:30 AM
3

If you show me solid studies that show women work full time and do more housework in general than men then you’ll have convinced me that women work full time and do more housework in general than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/21 06:38 AM
4

I couldn’t find them in your post history and I’m not reading your comment history.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/21 06:32 AM
3

If the goal is to make your contempt for the male half of the population understandable, provide figures, not instances, and not just disproportionately high rates of some harmful activity being committed by men. I get men are more violent and rapey compared to women, but if it’s just a small minority of men who are so then your general antipathy for men is harder to sympathize with. No one is denying the existence of shitty men.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/21 05:52 AM
5

But most men are shit partners and are looking for a mommy mcbangmaid. I giggled when I read this. FDS subs are so needlessly provocative and combative that I assume it’s reflexive. I envision almost random hot flashes of misandrist anger.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/21 05:19 AM
2

Religious couples tend to have more stable marriages.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/21 04:46 AM
3

Have I? I may have used it once before, and didn’t include it in my main post a few days back because I couldn’t find the figure in the study.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/21 04:44 AM
6

I didn’t find it. I quoted the claim made in the Wikipedia article and then clearly stated that I couldn’t find support for that claim in the actual 12-paged study. That’s why I linked both and asked if others could find it or potentially look elsewhere for it if that figure actually exists.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/21 04:42 AM
5

And a good way for people to preemptively dismiss statistical evidence that supports conclusions contrary to their own.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/21 04:39 AM
2

Could be the case. The guy who made the edit was a veteran contributor (nearly ten years at that point), so to make a blunder like this (assuming it is one) is sort of worrisome.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/21 04:35 AM
12

UT prof. Nick Wolfinger crunched NSFG numbers and found that about a fifth of women getting married are in the double digits, which is a ten-fold increase from 40 years ago (link). CDC figures place roughly a quarter of women in the 25-49 cohort in the double digit range (link). As the number increases, so too the ratio of casual partners to intimate ones.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/21 03:04 AM
3

99% of women are not hooking up with multiple men, 99% of women are not scrolling on hook up apps choosing "Chad". This isn’t true. And let’s refrain from using terminology belonging to a toxic subculture.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/21 02:44 AM
2

80% chance at divorce.. funny as women also initiate divorce 80% of the time. I wouldn’t read too much into that. I’m dubious of this figure however. It means 4 in 5 marriages. That is a lot. Imagine a hand with only a pinky. 60% more than the baseline. It doesn’t seem correct. I expected an effect but not one this large.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/21 01:50 AM
12

Wealth is a moderating factor when it comes to appearance and sexual success, but OP is right when he says that that success comes in spite of appearance and not because of it. Appearance wouldn’t stop being a handicap just because hypothetical ugly wealthy man compensates for it, but the extent to which it handicaps is partially mitigated by wealth. Ugly women have no such recourse. Sure, but in terms of what most men would find to be acceptable in the physical realm and what most women find ac…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/21 12:09 AM
14

“Close”. Maybe that argument can be made with pre-mother raping Chris Chan, but not really with post-mother raping Chris Chan. The blue pill taken to its extreme leads to porn addiction, hollow consumerist tendencies, subservience to women, blind adherence to in-flux social mores and depression. It does not lead to mother raping. I’d bet there’s something seriously wrong with that person’s brain. If you were to compare his brain images to those of randomly sampled grown men throughout the US, th…
/r/TheRedPill06/08/21 10:59 PM
1

[A]pproximately half of the men and women in the top (withinsex) quintiles of sociosexuality had been sexually unfaithful to a steady partner; this was more than a tenfold increase over the corresponding rate for people in the bottom quintiles. Sexual infidelity is a common cause of divorce cross-culturally (Buss, 1994). Bailey, J. M., Kirk, K. M., Zhu, G., Dunne, M. P., & Martin, N. G. (2000). Do individual differences in sociosexuality represent genetic or environmentally contingent strategies…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/21 03:07 AM
3

Anecdotal experience does not invalidate trends.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/21 02:08 AM
22

Interesting that she’s making a distinction between men and people on a social platform designed and maintained by men that she has access to because of a device designed by and conceived of by men. 99% of the luxuries, in terms of the medicine, the nutritional food she eats, the tech she uses come to her due to the efforts of men, and yet she makes a distinction between men and people.
/r/AntiFeminists02/08/21 09:34 PM
2

Is there a person suggesting that or are you imagining things?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/21 08:56 PM
1

What if they insist they’ve changed their ways? Why does it matter?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/21 08:42 PM
1

Why do you ask about that?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/21 08:34 PM
1

Same with a history of infidelity or porn addiction?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/21 08:27 PM
1

Do you consider asking for a history of STDs to be important?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/21 08:14 PM
1

When 4 in every 5 of them can’t hold a marriage, it’s a pretty damn good heuristic.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/21 07:58 PM
1

Peer-reviewed studies in the order they were cited: Haselton, M. G., Buss, D. M., Oubaid, V., & Angleitner, A. (2005). Sex, lies, and strategic interference: the psychology of deception between the sexes. Personality & social psychology bulletin, 31(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271303 . Whisman, M. A., & Snyder, D. K. (2007). Sexual infidelity in a national survey of American women: Differences in prevalence and correlates as a function of method of assessment. Journal of Family P…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/21 07:49 PM
2

Please provide sources as I have.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/21 05:04 PM
2

https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2013-43003-007 Busby, D. M., Willoughby, B. J., & Carroll, J. S. (2013). Sowing wild oats: Valuable experience or a field full of weeds? Personal Relationships, 20(4), 706–718. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12009 . Wild oats are a myth. What you’re using is called anecdotal evidence, which is unreliable because it’s non-representative and marred by cognitive bias.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/21 04:53 PM
6

Allahu akbar
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/21 06:06 AM
18

While paying the other woman child support and having partial custody or no custody? Bad idea.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/21 05:58 AM
22

It matters if you’re raising a kid with her.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/21 05:46 AM
1

How so?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/21 05:25 AM
2

In its purest sense it’s awareness of the truth however difficult it is to swallow. No group has a monopoly on it, and it’s not limited to sex. Usage of the word and that concept predates that subreddit and even that movie. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegory_of_the_cave https://www.greekmyths-greekmythology.com/the-myth-of-cassandra/
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/21 05:15 AM
3

Most estimates place who misrepresent their histories to their partners at between 25-33%. Women with answers considered socially acceptable tend not to deflate their histories. Often, high-n women claim all women lie, and I usually assume that’s just projection because they do. You may be comfortable with lying and being unfaithful to your partners, but that’s not all women.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/21 05:02 AM
3

Women with low numbers tend not to lie or hide it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/21 04:49 AM
4

I don’t think that’s the case. Anyways, this is useful for guys who are “plate-spinning” AND those that aren’t, who are in the market for a stable long-term partner to raise a family with. If you’re going to be with someone in the long haul, you have to be able to love and trust her. Low-to-no-n women who only are physically intimate within the confines of committed relationships statistically make for good long-term partners, and the time and investment necessary to woo them is worth it if you …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/21 04:27 AM
7

Some people like to ride motorcycles. Fatality rates in accidents are much higher compared to cars, and others refrain from getting one themselves and opt for cars because of that, but motorcyclists and people who only drive their cars coexist just fine. As long as motorcyclists don’t downplay or deny the danger of their lifestyles to other people, I don’t have a problem with it at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/21 04:10 AM
8

I’d much rather be with the latter.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/21 02:53 AM
3

If you had to pick between marrying two guys, and one had qualities that were strongly correlated with infidelity and divorce and the other didn't, which would you choose? Assume everything other than those qualities are held constant between them.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/21 02:44 AM
15

Sources I don't like are cherry-picking
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/21 02:37 AM
4

So you're saying guys should tolerate infidelity and take on high-risk partners?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/21 02:32 AM
15

You're dismissing them using the same two arguments without actually reading them. Many of them do account for religiosity.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/21 01:41 AM
9

Who is saying it isn't? I never said it was directly causal. There's a general consensus in these peer-reviewed articles as to why infidelity and relationship dissolution are related, and if you bothered to read them before dismissing them because they contradict your deeply held beliefs, you would know why that is. Most of the PDFs can be found on google. For the ones that you can't google, sci *cough hub *cough.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/21 01:38 AM
8

A 2010 study published in Journal of Marriage and Family found that there was a correlation between female pre-marital promiscuity and higher rates of divorce. The research, conducted by Jay Teachman, found that women with 16 or more sexual partners prior to marriage had an 80% rate of subsequent divorce. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_promiscuity#Psychology In the United States, couples marrying for the first time have approximately a fifty percent chance of divorcing. https://www.apa.org…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/21 01:12 AM
21

With Busby: was associated with poor relationship outcomes while controlling for relationship length, education, race, income, age, and religiosity With Sarah Estelle: examine this information along with other variables including religiosity and income to account for potentially confounding factors Actually, if you read anything before pointing out the flaws of studies you know nothing about having not read them, you'll see that those variables were controlled for and these relationships still p…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/21 01:07 AM
1

She’s trying to con her ex back into a relationship a d yet is unwilling to proofread or fix her spelling and grammar.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/08/21 06:32 AM
3

I remember one of a dude who'd been cheated on several times before by his other girlfriends being pressured to allow his current gf to go camping alone with a dude she'd repeatedly hooked up with in the past.
/r/TheRedPill01/08/21 12:54 AM
3

Outside of here, it’s not well known.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/21 03:37 AM
6

it’s not going to alter their attraction to it. And these studies explain why that is. Also, they’re attracted to height and strength for a reason, and it’s not a conscious one.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/21 03:32 AM
29

No, they don’t. Most people don’t know how to access scholarly databases, and Google, which dominates with 92% of the search engine market share, filters its responses. Liberal left results are favored by its algorithm, so information on this topic is usually limited to opinion pieces written by ideologically-motivated women who don’t reference the existing literature. There is a general disconnect between academia and the public. What bridges the gap—authors with various motives selecting what …
/r/TheRedPill30/07/21 01:35 AM
74

I wrote it in response to this: You could date a woman and she is absolutely everything you want but she’s slept with 40 people and it literally makes zero difference to who she actually is as person. Other than she’s had some fun, found out who she is and what she likes and what she doesn’t and will probably be a better partner and lover but you won’t date her because her number isn’t one you like? If you care about something so trivial then it’s sad. Same goes for women who only date for certa…
/r/TheRedPill29/07/21 10:06 PM
0

This is why you get history up front
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/21 07:55 PM
2

“Small positive actions” equal the presumption of guilt. Men who are falsely incriminated are “acceptable casualties” when the alternative is the rapist getting off scot-free.
/r/MensRights28/07/21 07:18 PM
4

This is probably the most wholesome one I’ve seen on this sub
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/07/21 01:42 PM
6

Keeping it real by being stand-offish and using poor grammar. It’s not pretentious to proofread and to tidy up what you’ve written.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/07/21 08:09 AM
2

Detective Constable Peter Burrows, of Nottinghamshire Police, said: “I am pleased to see this result from court and that she has been handed a lengthy prison term for her serious crime.” Reminds me of Lavinia Woodward who received no jail time for stabbing her boyfriend because she was “too bright”. Good to know that intersexual violence with female offenders and male victims still isn’t taken seriously. I wonder if it ever will.
/r/MensRights26/07/21 08:42 PM
2

I’m not disputing the fact that women who marry their first partner have higher rates of marital satisfaction and lower divorce and infidelity rates. Per that Atlantic article on Wolfinger’s study: “Contrary to conventional wisdom, when it comes to sex, less experience is better, at least for the marriage,” said W. Bradford Wilcox, a sociologist and senior fellow at the Institute for Family Studies (and an Atlantic contributor). In an earlier analysis, Wolfinger found that women with zero or one…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/07/21 06:07 AM
2

Disagree there. A handful of long-term committed relationships wouldn’t faze me. That’s rare enough as it is.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/07/21 04:47 AM

Fool me once. My sympathy begins to wear when a person repeatedly gets duped by the same trick. At best, you suffer some neurological deficiency that prevents learning from experience. At worst, you’ve developed an unhealthy addiction for being used and abused. If you want a relationship-oriented guy, weed out those who are only interested in the physical through long-term attrition. After a certain amount of time, that wait stops being worth it if a guy’s only interested in sex, assuming sexual…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 01:30 AM
11

This is why you don’t date girls who’ve had a lot of casual partners.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/07/21 04:56 AM
1

Easy. Don’t date people who sleep (or have slept) around. It will narrow your pool, but it usually means a lot less headache for those belonging to category A.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 06:39 AM
82

Suicide prevention or promotion?
/r/MensRights12/07/21 08:48 AM
19

Fucking paywall.
/r/MensRights08/07/21 06:21 AM
4

I wonder how they’d respond to a man reversing the direction of justification: women earn less because men pay more (and are expected to be breadwinners). Therefore, it’s justified. Like all things, advantages conferred by the patriarchy must be preserved and only the disadvantages need be dispensed with. Men will be expected to pay more when women earn the exact same salaries (despite less hours, experience, qualifications and competencies). You don’t see women fighting sex disparities in sente…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/21 11:31 PM
5

This honesty is refreshing and you should be grateful. She’s only unveiling things that as of yet have been implicit. Don’t get married, don’t cohabit, and don’t mix finances.
/r/MensRights06/07/21 03:07 PM
10

going 50/50 is never a good sign and a man should always be paying more We are not 100% equal and we can never become equals If a man starts acting aggressively when you start setting fair boundaries “Equality in situations where I’m at the disadvantage. Inequality when it advantages me.” Remember this whenever people couch their arguments in terms of “equality” or “fairness”. If an arrangement is unequal in your in-group’s favor, do whatever you can to preserve it. Conceal it, dismiss it, excus…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/07/21 11:08 PM
2

but I’m picky and hate men There are guys who’ll go for her anyway.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/07/21 05:54 PM
1

Because pregnancy and relatively limited reproductive window serves as an evolutionary bottleneck for women, they tend to prioritize quality. Such a bottleneck doesn’t exist for guys who theoretically could ensure a greater frequency of their alleles in the next generation by sleeping with as many women as possible, but that quickly becomes unfeasible because of a 1-to-1 sex ratio in the population and intrasexual competition. Women looking for short term partners use shorthands as “good gene in…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/21 05:18 AM
5

I suggest you read up on what men and women look for in short-term and long-term partners and why.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/21 03:47 AM
3

They become aware of their changing circumstances and certain biological realities, which is reactive and not a proactive and introspective process.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/21 02:47 AM
1

If you were easy for every dude before, then no.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/21 12:34 AM
6

This is why I never feel bad for people with rough upbringings. You should have picked better parents, bro.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/21 02:26 AM
1

I’m going to forward this to my masochist friend.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/06/21 05:57 AM
1

Still top 20 Alexa. Top 10 if you subtract the ten Chinese sites: Google, YouTube, Facebook, Amazon, Yahoo!, Wikipedia, Zoom, Windows Live, Reddit, beating Microsoft, Netflix, Twitter, etc. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_most_popular_websites Subtract the Search engines, Amazon, Wikipedia, Zoom, and Windows Live, leaving just the social media sites, and you have YouTube, Facebook, then Reddit. YouTube operates as a sort of social media site. When it comes to the Non-Chinese w…
/r/TheRedPill24/06/21 02:04 PM
1

She’s not wrong. Censorship does work even if it doesn’t completely stop the spread of wrongthink.
/r/TheRedPill24/06/21 03:31 AM
1

Ideological consistency in each and every choice one makes isn’t necessary for this to be useful. It's better that this community is because at this point it no longer functions to Red Pill anyone on anything that matters The sidebar is still there. The top posts over the years are still available. Any person that applies even a shred of effort can find useful material. If the massive amount of still births couldn't convince you that you were injected with a sterilant nothing can. If this is tru…
/r/TheRedPill24/06/21 01:43 AM
1

decide if you're promoting hatespeech. But if you're leftist leaning: no action. My account was fairly new at that point, but my most most popular comment was on APF and my first post was on SPS. You might be right, but my instinct is to counter any defeatist attitudes (irrespective of whether they’re justified) exhibited by our half of this broader culture war. We’re still kicking. Bsultan may actually have his account reinstated on appeal. Every additional guy who seeks truth and ultimately be…
/r/TheRedPill23/06/21 05:31 PM
11

Account history isn’t perfect in gauging if someone’s a long-time user. I’ve been on and off here and reddit in general since 2013, with probably dozens of dead accounts, making a handful of posts that were well-received.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/21 05:17 PM
2

I know because I was permanently suspended on two separate occasions for saying the r-word not three months back. First time: For this comment: These people are [r-word]ed. screenshot Context: I called two guys who intentionally drove into a tornado and lowered their windows to record it the word. Their message: “banned for promoting hate,” which I disputed in my appeal. They lifted the ban. Second time: Archived my page this time For this comment: Probability for [r-word]s screenshot In respons…
/r/TheRedPill23/06/21 04:42 PM
1

I don’t know. I’m not the mods. They have a better idea of what type of posts and comments are being deleted if there is a discernible pattern and it’s not completely random. If they can find an underlying theme, then yes, they can get ahead of the admins by removing them and blacklisting certain words and phrases. We know that the r-word is off limits, for example. It may even delay when the admins decide to give the subreddit the axe if they’re already dead set on it but haven’t assigned an ex…
/r/TheRedPill23/06/21 03:04 PM
50

Most of Reddit’s clones/spin-offs/alternatives/competitors haven’t achieved any significant fraction of the success that Reddit has. Voat shut down, Ruqqus sucks, Saidit shut down, Raddit (now Raddle, for socialists) is a joke, Imzy (lol), etc. The alternatives listed on RedditAlternatives are lackluster to say the least. I don’t know what the analytics are on TRP.red, but it relies on this subreddit for growth and can potentially become intellectually stagnant from the lack of newcomers bringin…
/r/TheRedPill22/06/21 07:55 PM
22

You would think a parent would have a strong impulse in favor of their children raising their own biological children. I’d expect the strength of that impulse to vary based on one’s number of children, with more children making it weaker and less children making it stronger. Wonder if OP is an only child.
/r/askTRP21/06/21 06:10 PM
6

no one wants to read walls of text. Except those interested in truth and precision.
/r/askTRP20/06/21 04:12 AM
1

I suggest tactical homosexuality.
/r/askTRP19/06/21 08:43 AM
2

I was permanently suspended on two separate occasions for saying the r-word not three months back. First time: For this comment: These people are [r-word]ed. screenshot Context: I called two guys who intentionally drove into a tornado and lowered their windows to record it the word. Their message: “banned for promoting hate,” which I disputed in my appeal. They lifted the ban. Second time: Archived my page this time For this comment: Probability for [r-word]s screenshot In response to these comm…
/r/TheRedPill19/06/21 08:28 AM
2

In-group preference. It’s the same reason black social justice activists ignore racism against Asians in the black community, black-on-Asian hate crimes, and contextual factors in police killings. It’s why white supremacists excuse, justify, or deny white-on-non-white violence, or they blame it on Jews. It’s why the descendants of Holoca*st survivors can so readily persecute Arabs. It’s why women who are putatively in favor of gender equality usually don’t care about gender sentencing disparitie…
/r/askTRP18/06/21 01:47 PM
17

[DIVORCE RISK] “Contrary to conventional wisdom, when it comes to sex, less experience is better, at least for the marriage,” said W. Bradford Wilcox, a sociologist . women with zero or one previous sex partners before marriage were also least likely to divorce, while those with 10 or more were most likely. These divorce-proof brides are an exclusive crew: By the 2010s, he writes, just 5 percent of new brides were virgins. And just 6 percent of their marriages dissolved within five years, compar…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/06/21 09:34 PM
6

FYI this user actively tries to get this sub banned.
/r/MensRights11/06/21 11:05 AM
2

I doubt they’re attracted to you like how other users say. If it were one dude relentless picking on you, I’d advise that you fight him. With three girls, I’d advise that you never rise to their bait, not react to the shit they pull, and treat them with the bare minimum when you do have to interact with them. Keep your face blank/impassive near them and never engage in idle conversation or initiate interaction.
/r/askTRP09/06/21 09:28 PM
5

Bad advice
/r/askTRP09/06/21 09:23 PM
1

Wear a rubberband on your wrist. Every time you say it, pull on it and release.
/r/askTRP08/06/21 12:58 AM
2

I’d caution against this line of thinking tbh
/r/TheRedPill04/06/21 03:53 AM
4

I concur with this hypothesis. The value of lesser obese women is on the rise too.
/r/TheRedPill04/06/21 03:50 AM
2

I knew a girl like that once. We were in the same accelerated program in high school, but she was significantly brighter than I am and is just graduating from a ranking dental school right now. Her childhood sweetheart, who she was dating since before I knew her, was a short (but stocky and muscular) piece of shit. He had a reputation of flirting with other girls and was constantly making her cry, but she stuck with him those four years. Women who aren’t broken yet pair the strongest with their …
/r/askTRP03/06/21 11:23 PM
1

Go out. Even when there’s no one else. Talk, meet, and approach people, men and women. Get comfortable with it.
/r/askTRP03/06/21 06:14 PM
1

Bluechew
/r/askTRP03/06/21 02:00 PM
2

I can’t impress upon you how little this matters.
/r/askTRP03/06/21 01:23 PM
5

Where’s the “but she’s fucked 30 guys” reveal?
/r/askTRP03/06/21 12:33 PM
1

If I had a dollar every time I heard this sob story.
/r/askTRP03/06/21 10:25 AM
2

Ignore him, OP. Full speed ahead!
/r/askTRP03/06/21 09:38 AM
16

Maybe a “happy birthday” message is only that. No need to read further into it.
/r/askTRP03/06/21 08:33 AM
150

*guys. She don’t know who pappy is. Is it coincidence that she’s picking now to settle down?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/06/21 06:22 AM
2

I’m not convinced the medians and distributions out there are accurate
/r/askTRP03/06/21 01:25 AM
10

It’s the norm. Still grim. The guys who have a problem with this won’t be reproducing.
/r/askTRP03/06/21 01:24 AM
23

Some argue that Man’s drive for excellence is in part due to the pursuit of women. Others will argue that women can be a distraction in the quest for greatness. Both are correct, however contradictory that may seem.
/r/askTRP02/06/21 09:41 AM
3

Because expecting more leads to inevitable disappointment. Treating something as a natural phenomenon (and thus completely out of our hands) is a good psychological buffer against madness.
/r/askTRP29/05/21 12:29 AM
2

He was considering becoming exclusive to her and he has boundaries. You’re minimizing what those boundaries are. Maybe she had a train run on her. A guy shying away from LTRing that isn’t being unreasonable. By 2040 though, the preference will probably be unreasonable, but it isn’t yet.
/r/askTRP25/05/21 03:33 AM
2

Did he commit to any single person?
/r/askTRP25/05/21 03:30 AM
7

It’s either a gangbang/MFM threesome, unprotected sex with strangers, or some kind of competition like 30 guys in 30 nights.
/r/askTRP25/05/21 03:27 AM
6

America isn’t a monoculture. There are portions of society (usually urban, secular, left-leaning) that celebrate it, and there are others (rural, religious, right-leaning) that do not. In terms of proportions, it’s hard to say which is greater, but I’d wager the former group outnumbers the latter. There may be a generational aspect to it as well. The fact that it’s not equally accessible makes some dudes embittered to it, but that doesn’t negate the fact that unrestricted sociosexual orientation…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/21 11:27 PM
3

I never responded. Good. I didn't respond. Good. She wants to cheat on her ex with her other ex like how she cheated on her last ex with the ex before.
/r/askTRP23/05/21 07:36 PM
2

Michael from Toronto is going to become a meme here lol
/r/TheRedPill22/05/21 07:57 PM
5

I hate this person for manipulating me several times for her own reassurance and comfort in knowing someone wants her this much. I doubt anyone here does not have a cringe-inducing story about texting an ex. You can honestly just block her or whatever. Or don’t. You probably won’t do this again, and this is one of the most painless mistakes a guy can make, assuming you’re in different circles. Just don’t dwell on it and don’t do it again.
/r/askTRP22/05/21 06:20 AM
2

Depends on the temperature. There’s a male fashion advice sub that can give you better advice than I can here.
/r/askTRP21/05/21 05:22 PM
2

Put your pinky or index finger on the main part of your eyebrow. Tweeze the thin parts around the edges and the outliers. Your eyebrows should have a definitive edges instead of just fading away.
/r/askTRP21/05/21 05:18 PM
5

Women notice and are receptive to it imo.
/r/askTRP21/05/21 06:11 AM
1

Embarrassing mistake. Thanks for letting me know.
/r/askTRP21/05/21 05:32 AM
18

In terms of grooming (and some clothing advice): Don’t grow your hair out long. It probably looks better short. Few guys can pull off looking good with long hair. Find an old school barber that gets it right and stick with him. Same with beards. Clean-shaven will be the superior option through high school and college. Maintaining a well-groomed beard takes a lot of time and responsibility. Use an electric shaver to prevent ingrown hairs. If your eyebrows are unkempt, tweeze. Finger rule, no erra…
/r/askTRP20/05/21 11:38 PM
16

On average, compared to secular women? No.
/r/askTRP18/05/21 09:41 AM
1

The wall is usually about relationships, not sex. Enough guys have an “any port in the storm” mentality that even overweight, middle-aged women have options when it comes just getting laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/21 02:15 AM
2

Good sex from smart girls can make you ignore their glaring flaws and commit to them regardless.
/r/TheRedPill18/05/21 12:19 AM
3

These types of stories are necessary to hammer in the lesson that our emotions often get the better of our good judgement. The objective facts which point in one direction are often counteracted by strong impulses that try to lock down girls that give you good feelings. I think the strongest guys can be susceptible to this, where their hearts override their minds’ conclusions, so we need this continual reinforcement of the pitfalls of do so. Women have evolved to be good at this.
/r/TheRedPill18/05/21 12:16 AM
3

got a hotel for 2 nights for for over a grand just to be with me, wants to get my name tatted (i don't care for this) There’s a sweet spot between too little interest/effort from a girl you’re seeing and too much. In fact, the offer to get a tattoo of your suggests a certain level of instability that shouldn’t be ignored. which are that she has kid nearing 2 years old and she's relatively far. Like she told me she had a threesome with a couple and would be willing to let me have one "if it made …
/r/askTRP17/05/21 11:47 PM
4

There is, but that isn’t it. The black pill is supposed to justify defeatism, quitting, and not even trying because they think failure is guaranteed.
/r/TheRedPill17/05/21 05:58 AM
1

It’s like an interview when you pretty much have the job. They want to feel you out and make sure you’re not weird.
/r/askTRP16/05/21 07:37 PM
1

Indeed. If I don’t know how to respond to something, I don’t. Forcing an answer seems weird.
/r/askTRP16/05/21 07:35 PM
1

Reblock her. Enjoy your new LTR or spin new plates. Look up how to deal with intrusive thoughts.
/r/askTRP16/05/21 07:20 PM
0

More like she’s a part of the internet movement that hates men.
/r/askTRP16/05/21 07:13 PM
7

If she said “yes, you smell awful,” she might have gotten you.
/r/askTRP16/05/21 07:11 PM
1

Invite them to their place How do you do this. Or is something they suggest?
/r/askTRP16/05/21 01:01 AM
4

Block.
/r/askTRP15/05/21 09:42 PM
1

How is this reckoned with the fact that Dark Triad personalities succeed in short-term sexual relationships?
/r/askTRP15/05/21 09:10 PM
6

If you don’t try, you lose. If you try, you can still lose. You can only win if you try. It’s the difference between a life and a slow death.
/r/TheRedPill15/05/21 07:46 PM
1

It’s hilarious how depraved that sounds.
/r/TheRedPill15/05/21 07:38 PM
9

You should literally just assume this is the case with every one you meet. Unless you want marriage and children, it doesn’t matter.
/r/TheRedPill15/05/21 06:59 PM
4

Your FWBs appear to be your more valuable china, but they’re still plates.
/r/askTRP15/05/21 03:36 AM
1

There needs to be an adapted version of The Prince to help guys in the modern era.
/r/askTRP15/05/21 02:39 AM
1

i'm a fuck boy and shit like that, and she flaked How bad is it to have this reputation? I thought it was no big deal.
/r/askTRP14/05/21 11:37 PM
1

More businesses need to adopt this hiring process.
/r/askTRP14/05/21 11:35 PM
26

Should have split 22-30. It’s too broad a demographic, everyone is concentrated there, and there’s a big difference between your early twenties and late twenties.
/r/TheRedPill14/05/21 07:23 PM
1

A lot of what you’re raging about is completely out of your hands. You’re wasting your energy trying to move glaciers.
/r/askTRP14/05/21 07:05 PM
3

If you’re interested in physical relations with her, and she isn’t but keeps you around, you’re in her orbit. Outside of the manosphere, this is known as the friend-zone. In any case, the correct response is to limit all non-essential interaction if not all interaction with her. You were looking for one kind of relationship, and she isn’t interested, which is her prerogative. Part ways with no fuss. But if you want to remain just friends with her (assuming she does too), that would be your prero…
/r/askTRP14/05/21 06:56 PM
12

If your girlfriend thinks this is acceptable behavior, then what? If she doesn’t have a problem with it, that can be an issue in itself. And what do you mean by withholding attention from them? Ignoring them completely or just the bare minimum interaction (curt answers and coolness)?
/r/askTRP14/05/21 05:08 PM
20

Perhaps you were pursuing too much. Then she should have done the honorable thing by ghosting him. Instead, she’s trying to keep him in her orbit. Next.
/r/askTRP14/05/21 04:01 PM
12

If her friends are a bad influence, yes. But vetting a potential LTR means examining her friends.
/r/askTRP14/05/21 03:51 PM
2

I call it the Paradox of Feminine Attraction. Women are paradoxically attracted to guys who initially don’t appear to be interested in them. They will send non-verbal indicators of interest, like looking in your direction a lot, smiling at you for no reason, laughing at your jokes even they suck, etc. During this time, there is a sweet spot to act, but after a certain point, your apparent uninterest will cause them to move on. At this point it’s impossible to rekindle their attraction. I can thi…
/r/askTRP14/05/21 01:35 PM
41

Similar to how women who have relations with a lot of different dudes feel threatened and judged by women who refrain from doing the same, often pressuring them to do so.
/r/askTRP14/05/21 01:09 PM
9

This presupposes that she treats men as disposable, discarding them when they’re no longer useful without thinking twice. The point is that the relationship is temporary, so don’t get so emotionally invested and enjoy it while it lasts. It’s a useful defense mechanism in the age of casual hypergamic branch-swinging. You are adopting a mercenary attitude in response to women having already adopted it.
/r/askTRP14/05/21 05:05 AM
1

I wish I had a solution for you. I’m spitballing here cause I’ve been in similar ruts. When your days start to blend together, your progress appearing less and less tangible, I suggest you plan and organize a trip: something to look forward to and that breaks the monotony. Maybe a hiking trip, invite a girl, or maybe take her to Six Flags or whatever your equivalent is if you live outside the U.S.
/r/askTRP14/05/21 12:05 AM
3

wtf is this weird formatting?
/r/askTRP13/05/21 05:51 PM
2

If million dollar purification companies can’t remove those bc juices from the water, what makes you think your shitty fridge filter can?
/r/askTRP13/05/21 05:18 PM
1

Amphetamines, obtained legally and after a doctor’s diagnosis, of course. It completely kills your appetite. You have to force yourself to eat, and if you’re not careful, you can go 2-3 days without eating.
/r/MGTOW213/05/21 05:09 PM
11

Brainwashing, lack of boundaries, fear of not being in a relationship.
/r/MGTOW213/05/21 05:06 PM
3

It’s in the water tho
/r/askTRP13/05/21 04:37 PM
1

Talk to your doctor and specifically request for blood work to check your T levels. If it’s low, your doctor may suggest Testosterone Replacement Therapy (TRT). https://www.webmd.com/men/guide/testosterone-replacement-therapy-is-it-right-for-you It’s semi-expensive (~$100/month) and can be administered topically (absorbed into the skin from gel or skin patch), by injection, or orally. TRT will only become more widespread I think.
/r/askTRP13/05/21 03:08 PM
23

Maybe because the widespread availability of porn remains as a miserable alternative. It’s like unicorn blood: The blood of a unicorn will keep you alive, even if you are an inch from death, but at a terrible price. You will have but a half-life, a cursed life, from the moment the blood touches your lips. Porn is a shitty alternative to sex, but it, like sex, can temporarily stave off horniness. It may be our decreasing T levels. A lot of guys devote their energies to their hobbies in addition t…
/r/askTRP13/05/21 02:34 PM
26

That’s part of the equation. The other parts are the options provided by online dating. Women can afford to be more selective than guys because they’re the minority in online dating apps.
/r/askTRP13/05/21 02:02 PM
2

At the risk of sounding cliched, reality is a hard pill to swallow. Most people would rather live in blissful ignorance. That was the point of the movie and is the point of the metaphor. They are the uncomfortable truths that most people would deny rather than face, with encouragement from people in positions of power. In fact, if the majority of the population were to become aware of some of these things, very bad things would happen.
/r/askTRP13/05/21 06:17 AM
1

Pretend to care. And, honestly, while what they’re saying may not be interesting, why they’re saying it can be interesting and can lend insight into the human condition.
/r/askTRP12/05/21 10:25 PM
9

It’s because they’re better looking. That’s why guys who can, pursue young twenty-somethings. You will never get a single thirty-something woman to admit that.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/05/21 08:25 PM
68

Crab mentality. Become the beautiful butterfly God intended you to be. Fuck the haters.
/r/askTRP09/05/21 08:30 AM
29

What is the best way to break up with a crazy girlfriend? You don’t. You let them break up with you. I call it “The Handoff.” It’s not fast. But it’s safe and 100% guaranteed. I gotta warn you though. She’ll be the one initiating the split. You will also be cheated on during the transition. But you will be free without having your tires slashed. If you have a wife or girlfriend, pay attention. The Handoff is the same way guys unintentionally lose their wives or girlfriends. Here’s how to perform…
/r/askTRP08/05/21 12:53 AM
10

Indeed. These are the sorts of things that turn guys into jaded plate-spinners. It’s almost like a rite of passage that makes men see the truth and become cynical realists. It’s supposed to be painful.
/r/askTRP08/05/21 12:40 AM
1

Kettlebells if you’re driving.
/r/askTRP08/05/21 12:29 AM
0

There was no depth. What you experienced was illusory.
/r/askTRP08/05/21 12:28 AM
34

What’s worse is that his ex likely doesn’t have any of these residual feelings. Most women will screw a dozen dudes or so post-breakup, and that helps tremendously in forgetting an ex. That’s the answer btw. Know that she isn’t stuck up on you as you are on her. You’re a speck in her rear view (IF that), and she should be a speck in yours. Abundance is the second part of the answer. You won’t be so fixated on one girl if you’re on speed dial for 3-4 other ones. She’s forgotten you in a sea of FW…
/r/askTRP08/05/21 12:11 AM
2

I might be able to discern some of it, but if someone with more experience does a breakdown, I’d read it.
/r/askTRP07/05/21 05:10 AM
4

Make sure the sleeves open in both directions.
/r/askTRP06/05/21 11:58 AM
31

I agree with you. There’s this desire in most men for a long-term partner. Irrespective of whether it’s conditioned from a young age or programmed into our DNA, we get physically sick without one. But what happens when the overwhelming majority of our choices are subpar, and who too would adversely affect our health? Sickness becomes inevitable then. Pick your poison.
/r/askTRP05/05/21 10:32 PM
1

Such is the lot of men. You need guy friends.
/r/askTRP05/05/21 12:10 AM
2

She blew him? I don’t remember this.
/r/askTRP04/05/21 04:26 AM
7

Being red-pilled means being versed in the underlying nature of social and sexual relationships. You can be red-pilled on gender dynamics, race, politics, etc. Goku is disinterested in everything not related to fighting, training, and martial arts. He’s either unaware or childishly naive about all else. He’s a one-track mind. Jesus, I’m arguing about whether or not Goku is red-pilled.
/r/askTRP04/05/21 03:06 AM
2

In just that facet of his life, to the extent that he neglects his wife and kids. His kids desperately train and fight just to get his attention. Maybe a natural Chad, but not red-pilled. He’s not that intelligent, all things considered.
/r/askTRP04/05/21 02:52 AM
10

How is Goku red-pilled? Lol. I don’t think he ever indicates interest in women, and his wife essentially forced him to marry her. He’s addicted to training and fighting.
/r/askTRP04/05/21 02:44 AM
22

This one hot chick was trying to hitch a ride and she showed him hella IOIs and he didn't let her in simply because he was going in a different direction. He didn’t because she was a minor and he didn’t want to go to jail. This was explicitly made clear.
/r/askTRP04/05/21 02:42 AM
15

Bond should be at the top of anyone’s list. Even the Daniel Craig iteration. So too Pierce Brosnan.
/r/askTRP04/05/21 02:40 AM
30

My well is polluted. I think I’ll go over there and pollute theirs too.
/r/askTRP03/05/21 09:07 AM
3

I’d cut my losses. If she’s still interested, she might get in touch with you, but that’s doubtful considering the info you’ve provided. Move on.
/r/askTRP02/05/21 08:08 AM
2

Regardless of why she said it I'll keep acting cold, as it seems to make her feel more attracted to me. Stay the course.
/r/askTRP02/05/21 07:49 AM
27

Laws that inconvenience women are sexist.
/r/MensRights02/05/21 06:41 AM
3

Again, enjoy your little french toy :) No joke, OP. I hope you do.
/r/askTRP02/05/21 02:38 AM
21

I wouldn’t shake his hand either. What olive branch? I don’t work with the guy or ever have to see him, so why is “making peace” necessary? Neither of these people should exist to OP.
/r/askTRP02/05/21 01:45 AM
65

Your ex doesn’t exist to you anymore. What ex?
/r/askTRP02/05/21 01:43 AM
-3

I’m thinking it will be banned in many countries in the next few years.
/r/askTRP01/05/21 06:16 PM
18

He’s not joking.
/r/askTRP01/05/21 12:38 AM
3

*unfazed Congrats.
/r/askTRP30/04/21 07:36 AM
15

I used to look up to him.
/r/MGTOW30/04/21 05:13 AM
3

The Tank is German too. https://youtu.be/7w8aG3VhArE
/r/MGTOW30/04/21 05:03 AM
2

It would be hard to out-masculine that chin.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/04/21 01:53 AM
2

The Swiss are very independent. No to NATO, no to EU. It means they take full responsibility for their own defense. They have enough bunkers and provisions set aside to last for years. They’ve rigged all their major roadways with explosives, and essentially live in a country fortified to the extent that it gives Israel a hardon.
/r/MGTOW29/04/21 11:11 PM
1

Panzer?
/r/MGTOW29/04/21 11:07 PM
2

Haven’t you seen Kingdom of Heaven?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/04/21 09:13 AM
4

Snip snip, lads.
/r/MGTOW29/04/21 07:01 AM
4

So what? Lol. You don’t have to convince a girl that this matters. You just have to avoid the ones with deep counts for LTRs.
/r/MGTOW29/04/21 06:50 AM
40

[DIVORCE RISK] “Contrary to conventional wisdom, when it comes to sex, less experience is better, at least for the marriage,” said W. Bradford Wilcox, a sociologist . women with zero or one previous sex partners before marriage were also least likely to divorce, while those with 10 or more were most likely. These divorce-proof brides are an exclusive crew: By the 2010s, he writes, just 5 percent of new brides were virgins. And just 6 percent of their marriages dissolved within five years, compar…
/r/MGTOW29/04/21 01:10 AM
1

Stranger
/r/askTRP28/04/21 07:10 PM
1

Ideas considered “red-pilled” can be expressed without coming off as weird as long as you stay away from subculture lingo and if you stick to first principles. That said, I still wouldn’t discuss it with women.
/r/askTRP28/04/21 08:12 AM
24

I believe the most driven and successful guys in history like Alexander, Caesar, Chingis Khan, etc., were fundamentally driven by rage at what the world is, fueling their strong desires to change it.
/r/askTRP28/04/21 05:41 AM
32

Lol. Simply don’t, OP. Only swipe right on who you want to fuck.
/r/askTRP28/04/21 12:47 AM
18

That’s exactly what she’s suggesting. And she’s probably right.
/r/MensRights26/04/21 10:32 PM
4

Treat these relationships as temporary (as they are) and it’s harder to get jealous.
/r/askTRP26/04/21 10:27 PM
30

The MSM is literally the enemy of the people. I feel like someone tried to warn us about this before 🤔🤔🤔
/r/MensRights26/04/21 07:24 PM
43

spoils the fun otherwise F is for herpes.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/04/21 02:50 PM
1

There’s more than just those two options. I don’t like to use the “I word” because it’s what leftists use to describe the entire manosphere or any man who won’t subordinate his own interests to those of women. If he decides the voluntarily opt out, it wouldn’t apply to him anyways. He can choose to not pursue women. He can choose to pay for sex. He may decide OLD is not for him, which seems to be what he’s complaining about. He then has the option to meet women through groups, or public venues l…
/r/askTRP26/04/21 07:09 AM
14

Some must touch the stove to learn it is hot.
/r/askTRP26/04/21 06:55 AM
15

I'm open to them living with me Cohabitation leads to complacency. Everything good comes at a risk though.
/r/askTRP26/04/21 02:00 AM
55

A decision that’s bad for society as a whole but good for the individual. The situation will only get worse and we’ll be dead long before it gets better. Find solace in your hobbies, your health, and your male friends. Allahu akbar.
/r/askTRP26/04/21 01:54 AM
1

Men don’t want their pelvises pulverized.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/04/21 01:19 AM
1

Isn’t one of the rules in the book to not insult others?
/r/askTRP25/04/21 04:15 PM
2

Forrest Simp
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/04/21 09:40 PM
16

OP shouldn’t have included that. It distracts from his main point. Or he could have used “meth addiction” as an example instead.
/r/TheRedPill24/04/21 01:40 AM
47

It only gets worse from here, fren.
/r/MGTOW23/04/21 09:32 PM
1

There was a copypasta floating around that broke it down by marriage and divorce rates. I just cut-pasted onto my profile if you want to see it. This study says there was a ten-fold increase of infidelity when comparing the top fifth most promiscuous women and the bottom fifth. Bailey, J. M., Kirk, K. M., Zhu, G., Dunne, M. P., & Martin, N. G. (2000). Do individual differences in sociosexuality represent genetic or environmentally contingent strategies? Evidence from the Australian twin registry…
/r/askTRP23/04/21 12:43 AM
4

Scientific data shows long term marriage success declines the more partners she has had. This is actually true though. The chances of infidelity, divorce, and marital dissatisfaction all skyrocket for women with more partners.
/r/askTRP23/04/21 12:06 AM
1

This is why I don’t feel bad for eunuchs in the past. I envy the mental clarity, the unclouded minds, they must have had.
/r/TheRedPill22/04/21 10:39 PM
21

I’ve gotten more compliments from men than women. Women just smile at you or make excuses to look in your direction.
/r/askTRP22/04/21 10:11 PM
3

It’s possible this is a crabs in a bucket-type deal, but you should ask yourself honestly if you’ve been treating them differently, perhaps even contemptuously, for their beta qualities.
/r/askTRP22/04/21 10:10 PM
13

Jesus Christ
/r/askTRP22/04/21 07:34 PM
4

Yeah. Lotta dudes between 18 and 22.
/r/askTRP22/04/21 04:54 PM
110

AITA invariably sides with women. There was a post of a dude who warned his friend about this girl he was seeing because all of her exes had something bad to say about her. They tore this poor guy to pieces. You know for a fact that if it were a girl warning a girlfriend of a guy who had a bad reputation, they’d all be congratulating her. The glaring double standards they refuse to acknowledge leads me to dismiss their opinions immediately.
/r/MGTOW22/04/21 03:02 PM
2

Losing your v-card by your 7th birthday is pretty impressive ngl
/r/askTRP22/04/21 01:38 PM
1

Some would. Others would quickly attach themselves to a man.
/r/MGTOW22/04/21 12:28 AM
15

It’s not her actions necessarily. She didn’t do anything wrong, and in fact gave him a valuable lesson—these relationships all have expiration dates.
/r/askTRP21/04/21 05:40 AM
1

He’s the hero we need.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/04/21 11:02 PM
18

Most women aren’t worth it. Probably the biggest red pill (black pill?) out there. In terms of companionship, most nowadays don’t have much to offer or are actually negatively affecting your psyche.
/r/askTRP20/04/21 04:34 PM
2

You wouldn’t be an asshole if you ended things. She grew nearly 50 lbs. in 6 months? Next!!
/r/askTRP20/04/21 12:27 PM
101

34yo plate? Did he find her in a museum?
/r/askTRP19/04/21 09:08 PM
2

Fitness should be mandatory in this country. No one should have to look like that or at that.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/04/21 12:13 PM
2

Suicide just passes the pain on to someone else. It’s horrible. It’s the most selfish thing someone can do. It is selfish, but ultimately if someone opts to do it with sound mind and deliberation over the long term, I’m not necessarily opposed to it. Forcing someone to live so that you don’t personally feel sorry seems selfish. There’s a fundamental contradiction in believing in “my body, my choice,” and yet is not being pro-choice. And only becoming concerned after an attempt, whether it’s succ…
/r/TheRedPill18/04/21 11:20 PM
4

Sometimes it seems like their bios are repulsive by design. No one can unintentionally be so off-putting.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/04/21 10:14 PM
4

You should care what others think. That’s why we bathe, dress nice, control ourselves, etc. But yeah, you fucked up. Good news is that most rp guys have bp things in their pasts that they cringe at, like texting pathetic things to an ex or whatever. You learned from this. It’s essential that you cut this girl out of your life, act as though this never happened while simultaneously learning from it. Read Marcus Aurelius.
/r/askTRP18/04/21 05:12 PM
3

How much can you lift? Also, Crest white strips.
/r/askTRP18/04/21 03:56 PM
21

I’ve noticed that ~99% of women don’t feel guilt when they’re unfaithful. Don’t get married, lads.
/r/askTRP18/04/21 01:11 PM
5

Looking someone up on fb ever few months isn’t stalking.
/r/askTRP18/04/21 01:08 PM
1

It was a good joke. I was just saying that I knew I misspelled the word when I wrote it, but I only figured out how when you said arbor-.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/04/21 05:48 PM
2

Indeed. Some learn through observing others, some through their own experiences and some not at all.
/r/MGTOW17/04/21 12:25 PM
22

Let this be a cautionary tale to you, lads. The biggest proponents of the “don’t get married” message are men who’ve been married. Allahu akbar, nibs.
/r/MGTOW16/04/21 03:57 PM
3

Evidently, OP is in the market for an LTR. No one is suggesting that high-n women don’t make for good short term partners. In fact, they make for better short-term partners than quality women because they put out more easily and have more experience. High-n women don’t make for good long-term partners because they’re more likely to be unfaithful, unsatisfied, unstable, etc.
/r/askTRP15/04/21 01:12 PM
3

If you were in the market for the elusive quality woman, why wouldn’t you?
/r/askTRP15/04/21 12:33 PM
2

What is human nature? Are you suggesting immorality isn’t natural to humans?
/r/askTRP15/04/21 12:29 PM
10

https://files.catbox.moe/p9x0nq.mp4
/r/MGTOW15/04/21 11:27 AM
22

This sub gets surprisingly moralistic about infidelity, but to all guys who can, and who can get away with it fairly easily, I’d recommend hooking up with other girls once in a while. It surprisingly does well at keeping a guy from getting betafied. Obviously no long-term things on the side. Also, never mix finances or cohabit with her her until you’ve carefully vetted her and her history.
/r/askTRP15/04/21 10:24 AM
26

From the BBC: Lavinia Woodward: Stab attack student quits Oxford
/r/MGTOW15/04/21 08:47 AM
10

I guess there’s hope for Looney Lovegood after all.
/r/MGTOW15/04/21 08:28 AM
21

Idk about you guys, but I wouldn’t want this stab-happy person cutting me open on the operating table.
/r/MGTOW15/04/21 08:26 AM
1

Caesar’s wife must be above suspicion.
/r/askTRP15/04/21 06:22 AM
12

it turns out she bought those condoms for a girl's trip to Vegas "just in case" Marriage is such an idiotic prospect in light of things like this. Honestly, I’m starting to think fidelity is too. I would never rat out a guy friend that’s stepping out because my default assumption is that any given woman is doing the same.
/r/askTRP15/04/21 06:20 AM
5

Posts tons of pictures of just their dogs too. Almost like a surrogate child.
/r/askTRP14/04/21 04:43 PM
6

What’s funnier is her white fever. https://i.ytimg.com/vi/NPhwmXLIJKE/maxresdefault.jpg
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/21 08:57 AM
2

At first I thought workaholic(?), but it seems completely reasonable that she drinks on the job.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/04/21 05:45 AM
1

Irregular as in a non-regular occurrence. I’m not sure what you’re reading into this.
/r/askTRP14/04/21 05:00 AM
8

It is true, but keep in mind that they selectively apply this logic. When defending Islam or Muslims, they’ll say that the biggest victims of radical Islamists are Muslims, which is technically true. The point is that we should still feel sympathy for them. Unfortunately, this sympathy does not extend to male victims of male violence, let alone that male victims of female violence are completely ignored. Same thing with their generalizations; they’re comfortable with making sweeping generations …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/21 05:11 PM
7

Your situation is irregular. That doesn’t mean it doesn’t happen. A nearly 20 year gap is comparatively rare, but if 2/100 relationships qualify, you’re still going to encounter examples of these on a regular basis if you interact with a lot of people irl or participate in a large forum such as this.
/r/askTRP13/04/21 03:38 PM
38

College-aged girls tend to prefer college-aged guys. Beyond college, the more stable ones are usually open to relationships with guys 2-10 years their senior. Women complain about guys pursuing younger women, claiming we do so because they’re more susceptible to manipulation or are less likely to have a good basis of comparison. They won’t confess that it’s literally because women in their early twenties are generally a lot more attractive than women beyond them.
/r/askTRP13/04/21 02:18 PM
2

Positively reptilian.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/04/21 03:00 AM
4

Some dudes are into fat chicks. Couldn’t tell if you weren’t be serious.
/r/askTRP08/04/21 02:38 AM
8

and that what happened with me meant nothing lol and it was all me. She never wanted it She isn’t just crazy. She was insinuating that it was borderline non-consensual. Op, do not pass go, do not collect $200.
/r/askTRP08/04/21 02:29 AM
-2

Disgusting. Wtf
/r/askTRP08/04/21 02:17 AM
2

She’s not yours. Let her go.
/r/askTRP08/04/21 01:52 AM
4

There’s got to be other gyms. If not, this is truly a dilemma.
/r/askTRP08/04/21 12:55 AM
1

wtf lol
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/04/21 10:16 PM
2

With those levels of abundance and opportunity, it’s hard to define alpha and beta qualities. He’s not sticking to any single woman here. He’s not beholden to any single woman. He doesn’t live a life where attractive young women aren’t throwing themselves at him. He doesn’t have to work hard to do well there at this point.
/r/askTRP07/04/21 06:16 AM
3

Beta Elon, fucking dozens of hot women twenty years his junior. Beta Elon, richest man in the world, electrifier of cars, colonizer of Mars. Beta Elon, only allowing his Y-chromosome carrying sperm cells fertilize the eggs of his women, ensuring all sons and no daughters. Beta Elon.
/r/askTRP07/04/21 05:45 AM
3

On the one hand, I like the laxed moderation because you can banter here like you can’t elsewhere. On the other hand, shitposters, retards, and incels can ruin the atmosphere and veer conversations away from what aids in growth and productivity.
/r/askTRP07/04/21 02:16 AM
31

“Punching up” is alright by them, even though men are committing suicide 3.5x more often than women, have much higher prison sentences, are systemically ignored when we’re victims of domestic abuse, are generally more isolated and lacking support networks, and where men’s groups or movements that seeks to curtail these things are targeted by left-wingers and women’s groups.
/r/TheRedPill07/04/21 01:06 AM
30

For an electrical engineer, OP seems dumb af. But he’s come to the right place. Hopefully he heeds this advice.
/r/askTRP07/04/21 12:55 AM
6

Don’t get married, boys.
/r/askTRP07/04/21 12:54 AM
1

Since I’m not interested in arguing this point, I suppose we should just agree to disagree and leave it at that.
/r/askTRP06/04/21 08:15 PM
1

If you cannot present your values honestly to the world, well , lets just say you have a problem You can’t. Not without real potential social, professional, or even physical repercussions.
/r/askTRP06/04/21 07:55 PM
4

He’d have to bring them in from another relationship.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/04/21 07:45 PM
15

I’m glad you came out of this mostly unscathed, with a valuable lesson learned. Good luck, brother.
/r/askTRP06/04/21 09:59 AM
42

This is why you never mix finances or cohabit without extreme vetting. You could have just plated her and the option still appears open.
/r/askTRP06/04/21 09:44 AM
42

It is a bad idea. Practice better opsec and maintain a separate account for non-trp posts. Paranoia is your friend.
/r/askTRP06/04/21 01:19 AM
11

It’s called yo-yoing. She’s a 34yo single mother without many options in terms of providers, trying to increase her own value in your eyes by creating a manufactured sense of scarcity. Hard pass. Block and ignore.
/r/askTRP06/04/21 12:46 AM
1

Allah weeps, lads.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/04/21 12:24 AM
24

When I was in a frat, if two brothers got into a dispute and couldn’t just talk it out, it was settled through other means. After that, the problem more or less went away. It rarely happened, but when it it did, the conflict was pretty much resolved.
/r/askTRP05/04/21 11:16 PM
13

If you’re going to dispense with proper spelling, grammar and punctuation, you better be young and hot. Even then my tolerance would be low.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/04/21 09:22 AM
5

If I were in the market, I wouldn’t be looking for a virgin, but what you’re saying isn’t true. Roughly 20% of women marry their one-and-onlies, and they are a group of women that’s least likely statistically to cheat and divorce. Not all women lie about their pasts. Otherwise, you wouldn’t have women freely admitting to getting with 30-50 guys or saying that they don’t know the exact amount. The disparity in outcomes (infidelity, divorce, high relationship satisfaction rates) between women who’…
/r/askTRP05/04/21 03:45 AM
5

It’s relative. During the 70’s, over 90% of women had less than 5 partners. 5 then was a lot whereas it’s minuscule now. I personally wouldn’t invest in the long-term with someone in the double digits, which, back in the day for a woman, was a lot and almost unheard of.
/r/askTRP05/04/21 03:21 AM
1

Which was evolutionarily adaptive. Historically, men instinctively separated women into wifey material and only-for-sex material because investing time and resources into a woman who probably wasn’t carrying your child was evolutionarily maladaptive. Remember, paternity tests and widespread access to effective contraceptives are a modern phenomenon, so promiscuous women usually got pregnant and then had to pawn the kids off as those of their provider. Cuckolds were thus less likely to to pass on…
/r/askTRP05/04/21 03:10 AM
47

Yeah, it’s retard thinking. Psychologists divide women (and men) into two categories: those with unrestricted sociosexual orientations and those with restricted sociosexual orientations, with there being no transfer from one category to the other. Women who sleep with lots of guys desire novelty and variety, are considered unrestricted, and are low on commitment and fidelity. There’s no such thing as “taming a slut.” She’s most likely going to step out on you, your personal performance nonwithst…
/r/askTRP04/04/21 10:48 PM
5

She seems soft in the head tbh. I’m not touching this one.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/04/21 12:48 AM
25

Well then emotionally uninvest. Assuming what you’ve provided is accurate, the consensus here is that she is indeed not LTR material. So disengage. In fact, I’d just break it off, but that’s up to you. I can’t stay with a girl that I was ever serious about, even if it’s only as a plate. Hurts too much.
/r/askTRP03/04/21 01:25 PM
10

Allah doesn’t forgive. Allah doesn’t forget. Take the Sharia pill.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/04/21 11:23 AM
35

Are contraceptives not available where she’s from? 2 babies and yet a mid-pregnancy pic so another may be on the way? I almost feel sorry for the poor dumb bastard that gets conned into this relationship.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/04/21 01:32 AM
5

I think at some subconscious level women are aware of this, which is why they too wouldn’t be in favor of a female head of state.
/r/TheRedPill03/04/21 12:33 AM
17

If they legalized prostitution, internet sex workers wouldn’t be nearly as successful. They’re only propped up by simps who can’t get laid.
/r/askTRP02/04/21 10:21 PM
1

I don’t. If they know her history and proceed anyway, it’s really on them. Some guys can only learn by getting burned.
/r/askTRP02/04/21 09:27 PM
3

It’s a valid concern, but there’s really no way to verify as associating with rp can be social and professional suicide. You’re going to have to use your own judgement/TAE to separate the wheat from the chaff.
/r/askTRP02/04/21 12:28 PM
2

It dispels foolish love for an ideal that no longer exists and will never come back.
/r/askTRP02/04/21 09:59 AM
4

I was dumb enough to be taken in by this.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/21 08:39 AM
4

This is due to paternity fraud anxiety. It’s literally evolutionarily adaptive.
/r/askTRP01/04/21 06:12 PM
5

I suspect desiring that low amount would just lead to disappointment Guys don’t desire LTRs with low numbers for no reason. It’s the things that accompany a high count that gives us headaches, like infidelity, low relationship satisfaction, the high probability of separation/divorce, risk of disease, psychological trauma, etc. I’d much rather be disappointed. That’s several times less damaging.
/r/askTRP01/04/21 06:07 PM
3

For a LTR, anything in the double digits is too high. For anything else, as long as she’s clean it doesn’t matter.
/r/askTRP01/04/21 06:02 PM
14

This has always been the biggest obstacle to Frame.
/r/askTRP31/03/21 11:44 PM
17

I hold doors if someone’s nearby and don’t really think much else about it.
/r/TheRedPill31/03/21 09:06 PM
1

When someone insults me, I try to come up with a clever comeback. This shouldn't be your reflex.
/r/askTRP26/03/21 07:44 PM
1

It feels like life is divided into two parts. The first half is where you learn, grow, date, have experiences, get your career goals aligned, etc. Then you get married, become the parent and start a family, restarting the cycle for your kids. The first half of your life is validated by your success and achievement, and while that remains important in the second stage that is parenthood, what takes precedence then is children and grandchildren. An evolutionary psychologist defines evolutionary su…
/r/RedPillWomen25/03/21 10:38 PM
1

It's all about sociosexual orientation. Unfortunately, finding a compatible long-term partner from today's pickings is a lot more difficult. He'll need to bring a lot to the table.
/r/TheRedPill25/03/21 09:55 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter