TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • A Voice for Men
    • Dalrock
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Heartiste
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • Return of Kings
    • The Power Moves
    • The Rational Male
    • The Spearhead
    • Other

      • Alpha Game
      • Archwinger
      • Artful Prudence
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • Illimitable Men
      • In Mala Fide
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • KillToParty
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Rian Stone
      • RooshV
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Woujo
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Support

top %20 cope DESTROYED

fakelovers1

December 21, 2022
1 upvotes
/r/AllPillDebate

let's see what happened between generations

lower test: https://health.clevelandclinic.org/declining-testosterone-levels/

lower IQ: https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/iq-rates-are-dropping-many-developed-countries-doesn-t-bode-ncna1008576

dramatic increase in disorders: https://www.unicef.org/press-releases/increase-child-and-adolescent-mental-disorders-spurs-new-push-action-unicef-and-who

​

B-B-UT women have been choosing the top men because height increased!!!!!!!1111

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title top %20 cope DESTROYED
Author

fakelovers1

Upvotes 1
Comments 77
Date December 21, 2022 8:56 PM UTC
(3 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/AllPillDebate
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/AllPillDebate/comments/zs0m3l/top_20_cope_destroyed/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/AllPillDebate/top-20-cope-destroyed.1144869
https://theredarchive.com/post/1144869
Red Pill terms in post
testosterone

Comments

[–]no_bling_just_dingself-aware MSTOW (hit the wall at age 0)[M] [score hidden] 3 years ago stickied comment (0 children) | Copy Link

thread was manually reapproved after algorithmCels said it's jannying time and then jannied all over it

[–]FortniteAbobusWhitePill 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

All HighIQ boyz in my company are single/incels. All "blue collars" and techs are in relationships/married/with children. Guess who has sub 6 exterior and who is 6"+ height?

[–]fakelovers1[S] 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

yeah, low t and autism are such featıres of attractive hunky men.

[–]FortniteAbobusWhitePill 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

Take you pills and calm down.

[–]fakelovers1[S] 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

no, my links say lower t and autism are also getting more common

[–]debatelord_1 -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Autism is becoming more common because people are having children later in life. Autism rates are heavily correlated with age of parents.

[–][deleted] 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]debatelord_1 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

And now you post on allpilldebate, go figure

[–]We_Are_All_One 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Autism is heavily correlated with heavy metal damage mainly mercury and aluminum.

As shots go up, autism goes up.

[–]FortniteAbobusWhitePill 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

More common != more attractive.

[–][deleted] 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]FortniteAbobusWhitePill 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Chill, mental. chill.

[–]no_bling_just_dingself-aware MSTOW (hit the wall at age 0) 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (56 children) | Copy Link

lower IQ

who says women have been selecting for iq

why do you think that women's sexuality works for the greater good of the species do you know what a selfish gene is

lower test

microplastics and diet

increase in disorders

tneds to happen when your mom breathed in a shitton of lead in the atmosphere from leaded gasoline during the 70s and then had you in her late 30s like mine did

[–]fakelovers1[S] -2 points-1 points0 points 3 years ago (54 children) | Copy Link

lower iq isn't an attractive trait and has also been assoicated with unattractive facial features, and obviously is the opposite of hypergamy, it means she seek a man easier to control, rather than a dominant one, just admit this is an oofy doofy trait(though, it could also be that men choose for low iq instead, i'm not sure)

neurological disorders are largely genetic, personality disorders are a different thing.

​

just admit women literaly choose to bred with emasculated cucks that are easy to control.

[–]tired_hillbilly 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (27 children) | Copy Link

Lower iq tends to come with higher risk-tolerance and low inhibitions, ie. the kinds of things women like.

[–]fakelovers1[S] 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

lower iq AND lower t, it isn't even the cia propaganda of low iq brute replacing the gentleman stereotype, it's literally weak soyboys.

[–][deleted] 3 years ago (25 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]tired_hillbilly 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I mean, if you're a bookworm spending all your time alone studying, you're probably not gonna meet any women.

[–]no_bling_just_dingself-aware MSTOW (hit the wall at age 0) 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago* (17 children) | Copy Link

tsugacel, you really think women are lining up like consumers at an apple store to fuck the most intelligent and most decent men? ive seen women complain that they fuck guys who have shit on their house's floor, guys who don't shower, don't "treat women like people", guys who have their phone contact labeled "free pussy #3", what does it tell you that 1) that guy isn't an incel and 2) there was a #1 and a #2? where are you more likely to find virgin men, a STEM class or the hood? let's not be delusional here. i also see guys competing to date wife up girls who are so narcissistic i wouldn't so much as bang with a blindfold on if they handed me cash for my services while some faw users seemed decent in my judgment, i'm not playing the men good women bad game here.

[–][deleted] 3 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]no_bling_just_dingself-aware MSTOW (hit the wall at age 0) 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago* (15 children) | Copy Link

i didn't say "desirable" women choose garbage men, i said the supply of women that value the right things is low, and i believe that what you fuck is who you are. i dont know why you act like this is shocking, if i explicitly say something's wrong with those ladies you'd probably read it as misogynistic.

[–][deleted] 3 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]no_bling_just_dingself-aware MSTOW (hit the wall at age 0) 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

ok i apologize.

[–][deleted] 3 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Occams_clipper2 points 3 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Constantly framing people as good if they are lonely and bad if they are popular takes all credibility out of these arguments.

The opposite of this is the norm i.e. most people assume someone is 'good' if popular and 'bad' if lonely. So it's only natural that to counter this you'll get a little overcorrection.

[–]no_bling_just_ding1 point 3 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Now let’s discuss how every successful “Chad” isn’t a jerk, an abuser, a low life, or a deadbeat

i dont think i said this, i just said that those attributes and their absence dont make nor break chad

[–][deleted] 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]no_bling_just_dingself-aware MSTOW (hit the wall at age 0) 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

lol i wish ayn rand fans would get fired from their jobs and go homeless i just think she's right about this specific topic

a broken clock is right twice a day and all that you get me

[–][deleted] 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]no_bling_just_ding2 points 3 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

bro i think ayn rand was an actual fucking sociopath, if anything im blown by the fact that people actually revered her

[–]fakelovers1[S] 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

i do think there's an agenda by american government to replace the stereotype of civilized, high status gentleman with opressed, lower iq brute archetype but... it isn't women's nature lol it's burgerica messing with human nature.

though it's lower iq WITH lower test, so it probably isn't even that

[–]Occams_clipper 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Why are you so desperate to put a positive spin on female preferences? I doubt you would be doing this in the opposite scenario i.e. if a woman said that men in general prefer bimbos.

[–][deleted] 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Occams_clipper 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

All people with a sex drive prefer people they are attracted to rather than people they aren’t. This isn’t a mystery.

Obfuscating like this does not strengthen your argument. We're talking about the specifics of what does or doesn't cause attraction. My main point in my previous comment was that it's kinda curious how you instantly poo-poo the notion that women might not be all that attracted to intelligence or decency in men. Especially when it's pretty mainstream for women themselves to complain about male preferences such as supposedly being less attracted to educated and/or career-oriented women.

[–]no_bling_just_dingself-aware MSTOW (hit the wall at age 0) -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (22 children) | Copy Link

lower iq isn't an attractive trait

lower iq is more sexually successful than higher iq and is more associated with crime and aggression. not very docile either.

[–]sparklyyblueberryy 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

But it's not due to attractiveness. It's that they pursue a "r-selected" mating methodology. Low IQ men and women have a different type of sexual behaviour, can't delay aversion and so on.

[–]fakelovers1[S] 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

it could also be just that STEM fields have less women, thus more likely to be virgins. i wouldn't take STEM field as an auto indicator of high intelligence though.

[–]sparklyyblueberryy 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Who talked about STEM?

[–]fakelovers1[S] 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

generally ''high iq fields'' are associated with them, and they do have an infamous gender balance that was probably even greater in year 2000.

[–]sparklyyblueberryy 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

In these studies they'd control for factors such as education

[–]fakelovers1[S] -2 points-1 points0 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

r-selection is an outdated bs study by someone who liked BBC

[–]sparklyyblueberryy 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

What on earth are you talking about?

[–]fakelovers1[S] -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

it's coined by someone who used racist theories along with it in 80's.

it has been discredited and considered outdated by many others.

[–]no_bling_just_dingself-aware MSTOW (hit the wall at age 0) 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

it's wignat holocaust denier pseudoscience but i think sparklyy is referring to the behaviors those terms describe not the broader theory about evolution behind them

[–][deleted] 3 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]no_bling_just_dingself-aware MSTOW (hit the wall at age 0) 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

longer life history

higher risk aversion

[–][deleted] 3 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]no_bling_just_dingself-aware MSTOW (hit the wall at age 0) 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

It’s fun to watch men continually shame women for their romantic and sexual choices, but women do not choose men with lower IQs or a lesser education.

lower iq i aint sure but a lesser education i agree entirely

> The “hur durr women prefer stupid thugs” is a revenge fantasy with no basis in science or reality.

ask the other person who replied to me about bbc and hip hop being pushed by the cia

it's more so that soyciety in general worships dumb thugs than just women

[–]fakelovers1[S] 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

also
i'm not saying america didn't fuck modern soyciety in the ass, it's
just that you guys accept it as ''women's true nature'' instead
burgerica fucking u guys in the ass

[–]no_bling_just_dingself-aware MSTOW (hit the wall at age 0) 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

i agree but i dont call it "women's true nature" for me its more like "this is what women do in our current environment which is unlikely to change in a fundamental way in our lifetimes" and instead of ascribing it only to cia i just acknowledge that some permanent technical advances have played a major part. in other words, a rightoid would say "women dont get married because muh feminism", a leftoid who cares about family would say "women dont get married because muh economy", a blackpiller like me says "women dont get married because they dont want to, the guy they'd marry would end up in a dead bedroom anyway or an open marriage so it's not at all obvious that forcing them into it would help ANYBODY barring the infringement on boundaries, and women have infinite access to dick from the internet and they can shop for genes from sperm banks." you can call it 'true nature', i call it this is how female h sapiens behave in 21st century soyciety.

[–]fakelovers1[S] 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

technology is also utilized by american or global elites gov's.

[–]no_bling_just_ding1 point 3 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

and it's used by you and me. we're on reddit. the point is, the empire can collapse, match group can go bankrupt, but the technology isn't disappearing. better get used to it, boys - the best we're gonna hear from everybody else is "quit bitching and gain status so you can make it someone else's problem."

[–]fakelovers1[S] 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

or maybe it could be that fields that are considered classically ''high iq'' have less women overall? besides high iq or STEM fields aren't even the only indicator of high inteeligence.

appear to be lower iq yourself as you don't even make this connection
yourself and take every study made in burgerland unquestionably,
remember america is evil and is filled with billions of bullshit
agendas. that you blackpillers choose to take as ''women's nature'' instead of america fucking everyone in the ass.

[–]no_bling_just_dingself-aware MSTOW (hit the wall at age 0) 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

math or STEM fields don't have much women in the first place and aren't necessarily indicator of high iq anymore than an artist.

red herring. if hypergamy selects for higher iq, high IQ would be as preferred as tall heights, neither of which are common (by definition) among women, and it should be balanced out by the fact that women are the majority of other majors. if the moids didn't want them for LTR, it would simply mean the moids are p&d'ing them which isn't what we're seeing. although in MIT's case, it's probably safe to assume that there aren't many non-STEM majors & the women have a lwoer sex drive than the men anyway, which would be more relevant than what you just said.

also: did you also know that different majors in uni have different average IQ scores?

[–]fakelovers1[S] 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

because women just aren't hypergamous anymore JFL, hypergamy is promoted more AMONG MEN, ever wonder why incels only like women from high socio-economic status countries? muh hypergamy is cope.

what i'm saying is, those in ''high iq'' major colleges simply haveless access to women due to high amount of men and not enough men. nowadays its probably abit more balanced commpared to year 2000... since more women go to college overall.

[–]We_Are_All_One 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Not to mention constantly injecting newborns with pharmaceuticals.

[–]fakelovers1[S] -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

u/Lainpiller

[–]HateSpeechFanBoy -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

For there to be any physiological change from evolution, you need hundreds of thousands of years. This is all meaningless.

Also yes, females do prefer lower IQ even if they say they prefer intelligence. Every Chad I met has been dumb as fuck. All my accelerated and advanced classes in high school were full of ethnic truecels

[–]fakelovers1[S] 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

evolution isn't selective breeding lmao

also maybe the ''chads'' you knew were just NT and not on blackpill shit? and if you're going to bring up the racial aspect, most ethnicities and non-white countries have lower iq than whites due to lower socio-economic status. besides lower t and autism aren't chadly traits at all.

[–]HateSpeechFanBoy 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

There are no people in selective breeding programs and I doubt that will ever happen.

Chads are good looking, their personality does not matter

[–]fakelovers1[S] 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

if women only had sex or choose to bred with men who had certain qualities or features, that would be selective breeding, even if a more politically correct one.

lower testosterone and disorders are also going to effect physical appearence, and not in a good or chadly way.

[–]HateSpeechFanBoy 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Females don’t breed that way, they often beta bux and in a lot of the world they marry who they are told to.

[–][deleted] 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]HateSpeechFanBoy 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

It hasn’t been gone for a long time in terms of physiological change. That needs tens of thousands of years for something very small and hundreds of thousands for something significant

[–]holdmebebi 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

even something like zoomers vs boomer's youth would be enough to observe change

do zoomers or gen alpha look better than boomers when they were young?

[–]HateSpeechFanBoy 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No, that’s not enough to observe change. That’s only a couple of generations

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

So you're saying people are getting dumber and dumber because women are only selecting for looks whereas women from previous eras selected for other things like status and wealth?

[–]fakelovers1[S] 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

lower testosterone and autism certainly are markers of a handsome hunk. great lainpiller.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

T levels are largely dependent on evironment too as in poor nutrition, etc

[–]fakelovers1[S] -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

taller height is also dependent on nutrition tho.

also autism certainly makes your face look dumb, even with good features. plus lower iq doesn't mean hot bro, low intelligence is actually associated with ugliness.

hypergamy is a cope.

[–]peteypete78 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Test is dropping due to environmental problems like micro plastics and forever chemicals, same for IQ (note this quote "Even children born to high-IQ parents are slipping down the IQ ladder.")

Increase in disorders will be because of the aforementioned environmental issues and the fact we can recognize and diagnose more conditions now.

The 20% thing is about casual sex not having babies as women now control that. But as there is less men who fit the classic "chad" build you ironically point out that the 20% is a thing.

[–]fakelovers1[S] 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

i've also seen an explanation in an incel wiki that high iq women are actually ''genetic-dead ends'' which means maybe my explanation is actually something else? that tells more about how men can't handle non-dumb women though.

[–]peteypete78 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

High IQ women are more likely to be well educated and we know as women gain education the number of children they have falls, so if they are only having 0-1 children then they are not breading at a replacement levels.

It's not that men can't handle high IQ women but the fact these women want high IQ husbands as they want men to still be better than them.

[–]fakelovers1[S] 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

either way, despite the claims of everyone here saying only attractive men are being choosen, what we're seeing is objectively unattractive features are getting higher in number instead.

[–]peteypete78 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

despite the claims of everyone here saying only attractive men are being choosen

The claims aren't that they get chosen for marriage and children and that they get chosen for casual sex, this is what the 80/20 thing is about and is why the AF/BB is a thing.

Unattractive features are the results of environmental impacts on the development of the children. This is why the 80/20 is getting worse as more and more men are born with these bad traits means that women don't find them attractive so over the coming years its goes even further downhill.

[–]fakelovers1[S] 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

then why do people claim you can't get aything, not just casual sex?

[–]peteypete78 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Those claiming they can't get anything (incels) have other issues (personality mostly) that effect how they interact with people and so are not even good enough to be the BB a woman will settle down with later on.

Incels are now so abundant thanks to the problems mentioned, they are the ones with the mental disorders, low T, anti social creeps women don't like. They are the 20% bottom level.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter