EDIT: I should have added a fourth option. "No requirement but ban after trolling". Actually, this would be my option. No restriction, just ban after abuse.

Now we have an active mod, and I am not sure how it will go. Looking at u/SAMMYYYTEEH history on this sub, has raised some alarms. He's hardly present. SAM, I hope you will not censor disagreements or what you perceive as "toxic". I have no issue with vitriol disagreement, I have issues with censorship and trolls. This place should not be an echo chamber. We have people on the left, right and centre and sometimes insults fly. That's fine. I won't be clutching my purse. Insults are not trolls.

​

One of the most heated subjects is transgenderism. People are in complete disagreement on the matter. Many, including myself are on the side of mental illness. Others see it as choice and others even support it on toddlers. Of course the usual insults fly. Transphobe, pedo etc. I have no issue with that. But any banning and censorship for such heated subject is a big red flag. Also for insults. No mods is better than a heavy handed one.

​

Now the poll at hand. I am against requiring requests to post as it will deter people from posting and it would also give too much discretion to the mods. I think it should be open to anyone who has a high enough Karama. It will mean it is their main account, and once it gets banned, it will have to farm Karama again for a new account.

​

As to seeking Request, I do not see any advantages over Karma.

View Poll