Ironic…

DistrictAccurate · 2024-12-21T08:45:39+00:00

Please make sure that logo, names and links to other subreddits (besides lwma, etc.), titles of posts (unless necessary), all (user-)names and handles (even fantasy), profile pictures and avatars (even abstract), any unnecessary images, and (if present) other personal information (including all faces) are removed entirely, then resubmit the post. This might not apply to politicians, major influencers, and other people of public interest. When in doubt, just remove it. If celebrities/influencers/etc. retweet or post a screenshot of a non-celeb, then the information of that non-celeb still needs to be removed. If you need to indicate who said what in a chain of comments, please use different colors or manually add other indicators like a number or letter for each unique user.

EL_overthetransom · 2024-12-20T00:41:29+00:00

I got banned from news for using that phrase. They can't stand having their own bigotry reflected back at them.

AigisxLabrys · 2024-12-20T00:46:31+00:00

How not very progressive of them.

ForsakenReporter3504 · 2024-12-20T02:09:04+00:00

The funniest part is that women like them get offended when you say the exact same thing that some women do online.

Butter_the_Garde · 2024-12-19T23:43:37+00:00

Misandrists: not all feminists, but always a feminist!

TheSpaceDuck · 2024-12-20T12:12:00+00:00

Tbf this argument would make more sense whenever a child is killed. Majority of mass shootings come from men, majority of filicides come from women (99% if neonaticides), so "always a woman" doesn't really make sense on the former.

Don't expect any self-awareness of their own bigotry from these people even if you used that example though. There's a reason why mental illness plays a role in more mass shootings than neonaticides and yet the latter is excused by mental illness (blamed on "post-partum psychosis" even though it rarely results in murder) while the former is explained by "male aggression".

I don't think people using the original argument ("always a man") are capable of self-awareness.

vb_nm6789 · 2024-12-20T18:17:34+00:00

When you can't argue back, just drop the i-word

PanGulasz05 · 2024-12-20T12:12:07+00:00

I know what you mean but I don't think we should use the same arguments as misandrists.

YetAgain67 · 2024-12-20T15:01:10+00:00

Original comment is garbage, too. But I do think, in certain scenarios, showing just how easily the so called most "progressive" and self-identifying feminists instantly slide into unambiguous and unadulterated bigotry as soon as they brush up against something critical of them or their worldview.

Why, pray tell, is it ok to use homophobic slurs just because you perceive a man as an incel or misogynist? Hmmmm.

Libfems and Yass Queeners (I use this term for the kind of women who adopt the most egocentric and superficial "woman are wonderful and men ain't shit" kind of feminism) post all day every day all kinds of casually misandrist, gender essentialist bullshit about men and get nothing but agreement, praise, or excuses as to why its ok.

But as soon as men push back and give them a taste of their own medicine...suddenly its a problem. The whole "sprinkle sprinkle, drizzle drizzle" battle comes to mind.

The Yass Queeners can promote this misandrist shit all to claps and cheers. But when men satirically pushed back...all of the sudden the think pieces came out. All of a sudden "men are just proving us right" and yadda yadda yadda.

Title	Ironic…
Author	Sick-of-you-tbh
Upvotes	144
Comments	17
Date	December 19, 2024 11:25 PM UTC (1 year ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/EverydayMisandry
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/everydaymisandry/comments/1hi66ed/ironic/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/EverydayMisandry/ironic.1539002 https://theredarchive.com/post/1539002

Comments