Watch a whole sub fail to understand OP point about men getting mixed signals in society, and end up proving OP point.

Every rebuttal in that thread insists that men lack emotional intelligence while ignoring how mixed messages from society and women create confusion. They blame men for misreading cues yet excuse contradictory standards as "nuance." They demand men be bold but punish them for missteps, proving the paradox. Each response reinforces the very inconsistency they claim doesn't exist.

For fuck sakes the first woman in slide 3 and 4 controdict herself numerous times. Saying that it makes sense for women think OP is gay for not sexualizing them. But in slide 4 she says OP is just a bad man who only view women as sexual objects. I kid you not this is the same person in sldie 3 and 4.

Then she ironically proves OP point about women playing with the word no and men having to be mind readers. In slide 4 she actually says when she is tried and her husband asked her if she needs anything or ask if she is hungry. She would say no. But then she said her husband would still give her what she needs. Because of his "emotional intelligence". Again basically proving the OP " men are expected to be mind readers" point. She expects her Husband can still read her my mind when she says no. You can't make this shit up, the level of cognitive dissonance is insane. 😭

They expect men to be mind readers. To know when it's ok to sexualized women, or not ok. Even women themselves say they must be cautious and assume all men are potential creeps and predators, In order to be safe. Because they can't tell the difference between good men and bad. And that's considered valid by most people. And people would call you misogynistic for thinking women should be mind readers with good men and dangerous men.

But yet men aren't allowed to do the same thing when it comes to approaching women or flirting with women. And men must automatically know when they can sexualized a random woman. OP whole point is that men can't be mind readers who can magically know when a woman want to be flirted with or not flirted with. And this whole thread is downvoting OP for this simple fact.

By the way the woman in slide 15. Is the same woman in slide 17 and 18. And in slide 18 she is making joke about the man that got burn by the woman. Again that's a Reddit feminist (not a Elon Twitter Feminist) saying something like that. Let that sink in guys. And this is a popular Reddit sub too. And she still isn't ban.