Good, I have doubts about the divorces, I have read that much more reach a mutual agreement or the great majority of divorce cases. The MGTOW arises about the risk of losing heritage or properties or things. Especially in the famous millionaires. The question is that they claim a discrimination on men by the economic tenure in divorces but I read cases like Adele had to pay a lot of money in divorce, Britney Spears who paid pension, Madonna that I pay almost $ 100 million dollars in Guy Ritchie, Paulina Rubio, Janet Jackson, Christina Aguiler or many more cases of women who paid ridiculous sums of money to their husbands. Even many residits of women who had their properties lost it and even pay pensions to their husbands (of course they are cases of fewer percentages than men).

My questions are: you benefit from the woman more than the Himbre in court or do you really benefit from the one who has less regardless of the sex than what they have everything?

How do divorces really work? Are you really discriminated against men? Cases of discrimination to men in courts are minority?

Masculinists use many divorce topic to promote their movements and attract attention. It is like when the communists used the unlawful deaths of the workers to promote their speeches.

I read many cases of divorces but only from men and as to polarize things more and give understand their points about what they promote in their movements and thus stop stopping at the opposite sex.