Please if you want to know about hypergamy read these two reddits.

https://www.reddit.com/r/exredpill/comments/pm5l7u/hypergamy_is_in_decline_lol_data_and_studies/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf

https://www.reddit.com/r/exredpill/comments/ppoj48/hypergamy_is_in_decline_part_2_data_and_studies/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf

Dude 80/20 doesn't exist, dating apps are poorly made. The algorithms to choose a partner are very exaggeratedly wrong. The %80 of active users on Tinder are Men and only %20 women (and in 2021 in pandemic), so if you have 1000 people and apply the figures in that population.

1000 x %80 Men = 800 1000 x %20 Women = 200

So there are only 200 women for 800 men. Supply and Demand my friends. So the probability that you have a choice is less than %0.25 if that sucks xd.

OkCupid also has a large demand for men. 11% are male users vs. 6%, almost double the population. So that greatly alters the studies that the RP was based on. The RP saw the study and they said: women are the problem and it causes incelism so blame it on women !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! But it didn't cross their minds whether the number of registered users was really the problem. They never thought about those possibilities and about how the studies are altered by this small piece of information.

Men in their desperation to get a partner often slide further to the right to get it right. Therefore the women that there are, will have more options, however, tinder has a limit of 99, only the first 99 men will have a chance, that is the men that arrived late, will be forgotten. That's why it's hard to find a date, and for a woman it will be impossible to manage such an exaggerated supply and demand.

The data also reveals large inequalities for both genders. Men and women in the top 10% (meaning, the 10% of users who received the most matches) typically see a minimum of five matches per day, and a select few can see dozens per day. Some users went on to accumulate thousands or even tens of thousands of matches over time. The inverse of this is that while some people see a large number of matches, others see very few. Men in the bottom 10% see just one match per week at most. Success varies greatly among women as well. However, even those in the 10th percentile (meaning those who receive matches less frequently than 90% of women) can usually match about once per day.

“Aviv Goldgeier, an engineer for the dating website Hinge, recently analyzed the share of “likes” on Hinge that went to the most-liked people of each gender. He found that inequality on dating apps is stark, and that it was significantly worse for men. The top 1% of guys get more than 16% of all likes on the app, compared to just over 11% for the top 1% of women. (Unlike swipe-based Tinder, Hinge is based on a system of “liking” some particular aspect of a person’s profile.) “ Quartz (2017)

https://preview.redd.it/221s5d47y2t71.png?width=1361&format=png&auto=webp&s=9172d3444d674bcf91add13fe674e8789cdbcefb

This doesn't make sense right? isn't that top %1 supposed to get 90% of all women? As well as the rest of the groups it doesn't make sense that they have few options. There is imbalance in the mechanics of the application that just doesn't work.

To answer this question, let's take a look at a 2017 Business Insider article, which states that 52% of women have been successful in matching with the person they swiped right compared to only 16% of men who did the same.

This means that if you're a girl using Tinder, you have a 1 in 2 chance of getting a match, while if you're a guy, your chances are only 1 in 5. Source

I mean, attractive men don't manage to get that %80 she likes xd. Simple the mechanics of Tinder are poorly done only rely on the desperation of men and these are forced to pay more money to get more opportunity.

Another problem to consider is the clash of interests. Women are looking for long-term relationships and men are looking for short-term relationships, so this clash of interests means that few men are looking for long-term relationships for women of that interest.

Ok, of course another thing to keep in mind, men go for younger women and women go for older women. The following statistics show more or less certain graphs. They also show that men maintain their standards with increasing age.

Indeed, men do not change their expectations and in fact maintain their standards higher than women!!!!!. Women 30-48 as they get older, lower their standards and tend to look for men 1-10 years younger than her, men 20-48 the older they get will always look for women 20-22 years old. Young women 20-30 years old prefer men 0-3 years old, they look for older but younger xd xd xd xd Many would think that a 40-48 year old woman hit the wall, but the truth is that these women receive more offers than men on the app xd.

What about women having more sexual partners? False, according to these data: According to 2011 to 2015 CDC data, women between ages 25 and 44 had a median of 4.2 sexual partners, while men in that age group had a median of 6.1 sexual partners. (These are medians, not averages. These medians are based on number of lifetime sexual partners among sexually experienced men and women, meaning they don't take into account people who have had zero sexual partners.)

Ok and what about marriage and dating? People are dating less or having less marriages thanks to dating apps? No, the following text says the following:

Today, three-in-ten U.S. adults say they have ever used an online dating site or app – including 11% who have done so in the past year, according to a new Pew Research Center survey conducted Oct. 16 to 28, 2019. For some Americans, these platforms have been instrumental in forging meaningful connections: 12% say they have married or been in a committed relationship with someone they first met through a dating site or app. All in all, about a quarter of Americans (23%) say they have ever gone on a date with someone they first met through a dating site or app.

From all this compilation of data, my conclusion is simple. The dating market is overpriced and poorly done. The mechanics do not serve or help both sexes to have a potential partner because of the clash of interests and standards. As we have seen, as age advances, men tend to look for younger women but younger women look for men just 2-5 years older than her and older men 20-48 look for women 20-22. This makes it more difficult for older men. That huge demand for women on dating apps is evident and clear. The best way to have a partner is in real life and not in dating apps where everything is done wrong.

That 80-20 rule does not exist, attractive men as well as attractive women will have many options and opportunities is simple logic. Would a man date an unattractive woman? Attractiveness does influence a lot in many areas. And if we are talking about hypergamy, please read the two reddits about hypergamy. Where it is in decline and I show brutal and shattering data. Ok, lastly, I hear a lot about men going for unattractive women which I don't believe. Instagram and Only Fans wouldn't exist xd xd xd xd. Soon I will show more studies that I will be dismantling little by little.

Sources: https://pastebin.com/JRsszfWu