The red pill man I dated seemed to think men deserved to be served because they protect women. He even mentioned that men had to sign up for the draft in order to be able to vote. I have two different ways to solve that part of the issue- either women also sign up or neither. Of course, I think exceptions would need to be made so both parents don't get drafted, etc.

However, the overall thinking of being so calculating of someone's value is what truly bothers me. Plus, what men like him seem to place high value on doesn't seem to care about things that are important but less tangible.

Three points I think people who are red pilled should think of...

  1. If we measure a person's value on what degree of protection they provide for others, it could start to get ridiculous. You served in the Army- thank you, but you never went to battle. Oh, you went to battle- thank you, but you were never in danger. Oh, he was in danger- he's worth less than the man who was injured in battle... on and on.

  2. What do have the red pilled men done for people who have put their lives on the line to protect them? For example, the man I dated served in the Navy. He never went to battle. I don't think he ever did anything significant for anyone who served and actually went to battle.

  3. If we measure someone's value so cold heartedly, it seems that this will negatively affect a relationship. I don't always want to calculate my "worth points." I don't want to always think, "I better clean this or cook that in order to keep my value."

Don't get me wrong I think both partners should contribute to things in the relationship. I also think both should seek to please the other.