What is one of the most fundamental rules of the red pill ideology? They are obsessed with a woman's "body count." They declare women who sleep around easily and lack selectivity as "low value," labeling them as unmarriageable and unworthy of respect.

Here is where the comedy begins: According to their own rules, how can acquiring the most "low value" and least selective person be the ultimate success of a "high value" (alpha) male? Getting someone into bed who has no filters or boundaries, and who engages in intimacy on the day you meet, is not a sign of skill or charisma. This logic is as absurd and pathetic as picking up a piece of trash and bragging, "I managed to steal this."

True success is being able to earn the respect and love of a woman of character and intelligence, one who has standards and maintains her boundaries. This requires honesty, character, compatibility, and time.

In those "same day or same week" scenarios that PUAs boast about, the woman usually either wants exactly that from the interaction, or she is dealing with severe psychological and emotional voids. Pulling the trigger when the target has already walked willingly to the end of the barrel is not a mark of marksmanship. What these men are doing is not "manipulating" or "picking up" women; it is merely casting their nets into the shallowest waters and filtering out the easiest targets.

In this mindset, women are not seen as individuals, human beings, or souls; they are merely "XP" on a scoreboard. It is entirely natural for me to ask, "Where is the success in this?" because I view the situation through the lens of human value, quality, and connection. They, on the other hand, view it as a video game scoreboard. You can earn points in a video game just by slaughtering the weakest characters, and these types of guys exist solely through the sheer volume of their scores. When there is no quality, they try to dazzle with quantity (numbers and speed).

The most crucial point, as I mentioned, is that this is essentially an "advertising and sales strategy." These "relationship coaches" sell courses, bootcamps, and books to young men who are incapable of communicating with the opposite sex, terrified of rejection, and suffering from loneliness.

You can’t sell a $1,000 dating course by telling a lonely guy to build actual character, develop empathy, and be patient. Instead, these 'coaches' sell a soulless numbers game. They teach men to cold-approach hundreds of women using rehearsed scripts, banking on the absolute certainty that eventually, some girl with zero boundaries will say yes. That is not 'mastery' or 'game'—that is just basic probability. Yet, they package this statistical inevitability as some kind of elite alpha male skill just to empty the pockets of desperate men.

In summary, as I said, there is no real feat here. There is only a sick circus created by those who shoot cheap targets and fancy themselves legendary hunters.

What do you think is the underlying psychological wound that causes such an illogical, cheap, and hollow metric of "success" to be followed and bought into by thousands of young men today, almost as if they are spellbound?