Right-wing women have surveyed the world: they find it a dangerous place. They see that work subjects them to more danger from more men; it increases the risk of sexual exploitation. They see that creativity and originality in their kind are ridiculed; they see women thrown out of the circle of male civilization for having ideas, plans, visions, ambitions. They see that traditional marriage means selling to one man, not hundreds: the better deal. They see that the streets are cold, and that the women on them are tired, sick, and bruised. They see that the money they can earn will not make them independent of men and that they will still have to play the sex games of their kind: at home and at work too. They see no way to make their bodies authentically their own and to survive in the world of men. **They know too that the Left has nothing better to offer: leftist men also want wives and whores; leftist men value whores too much and wives too little. Right-wing women are not wrong. They fear that the Left, in stressing impersonal sex and promiscuity as values, will make them more vulnerable to male sexual aggression, and that they will be despised for not liking it. They are not wrong. Right-wing women see that within the system in which they live they cannot make their bodies their own, but they can agree to privatized male ownership: keep it one-on-one, as it were. They know that they are valued for their sex— their sex organs and their reproductive capacity—and so they try to up their value: through cooperation, manipulation, conformity; through displays of affection or attempts at friendship; through submission and obedience; and especially through the use of euphemism—“femininity, ” “total woman, ” “good, ” “maternal instinct, ” “motherly love. ” Their desperation is quiet; they hide their bruises of body and heart; they dress carefully and have good manners; they suffer, they love God, they follow the rules. They see that intelligence displayed in a woman is a flaw, that intelligence realized in a woman is a crime. They see the world they live in and they are not wrong. They use sex and babies to stay valuable because they need a home, food, clothing. They use the traditional intelligence of the female—animal, not human: they do what they have to to survive.”
[+][deleted] (5 children) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–][deleted] 9 points10 points11 points (0 children) | Copy Link
Sahm I am. Can confirm. Well said, all the way to the end. Dependency is the opposite of freedom.
[–]CyanCayenneFDS Newbie2 points3 points4 points (2 children) | Copy Link
Yes, this is so true.
I basically agree with you, but I feel conflicted because I want to be a SAHM. I want to spend that time with my kids. It's a huge risk though, for sure. And you can't tell what kind of dad and family provider someone is going to be until you actually have kids.
[–]HeroForHire369FDS Disciple4 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
I have a two aunts that both worked two, maybe sometimes three days out of the week (they both had very good careers, too) while their kids were under five/kindergarten age, just so they could stay in the work force as far as employment gaps and references go. The two days they worked either family watched them (family exclusively watched one aunt's kids), or they were in Pre-K/daycare.
For a lot of women it may be a wash financially, but staying in the work force even part time is exponentially better than having a massive gap, even if it can be explained by childrearing to future employers- they often just don't care.
[–]CyanCayenneFDS Newbie2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
That is a great point about it being worth avoiding a resume gap even though it's a wash financially.
[–]HeroForHire369FDS Disciple2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
That is so insane, completely forgot about that. That wasn't even that long ago, over the course of history.
Sometimes I look at the things going on in the world, and expect it to get worse before it gets better. The two sexes seem pitted against each other (for damn good reason for us, at least).
There are a lot of women who thought they married a HVM only for the mask to come off after the kids come along. It's possible there were red flags along the way, but it's often so insidious you don't even notice it. My absolute nightmare.
[–]the-red_womanFDS Disciple8 points9 points10 points (0 children) | Copy Link
Powerful stuff. Yes the tragedy is that the world views women as property and private property is treated better then public property. Many women are forced to make that choice and as sad as it is, you can understand it.
[–]YveisGreyFDS Newbie0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
Mm idk imo conservative women are way less pickmeishas then lib feminists. Remember who are the ones behind “sex positive” movement. Conservative women can be problematic but far more of them believe in FDS dating standards compared to libs. Splitting the bill and “equality” which always translates to you working full time and doing all the housework or you straight up being a single mom ugh I really can’t stand them.