~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
xstalpha
[–]JakBlack1234286 points287 points288 points 8 years ago (27 children) | Copy Link
Followup. If you chose:
"Should women be in the infantry" - yes
"Should they be held to the same physical standard" - no
Then:
"If women serve and are not held to the same standard, can we then say that the standards have been lowered for women?"
Yes - 4%
No - 96%
[–]CDaKidd106 points107 points108 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Insane, isn’t it?
[–]BeastMaster6669 points70 points71 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
No 99% Yes 1%
[+][deleted] 8 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]seeriktus59 points60 points61 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
In 1984 thats called doublethink
[–]ShrunkenHed23 points24 points25 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
That's how you know their beliefs and the rudimentary thoughts they possess are not their own, but inseminated into them by outside forces. That's not to say they're not to blame. They are, very much so. Those people need to suffer immensely before they take the reigns of their own brains.
The vast majority never will.
[–]yukdave4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
He said > inseminated
[–]mrHappyPotatoe14 points15 points16 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Maybe they understand world at quantum level.
[–]that_nast9 points10 points11 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Schrodinger's post-wall cat lady
[–]herpderpfeynman2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
She exists in a superposition of "strong, independent wymon who don't need no man" and "where have all the good men gone?"
[–]that_nast2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
haha thats great
[–]herpderpfeynman1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
thanks lol, you set me up for it with "scrodinger's post-wall cat lady."
[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It's usually because they're following a collectivist ideology that advocates for equality of outcome, then we get confused because we naturally see people as individuals instead of groups, hence view equality in terms of equality of opportunity. Treating individuals differently in order to raise disparate groups to parity basically summarises it.
[+][deleted] 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig actually likes it!
[–]AmokOfProgress2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Bah-hah! Well put.
[–]BooDoug1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
BPD
[–]Itisforsexy1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It's cognitive dissonance. Holding two conflicting viewpoints. And the effect when these two points are shown to the individual who holds them, they are wild and often mentally catastrophic.
[–]mma1357941 points42 points43 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
"Should they then be paid the same?"
Yes - 97%
No - 3%
[–]Pope_Lucious2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
People care more about appearing virtuous than actually dealing with reality.
[–]ploobadoof2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
We simply need to ask all nations to fight wars less intensely/violently. That way women can participate.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
‘Should they be paid the same as the infantry men they aren’t held to the same standards as?’
[–]keeleon-2 points-1 points0 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Where are you getting these numbers from?
[–][deleted] 11 points12 points13 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It’s a joke.
[–]EvilBananaManRD132 points133 points134 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
They also wanted to lower the physical standards to become a firefighter so more women could join in.
I don't want people to die in a fire because some girl half my size can't carry them.
[–]TravaPL28 points29 points30 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Pretty much. During my driving lessons we had a meeting with a paramedic that explained CPR n stuff, as well as how to pull people from a car without injuring them further. Needless to say, most girls weren't strong enough to pull anyone out.
[–]wildfireboat6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I'm imagining all of the women I've ever met...
3 could carry the fire retardant clothing, oxygen tank, and hand tools.
2 could carry all of the above and have the balls to walk into a blazing building.
0 could carry all of the above, walk into a burning building and still have the physical capacity to pull an unconscious grown man out.
[–][deleted] 59 points60 points61 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
So a man fails because he's not strong enough, but he is stronger than any woman, and women should be accepted while that man shouldn't? Yeah... Fuck you.
[+][deleted] 8 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]ScrewWomyn24 points25 points26 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Yes. Cunt troops are only viable(if at all) in segregated units.
[–]delta9mm48 points49 points50 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I'm currently in the army, about to get out soon. Our MOS used to be male only. used to be. 2 months ago we got our first female soldier.
Now we already have females in the unit, but as cooks and mechanics, not as one of us. When this female showed up the entire units atmosphere changed. It went from being a hardworking friendly environment where we could talk about whatever, to now its just hostile territory. Needless to say, there is no more friendly bullshitting anymore as Its not "inclusive enough."
[–]HorusEyeDrops0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I'm in the National Guard-Indiana, and I completely agree. Since women got into the hierarchy, aggression and competitiveness (testosterone) have been practically made TABOO! We're not allowed to fight with pugil sticks bc "we might get hurt," we can't workout too long lest someone faint, cussing is frowned upon now, nudity is practically illegal, we have to yell "female on the floor," whenever a chick enters so we can adopt our best behaviors. The military culture is being killed from the inside, by women and by congressional bootlicking officers.
Jokes have become a thing of the past, and my platoon sgt has to practically apologize in advance for his speeches since he's usually brutally frank.
In basic training, we had a Paternal guidance meeting where a female sgt disguised as a civilian chick talked to us and tried to prove we were prejudiced against her bc she was a female. Afterwards she said how we shouldn't "cuss at each other because that's no way for a soldier to talk."
I was used as an example for a few weeks of pt sessions by one female sgt who probably felt she wasn't respected due to her feminine nature. She'd call random male privates out and give them **** royal soeeches about how to do the exercises.
The one female that is in my squad is being banged by another of my squad. You can bet he'll ignore my *** if I get shot, and she's scratched.
Now because male and female soldiers are partying it up like it's college, we have many many many classes of sexual harassment we MUST become qualified in. EO ones too! Bc every killing machine needs to know these things.
Oh, and on Trans, if you have gender dysphoria, and feel like you should cut off your ****, the Army will pay for it, and you get 4 years off the deployment lists do your "parts" can settle in.
TLDR: Military culture is being replaced by SJW college campus culture.
[+][deleted] 8 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]Juxtapointer22 points23 points24 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Too much friendly fire would occur.
[–]xevtosu1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Lol yes girls would slaughter each other regardless what side they were on
[–]uglymtherfker9 points10 points11 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Ahhahahahahah. The women will start complaining about their nails being damaged.
[–]SuddenTrip0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
women vs women is fair, let just do that but if I want to win, I can put anyone who identified as a female there or having the female jacked with testosterone.
I am sure it's not just me who think about that, I can't see how that will get accepted.
Women will say that we want to eradicate humanity and the next generation by asking them to fight while bringing the biology model about how much important their womb to the world as we always said as the new ideology to exempt women from war.
[–]FeelThatBern1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Wut
[–]SuddenTrip0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Feminist said that everyone can identify as everything, therefore, in the war, it will still full of men identified as women because they are stronger to win.
If we make women fight in the battle,
they will use the old age reason for why we don't let women in war
: because without women, the society will collapse, if men die, they die alone, if women's die, they and the next generation that can be born from her die too, therefore, no future generation, no society from our kin left.
Reptile Wars
[–][deleted] 22 points23 points24 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
that's dangerous - these answers come from the fact that people don't realize their consequences
it's the same as women as police officier, they will tend to use more their weapon and even kill a dude because they weren't physically strong enough to deal with him (as opposed as a man)
that would be madness to take people that can do the job, i hope for them that one day they don't have to deal with a firewoman that can't save them
[–][deleted] 10 points11 points12 points 8 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link
Women have no business being in the military. A woman can’t even throw a grenade far enough a way not to kill themselves. And every time they deploy they get pregnant, and if they fail to do that they are constantly risking the lives of the people around them by dragging down the standards. Women use the military to find husbands, have babies, and cuck their husbands out while they go off to fight Mohammad.
They don’t give a shit about fighting for a secure country. They give a shit about money and Chad cock.
[–]JustPassingBy07-2 points-1 points0 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
What do you mean by going off to fight Mohammad? I didn't get it.
[–]utopista1144 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
What do you mean by going off to fight Mohammad?
The little CIA pets and other vermin that the US utilizes as excuses to invade countries and suck that sweet sweet black juicy oil and produce money for a bunch of companies that manage the US Government.
Oh, and they have a bunch of "knock knock nobody here" dudes that believe in their "country" or something. Dudes, is not France or Germany.
[–]Rich77u4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Jihadists
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Islamic Terrorists, like ISIS. In some places like Sweden and Canada they are openly welcoming them and encouraging Islamic Terrorists from Syria, Iraq, and Northern Africa to come and build Islamic Neighbourhoods that grow and eventually become destablizing problems.
[–]SuddenTrip6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
For society, women in combat is a loss because they were weaker and another nation will definitely put the men up front. When the troops are falling, there is no one left for the lost society if they have no children to bring their hope and resistance.
I hate this feeling when I realised that women are always needed for society because they can make another human, even an artificial womb is only about sustaining the embryo that already exists and the womb is already perfect for a baby but women nowadays don't know their place and want to be worshipped for merely existing.
Women were always the priority.
[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
That is a two-key system. Never fucking forget that. A planet of 1 trillion women could not make 1 baby without a man. You are as valuable.
[–]SuddenTrip1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
it's a 2 key system but it's not 1 on 1, they also have sperm bank ready nowadays.
1 man can have 10 children as long as there are 10 women at the same time,
10 man can only have 1 children if there is only 1 woman left at the same time,
You are right about needing each other, for reproduction, women are higher, for working, men are higher.
[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
if women shouldn't be held to the same high standards then they need to be stripped of their voting rights to compensate men for having to pull more than their own weight. fuck this decadent misandryist society and the system that rules. patriotism is for traitors who support men and ONLY men risking their lives for a system and a people not only unworthy to defend but who are working for our detriment.
[–]Eggs__And__Bacon7 points8 points9 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I would love to see them in the military. Send women instead of boys to die in warzones.
[–]CursingWhileNursing5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Should we inform the enemy that we consider shooting at female soldiers illegal?
[–]AirplaneNote4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I smell double standards
[–]aCNNAnonymousSource2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That survey was
[–]AntiAbleism2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
One standard for men, one standard for women.
Do women belong on their knees ? Yes: 100% No: 0%
Should women be allowed to voted ? Yes: 0% No: 100%
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–]JakBlack1234286 points287 points288 points (27 children) | Copy Link
[–]CDaKidd106 points107 points108 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]BeastMaster6669 points70 points71 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (16 children) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]seeriktus59 points60 points61 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]ShrunkenHed23 points24 points25 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]yukdave4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]mrHappyPotatoe14 points15 points16 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]that_nast9 points10 points11 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]herpderpfeynman2 points3 points4 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]that_nast2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]herpderpfeynman1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (2 children) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]AmokOfProgress2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]BooDoug1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Itisforsexy1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]mma1357941 points42 points43 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Pope_Lucious2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ploobadoof2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]keeleon-2 points-1 points0 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 11 points12 points13 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]EvilBananaManRD132 points133 points134 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]TravaPL28 points29 points30 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]wildfireboat6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 59 points60 points61 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (2 children) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[+][deleted] (4 children) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]ScrewWomyn24 points25 points26 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]delta9mm48 points49 points50 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]HorusEyeDrops0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (9 children) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]Juxtapointer22 points23 points24 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]xevtosu1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]uglymtherfker9 points10 points11 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]SuddenTrip0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]FeelThatBern1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]SuddenTrip0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 22 points23 points24 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 10 points11 points12 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]JustPassingBy07-2 points-1 points0 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]utopista1144 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Rich77u4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]SuddenTrip6 points7 points8 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]SuddenTrip1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Eggs__And__Bacon7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]CursingWhileNursing5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]AirplaneNote4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]aCNNAnonymousSource2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]AntiAbleism2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link