Is he wrong?

TurnDownForWhat · 2017-12-19T07:28:49+00:00

[deleted]

gods_bones · 2017-12-19T07:35:56+00:00

No lies detected. However, he can easily link the war on the family being waged via the war on men. AKA: Feminism isn't the only thing that deserves to be blamed. Women as a whole are to be blamed. Everything going on in the world nowadays is 100% all their fault.

gantz_au · 2017-12-19T08:53:11+00:00

Feminism is the societal level shit test that was failed and now we're all paying the price.

2017-12-19T07:43:59+00:00

Communists are sore losers. Rather than question their own crap theories, they focus on what "got in the way" last time. Ethnic solidarity, families. It turns out, ways for people to organize into groups without state oversight.

So these dweebish academic crypto-communists come out and try to screw up the family and make everyone race mix (not a bad thing, necessarily, they just believe that identifying as an ethnicity is why some people were unwilling to go communist in the past, so they believe if there's only one ethnic identity we'll all happily be communist).

Nutsos.

But, stop blaming ideology for what is the fault of women and their hypergamy.

strangerthing7 · 2017-12-19T13:31:35+00:00

Wrong, it was war against men, and men chose to avoid having families with these cunts.

DarwinianKEKistani · 2017-12-19T09:48:24+00:00

.8 sounds low.

Aussiewolf82 · 2017-12-19T12:23:31+00:00

My genetic line ends with me and probably my brother too. All my uncle's on my father's side are parents and my aunty too. Only my oldest brother reproduced.

2017-12-19T07:44:37+00:00

The systematic intrusion through feminism will see to it that it also destroys itself.

ThrowawayHert420 · 2017-12-19T15:00:59+00:00

Yeah, he's totally wrong about the UK birth rate which is 1.81 not 0.8. Besides we need less people in the UK, well England anway. Too crowded as it is.

Edit: US TFR is about 1.9.

somuchluv2give · 2017-12-19T07:26:34+00:00

He’s not wrong.

SmilingTroublemaker7 · 2017-12-19T09:54:43+00:00

Well, he is not wrong.

Movements like feminism and MGTOW destroys the concept of family, if not already destroyed...

but if i'm going my own way why should i care? i will die someday and future generations will have to deal with their own problems...

I'm not a family man, i certainly won't deal with a wife (i could accept kids and be happy with them tough), and this truth won't change anytime soon.

RadicalAsceticMonk · 2017-12-19T11:29:23+00:00

It will disappear in 2 generations

Looks like Retard McIdiot here skipped Math and History classes.

SanJustSan · 2017-12-19T13:21:15+00:00

It's a war on men with the destruction of society the unintended but inevitable consequence.

gvs77 · 2017-12-19T15:11:24+00:00

Feminism was started by social engineers, and both the nuclear as well as the extended family made that difficult. Feminism was one of the tools used to break that up. It servers both that purposes as well as helping to bring the population down. We would need 2.3 kids per woman to keep the population steady, most western countries are at or below 1.3, so a rapid decline will start soon.

CadeyrnDragheim · 2017-12-19T16:31:13+00:00

I'm certainly grasping at straws, but why does a .8 fertility rate imply that they'll dissapear in 2 generations? Doesn't it just mean that the population will just decrease by 20% each generation?

kingullu4 · 2017-12-19T16:31:43+00:00

Maybe the ruling elite want the population to drop. Maybe this is why the ruling elite are promoting feminist shit to the top of every media outlet.

curiouslyengaged · 2017-12-19T16:33:51+00:00

This has been on feminist agenda for years. Here's is a direct quote by Linda Gordon:

The nuclear family must be destroyed, and people must find better ways of living together.... Whatever its ultimate meaning, the break-up of families now is an objectively revolutionary process.... No woman should have to deny herself any opportunities because of her special responsibilities to her children... Families will be finally destroyed only when a revolutionary social and economic organization permits people's needs for love and security to be met in ways that do not impose divisions of labor, or any external roles, at all.

http://www.azquotes.com/quote/692702

mgtow4ever · 2017-12-19T16:38:02+00:00

No but I am ok with this.

SomeGhostingGuy · 2017-12-19T16:43:05+00:00

Well, as I have no personal future investment (children) into our society and with an end in sight, what do I care?

But obviously our elites are stupider than any farmer ever will be. Because when the cows do not have calves as they should a farmer would have a very close look into everything going on on his farm to find the reason.
Just replacing loses with new cows is not an working strategy.

But as our politicians and elite think and teach that all cows are equal... As I said, every simple farmer is smarter than our "elites"

based_meme · 2017-12-19T21:59:28+00:00

He's correct. The idea was to use feminism to dismantle the concept of the nuclear family, to inject women into the workforce so that the other 50% of the population can be taxed, and to isolate and disconnect the individual from the family unit so that they become dependent upon state and corporate systems (such as fiat interest debt).

A secondary objective, and incidentally an intended consequence, was to pacify and virtually neuter the male populace. Look at the status quo. Men have little to no power as far as the system and society is concerned.

Classic divide and conquer on a cultural and societal level. You have to admire the insidious genius of it all.

Title	Is he wrong?
Author	[deleted]
Upvotes	87
Comments	41
Date	December 19, 2017 7:20 AM UTC (8 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MGTOW
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/7krq8y/is_he_wrong/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MGTOW/is-he-wrong.522425 https://theredarchive.com/post/522425

Comments