Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.
It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.
I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.
Support the archive
[–]slickdevil1 15 points16 points17 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] [recovered] (6 children) | Copy Link
Ironically... that last bit -- putting a specific TIME-LIMIT on it -- could be a GOOD thing, at least for men.
Why? Because "marriage" has already essentially been GUTTED by the legal and court system -- this would actually help rebalance that (at least a bit) -- because if nothing else, it would at the very least re-establish that marriage is in fact a CONTRACTUAL thing.
And THAT might begin the process of forcing the courts into realizing that "Marriage 2.0" -- as judges & lawyers have clusterfucked it -- is in fact an "unconscionable contract"; to wit:
And one could add in other aspects as well. If some "marriage" is pre-agreed upon to only last say 5 years -- then that rather DRAMATICALLY alters the way it is going to be viewed in OTHER LEGAL contractual terms & senses... the "unconscionability" for example of a wife keeping a home in exchange for such a short period of "service" becomes rather blatantly obvious to everyone; not the least of all BANKS and other 3rd parties.
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link
Don't see any reason why preset lengths should be required -- by which I mean, there's no reason to designate a "7 year term"; if someone wants a "1 year term", or even a "1 week term", well why the fuck not?
That would basically alleviate the "yes means yes" bullshit. You wanna fuck? Becomes a "sign here" on a 24 hour marriage certificate -- though depending on the state, you might need to do the signing in the presence of a notary, or else have other witnesses -- of course I could easily see some online web-cam recording & video "consent/marriage" service happening... be like an "Uber/Skype wedding chapel" thing.
[–]alcockell2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]thrownaway_MGTOW4 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]kanji_sasahara1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]mrmeemermamer_87 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]RichardBelmont2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]RecQuery0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Pastriarchy1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Bugeyed7770 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]fretit0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link