~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
Ida_imasadperson
[removed]
[–]Omnibrad16 points17 points18 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
A man's highest purpose is sacrificing himself for a woman who is modest, faithful, and submissive to him. This is love to a man. To sacrifice for a woman worth sacrificing.
Now show me a modest, faithful, and submissive woman.
[–]Marque018 points9 points10 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Or a virgin over 16 years of age, haha
Later chicky. There are plenty of pathetic simps out there for you to stick your claws into. You aren't going to find any here though
[–]MigTau2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Do women not believe in Love?
Love has a damn high female initiated divorce rate. And Love sure takes a lot of your money and children with her when she goes.
[–]Ida_imasadperson[S] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
So the problem isnt women - it's modern women?
[–]Slaide0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
How is that relevant? We're not living with woman from 60 years from now or 60 years ago--we're living with modern women.
Let me try to explain to you the events that lead to the current situation:
Baby boomers happen.
Governments start spending without counting.
Governments are broke.
Governments are the banks bitches.
Governments want YOUR money so they can pay THEIR debts.
Governments realize that women spend money irresponsibly despite earning a minority of it (fucking black holes of consumption), while men have a tendency to save up while earning most of it.
Women start continue to whine they want equality and are oppressed.
Governments realize that all they need to do to get all the money back is to steal the money from men and distribute it to women.
Most governments see the opportunity to cater up to the women while stealing money from men. Family courts and the justice system are changed so that men are basically guilty of any accusations. Also are trying to encourage women to occupy more high-paying jobs and force them in higher education (which also means more student loans/debts to women since they're irresponsible).
Redistribution of money from men to women to the government currently in progress, while more women are also now earning higher wages and continuing to waste their money on useless shit.
Both women and men are being ruined: women are unhappy because they're going against their biology or procreating and raising a family, while men are going against their biology of earning/protecting/providing while being emotionally ruined by females who have zero issues being government-sponsored whores.
The men who aren't morons have realized a while ago that this is happening and refuse to be part of it (MGTOW). The simps and white knights are basically used to continue the destruction of society while claiming the MGTOW's are the problems by refusing to be part of the problem (thus why they're morons).
[–]Ida_imasadperson[S] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
So its the modern world? Thats the problem, you would say?
[–]Slaide0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
Nope. You're trying very hard to deflect the blame from women, that's almost cute.
Case in point: men also live in this screwed up world and yet the majority of us didn't turn into ultra-consuming monsters who suddenly became neurotic and the government's bitches. Women did, however.
[–]SamCasey989 points10 points11 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Go away
I just want to have a conversation about it :))
[–]SamCasey98-1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Are you stupid? Go away.
Im not stupid;)
[–]SamCasey98-1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
You are dumber than a door nail cunt. Go away.
[–]mrp_18445 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Love is an emotion. We have learned to control our emotions because the court system and the government are against us.
[–]Benny7574 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
What movement? There is no "movement" that you refer to. You are being delusional.
Silly goose.
[–]Ida_imasadperson[S] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That why the '...' I mean the way of thinking then. Because I view this as an answer to feminism.
[–]Eyes_Of_The_Dragon5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
But you do not at all think that men and women need each other
A man needs a woman like a fish needs a bicycle.
I really want to understand how you think.
Only so you can try to convince us to be subservient to women again. Nice try.
Nope wrong :)
[–]Zigora4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
"Love" is just chemicals being released in your brain.
It hits fast and hard. Basic instincts to sustain your species. It fades, like all chemicals. And then you're left with an unhappy husk of a relationship.
[–]ChantingMonk4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Rise above, Morty! Stick to science!
[–]FraterGGNM5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Slaide3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
How about posting on your real account if you want to be genuine?
[–]Ida_imasadperson[S] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Sorry im new to reddit. This is my first account
[–]Slaide0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Sure you are.
Haha i am! I wanted to know more about mgtow. And i saw you were on reddit so i made an account.
[–]VanDerVaart 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link
Love is designed by capitalism. Women spend about 85% of the money in the consumer economy and so everything is geared towards connecting these women with men who have money and then subsequently spending their husband's money. This is what "love" is. The female nature is to keep her head on a swivel for a higher value mate and so even though current circumstances dictate the mate she is with right now, if he loses his job or his value is removed in some other way, she already has connections to change her life. Love is dictated by the man being strong, the women having no other options, and so it is false. For MGTOW, we recognize that the odds are stacked against us and we simply opt out - you're not required to sit at the table of a stacked game, you can just walk away and this is what we do.
[–]Ida_imasadperson[S] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
Love have existed before capitalism. Maybe not hot, sexy Hollywood love. But the more quiet version of it has allways been around - not saying it is real og it works, but love didn't just show up because of capitalism.
[–]Dzartovian943 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I'll bite.
I don't speak for all MGTOW, this is my personal reasoning behind why I support this lifestyle. I'm a millennial in my early 20s, so my experience in society is relatively short compared to most.
Can you define love? Can you measure it? Can you prove it exists? Can you turn it off and on? Can you validate it?
Love is just a chemical process in the brain that entices the owner to procreate. Love is just an excuse to sap resources from people for procreation.
I have had numerous experiences where friends have been destroyed in relationships because the female; "did not love them anymore". If a women says she loves you, can you prove that she does and can you prove the intention behind it? No.
So if you were to enter into a contract where if your partner chooses not to "love" you, you are swindled, destroyed and turned into a slave, based on a concept that you can't prove or measure or even explain? That is the definition of retarded.
Romantic love doesn't exist, it's a fairy tale. It's a lie that women use as an excuse to trigger male validation so that they give up resources.
I actually agree
Well, i mean im young (and not very good at english but just ignore that), so i 'believe' in love - call naive, but I do. But I dont think love is what books and movies make it to be. Like, I think love isnt just the honeymoon fase - its whats comes after. Learning and respecting somebody and living with them, thats love to me. And yes I believe, even in the modern society, that can happen.
[–]scaur1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
There is no mgtow.
What do you mean?
[–]nigelh1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Our problem isn't love or even romance. Our problem is the fact that they seem to be very short term phenomena and lead people into making promises that they don't appear to keep. Our position is rather that we see how they work out in practice in the long term in the world around us and we really don't want to go down that path so we refrain from stepping onto the train in the first place.
[–]Dzartovian941 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Sure, you can believe in love an subscribe to your own definition but things change in life.
You will get older and your perception can change. Majority of people in the modern world have grown up with a monetary value system, all they "love" is money and will do whatever it takes to get it.
Sure there maybe so people who have a traditional value system based on principles or morals but the vast majority don't.
I don't think it's worth taking such as a risk with modern people because (this may sound really discriminatory) if they have that monetary value system, they are no better then animals; predators who take what they want and kill their prey.
The vast majority of people are illogical selfish animals. Why would I as a man marry someone who is selfish, egotistical and illogical? Disregard what that would do to me, could you imagine how my kids would suffer?
The vast majority of the world, value illusionary things over people's basic humanity. That is the most disgusting thing I have come to understand. When we die; it won't matter how much money you have or if you are famous or the size of your sex organs, we are really all worthless human beings that try to judge others on things outside their control, that's ultimately why I have no faith in not just marriage but in the people of the world itself.
[–]DangZagnut0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Its not so much a movement, it's a philosophy that a number of people are integrating into their lives.
Believe in love? That's the question?
I don't think anyone denies the existence of a feeling. People love things all the time. Hot pockets. Pizza. Ceviche. Rollercoasters. A puppy. Whatever.
How "we" think? We aren't a collective we're individuals. There's no ideology. No debate points.
It's just men going their own way in life to better their lives in the way they feel is important to them, and not according to some specific societal expectation regarding relationships and marriage and such things.
Everyone has their own reasons for doing so. there's no one reason people decide to embrace the philosophy.
[–]zachs_alligator 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Nope not at all. I can do everything a woman can do, but much better. I've had 20+ girlfriends and without fail all they do is want things. It usually starts small with flowers, and then graduates to you selling beloved cars to pay for marriage and huge houses. Fuck that noise. I will not sacrifice myself and the life I've built by myself for someone else.
Oh sad :(
[–]VoxVirilis0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Do you not at all believe in love.
There's already a bunch of responses along the lines of "love is just a chemical in the brain to make us reproduce". I won't rehash that although it is in a sense true. But more broadly speaking I do "believe" in love. I think human pair bonding, "love" if you will, carries with it a host of benefits emotionally and psychologically for the individuals who "love" each other. And I think there are benefits to the culture or society that encourages this kind of pair bonding/love among its constituents.
For me at least, MGTOW is the unfortunate realization that the emotional, psychological, and cultural benefits of "love" fail to outweigh the costs. Our society possesses a host of perverse incentives that make it advantageous for members of a certain sex to forego the benefits of "love" in favor of more tangible, monetary benefits. (To the detriment of the other sex) MGTOW is a response to society's perverse incentives. Men decide to deal with a life without love. Not because we want to, but because when we rationally analyze our situation, going our own way is the best option.
Now thats a good answer
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–]Omnibrad16 points17 points18 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]Marque018 points9 points10 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]MigTau2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ida_imasadperson[S] 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Slaide0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ida_imasadperson[S] 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Slaide0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]SamCasey989 points10 points11 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ida_imasadperson[S] 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]SamCasey98-1 points0 points1 point (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ida_imasadperson[S] 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]SamCasey98-1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]mrp_18445 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Benny7574 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Ida_imasadperson[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Eyes_Of_The_Dragon5 points6 points7 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Ida_imasadperson[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Zigora4 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]ChantingMonk4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]FraterGGNM5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Slaide3 points4 points5 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ida_imasadperson[S] 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Slaide0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Ida_imasadperson[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]VanDerVaart 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Ida_imasadperson[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Dzartovian943 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Ida_imasadperson[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]scaur1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Ida_imasadperson[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]nigelh1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Dzartovian941 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DangZagnut0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]zachs_alligator 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Ida_imasadperson[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]VoxVirilis0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Ida_imasadperson[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link