Continuing the discussion

DangZagnut · 2020-10-17T09:10:28+00:00

(1). No. Why would I? It isn't the laws that are inherently the problem, there's simply no benefit in my opinion.

Why would I want to even get into such an arrangement in the first place?

There's zero gain for men, and even when people try to convince me of it they babble about tax laws (which only work when you can be divorce raped which will never go away) or "living longer" like I want to maximize my time in hell.

Hard pass.

(2). Lust is a deep desire to fuck someone. Lust.

None of the options apply to me. The closest might be casual FWB types, but it was really my own relationship structures that weren't on the list.

TheApricotCavalier · 2020-10-17T14:26:47+00:00

IMO, a lot of yall lettin the devil in the door. You set these rules that work & make sense for you, not realizing at any time she can drive a bulldozer through them

classicliberal1 · 2020-10-17T17:57:33+00:00

1)Honestly if some politicians managed to repeal the anti-male divorce laws will anyone of you reconsider the idea of long-term monogamous marriage?

Repealing anti-male divorce laws aren't enough. Men would also have to be assured that the courts, the judges, and the lawyers aren't going to attack him. The entire divorce industry would have to be destroyed. All divorces would have to be non-profit for everyone in society.

In fact, it would take nothing less than an entire lifetime of men getting married and not being screwed in order for any rational man to access the risks of marriage to have been abated. That's at least 80 years to fix this problem, longer than anyone reading this today will be alive. This is a problem that is 60 years in the making. It's not going to go away in a few years no matter what legislation passes.

Which among the following choices would you select as your view on sex and relationships?

Your poll makes the choices exclusive. They are not.

I say everyone should be allowed to do what they want as long as they aren't infringing upon the rights of others. So prostitution should be legal, even if I don't recommend it and wouldn't even if it were legal. Remember that AIDS still has no cure and a prostitute will have had many sexual partners. No lay is worth your life or getting a lifetime disease. Still, making it legal would decrease the spread of AIDS as then the industry could be regulated. It would also reduce human sex trafficking and violence against prostitutes by allow them to have the protection of the law.

My own personal preferences are for one night stands, friends with benefits, and if the girl is really enjoyable to be around with and has common interests with me, non-exclusive and non-committed relationships. FWB is best, but its hardest to get and tends to end when one of the pair gets into a serious relationship with another. A FWB relationship is actually harder to get than a ONS, ironically. FWB is also less risky than ONS as far as STDs go.

malerevolution · 2020-10-17T23:12:47+00:00

I never would. Even without anti-male laws, women will still find a way to make marriage not worth a man's while. No matter how hard you work, how much you earn, and what you give them, they are never satisfied and when something goes wrong, no matter what the circumstances, it's your fault guys. Women are the first to take credit and the first to lay blame, I've seen it in my own family and in the workplace, and I don't want to receive zero credit and all the blame. Not worth it.

Perseus_the_Bold · 2020-10-18T04:20:10+00:00

No.
Lust is a natural biological impulse. We can choose to indulge in it or control it as with any other impulse. My view on sex and relationships is "none of the above" because situation and circumstances in life are ever changing and one must continuously adapt, therefore no one fixed answer is ever satisfactory when time is factored in. I may judge a FWB relationship to be ok today and a ridiculously bad idea tomorrow. The one thing that stays consistent in all my choices is my knowledge of female nature because all my decisions are weighed in based on such knowledge. I will never make a choice in where the woman's sake takes precedent over my own.

CuriousIncel2 · 2020-10-17T10:04:52+00:00

1)Honestly if some politicians managed to repeal the anti-male divorce laws will anyone of you reconsider the idea of long-term monogamous marriage?

Yes. I've never bought into the "love" nonsense. Women have something I want (sex, kids, family) and I'm willing to make a trade agreement (which is essentially my view of what marriage is).

The question is: is what I have to offer, enough for a woman to accept this trade deal? Or in other words, am I willing or capable of performing at the level at which the modern woman would consider the deal I'm laying out to be acceptable. Now that I think about it like this, I'm beginning to see why TRP people consider MGTOW as low-status.

What do you think about lust? Which among the following choices would you select as your view on sex and relationships?

Purely transactional.

I must admit I don't see how this discussion has anything to do with the other discussion about 'chameleons'.

2020-10-17T15:04:02+00:00

1) Nope. Never.

2) Lust? Human emotion.

CoolDEpot · 2020-10-17T18:13:04+00:00

If anti male laws were repealed i would marry

Title	Continuing the discussion
Author	purpletoredpilled
Upvotes	1
Comments	20
Date	October 17, 2020 9:04 AM UTC (5 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MGTOW2
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MGTOW2/comments/jcrv8g/continuing_the_discussion/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MGTOW2/continuing-the-discussion.804802 https://theredarchive.com/post/804802

Comments