~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
conspiracy_thug
[–]trytoinjureme 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Imnotmrabut 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I've nibbled it dozens of times! Rough Dick and extra foamy creamy bits ..... Slurp factor 10!
But My all time fave has to be #16, dripping with cream and with extra crusty bits. You have just no idea how those crusty bits add to the experience.
[–]SirSkeptic 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Oh, nice.
[–]Lupinfujiko 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
"17 Dicks you'd actually like to put in your mouth."
What...? Like, at the same time????
[–]conspiracy_thug[S] 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
In a row?!
[–]-redditardation- 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
In before this turns into "Objectification of men cannot exist." and some nonsensical explanation about power and institutions is cited.
Why is it so hard to accept that men and women like to see attractive individuals of the sex that they are attracted to...
Hypocritical moral puritans are the worst kind of puritans.
[–]swimmerv99 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link
You should have actually looked at the article before you posted this.
[–]conspiracy_thug[S] 11 points12 points13 points 9 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
The fact of the matter is they scream about misogyny and women's rights all the time and how women need to not be sexualized in the media but then they turn around and talk about whose dick needs to be sucked and which male celebrity has the most chiseled abs
[–]swimmerv99 8 points9 points10 points 9 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
The fact of the matter is that this satirical piece about the food called spotted dick is a terrible example for what you're talking about.
[–]conspiracy_thug[S] 9 points10 points11 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
The article sucks but the initial clickbait message is where my rage is.
Please don't try to normalize sexual exploitation of men in a men's rights sub.
[–]Imnotmrabut -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
Dear Thug can you please clarify the axis of your concern.
1) You object to the objectification of men?
2) You object to double standards
3) You object to both of the above when men are objectified and there is no objection from feminist about double showing a gross double standard?
Any way, the article left me quite peckish and I'm definitely considering whipping up some dick. I will probably throw on some Cointreau, light it and go down in flames.
[–]conspiracy_thug[S] 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
I mean am i not allowd to be multi-triggered?
[–]Imnotmrabut -3 points-2 points-1 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Of course you are!
But there is Triggered and there is new improved Multi-Trigger with that added F Factor.
[–]conspiracy_thug[S] 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Wtf im not fat!
[–]jaheiner 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
I think his issue is that even if it was complete clickbait and didn't really have anything to do with the article, if there was a title of "10 sets of nipples you should try" and had hot women with their boobs barely covered then ended up being about baby bottle brands, they'd still bitch about how it's sexism and objectification but when it's guys it's ok.
What If I was to be overly daring and say whether it was ladies or men, it would be fine. The issue here is over sensitivity for the shear thrill of outrage and finger wagging!
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
"fine" to who? [whom? - I'll never learn which to use]
Because to anyone sane, yeah there's no problem. Maybe a little eye roll at the clickbait, or annoyance because... a lot of people hate clickbait nonsense. Not caring that it's "objectification" because that's not a thing.
But feminists don't really showcase behaviors that would indicate they'd be "fine" if the proposed [baby bottle] "Nipples" clickbait, situation happened.
These are people that say that a vagina-like sex toy is objectification and a "disembodied vagina" is absolutely horrible sexism. Meanwhile, dildos are a thing, and if you even mention them to feminists... it's "different" because mental gymnastics.
[–]wzil 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The sexism of the headline exists even if the article has no sexism in it.
[–]rocelot7 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
In the far far far future of 2021, buzzfeed whill be forgotten. Exculding all the food porn shit they post. Food porn is always popular.
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–]trytoinjureme 5 points6 points7 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Imnotmrabut 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]SirSkeptic 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Lupinfujiko 5 points6 points7 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]conspiracy_thug[S] 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]-redditardation- 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]swimmerv99 5 points6 points7 points (11 children) | Copy Link
[–]conspiracy_thug[S] 11 points12 points13 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]swimmerv99 8 points9 points10 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]conspiracy_thug[S] 9 points10 points11 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]Imnotmrabut -1 points0 points1 point (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]conspiracy_thug[S] 6 points7 points8 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Imnotmrabut -3 points-2 points-1 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]conspiracy_thug[S] 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]jaheiner 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Imnotmrabut -3 points-2 points-1 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]wzil 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]rocelot7 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link