For the Record - Michael Brutsch

memymineown · 2012-10-21T17:46:28+00:00

Besides the fact that he would not be getting nearly as much fallout from this if he was a woman, how is this relevant to Men's Rights?

rightsbot · 2012-10-21T17:16:19+00:00

Post text automatically copied here. (Why?) (Report a problem.)

2012-10-21T19:35:57+00:00

aside about the phrase "child porn":

Using the phrase "child pornography" to refer to pictures of high school girls is Orwellian double-speak. It is one thing to say that porn involving high school age girls should be banned (I think 16-17 should be allowed, 14-15 no) but it is not child porn.

Grapeban · 2012-10-22T01:51:24+00:00

You're right, it wasn't child pornography, rather it was sexualised pictures taken of young girls posted on a public forum without their permission with the intention that people would wank over them.

There is nothing at all morally objectionable about that. To paraphrase one of your moderators, the law is the only moral code and everything legal is morally acceptable.

Words_of_Truth · 2012-10-21T18:22:20+00:00

[permanently deleted]

DerickBurton · 2012-10-21T17:55:58+00:00

Is this post another attempt to smear this sub by linking it to child abuse?

Title	For the Record - Michael Brutsch
Author	Words_of_Truth
Upvotes	0
Comments	22
Date	October 21, 2012 5:15 PM UTC (13 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/11umea/for_the_record_michael_brutsch/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/for-the-record-michael-brutsch.1010860 https://theredarchive.com/post/1010860

Comments