TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

memymineown Archive

View 435 posts and 2,711 comments by memymineown on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
657

memymineown/r/MensRights07/10/12 03:43 AM
639

Social Issuesmemymineown/r/MensRights18/02/12 07:50 PM
628

memymineown/r/MensRights23/12/12 08:35 PM
367

memymineown/r/MensRights10/03/13 09:15 AM
360

memymineown/r/MensRights09/05/13 04:45 AM
291

memymineown/r/MensRights11/09/12 11:30 PM
227

memymineown/r/MensRights13/03/13 02:20 PM
192

memymineown/r/MensRights21/12/12 04:53 AM
149

memymineown/r/MensRights01/12/12 01:14 PM
129

memymineown/r/MensRights18/03/13 02:44 PM
121

memymineown/r/MensRights01/12/12 11:19 AM
120

memymineown/r/MensRights30/07/13 06:27 PM
117

memymineown/r/MensRights04/05/13 05:36 AM
113

memymineown/r/MensRights04/12/12 11:21 PM
109

memymineown/r/MensRights21/03/13 09:52 AM
109

memymineown/r/MensRights20/04/13 01:31 PM
103

memymineown/r/MensRights21/12/12 08:36 AM
98

memymineown/r/MensRights23/10/12 09:14 PM
97

memymineown/r/MensRights08/03/13 09:02 PM
96

memymineown/r/MensRights12/10/12 05:40 PM
94

memymineown/r/MensRights11/09/11 11:21 PM
85

memymineown/r/MensRights17/01/13 07:49 AM
84

memymineown/r/MensRights23/11/11 07:43 PM
82

memymineown/r/MensRights11/07/12 12:35 PM
82

memymineown/r/MensRights25/05/12 01:47 AM
77

memymineown/r/MensRights29/01/12 07:42 PM
72

memymineown/r/MensRights17/02/13 04:38 PM
72

memymineown/r/MensRights14/02/12 01:56 PM
72

memymineown/r/MensRights23/04/12 07:16 PM
71

memymineown/r/MensRights29/12/12 08:25 PM
70

memymineown/r/MensRights23/12/12 03:16 AM
68

memymineown/r/MensRights15/03/13 04:57 AM
68

memymineown/r/MensRights17/06/11 07:48 AM
67

memymineown/r/MensRights19/10/12 04:44 PM
67

memymineown/r/MensRights22/10/12 11:11 PM
60

memymineown/r/MensRights13/05/12 11:55 PM
59

memymineown/r/MensRights20/03/13 05:27 AM
59

memymineown/r/MensRights30/07/13 06:25 PM
58

memymineown/r/MensRights22/05/12 01:41 AM
57

memymineown/r/MensRights13/09/11 06:02 AM
56

memymineown/r/MensRights17/06/11 06:51 PM
55

memymineown/r/MensRights02/12/11 11:51 PM
55

memymineown/r/MensRights03/01/13 09:46 PM
54

memymineown/r/MensRights08/12/12 10:51 PM
54

memymineown/r/MensRights07/10/12 03:41 AM
53

memymineown/r/MensRights09/10/12 05:14 AM
52

memymineown/r/MensRights28/01/13 03:51 AM
51

memymineown/r/MensRights09/02/13 05:10 PM
51

memymineown/r/MensRights22/10/12 11:09 PM
51

memymineown/r/MensRights12/01/12 05:48 AM
50

memymineown/r/MensRights06/05/13 04:37 AM
50

memymineown/r/MensRights22/12/12 04:37 AM
50

memymineown/r/MensRights06/03/12 06:07 PM
49

memymineown/r/MensRights30/10/11 05:42 AM
48

memymineown/r/MensRights22/02/13 05:00 PM
48

memymineown/r/MensRights10/10/12 07:00 PM
47

memymineown/r/MensRights05/05/12 03:44 PM
46

memymineown/r/MensRights08/06/11 04:34 PM
45

memymineown/r/MensRights25/12/12 02:41 AM
44

memymineown/r/MensRights28/06/12 01:09 AM
43

memymineown/r/MensRights10/10/12 04:36 AM
43

memymineown/r/MensRights30/06/12 01:36 AM
42

memymineown/r/MensRights27/02/12 05:54 PM
40

memymineown/r/MensRights10/07/12 02:34 PM
40

memymineown/r/MensRights21/10/12 07:37 PM
39

memymineown/r/MensRights09/10/12 10:39 PM
39

memymineown/r/MensRights04/01/12 10:12 AM
39

memymineown/r/MensRights08/03/13 01:33 AM
38

memymineown/r/MensRights05/06/11 09:07 PM
38

memymineown/r/MensRights19/07/12 11:08 PM
38

memymineown/r/MensRights21/05/12 12:12 AM
38

memymineown/r/MensRights20/05/13 05:26 PM
37

memymineown/r/MensRights29/11/11 09:21 PM
37

memymineown/r/MensRights03/08/13 01:03 AM
37

memymineown/r/MensRights13/03/12 04:21 AM
36

memymineown/r/MensRights10/02/12 11:12 PM
36

memymineown/r/MensRights03/02/12 06:32 AM
35

memymineown/r/MensRights27/06/11 03:29 AM
35

memymineown/r/MensRights10/01/13 04:32 AM
34

memymineown/r/MensRights30/12/12 08:04 AM
33

memymineown/r/MensRights11/07/12 01:12 PM
33

memymineown/r/MensRights02/11/12 07:45 PM
33

memymineown/r/MensRights19/06/11 11:46 PM
33

memymineown/r/MensRights30/06/11 04:33 PM
31

memymineown/r/MensRights16/01/13 12:26 AM
31

memymineown/r/MensRights11/01/12 10:06 PM
31

memymineown/r/MensRights29/04/12 06:02 PM
31

memymineown/r/MensRights16/03/12 08:36 PM
30

memymineown/r/MensRights27/01/13 02:17 AM
30

memymineown/r/MensRights11/10/12 10:14 PM
29

memymineown/r/MensRights10/07/12 07:57 PM
29

memymineown/r/MensRights10/02/13 06:52 PM
29

memymineown/r/MensRights20/09/11 02:13 PM
29

memymineown/r/MensRights04/11/12 09:34 PM
28

memymineown/r/MensRights08/03/13 04:22 AM
28

memymineown/r/MensRights24/06/11 11:31 PM
28

memymineown/r/MensRights06/01/13 08:30 PM
28

memymineown/r/MensRights25/05/12 10:20 PM
28

memymineown/r/MensRights29/01/12 04:53 PM
27

memymineown/r/MensRights14/04/13 05:30 AM
27

memymineown/r/MensRights12/10/12 08:52 PM
27

memymineown/r/MensRights03/05/12 03:56 AM
27

memymineown/r/MensRights08/12/11 04:58 AM
26

memymineown/r/MensRights07/06/11 05:46 PM
26

memymineown/r/MensRights09/02/12 05:31 PM
26

memymineown/r/MensRights09/02/12 01:42 PM
26

memymineown/r/MensRights09/03/13 07:48 PM
25

memymineown/r/MensRights22/01/12 02:39 AM
25

memymineown/r/MensRights25/03/13 08:53 AM
25

memymineown/r/MensRights22/04/13 04:05 AM
25

memymineown/r/MensRights06/02/12 03:10 AM
25

memymineown/r/MensRights16/03/13 04:49 AM
24

memymineown/r/MensRights23/07/12 01:03 PM
24

memymineown/r/MensRights09/06/11 08:10 PM
24

memymineown/r/MensRights05/02/12 02:29 AM
24

memymineown/r/MensRights07/06/11 03:47 AM
24

memymineown/r/MensRights22/12/12 04:56 AM
24

memymineown/r/MensRights19/12/12 04:02 AM
24

memymineown/r/MensRights11/10/12 03:12 AM
24

memymineown/r/MensRights17/04/13 02:54 AM
23

memymineown/r/MensRights12/10/11 12:27 AM
23

memymineown/r/MensRights01/04/12 01:27 AM
23

memymineown/r/MensRights23/02/12 01:11 AM
23

memymineown/r/MensRights20/07/12 10:12 PM
23

memymineown/r/MensRights26/04/12 01:27 AM
23

memymineown/r/MensRights10/06/12 12:48 AM
23

memymineown/r/MensRights04/07/12 05:31 PM
23

memymineown/r/MensRights04/11/11 06:51 AM
23

memymineown/r/MensRights07/02/12 07:38 PM
22

memymineown/r/MensRights08/07/12 10:03 AM
22

memymineown/r/MensRights31/12/12 02:18 AM
21

memymineown/r/MensRights14/04/13 04:02 AM
21

memymineown/r/MensRights21/10/12 07:31 PM
20

memymineown/r/MensRights01/09/12 01:13 AM
20

memymineown/r/MensRights27/06/11 01:13 AM
20

memymineown/r/MensRights09/01/12 02:54 PM
20

memymineown/r/MensRights25/06/11 05:14 AM
20

memymineown/r/MensRights18/04/13 07:59 PM
20

memymineown/r/MensRights17/06/11 07:48 AM
19

memymineown/r/MensRights21/06/11 05:33 AM
19

memymineown/r/MensRights11/03/13 04:51 AM
19

memymineown/r/MensRights26/09/12 08:21 PM
19

memymineown/r/MensRights08/07/12 09:37 PM
18

memymineown/r/MensRights08/05/12 05:53 PM
18

memymineown/r/MensRights09/04/12 04:56 PM
18

memymineown/r/MensRights03/05/13 07:11 PM
18

memymineown/r/MensRights25/05/12 12:50 PM
18

memymineown/r/MensRights18/03/13 05:35 AM
17

memymineown/r/MensRights08/12/12 09:42 PM
17

memymineown/r/MensRights11/01/13 08:25 AM
17

memymineown/r/MensRights11/07/12 03:44 AM
17

memymineown/r/MensRights22/07/12 02:27 AM
17

memymineown/r/MensRights10/07/12 12:51 PM
17

memymineown/r/MensRights02/07/12 12:34 AM
17

memymineown/r/MensRights12/06/11 07:28 AM
17

memymineown/r/MensRights08/02/12 11:50 PM
16

memymineown/r/MensRights16/10/12 09:27 PM
16

memymineown/r/MensRights11/07/12 03:45 AM
16

memymineown/r/MensRights14/12/11 11:09 PM
16

memymineown/r/MensRights22/12/12 05:01 AM
16

memymineown/r/MensRights03/05/13 07:17 PM
16

memymineown/r/MensRights23/04/13 10:47 PM
15

memymineown/r/MensRights01/09/12 01:12 AM
15

memymineown/r/MensRights27/06/11 01:12 AM
15

memymineown/r/MensRights27/06/11 01:10 AM
15

memymineown/r/MensRights10/12/11 09:06 AM
15

memymineown/r/MensRights12/03/13 10:37 AM
15

memymineown/r/MensRights31/08/11 05:34 PM
14

memymineown/r/MensRights13/06/12 01:29 AM
14

memymineown/r/MensRights29/06/12 01:08 AM
14

memymineown/r/MensRights01/11/11 09:54 PM
14

memymineown/r/MensRights30/01/12 08:53 PM
14

memymineown/r/MensRights26/02/12 01:53 AM
14

memymineown/r/MensRights05/05/13 01:28 AM
14

memymineown/r/MensRights22/08/12 10:52 AM
13

memymineown/r/MensRights18/03/13 02:45 PM
13

memymineown/r/MensRights17/09/11 08:12 PM
13

memymineown/r/MensRights24/12/12 03:22 AM
13

memymineown/r/MensRights09/10/12 05:49 PM
13

memymineown/r/MensRights03/01/12 05:04 PM
13

memymineown/r/MensRights30/06/11 04:35 PM
13

memymineown/r/MensRights06/07/12 05:12 PM
13

memymineown/r/MensRights07/06/11 05:49 PM
13

memymineown/r/MensRights23/05/13 01:32 PM
13

memymineown/r/MensRights07/06/11 12:05 AM
13

memymineown/r/MensRights02/12/11 05:07 AM
13

memymineown/r/MensRights03/05/12 02:06 AM
13

memymineown/r/MensRights13/07/12 02:23 PM
13

memymineown/r/MensRights01/08/11 03:18 AM
13

memymineown/r/MensRights25/08/11 05:52 PM
13

memymineown/r/MensRights14/10/11 07:12 AM
13

memymineown/r/MensRights05/07/12 03:45 AM
13

memymineown/r/MensRights02/08/13 09:40 PM
13

memymineown/r/MensRights10/06/11 06:43 PM
12

memymineown/r/MensRights27/01/12 09:35 PM
12

memymineown/r/MensRights05/03/12 09:26 PM
12

memymineown/r/MensRights25/03/13 08:52 AM
12

memymineown/r/MensRights07/11/11 09:00 PM
12

memymineown/r/MensRights07/08/12 01:34 AM
12

memymineown/r/MensRights16/01/13 05:56 AM
12

memymineown/r/MensRights16/01/13 05:57 AM
12

memymineown/r/MensRights20/01/12 06:28 PM
12

memymineown/r/MensRights09/12/11 02:59 PM
12

memymineown/r/MensRights20/07/11 11:22 PM
12

memymineown/r/MensRights24/07/12 03:49 PM
12

memymineown/r/MensRights10/04/13 08:13 PM
11

memymineown/r/MensRights14/04/13 05:29 AM
11

memymineown/r/MensRights05/05/12 01:51 AM
11

memymineown/r/MensRights29/02/12 03:35 PM
11

memymineown/r/MensRights10/12/11 09:04 AM
11

memymineown/r/MensRights05/04/13 07:38 PM
11

memymineown/r/MensRights14/12/11 10:52 PM
11

memymineown/r/MensRights17/06/11 02:53 PM
11

memymineown/r/MensRights05/07/12 02:51 AM
11

memymineown/r/MensRights30/03/12 10:05 PM
11

memymineown/r/MensRights14/10/12 02:33 AM
11

memymineown/r/MensRights10/03/12 02:45 AM
11

memymineown/r/MensRights12/12/11 10:27 PM
11

memymineown/r/MensRights18/09/11 09:37 PM
10

memymineown/r/MensRights01/09/12 01:11 AM
10

memymineown/r/MensRights23/07/12 06:47 PM
10

memymineown/r/MensRights10/01/12 05:50 PM
10

memymineown/r/MensRights02/07/11 07:17 PM
10

memymineown/r/MensRights11/12/11 03:15 AM
10

memymineown/r/MensRights14/06/11 06:10 PM
10

memymineown/r/MensRights14/07/12 01:28 PM
10

memymineown/r/MensRights04/03/12 06:55 PM
10

memymineown/r/MensRights16/01/13 05:56 AM
10

memymineown/r/MensRights31/01/12 04:38 AM
10

memymineown/r/MensRights12/04/13 02:32 PM
10

memymineown/r/MensRights04/02/12 05:37 AM
10

memymineown/r/MensRights04/10/11 07:49 PM
10

memymineown/r/MensRights16/07/11 12:26 AM
10

memymineown/r/MensRights09/05/12 04:09 PM
10

memymineown/r/MensRights02/03/12 04:04 AM
10

memymineown/r/MensRights03/11/11 07:28 PM
10

memymineown/r/MensRights04/07/12 02:10 AM
9

memymineown/r/MensRights10/01/12 08:41 PM
9

memymineown/r/MensRights26/07/12 05:31 PM
9

memymineown/r/MensRights08/07/12 03:39 AM
9

memymineown/r/MensRights11/07/12 09:27 PM
9

memymineown/r/MensRights03/07/12 06:08 PM
9

memymineown/r/MensRights17/09/11 05:39 AM
9

memymineown/r/MensRights18/02/12 06:14 PM
9

memymineown/r/MensRights15/09/11 04:41 AM
9

memymineown/r/MensRights21/09/11 02:48 AM
9

memymineown/r/MensRights09/07/12 05:07 PM
9

memymineown/r/MensRights06/01/12 11:20 PM
9

memymineown/r/MensRights06/08/11 05:22 AM
9

memymineown/r/MensRights19/04/12 02:04 AM
9

memymineown/r/MensRights15/07/11 03:40 AM
9

memymineown/r/MensRights21/03/13 05:30 AM
8

memymineown/r/MensRights27/01/12 09:37 PM
8

memymineown/r/MensRights05/05/12 04:04 AM
8

memymineown/r/MensRights09/06/11 08:11 PM
8

memymineown/r/MensRights07/07/12 12:31 PM
8

memymineown/r/MensRights21/01/12 06:45 PM
8

memymineown/r/MensRights16/09/11 04:16 AM
8

memymineown/r/MensRights04/05/12 04:25 AM
8

memymineown/r/MensRights10/07/12 08:00 PM
8

memymineown/r/MensRights22/12/12 03:08 AM
8

memymineown/r/MensRights10/05/12 12:45 PM
8

memymineown/r/MensRights29/01/12 07:44 PM
8

memymineown/r/MensRights25/10/11 06:10 AM
8

memymineown/r/MensRights21/10/12 12:26 AM
8

memymineown/r/MensRights08/10/11 05:43 PM
8

memymineown/r/MensRights21/12/12 04:54 AM
8

memymineown/r/MensRights24/10/12 04:32 AM
8

memymineown/r/MensRights23/10/11 06:25 PM
7

memymineown/r/MensRights23/01/12 02:55 AM
7

memymineown/r/MensRights11/04/13 01:46 AM
7

memymineown/r/MensRights28/09/11 04:00 AM
7

memymineown/r/MensRights09/05/12 01:43 AM
7

memymineown/r/MensRights08/07/12 12:02 AM
7

memymineown/r/MensRights07/07/12 02:44 PM
7

memymineown/r/MensRights16/10/11 06:38 AM
7

memymineown/r/MensRights02/07/12 09:55 PM
7

memymineown/r/MensRights13/06/11 05:02 PM
7

memymineown/r/MensRights22/07/12 02:28 AM
7

memymineown/r/MensRights21/08/12 06:02 AM
7

memymineown/r/MensRights06/07/12 05:22 PM
7

memymineown/r/MensRights02/04/13 08:46 PM
7

memymineown/r/MensRights06/01/13 10:23 PM
7

memymineown/r/MensRights03/05/13 07:11 PM
7

memymineown/r/MensRights04/01/13 04:11 AM
7

memymineown/r/MensRights17/07/12 03:36 AM
7

memymineown/r/MensRights07/10/12 03:37 AM
7

memymineown/r/MensRights22/02/12 12:03 AM
7

memymineown/r/MensRights30/07/13 06:26 PM
7

memymineown/r/MensRights04/07/12 10:18 AM
6

memymineown/r/MensRights15/06/11 06:49 AM
6

memymineown/r/MensRights11/04/12 04:17 AM
6

memymineown/r/MensRights15/11/11 07:16 AM
6

memymineown/r/MensRights07/10/11 07:55 PM
6

memymineown/r/MensRights24/12/12 02:18 AM
6

memymineown/r/MensRights14/11/11 04:35 AM
6

memymineown/r/MensRights02/07/12 09:56 PM
6

memymineown/r/MensRights19/02/12 05:18 AM
6

memymineown/r/MensRights02/09/11 06:00 PM
6

memymineown/r/MensRights15/03/12 04:54 AM
6

memymineown/r/MensRights25/09/11 10:30 PM
6

memymineown/r/MensRights10/07/12 01:49 AM
6

memymineown/r/MensRights05/07/12 01:25 PM
6

memymineown/r/MensRights12/01/12 06:15 AM
6

memymineown/r/MensRights09/07/12 03:06 PM
6

memymineown/r/MensRights28/06/11 10:16 PM
6

memymineown/r/MensRights31/12/11 05:26 AM
6

memymineown/r/MensRights13/12/11 10:32 PM
6

memymineown/r/MensRights04/07/12 05:28 PM
6

memymineown/r/MensRights19/09/11 03:02 AM
6

memymineown/r/MensRights16/06/11 03:41 AM
5

memymineown/r/MensRights22/09/11 09:36 PM
5

memymineown/r/MensRights29/07/11 02:57 AM
5

memymineown/r/MensRights07/07/12 11:54 PM
5

memymineown/r/MensRights17/09/11 06:53 AM
5

memymineown/r/MensRights09/01/12 02:56 PM
5

memymineown/r/MensRights12/10/11 03:19 AM
5

memymineown/r/MensRights08/05/12 01:44 AM
5

memymineown/r/MensRights02/11/12 07:46 PM
5

memymineown/r/MensRights22/03/13 10:05 PM
5

memymineown/r/MensRights17/02/12 08:13 PM
5

memymineown/r/MensRights11/11/11 05:10 AM
5

memymineown/r/MensRights02/12/12 09:24 AM
5

memymineown/r/MensRights20/07/11 10:36 PM
5

memymineown/r/MensRights02/12/12 12:49 AM
5

memymineown/r/MensRights01/11/12 05:20 AM
4

memymineown/r/MensRights09/11/11 05:12 AM
4

memymineown/r/MensRights16/10/12 09:27 PM
4

memymineown/r/MensRights19/07/11 05:48 PM
4

memymineown/r/MensRights05/12/11 11:40 PM
4

memymineown/r/MensRights02/05/13 05:27 AM
4

memymineown/r/MensRights22/09/11 09:24 PM
4

memymineown/r/MensRights14/06/11 06:08 PM
4

memymineown/r/MensRights04/10/12 08:46 PM
4

memymineown/r/MensRights14/07/12 01:32 PM
4

memymineown/r/MensRights16/04/12 08:30 PM
4

memymineown/r/MensRights06/07/12 06:44 PM
4

memymineown/r/MensRights04/02/12 07:32 PM
4

memymineown/r/MensRights28/02/12 03:14 AM
4

memymineown/r/MensRights01/07/12 03:00 PM
4

memymineown/r/MensRights28/07/12 04:03 AM
4

memymineown/r/MensRights20/07/12 03:21 PM
4

memymineown/r/MensRights01/07/12 02:55 AM
4

memymineown/r/MensRights09/07/12 03:13 PM
4

memymineown/r/MensRights26/04/12 05:25 AM
4

memymineown/r/MensRights07/12/11 11:23 AM
4

memymineown/r/MensRights03/02/12 06:34 AM
4

memymineown/r/MensRights06/05/12 12:51 AM
4

memymineown/r/MensRights24/04/13 04:13 PM
4

memymineown/r/MensRights16/06/11 03:42 AM
4

memymineown/r/MensRights24/03/13 11:37 AM
3

memymineown/r/MensRights12/02/13 11:50 PM
3

memymineown/r/MensRights19/07/12 02:47 AM
3

memymineown/r/MensRights25/06/11 10:54 PM
3

memymineown/r/MensRights04/05/12 06:46 PM
3

memymineown/r/MensRights01/03/13 12:33 AM
3

memymineown/r/MensRights10/12/11 09:09 AM
3

memymineown/r/MensRights14/02/12 01:55 PM
3

memymineown/r/MensRights10/07/12 01:28 AM
3

memymineown/r/MensRights03/05/12 03:14 AM
3

memymineown/r/MensRights03/05/12 02:35 AM
3

memymineown/r/MensRights25/01/12 12:34 AM
3

memymineown/r/MensRights09/07/12 03:10 PM
3

memymineown/r/MensRights06/08/11 05:21 AM
3

memymineown/r/MensRights10/04/13 03:54 AM
3

memymineown/r/MensRights10/11/11 07:21 AM
3

memymineown/r/MensRights10/06/11 06:42 PM
3

memymineown/r/MensRights16/02/12 02:24 PM
3

memymineown/r/MensRights28/04/13 02:20 PM
2

memymineown/r/MensRights02/02/12 05:52 AM
2

memymineown/r/MensRights11/04/12 04:17 AM
2

memymineown/r/MensRights14/04/13 07:45 AM
2

memymineown/r/MensRights16/09/11 07:23 PM
2

memymineown/r/MensRights16/09/11 04:15 AM
2

memymineown/r/MensRights11/07/12 02:14 AM
2

memymineown/r/MensRights26/05/12 08:42 PM
2

memymineown/r/MensRights16/01/13 05:58 AM
2

memymineown/r/MensRights14/07/12 12:38 AM
2

memymineown/r/MensRights27/12/12 05:28 AM
2

memymineown/r/MensRights05/12/12 05:50 AM
2

memymineown/r/MensRights10/05/12 12:31 AM
2

memymineown/r/MensRights28/06/11 06:26 PM
2

memymineown/r/MensRights07/12/11 03:54 AM
2

memymineown/r/MensRights09/10/11 12:20 AM
2

memymineown/r/MensRights13/10/12 10:56 PM
2

memymineown/r/MensRights17/10/12 03:20 AM
2

memymineown/r/MensRights24/05/12 04:07 PM
1

memymineown/r/MensRights23/10/12 06:29 PM
1

memymineown/r/MensRights08/07/11 08:47 AM
1

memymineown/r/MensRights15/07/12 12:11 AM
1

memymineown/r/MensRights16/09/11 03:04 AM
1

memymineown/r/MensRights28/12/11 06:10 PM
1

memymineown/r/MensRights06/07/12 09:37 PM
1

memymineown/r/MensRights18/10/12 08:14 PM
1

memymineown/r/MensRights20/04/12 04:10 AM
1

memymineown/r/MensRights14/07/12 12:36 AM
1

memymineown/r/MensRights12/11/11 02:34 AM
1

memymineown/r/MensRights18/11/11 03:42 AM
1

memymineown/r/MensRights24/01/12 11:50 PM
1

memymineown/r/MensRights09/04/13 08:37 PM
1

memymineown/r/MensRights17/01/13 03:59 AM
1

memymineown/r/MensRights31/10/11 02:29 AM
1

memymineown/r/MensRights01/12/11 09:13 PM
1

memymineown/r/MensRights05/07/12 01:17 PM
1

memymineown/r/MensRights10/03/12 02:47 AM
1

memymineown/r/MensRights03/02/12 06:28 AM
0

memymineown/r/MensRights28/09/11 04:03 AM
0

memymineown/r/MensRights12/11/12 03:27 AM
0

memymineown/r/MensRights14/06/11 06:08 PM
0

memymineown/r/MensRights09/10/12 05:17 PM
0

memymineown/r/MensRights25/06/11 05:05 PM
0

memymineown/r/MensRights15/03/12 07:36 PM
0

memymineown/r/MensRights10/02/12 07:43 PM
0

memymineown/r/MensRights04/12/11 09:43 PM
0

memymineown/r/MensRights27/04/12 01:47 PM
0

memymineown/r/MensRights23/12/12 01:46 AM
0

memymineown/r/MensRights10/07/12 08:05 PM
0

memymineown/r/MensRights26/10/12 03:49 AM
0

memymineown/r/MensRights12/03/12 02:04 AM
0

memymineown/r/MensRights11/05/12 01:56 AM
0

memymineown/r/MensRights10/12/12 11:39 PM
0

memymineown/r/MensRights14/07/12 12:42 AM
0

memymineown/r/MensRights01/03/13 04:26 PM
0

memymineown/r/MensRights06/07/12 04:44 AM
0

memymineown/r/MensRights18/11/11 02:45 AM
0

memymineown/r/MensRights13/12/12 05:17 AM
0

memymineown/r/MensRights22/05/12 03:57 AM
0

memymineown/r/MensRights30/12/11 10:36 PM
0

memymineown/r/MensRights04/07/12 10:22 AM
0

memymineown/r/MensRights05/05/12 10:41 PM
0

memymineown/r/MensRights30/07/11 04:14 AM
0

memymineown/r/MensRights29/04/12 05:36 AM
0

memymineown/r/MensRights29/10/11 12:43 AM
0

memymineown/r/MensRights27/06/11 09:04 PM
0

memymineown/r/MensRights10/01/12 10:33 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 2,711 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

http://arclaw.org/
/r/MensRights05/08/13 07:41 PM
-5

I was using the term in a different way than the first definition in the dictionary. You would do well to look at the other ones before criticizing.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 05:00 PM
-18

I don't care. Please post real things in /r/mensrights if you want it to be a real subreddit.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 04:05 PM
1

There are a number of problems with your position. The first is that there is no evidence that circumcision reduces the risk of HIV. The second is that it is not only men who are being victimized. The third is that they are lying to people about this and that it will increase HIV infections. The fourth is that they are using your money to do it.
/r/MensRights04/08/13 04:44 AM
16

GIven what I know about this man, this is almost certainly not a real suicide attempt. More likely a cry for attention.
/r/MensRights04/08/13 04:19 AM
2

Seth Macfarlane hasn't been relevant since season 3 of Family Guy.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 03:29 AM
1

I like to juggle.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 12:52 AM
6

Feminists are different than women's rights. Every single MRA I have ever heard of is for women's rights.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 08:02 PM
3

Hey, Anita Sarkeesian is a real gamer. Didn't you see that supposed picture of her playing a video game 20 years ago? I mean, that proves it right?
/r/MensRights01/08/13 08:11 PM
1

I don't think he's from SRS, I think he's doing the same type of thing that they do.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 06:57 PM
2

Am I the only one who doesn't care about what random internet retards say? Take this shit to SRS where it belongs.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 06:08 PM
2

Who the fuck cares.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 06:08 PM
0

Go back to srs.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 03:36 PM
4

That has nothing to do with Men's RIghts. That is a crazy group. To judge MRAs from that would be like judging all Christians from Waco.
/r/MensRights29/07/13 08:34 PM
1

You're wrong. Or you misunderstand what most MRAs are about.
/r/MensRights29/07/13 08:32 PM
1

How about no? Fuck off troll. Reported.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 02:37 PM
3

No, that's retarded and you're an idiot.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 02:34 PM
7

Look up who the quote is from.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 02:02 AM
2

I didn't read the original post. I commented on this one and pointed out a huge problem in it. If I were you I would be grateful. Anyway, as Gloria Allred said: "If you're not an MRA then you're a bigot."
/r/MensRights24/07/13 12:36 AM
10

Here's the thing though, for many MRAs, your list includes quite minor things. Feminists are so myopic they can't even see the larger things MRAs are pissed of about.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 12:07 AM
3

I joined this subreddit when it was full of news, articles and interesting content. It saddens me to see things like this posted here. Please go post your reddit arguments somewhere else where they will be appreciated.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 11:46 PM
2

No one fucking cares about your stupid fucking reddit squabbles. Go post this to /r/srs.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 10:34 PM
0

No it doesn't. A vanishingly small amount of MRAs are not successful with women.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 11:21 PM
5

This post is idiotic.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 10:52 PM
1

I'm going to start reporting this SRS shit.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 10:29 PM
2

Jeezus Christ, go to fucking SRS if you want to be like them. Stop polluting /r/mensrights with this bullshit.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 10:16 PM
1

You don't really understand surveys very well do you? There is a HUGE confounding factor at work here, what do you think it is?
/r/MensRights21/07/13 09:28 PM
1

Yes. What is your point?
/r/MensRights21/07/13 09:02 PM
2

Maybe if this was real life but it isn't. This is reddit.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 09:02 PM
1

No one cares about stupid internet arguments.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 08:37 PM
1

Don't turn this into SRS.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 08:46 AM
0

Who cares?
/r/MensRights21/07/13 04:55 AM
3

Jeezus Christ, it's perfectly legal to cut of the most sensitive part of a baby boy's body and then fellate him is pretty bad. But women being told that not having armpit hair is not attractive is much, much worse. I'm glad feminists have my back.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 04:21 AM
10

You should be upset and many men are. Many other men can't express how upset they are, more cover their feelings by overcompensating and others are religious. If you care about it, you should do something. http://intactamerica.org/
/r/MensRights21/07/13 02:37 AM
6

It is a response to the other statistic. To show how it doesn't make sense.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 12:34 AM
1

That is retarded. This is reddit.
/r/MensRights20/07/13 11:21 PM
-3

We should focus more on Men's Rights and less on feminism. Even if you are ardently anti feminist you must see that right now we need support as they are Goliath and we are David. And being too antifeminist too early will hurt that cause.
/r/MensRights20/07/13 04:31 AM
1

That is not what this thread is about.
/r/MensRights19/07/13 11:35 PM
7

Jeezus Christ, this isn't fucking SRS.
/r/MensRights19/07/13 11:33 PM
10

Fuck the good men project.
/r/MensRights19/07/13 04:22 PM
3

No one cares about stupid facebook arguments.
/r/MensRights19/07/13 02:44 PM
2

http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/michael-kimmel-defends-nomas-misandry-and-the-promotion-of-bigotry/
/r/MensRights13/07/13 02:46 AM
1

I didn't join the group at the end because it is idiotic to join things without knowing what they are.
/r/MensRights13/07/13 02:45 AM
2

That survey way incredibly upsetting and I may need to seek counseling for the emotional distress I incurred from participating in it.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 09:27 PM
3

That is idiotic. How old are you?
/r/MensRights12/07/13 08:09 PM
8

There are much, much better posters to get people talking about the issue and I think that without the previous posters the link between these and anti rape campaigns will be too tenuous for most people.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 10:37 AM
20

No, this idea is retarded. The only reason it works there is because of the he feminist posters. It is a much better idea to start a student group and post fliers supporting that. At the school my brother goes to they have posters against rape of both genders by both genders and a poster campaign of this would just alienate people.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 07:29 AM
7

It is a solution to a non existent problem. Alcohol is the most common date rape drug.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 04:19 AM
8

I would avoid this project like the plague. Just look at who the research is based on, Michael Kimmel and Jackson Katz. They are too of the most sexist people in "masculinity studies" today.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 09:24 PM
1

Yup, this seems legit....
/r/MensRights11/07/13 02:14 AM
1

Either you are very experienced or just going over there to troll.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 12:13 AM
1

People have already tried. it is clear what you are doinf.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 04:42 AM
1

Or it might turn people off and waste time.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 08:38 PM
7

Instead of doing something counterproductive, useless and stupid, why not help the MRA cause?
/r/MensRights06/07/13 05:58 AM
1

Almost every feminist I have met has said they care about Men's Issues. The problem is the we see no action. I am sure that many feminists care about many things but unless I see some sort of evidence of this more than just them saying it, it is just words to me.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 05:17 AM
23

You don't understand the history of the MRM. The MRM is a reaction to feminism. This comes in two forms, the first is seeing that feminists don't give a shit about men being discriminated against. The other comes from feminists being sexist and doing stuff like trying to do away with things like due process for men accused of rape or crimes against women.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 05:51 PM
3

Why? I have access to one but not at home.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 08:25 PM
1

There is no victim blaming. Thinking someone could have done something different is not victim blaming
/r/MensRights02/07/13 08:23 PM
13

I think that it is retarded. It is attacking a view no one holds solely to demonize a huge group of people.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 09:50 AM
26

Um, is there any evidence this is real? I mean, I could just as easily print out more retarded shit at home.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 04:19 AM
8

How can we answer this without seeing the study?
/r/MensRights01/07/13 03:40 AM
11

Because it is literally the mutilation of children.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 12:47 PM
6

That may prevent them from talking to you. Look up the laws in your area.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 05:38 AM
16

Make sure it's legal to record it. Maybe try SAVE? If they can't help then they may be able to point you in the right direction.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 03:22 AM
34

Get a lawyer. if you can, record everything.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 03:14 AM
1

You're not that intelligent are you?
/r/MensRights29/05/13 10:23 PM
1

Are you retarded?
/r/MensRights22/05/13 07:42 AM
5

Alliteration and flow. And Male Genital Mutilation can happen to adults.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 04:35 AM
1

Because he stopped when he noticed she was crying. How hard is that to understand? Also, are you threatening me with assault? That is pretty funny, I seriously doubt you could do anything to harm me.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 10:20 PM
5

He was drunk, maybe he didn't hear her. It is obvious that as soon as he realized she wanted him to stop he did. How on earth can that be considered rape in a just society? Edit: Whoops, just noticed the age of this account. Yup, I really believe what you are saying wink wink. Yes, I am certain you are not a troll wink.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 09:50 PM
1

What subreddit is this?
/r/MensRights20/05/13 09:48 PM
-2

The meaning behind it is different though.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 06:18 PM
3

Your math isn't right. It would be 2 women for every man.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 06:17 PM
1

This isn't the right place.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 05:27 PM
3

Just read it, seriously.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 05:26 PM
3

You may be right, time will tell.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 11:23 AM
6

A large part of Paul Elam's strategy involves the phrase "All publicity is good publicity". This is exactly the type of thing they would do but you have their motivations wrong. He makes posts with purposely inflammatory titles and language to get more visibility and increase awareness of the Men's Rights Movement. Whether that is still a good strategy is somewhat up in the air though.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 10:01 AM
3

Oh no, there's a woman being retarded on the internet. Instead of doing the smart thing(ignoring her and it) I'm going to post it on /r/mensrights. That'll show 'er.
/r/MensRights19/05/13 01:40 PM
2

Don't be retarded. That subreddit is not about rights, it is for anything related to women. It makes no sense to compare that one and this one. Furthermore, reddit(and the internet is general) is a terrible tool to analyze the values of the general populace.
/r/MensRights19/05/13 11:05 AM
12

If men are incapable of love then women are incapable of thinking rationally. But seriously, the whole thing is retarded. Leave her. She is one person out of 7 billion, why do you care what she thinks?
/r/MensRights19/05/13 09:50 AM
2

You can't really combine groups which are struggling for something else into feminists. Maybe some of the members are feminists but that doesn't make the groups feminist. Even if you were right, the things you are talking about have such and incredibly small amount of the mainstream feminists attention that they might as well not exist to them. Why not show me how some feminists with power choose to use their power? Lastly, what you talking about requires power. Right now feminists have more pow…
/r/MensRights18/05/13 08:14 AM
5

Except that feminism does not address the issues all people face in any country. It is focused on women's problems in the western countries. Men in those countries and everyone in other countries can go fuck themselves.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 08:55 PM
9

Three things. It looks like that comment has over 500 downvotes so I don't know why you are so angry about it. People upvote and downvote things all the time and it is clear that the vast majority of people downvoted it. I don't really understand what they are saying but at least part of it makes sense. Manipulating people and scamming them should be against the law. If you don't like the way something is, then it is your job to fix it. You should try to fix problems rather than abandon them.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 05:30 PM
3

The difference between a post I will take seriously and one I won't is if it has some sort of explanation.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 12:18 AM
9

The Men's Rights Movement doesn't care about women's rights. But pretty much every MRA cares about women's rights when they are actually abrogated, not things like being told to be safe, or not having the government pay for your birth control.
/r/MensRights16/05/13 01:30 PM
2

Cheezus christ do some research before posting.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 06:18 PM
3

Don't be retarded.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 02:49 PM
1

I agree with you on most things and like a lot of what you post but a random internet post is no evidence whatsoever that "the message is getting out there". We need real activism, in real life, between real people. Post that and I will upvote it.
/r/MensRights14/05/13 02:47 PM
1

Why on earth are you so angry?
/r/MensRights14/05/13 12:17 PM
2

What good does it do to post this article here?
/r/MensRights14/05/13 07:33 AM
-6

It is idiotic to claim that the message it getting out there from a thread on a forum about men, by men, on a website dominated by men, on the internet dominated by men. Especially when there is much crossposting between here and there. What would be getting the message out there would be to show how the common people are getting the message, not people who already agree with us.
/r/MensRights14/05/13 07:16 AM
-11

Don't be an idiot.
/r/MensRights14/05/13 06:39 AM
0

How about by not posting a 5 month article written by a retard?
/r/MensRights14/05/13 05:42 AM
48

The difference is 3%, not enough to make a big deal out of. C'mon people, we should be better than this.
/r/MensRights12/05/13 03:31 PM
2

I used to think like you but then I realized that people could be "triggered" by anything I said. If you are not mentally secure enough to be able to read something online then you probably shouldn't be there in the first place.
/r/MensRights12/05/13 12:40 PM
7

Two things: Trigger warnings are retarded. Don't use them. The other is that this sort of stuff continues to be okay because people like you don't stand up to it. You need to tell your friends what you really thought about it. If everyone did that then it would stop being funny.
/r/MensRights12/05/13 07:36 AM
1

"It just proves that feminists have no problem with a meritocracy, as long as women don't have to compete against men."
/r/MensRights12/05/13 03:07 AM
7

That article makes no sense. By not denying boys the right to play sports they are somehow denying girls? And they are denying boys the right to play sports, they sacrifice boys sports for girls sports and that is why so many boys are on girls' teams.
/r/MensRights11/05/13 11:26 AM
44

Don't be an ass. The chicks are /r/twox are alright, it is the people at /r/srs which are the problem.
/r/MensRights11/05/13 05:44 AM
3

If this is a question to feminists, why are you posting it here?
/r/MensRights10/05/13 06:56 PM
1

I think that if people want to pay for female "athletes" to play sports then they should. But I don't think that the state or athletic organizations should pay female "athletes" for playing a sport that 15 year old boys could play better.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 08:08 AM
7

Because anyone who says they should be forced is either an idiot or a bigot. If you can't see why forcing birth control on an entire group of people is wrong then there is no reason to talk to you.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 04:35 AM
12

Of course it shouldn't be forced. But it should be free.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 04:20 AM
1

Not women, feminists.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 03:17 AM
2

But feminists only want to support sub par athletes, not more entertaining athletes.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 03:17 AM
7

Why is there so much emphasis on making people watch sub par athletes?
/r/MensRights08/05/13 05:11 PM
0

This is not SRS.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 05:10 PM
9

The definition of feminism is whatever benefits the feminist you are talking to the most at that moment.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 01:21 PM
1

He is combining all of the internet into the small, powerful parts. Some random MRA's blog is not as useful as AVFM.com
/r/MensRights07/05/13 10:47 PM
0

If you don't know how to use it properly it is useless. And you are making a fallacy of composition.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 01:27 PM
8

Do you know what would be more effective than posting this here? Going out and talking to your friends about the issue. Writing letters and emails to important people. Flyering etc. Getting angry at anonymous internet retards does absolutely nothing.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 06:47 AM
5

Can you also start automatically removing posts about that stupid Jackson Katz video?
/r/MensRights06/05/13 09:19 PM
1

I think I would need to see several studies on the subject before making my opinion heard.
/r/MensRights06/05/13 11:35 AM
2

Kill yourself.
/r/MensRights06/05/13 11:21 AM
1

Why did you post this here?
/r/MensRights06/05/13 05:36 AM
9

Fine. MRAs are not feminists for two reasons. The first reason is that there has been a ton of hostility any time anyone says anything about Men's Rights. Watch this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iARHCxAMAO0 Feminists constantly attack Men's Rights Activists with all sorts of slander and lies. It's kinda hard to want to partner with people who do that you know? The second reason is that feminists haven't actually done anything to help Men's Rights. I can't think of a single thing that feminis…
/r/MensRights06/05/13 04:30 AM
5

Technically shouldn't people who post here just read the sidebar first?
/r/MensRights06/05/13 04:07 AM
12

It isn't American only but it seems that English speaking countries has the most active MRAs. But that may be because I only read news in English.
/r/MensRights06/05/13 04:05 AM
0

No you're not, you are thinking of Windows users.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 10:26 AM
2

Spam is real heavy today.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 03:35 AM
6

This is written by Glen Poole who also writes for A Voice For Men. Just go with adblock on.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 02:23 AM
7

Mr. Dwyer is doing a very good job at maintaining the high road but this may be one time where stepping off of it for a little while would be beneficial.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 01:18 AM
1

I like you.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 11:24 AM
3

People who say that don't understand the history of the Men's Rights Movement. The Men's Rights Movement has been attacked by feminists since the very beginning. They have now started to be violent and use illegal acts to try to silence pretty mundane things that MRAs do. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iARHCxAMAO0 I do think that MRAs would get more done if we stopped focusing on being so much against feminism but it is important to understand the history behind it. And to be honest, a lot of fe…
/r/MensRights04/05/13 05:26 AM
1

I'm not being sarcastic. That's not a TED talk, it is TEDx which means basically anyone can do a presentation on anything.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 05:22 AM
3

I don't think either of the things you said about supporting or not supporting political groups are true. I think it's even less true in regards to feminism because the term is being applied anywhere people think it will be politically expedient.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 05:08 AM
3

I see.... If you read here quite a bit I think you will see that there isn't too much of what you are complaining about. There is a bunch of complaining about feminism though. And while that is a bit unfortunate that isn't anywhere close to being against women.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 04:55 AM
2

Do you have any evidence she was downvoted? It looks like she is at 3 upvotes now.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 04:48 AM
2

Well, I can't read it so you can't use that. Did you actually downvote someone for being a woman?
/r/MensRights04/05/13 04:39 AM
1

?
/r/MensRights04/05/13 04:38 AM
6

Why don't you show me some of the trolls then?
/r/MensRights04/05/13 04:29 AM
1

No it isn't.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 04:22 AM
9

I haven't met a single MRA(besides trolls) who blames Men's problems on women. Ever.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 04:21 AM
2

Jackson Katz? That man couldn't think his way out of a paper bag. Edit: Certain people have shown themselves and their ideas to be unworthy of any respect. This man is one of them. If you want me to truly tell you what I find wrong in this specific video(it's not a TED talk by the way) I will.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 02:04 AM
1

Maybe if you think the people who will read it don't have two brain cells to rub together. I think anyone else will get the point.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 07:49 PM
77

You should have been more specific. What I would have done is reverse the genders and repost her paragraph.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 04:48 AM
6

The first problem is that it is taken from a Jezebel article with no reference to it or credit given to the author. The second problem is that these things are not true. Some feminists are like this but many are not. They actively work against fixing these problems. The third problem is that even those who do think like this do not feel strongly enough to do anything about it. The fourth problem is that there are far bigger issues in the Men's Rights Movement that are not addressed.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 11:33 PM
1

That article is incredibly idiotic.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 08:43 PM
1

You are too naive and your priorities are in the wrong places. We should be working to help men and boys, not dismantle feminism. Sometimes what we do will conflict with feminists and we should fight them but that should not be the goal.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 02:49 PM
3

That definition sounds like a bunch of pseudointellectual liberal claptrap but I would need to read more of her work to have an intelligent opinion of it.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 02:41 PM
4

I agree that complaining about feminism is unproductive but for different reasons. It just makes more sense to advocate than complain, to work for something than against something. Talking about whether feminists can be MRAs is besides the point because they are such a small fraction of people that it makes no difference. Also, wasn't bell hooks(lowercase on purpose) the person who wrote Killing Rage? Are you sure you want to align yourself with that kind of feminist?
/r/MensRights02/05/13 02:26 PM
9

The internet does not represent real life.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 01:54 PM
7

Don't make posts about your disagreements with random redditors.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 09:10 AM
4

This is not SRS.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 04:39 AM
0

Put up something mocking it or proving it wrong.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 01:42 AM
5

That is good and I wish more people were like you and I believe that feminism is part of the problem but a group of powerless women on a miniscule portion of the internet can't do anything. Just ignore them and let them do absolutely nothing. Make real change.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 11:30 PM
15

The best thing about this is the author literally mentioned this subreddit by name. Our existence is slowly seeping into the mainstream even if our ideals aren't. But they will closely follow.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 10:59 PM
15

I get that you are angry and you should be. Feminism at best does not care about male victims at all and at worst is pretty anti male. But posting things to /r/feminism and bitching about them does not solve anything. Go poster in the streets. Write a letter to your congressman. Start a Men's Rights Group. Talk to your friends about Mr. Silverman's suicide. Start a kickstarter to help male victims of domestic violence. Do something which actually matters.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 10:54 PM
8

She forgot about the Luce Irigaray explanation for why we understand solid mechanics better than fluid mechanics and the fact that Principia was actually a rape manual.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 09:49 PM
44

The proper response is to create Men's Studies classes and offer them as well. Edit: Everyone who is responding to me: I am not sold on the idea that there should be a unified gender studies class which teaches about both men and women for the simple reason that we know it will be about women. Feminists have tried to make feminism classes sound more gender neutral for quite some time now but it is bullshit. I am also not sure that not funding it is a good idea. Gender studies would be a useful a…
/r/MensRights30/04/13 06:40 PM
3

This is not SRS.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 03:01 PM
9

Because you are making a strawman out of what the Men's Rights Movement is.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 10:49 AM
-2

This may sound like an insult but you should really think about it. As a movement the Men's Rights Movement needs to tailor it's message to it' audience. If people's first impression of an MRA is an asshole they are going to be less likely to accept future MRAs even though the message is perfectly fine.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 12:37 AM
2

Go post that there.
/r/MensRights29/04/13 10:10 PM
11

There are more male circumcisions than female circumcisions in places with limited medical knowledge/access to doctors.
/r/MensRights29/04/13 12:25 PM
13

There is a difference between welcoming men and welcoming viewpoints they disagree with. A lot of stuff about how feminists are not accepting of other's viewpoints comes from experiences with feminists on the internet and are not especially helpful as examples. I have talked to several feminists(most at the university I attended) and the least horrible response I got was from the Women's Center who said that what men went through wasn't really their concern(we didn't have a Men's Center). The wo…
/r/MensRights29/04/13 12:23 PM
1

Maybe if it had any sort of production value it would be worth a glance. But no more than that.
/r/MensRights29/04/13 11:52 AM
8

MRAs are pretty much universally opposed to it but it's place in the list of important issues varies. And current intactivists turn MRAs off the movement.
/r/MensRights29/04/13 06:44 AM
12

Male Genital Mutilation.
/r/MensRights29/04/13 06:37 AM
5

Well, for starters, it is non consensual cosmetic surgery done on infants genitals. What more would you need? Let's not mention how it removes the 5 most sensitive parts of the genitals: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/06/070627144210.htm And many doctors do this surgery without anesthetic(Stang 1998) and even with surgery babies are still in horrific pain(Lander 1997). Any one of those things should be enough to hate it(not to mention that the complication rate is 10-15% and over 100 …
/r/MensRights29/04/13 05:54 AM
1

Male Genital Mutilation.
/r/MensRights29/04/13 05:39 AM
14

You don't like it? Then do the right thing and fix it instead of leaving it.
/r/MensRights28/04/13 10:59 PM
6

Who cares what he says? I can find 20 things worse on twitter in 5 minutes. The only time when posting quotes here is if they are from powerful people or organizations.
/r/MensRights28/04/13 10:58 PM
1

Maybe if you read through the posts in this subreddit you would have something more than an ignorant opinion about something you don't understand. Just a thought.
/r/MensRights27/04/13 10:16 PM
102

The Men's Rights Movement has pretty much nothing to do with your sex or gender or whatever. It is about equality. One word of caution though, in my experience MRAs tend to be more blunt than some people are accustomed to.
/r/MensRights27/04/13 07:40 AM
8

Being an MRA has nothing to do with enjoying or not enjoying dating or relationships.
/r/MensRights27/04/13 05:29 AM
3

Talk to a lawyer. Do not follow anyone else's advice. Do not post here until you get the okay from him. Talk to a lawyer.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 09:01 PM
2

Are you talking about the reasoning with rapists thing? I agree with you but for different reasons. I think we should embrace good ideas no matter where they come from but retarded memes like that are only useful for propaganda and should not be posted here.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 07:19 PM
1

Just think about it for a while.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 06:05 PM
1

Yes I am. I wonder why....
/r/MensRights24/04/13 06:02 PM
1

You talked about how the moral fiber of the subreddit was declining instead of putting it in a much more reasonable way. And I wasn't insulting you to insult you, I was using a word where I thought another one might be more insulting. You did the opposite. I am not going to talk any more about about lawsuits with you because it is obvious we don't see eye to eye. But you should think about your position. Lastly, if having stupid lawsuits is really why you are anti feminism you have a lot of lear…
/r/MensRights24/04/13 05:48 PM
1

I'm not opposed to anything which puts me out of a comfort zone but the things you talk about and how you phrase them makes you seem like a pretentious ass. I think that your blanket dismissal of lawsuits for things you deem not suitable is shortsighted and naive. Furthermore, I think that even if you personally disagree with a lawsuit the effect of a lawsuit for furthering our cause may potentially outweigh the lawsuit's "violence". Here are two tips for you: The first is that if you want peopl…
/r/MensRights24/04/13 05:15 PM
2

Your talk about beneficial to the human condition is bizarre and makes me want to stop talking with you.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 04:35 PM
3

It depends on the exact situation. Sometimes it makes sense to sue and sometimes it doesn't. Your ideas about not suing because it is violent is not beneficial to the movement.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 04:16 PM
2

The gym is funded by the government. And I fundamentally disagree with you. Some lawsuits against the private sector make sense and some don't. A blanket dismissal of all of them is not only not intelligent but it is not good strategy.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 04:04 PM
6

How on earth is this worthy of an entire article?
/r/MensRights23/04/13 10:01 AM
1

That is partially true and unfortunate. I think if we work hard we can change that.
/r/MensRights22/04/13 06:46 AM
2

Someone claimed that because I thought a certain strategy employed by certain members of the Men's Rights Movement was not well thought out that I believed the fourth estate was a waste of time. If that was not a purposeful misrepresentation of what I was saying the person who said that must have an IQ of less than room temperature.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 09:39 AM
2

ShitRedditSays is a subreddit where they post things that people have posted in other subreddits that they don't like and then go on mass downvoting/commenting/reporting sprees. They are pretty much universally despised for their radically liberal views and ban happy moderators. Take everything bad you have heard about feminists, condense it into a subreddit and you get SRS.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 05:07 AM
2

My reasoning is not that I was strongly disagreed with. My reasoning is that the people who disagreed with me repeatedly and purposely misrepresented what I was saying. If I posted something which they agreed with and there was a massive outcry of fallacies supporting it I may not have made this post but I would have commented a lot. And maybe if it was bad enough I would have made this post.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 04:26 AM
3

I didn't post anything because I thought that would make it turn into a debate about the issue we were talking about instead of how debate was carried out. And I was proven correct.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 11:42 PM
0

So you think I did some of the things I dislike other people doing. That is fine. But that is besides the point. Maybe I am at fault for some of the nastiness in this subreddit recently but that doesn't change the fact that the tone and substance of discourse in this subreddit is not that of reasonable adults. Also, it really seems like you are picking an argument. There is no cause for that.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 04:22 PM
15

This is exactly what I was looking for. This is how you have a reasonable discussion. Thank you.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 03:29 PM
6

If people weren't civil yet still engaged in well reasoned debates with logical positions I would be okay with that.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 03:16 PM
7

Aren't you a mod?
/r/MensRights20/04/13 03:15 PM
-2

It's not about being wrong or right, it's about respecting the other person's position and not purposely misrepresenting what they are saying.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 03:14 PM
-2

How am I being dishonest?
/r/MensRights20/04/13 02:17 PM
3

I think that the issue I want to address here is how the issue was discussed not what the issue was. I would be happy to discuss it with you another time. I believe I have debated with you before on different issues and you didn't resort to attacks like I have seen in other places.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 02:15 PM
0

I want people to debate the points not argue. And I want them to do it in good faith, not like this. That is my point.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 02:05 PM
7

I was trying to avoid bringing up the subject again. It was about register-her.com and how I believe it hurts the movement. I believe it doesn't matter what I posted about(so long as it is reasonable which it was) MRAs should be able to have debates without resorting to those disgusting tactics.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 02:02 PM
2

It is obvious I'm not a troll or a feminist. If you are a real MRA then you should be ashamed. Just because we disagree on something gives you no reason to call me a troll or a feminist. I have been having many discussions with people who agree with you and have gotten this quite a bit and it is really disgusting. You should stop it.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 01:24 AM
1

Stop fucking misrepresenting my point. Stop it. It is disgusting and I would have hoped an MRA would be above that. Stop it.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 12:28 AM
1

Was that CrossHook?
/r/MensRights20/04/13 12:18 AM
2

You know that disagreement is obviously not the issue. You said I think that journalism is a waste of time. I have no problem disagreeing on things but you cross a line when you start to say things like that. Stop misrepresenting my position.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 12:18 AM
4

That is bullshit and you know it. Sun News called these protestors to task and AVFM did as well as many, many other blogs and websites. Register-her.com did nothing besides create bad publicity and give feminists ammo. You are incredibly naive if you think the force of your conviction will win the day. It won't, that's not how change works.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 10:04 PM
5

That is just not true in the slightest. It was StudioBrule who brought that event to the public's attention and the registering of people on register-her.com has not only accomplished nothing it has created bad publicity for the movement. And don't say I am against the fourth estate. That is utter bullshit. Why on earth can't people who are for register-her.com explain their position without misrepresenting what people against it are saying and without lying about it. Jeezus fucking christ, I am…
/r/MensRights19/04/13 10:02 PM
4

The mainstream is pretty against lulu. And that isn't even about registering offenders. I don't know enough about hollarback to comment.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 09:47 PM
1

That's bullshit. There isn't a list like register-her.com You are comparing apples and oranges.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 09:47 PM
3

Do you have any evidence that it would be applauded in the mainstream?
/r/MensRights19/04/13 07:52 PM
3

That is not my position and you know it.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 07:51 PM
4

No I don't. Stop lying about what I want after I have explained it very clearly to you. It is okay to disagree with me but you really need to stop doing what you are doing.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 07:03 PM
0

Look at the sidebar. And go here: circumstitions.com intactamerica.org
/r/MensRights19/04/13 07:02 PM
3

You need to stop purposely misrepresenting people who disagree with you on this. Seriously, stop. I want the Men's Rights Movement to be better than that.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 06:51 PM
3

We have been over this. It is obviously not one of the most effective tools for anything and hurting the movement more than it benefits it. You need to take a step back and realize that most people posting here only want whats best for the movement and are not part of a massive feminist conspiracy. That sort of paranoia is how movements fall apart. Soon you will be accusing people of being secret feminist sympathizers(whoops, already happened) and kicking them out of the movement. Don't do that.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 06:31 PM
0

This is a good idea.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 06:02 PM
1

Because they want to get public support.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 06:02 PM
2

You are paranoid.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 06:02 PM
2

Most feminists are for actual equality but are ignorant of what that would entail. The leaders of the feminist movement are not and have poisoned the minds of more rational, equality minded feminists against the Men's Rights Movement by basically lying about it. There are people with very vested interests in maintaining women's monopoly on oppression. For most feminists, if you talk about Men's Isssues without mentioning Men's Rights they will be all for them. They may think they are less import…
/r/MensRights19/04/13 07:36 AM
0

Because women are basically children who can't do anything for themselves without the difficulty being lowered. And if you disagree you are a misogynist.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 02:11 AM
1

I think what you will get here is that MRAs do not care if you take his name or if he takes your name. We are for equality not privileging one gender over the other.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 12:21 AM
4

First of all, posting here about how she is wrong or how angry it makes you does nothing. What is slightly better is going over there and showing how she is wrong by being courteous, intelligent, logical and non combative. What would be even better would be for people to start their own in real life group to disprove the things she is saying about the Men's Rights Movement with their actions. MRAs are winning the internet but have a long way to go when it comes to real life and affecting policy.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 11:10 PM
6

Post what you have here and let people with more experience help you.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 11:08 PM
3

You obviously haven't read them because of what you think the Men's Rights Movement is. It is pathetic. You should be ashamed of yourself and stop lying about things you don't understand.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 10:21 PM
3

It's obviously not a threat. It is exasperation because we get this all the time from people who have done exactly no research before deciding to shoot of their big mouths. If you look at my posting history it should be obvious that I am not afraid and your questions are not scary. They are annoying and you should have answered them yourself.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 10:17 PM
4

Go look at the sidebar. Read all the links. Don't post here again until you have.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 10:04 PM
1

Look at the sidebar. We get this all the time. Do some searching before making an ass out of yourself. Do the most basic amount of research before posting. Jeezus christ.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 10:00 PM
10

It is a non issue. It doesn't matter in the slightest who takes whose name. What really matters to me is the fact that feminists have focused so much on this stupid issue instead of real things that affect men and women.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 03:35 AM
1

I disagree. I think that feminists have the wrong idea about privilege but I think that privilege is a useful concept. Not only that, I think that putting things in terms of privilege may help feminists understand things about the Men's Rights Movement that they wouldn't otherwise.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 02:45 AM
1

Just because some people use certain words when they talk gibberish does not mean the words are gibberish or not useful.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 02:17 AM
5

This article was what we will be seeing more of soon, baseless lies and slander against the movement. It seems as though things like this kind of break the image that Vice is trying to create for itself. But the important bit is at the end: "When I walked into the lecture I was under the impression that CAFE, AVFM and men’s rights activists are something that we in the media should not give attention by discussing because their ideas—since they’re really dumb. However, actually going to one of t…
/r/MensRights18/04/13 01:59 AM
5

I disagree with some parts of feminism. I do not want to be bound by a movement and an ideology that I have no voice in.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 01:48 AM
0

You don't understand the point of debating with feminists. You are not going to convince a feminist by debating with her. What your goal should be is to convince people watching the debate who are on the fence.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 12:57 AM
1

You did not show how the coverage is the opposite of how I described it in any way. You made baseless assertions without providing any eidence. Do you know the history of Rosa Parks? Did you know that there were several attempts before her and that the civil rights movement had been going on for a long time? Why didn't those previous attempts work? Because it wasn't the right time, just like it isn't the right time for register-her.com. Why is this so difficult for you to understand? This is not…
/r/MensRights18/04/13 12:29 AM
0

I do have evidence for what I am saying. This and every other single time I have seen the Men's Rights Movement being covered by the mainstream media. What you are arguing is that by being so controversial AVFM made the protesters show up which made the media show up? That is just not true.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 10:08 PM
0

Men drive faster, obey the speed limit less and are more aggressive. So they are more skilled than women but get into worse accidents.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 09:28 PM
0

It doesn't draw attention to Men's issues by being controversial. It only detracts from men's efforts when someone is already researching Men's Rights. And it is not controversial because it breaks some sort of dichotomy, it is controversial because it is a terrible idea. And in this case it did nothing but detract from CAFE's message. And it is utter bullshit that AVFM had anything to do with CityNews showing up there. It was all CAFE.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 09:25 PM
1

Let's do this one by one. Does it work? What is it supposed to do, what are the supposed effects and what evidence do you have that it has done these?
/r/MensRights17/04/13 08:23 PM
0

The most likely explanation as to why men get into worse accidents than women is that men drive less carefully than women even though women are worse drivers.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 08:12 PM
2

It is better to just ignore them.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 08:11 PM
0

But it's bad strategy. And people aren't objective, they will be given their information by people who aren't objective and form their opinions that way.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 08:11 PM
-1

We need to think about strategy. And this is terrible strategy.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 08:10 PM
-6

It's true. But so are things like "Men make better scientists than women."
/r/MensRights17/04/13 09:09 AM
0

How old are you?
/r/MensRights17/04/13 07:24 AM
2

So you are saying that register-her.com is sort of a diversion to catch bad publicity so that other groups don't get it. That is obviously wrong. Please try again.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 07:13 AM
3

Except that in the mainstream media's eyes Warren Farrell isn't a rape and incest supporter and CAFE is not a group of misogynist, racist rape supporters. The only thing they find blame with is register-her.com. Think strategically.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 07:04 AM
3

What you are saying is obviously not one of the main functions of register-her.com but that is besides the point. You need to be smart about what you challenge when. And challenging this now is not smart. This is easily seen by looking at mainstream media coverage of an unrelated event. The Men's Rights Movement would be blameless except for register-her.com. Do you think that giving feminists a freebie is good strategy?
/r/MensRights17/04/13 06:48 AM
3

I am not buying into any narrative that register-her.com has done anything awful. Stop putting words into my mouth. Furthermore, I already described the different standards between register-her.com and a mainstream news source. I don't know why you can't see them. Lastly, you need to realize that the rules are different for the Men's Rights Movement, feminism and mainstream society. Actually, this is the last thing I am going to say, these last few discussions with you have been very dishearteni…
/r/MensRights17/04/13 06:37 AM
0

A shrink is a counselor. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreskin_restoration Right now you need to think about what a confrontation would accomplish for you. Nothing. It would do nothing. What you need to do is to start work on something that consumes you and prevents this from happening to other people. http://www.intactamerica.org/ http://arclaw.org/ Once you reach the age of majority you can sue someone but there is a very limited time span it is possible. Start preparing now if that is someth…
/r/MensRights17/04/13 06:21 AM
3

Come on dude, this whole manipulated by feminists thing is like the feminists claiming that I have been manipulated by patriarchy. AVFM needs to walk a fine line between good controversial and bad controversial. And Register-her(I'm assuming that's what you meant but please correct me if I am wrong) is on the wrong side of that. If AVFM had a few controversial articles but most of them weren't(like it is now) then that is good controversial. But register-her.com has nothing but bad controversial…
/r/MensRights17/04/13 06:10 AM
1

The best thing to do is not confront your parents. You should also start researching the issue and start getting active. Look up Intactivist groups. Talk to your school shrink but if it is legal you should record the conversation. Start restoring.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 06:05 AM
2

First of all, you can't compare a mainstream media outlet to register-her.com. Mainstream media outlets are mainstream and have done a whole lot of things to gain credulity to the average person. Register-her.com is basically a guy with a website and will be looked upon poorly by most average people. They are qualitatively different and work with different rules. Do you understand this? I am not being manipulated by feminists. I have come to this conclusion of my own accord. If you recognize my …
/r/MensRights17/04/13 05:19 AM
2

Would CAFE have this much media coverage without AVFM? And please stop committing fallacies. It is really annoying. Stuff like this "Further to that Register Her isn't actually doing anything that the mainstream would do to mra's in a heartbeat were the roles reversed and it was mra's being violent criminals at feminist events." does not belong here and is just a tool of misdirection. Furthermore, feminists were not violent towards MRAs at this protest except for one time(maybe). Didn't you get …
/r/MensRights17/04/13 05:06 AM
2

First things first, disagreement and debate are healthy for a movement and signs that it is growing. So there is no need to be so hostile and insult me so much just because we disagree on strategy. I don't know what you think that doing those things will accomplish but I can't see it working. You also should really stop doing things like ignoring questions I ask, conflating things which should not be, assuming I mean things I did not say and generally committing fallacies. Not only that but I re…
/r/MensRights17/04/13 04:54 AM
1

Yes but right now we can get good publicity instead. If register-her.com did not exist it looks like the few articles and news segments I have seen about the protests would be nothing but positive. They didn't do those because of register-her.com and the focus was not bad publicity.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 04:48 AM
3

Tell me honestly how register-her.com does what you say it does. Give me one example of someone in the mainstream media making sure that feminists do not walk all over Men's Rights Activists because of register-her.com which would not have happened otherwise. And I disagree with your idea about why we have a movement. Furthermore I would say that now is the time for the people at AVFM to tone down the rhetoric or else become the radical feminists of the Men's Rights Movement.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 04:42 AM
-5

Not as this moment. Your position is that of an immature movement. We need to get people on our side to make our movement grow and bad publicity hurts that. Once we have power then go crazy with lists of whoever you want. Start making the list now, be patient, and when it will actually do something post it. And you should drop this idea that register-her.com is A. Making women responsible for their actions or B. Performing any useful service whatsoever. Any actual use it may have is bound up by …
/r/MensRights17/04/13 04:37 AM
-2

Why? That's not my major issue with it.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 04:29 AM
1

This is not SRS.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 04:28 AM
0

Take register-her.com out of the equation and the only thing lost would be bad publicity. What did I say about conflating things which aren't the same?
/r/MensRights17/04/13 04:27 AM
4

Yup. It's not a big deal now but it will become much bigger in the future and the longer that site stays up the worse it will look.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 04:25 AM
1

Don't conflate A Voice for Men, CAFE, MIA and register-her.com.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 04:21 AM
4

It is terrible publicity.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 04:21 AM
1

Why do you care?
/r/MensRights17/04/13 03:52 AM
2

Yeah but it wouldn't have been true. Or would it would be pretty much nothing.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 03:36 AM
14

Paul Elam take note of where they chose to focus the negatives of the MRA movement. You are hurting the movement with your bullshit about registering protesters.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 03:28 AM
2

Thank you for that.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 01:50 AM
11

Yes.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 01:42 AM
-1

This is retarding and you should be ashamed for spreading bullshit.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 01:37 AM
12

I don't think it is a step in the right direction. They are taking an issue they didn't care about and trying to make people believe they are the only ones fighting it now that they see they are losing influence. And it isn't true.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 01:35 AM
9

You don't understand anything about MRAs. You should be embarrassed.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 01:33 AM
2

Why on earth do you care about them?
/r/MensRights17/04/13 01:33 AM
3

The proper way to respond to this is to ignore it and not post it here like SRSers do.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 01:32 AM
2

Read the sidebar to find out some of the ways men's rights are abrogated in developed countries. Also, in which areas in developed countries do women not have equality(or better) with men?
/r/MensRights16/04/13 07:59 PM
1

I didn't really like him before and I this doesn't change my opinion.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 07:09 PM
0

I don't know if you have any privilege right now besides physical things.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 03:20 PM
1

As far as I can tell it as. The small amount of press the Men's Rights Movement has gotten from the mainstream media which wasn't feminist has been relatively positive.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 03:09 PM
0

Um....no. You are insane. Are you really arguing that those women have had a larger impact on their society than people like George Washington? Or Hitler? Or Edison? You are objectively wrong. Furthermore, your talk about privilege is so incredibly untrue that it boggles my mind. Feminists are right on some things, just start reading about them and you'll see that.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 03:07 PM
1

I'm not arguing that the feminist idea of privilege has some major flaws but even a broken clock is right twice a day.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 04:55 AM
2

But I explicitly said previously that both men and women had privilege. I don't know who had more but right now men have significantly less privilege than women. And your dichotomy of equal or no privilege is fallacious.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 03:04 AM
-1

I disagree.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 03:03 AM
1

Which was my point. Both men and women had privilege.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 02:52 AM
2

I disagree with your point for a few reasons. I think that because feminists already know what privilege is it should be easier to convince them that female privilege exists. At least the not crazy ones. By showing many similarities between what they call male privilege and what they should call female privilege it should be easier to convince them. And I think that talking about privilege is considerably easier than talking about societal assumptions and expectations. It may be an oversimplific…
/r/MensRights16/04/13 02:36 AM
1

Don't be an idiot. Listing female privileges in no way disproves male privilege. Discuss this like a mature, rational adult, not like a feminist please. Also, women have died in senseless wars, women do not(and most certainly did not throughout history) automatically win their children. Men have had more access to education, wealth and power throughout history.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 02:33 AM
1

That is just not true. What we need to focus on are moderates and they will look at how we look. We should try to reduce the amount of true bad press to a minimum.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 02:31 AM
2

Men still had more potential access to education, wealth and power than women. You are being just as bad as the feminists when they talk about privilege.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 02:30 AM
1

Who cares? It has nothing to do with what she is about or how valid her message is? It is totally irrelevant.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 10:45 PM
9

That is just not true. Men have always had male privilege(except maybe not in the past 30 or so years) just like women have always had female privilege. We should avoid being as crazy as the feminists.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 04:44 PM
3

That women get easier sentences than men on average.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 04:30 PM
3

Your point?
/r/MensRights15/04/13 04:22 PM
10

All women. Not individually but as a group.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 04:15 PM
6

This is such a non issue it boggles my mind that you would bring it up. It makes no difference whatsoever if her dog was killed or not. Don't be an idiot.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 04:07 PM
1

Don't be retarded.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 04:06 PM
5

What are the recording laws in your country/state?
/r/MensRights15/04/13 04:06 PM
2

Kill yourself.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 04:05 PM
40

Not really. Women get easier sentences and are significantly less likely to be convicted of the same crimes.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 07:30 AM
1

Obviously not. I was correcting you and chastising you for starting trouble not only where there is none but where it is actually harmful. Don't do that.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 11:10 PM
1

Why are you posting this here? Go talk to some feminists.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 06:04 PM
1

I didn't call you mindless. I said your strategy was that of mindless anger. Do you deny this? If you said "Your strategy is idiotic" that would make sense.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 06:03 PM
0

Why on earth are you so hostile to me?
/r/MensRights14/04/13 05:46 PM
1

In my experience that is because they have not been exposed to men's issues.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 05:34 PM
2

Your strategy is that of mindless anger and you are trying to justify it after the fact. That is not smart.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 05:33 PM
3

The Men's Rights Movement has essentially no strategy. Which makes sense given where it is in advancement. The most important thing right now is to get people to join the movement. Do the easy things now and save the hard, more controversial stuff for later. Pick your battles. Feminists are not the enemy. They can be and often are but don't spend all the time attacking feminists. Plus, it looks bad. Never do anything which could be construed as threatening to women and know that how we look is c…
/r/MensRights14/04/13 10:16 AM
22

If I'm in real life they switch tactics and devolve into absurdity. I actually had someone tell me that I wouldn't convince anyone by continually bringing up studies(she had a bachelors in women's studies and was getting a master's in it). I have also had people say that studies about sex drive were not important because, and I quote, "I know plenty of horny lesbians". I have also had people tell me they don't care about the issues I am raising after I have proven they were issues(this was after…
/r/MensRights14/04/13 08:55 AM
11

Because men can't be victims. You see, we live in a patriarchy where everything bad happens to women and everything good happens to men. So whenever a man gets raped in prison is it actually a good thing. Because he is a man.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 05:56 AM
6

Strategy is important and sometimes you need to pick your battles and have patience. If a social movement is going to achieve what it wants it needs people who are willing to sacrifice their posessions, livelihoods and even themselves to get what they want.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 04:20 AM
1

The moderates.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 12:25 AM
1

Go out and ask your friends/family(people who are not feminists or MRAs) what they think of the site. Seriously, go do it and then you will see my point.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 12:24 AM
2

You are missing my point entirely.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 12:23 AM
2

It looks bad to everyone who isn't an MRA.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 12:22 AM
1

Why did you post this here?
/r/MensRights13/04/13 10:43 PM
2

That is interesting. What were your thoughts on the Men's Rights Movement before you visited the site?
/r/MensRights13/04/13 08:58 AM
0

We live in a patriarchy, therefore it is good when men are portrayed as idiots. But when women are portrayed negatively it is a cause for national concern.
/r/MensRights13/04/13 07:01 AM
2

There are better ways to be interesting than this. I am not for forcing people to say or not say things. They can say what they want. I am for people thinking about the consequences and weighing them against their long term goals before they do something that might hurt those goals.
/r/MensRights13/04/13 05:49 AM
1

It matters less about if they are right to be turned off by this than if they are at all. That is my point. Picking your battles and strategizing on how to get the most support for your ideas are key in forming a social movement.
/r/MensRights13/04/13 05:46 AM
1

The success of A Voice for Men is not dependent on the success of register-her.com. I am in the process of trying to start something I feel is better but it would still be very useful if he shut down that site.
/r/MensRights13/04/13 05:45 AM
1

The Men's Rights Movement could get the exact same opportunity to talk about double standards without people using that site to brand us as a hate group.
/r/MensRights13/04/13 05:44 AM
4

That it is a extra judicial list of pretty much random women that does no good and actually hurts the movement. There is an obvious difference between criticizing feminism and having these women's faces up on that website. Some people will react strongly the seeing feminism criticized at all but quite a few will not. And the majority of that few will be very turned off by this. Lastly, why on earth are you saying I am trying to white knight for that person? That is utterly ridiculous and discuss…
/r/MensRights13/04/13 01:11 AM
1

You could make the exact same argument about a lot of Men's Rights issues and that would be valid. I would probably disagree but the complaint is valid. And I am going to talk to Paul Elam.
/r/MensRights13/04/13 12:03 AM
1

That's idiotic strategy. There are much better ways to get publicity and every mention of register-her.com in the media I have seen has been negative even when the article in question is positive about the Men's Rights Movement. It doesn't offer an opportunity to talk about double standards in the mainstream it offers sexists, feminists and bigots a way to attack the Men's Rights Movement that is not based on lies and sway potential supporters away.
/r/MensRights13/04/13 12:02 AM
1

No I am not and you know that's not what I mean. If we want to accomplish our goals we will need to think strategically and register-her.com is bad strategy.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 11:29 PM
1

I plan to.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 11:28 PM
-6

I think that we can address dangerous social double standards without creating things like register-her.com. What do you think moderates seeing the site will think?
/r/MensRights12/04/13 11:26 PM
2

This is different than choosing not to focus on certain issues because the negative press will be bad. This is literally just taking one website down for a few years until it can do more good than bad. We need to be smart and try for the largest number of supporters as possible in the smallest amount of time. And register-her.com hurts that. When we have those supporters we can start the website again and people who are posted there can get what they deserve. But right now it is an ineffective t…
/r/MensRights12/04/13 11:13 PM
1

It obviously isn't about creepy MRAs trying to doxx and victimize women. But that is how most people will see it including people who are otherwise on our side. And it is true that there are different rules for MRAs. That is a fact which is unfortunate cannot be denied at this time. When the Men's Rights Movement is a powerful force in politics the rules will equalize. But you can't just decide that the differences aren't there because it will only end up hurting the movement as a whole. If you …
/r/MensRights12/04/13 11:09 PM
2

But before you get to be a true Men's Rights supporter the movement needs to get it's foot in the door and seeing this website before that happens closes that door.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 11:06 PM
2

Simply doing what feminists want is not a bad thing in and of itself for two reasons: Feminists are not always wrong and we shouldn't disagree with something just because feminists disagree with it. and Feminism is still seen as a good thing by the majority of people in my country and that means that what they say has some impact on how people feel. If they can attack the Men's Rights Movement with truth instead of lies that is not good. This is a strategic move. Why not take it down, compile of…
/r/MensRights12/04/13 11:04 PM
1

You are talking about Jenna Myers Karvunidis who would have come to that conclusion if there had simply been an article written about her. And I think it is stupid to keep her on the list even after she apologized. I don't know who the other one is.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 11:01 PM
2

I thought it was clear from watching the Toronto protests that the feminists wanted an MRA to strike out violently and were trying to make people do that. What is the long term goal of the movement? Equal rights for boys and men? That can't happen without widespread support and to get that we need to convince other people of our position. And how can we do that if we turn them off of our movement before they see what it is even about.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 10:58 PM
1

Did you show them that specific site?
/r/MensRights12/04/13 10:55 PM
2

From what I have seen, moderates do not like the site and it is cited as an example of bad things MRAs have done, sometimes even as a counterpoint to the Toronto protests.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 10:54 PM
2

You seem to be personally angry at me for making an argument I believe in. Since we are on the same side I recommend that you try to calm down and discuss this rationally.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 10:53 PM
1

But realistically, how often will you be able to object?
/r/MensRights12/04/13 10:50 PM
2

Did you go ask your friends? What did they say? And just having higher standards that feminists is not good enough. These are people who will lie through their teeth to get what they want.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 05:32 PM
1

I have seen one person apologize and that could have been because they wrote an article about her. If you have evidence of people apologizing solely because they were put on that site I would appreciate some links. And I think you will find that I post links from avoiceformen.com somewhere regularly here so I do read it. How many of the people on that website have been shamed because they were put on that website? I know these type of people and they would take it as a badge of pride.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 05:27 PM
2

That was quite clever and I laughed a bit. Thank you, I was being a bit of an idiot. I thought I made it quite clear that that is not what I believe. It is what I think feminists(and non MRAs) will believe when they visit that website.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 05:18 PM
1

Okay, fine, do you have any proof?
/r/MensRights12/04/13 05:17 PM
1

How many people do you think are going to read about register-her.com and check it out? And of those who do, how many are going to check it out with an open mind? You should go ask your friends who aren't MRAs what they think of the website. Seriously, go ask them.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 05:17 PM
0

You won't give up will you? You have no idea what you are talking about and seem to be trolling simply for the sake of it. So unless you want to have an actual discussion I won't be responding to you any more.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 05:14 PM
1

How has the social aspect been effective? And if it is just a list of "bad" people why not make it private so only MRAs can see it? And why not include men?
/r/MensRights12/04/13 05:13 PM
2

Tell me what the feminist misrepresentation of register-her.com is please.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 05:10 PM
10

I have been a member of this website for over a year and you have been for 14 days. I have contributed many meaningful conversations, comments and posts. Please shut up and let the grown ups talk.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 05:08 PM
3

Go out and ask your non MRA friends about register-her.com. Go find any non MRA website or news source talking about register-her.com and you will see something very clearly. I'm serious, go do it. I'm not basing my opinion off of anything feminists have said. I think that given my posting history it is obvious that I am not a feminist. I am basing my opinion on the responses from people who are not in the Men's Rights Movement to this website. Any forum has a tendency to become an echo chamber …
/r/MensRights12/04/13 05:05 PM
5

If you don't care what the arbiters of gender think and you are trying to massively change the way gender is thought of in society then you have your priorities in the wrong order. And you should care even more about what people who aren't feminists think. And stuff like this turns them off.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 04:57 PM
2

How was it tried before, why did it cause infighting? Can you send me some links?
/r/MensRights12/04/13 04:53 PM
6

What is wrong with you? Why not address the question civilly?
/r/MensRights12/04/13 04:52 PM
1

So you are arguing that register-her.com is for MRAs to know their "enemies"?
/r/MensRights12/04/13 04:49 PM
1

"Anyone can scrutinise Register Her, they won't find anything wrong with it" That's just not true. And you are not addressing my point that a movement fighting to grow and become a real social movement needs to be squeaky clean. I think that pretty much no matter what we do the Men's Rights Movement will achieve many of it's goals but stuff like this only makes that take longer. Feminism is already established so that it is not effected too much by posting this kind of shit. And furthermore, it …
/r/MensRights12/04/13 04:47 PM
6

What is wrong with you? Just because we disagree on an issue we agree on the larger issue(I hope). And it is incredibly stupid to insult people on your side. I am not swallowing feminist's false accusations. I am looking at the current situation and concluding that this is a larger negative than positive for the Men's Rights Movement. Because there are double standards. And you know what? You can't get them to go away just because you want them to. You need to work on getting rid of them and onc…
/r/MensRights12/04/13 04:35 PM
5

"If another site or organization forms that becomes more effective and popular than AVfM by doing things differently, then and only then will you have proven me wrong." That is obviously not the case. Why on earth are you saying it? If I can find one person who is turned off of part of the Men's Rights Movement because of that site then I think that proves my point. Anyway, can you really say that register-her.com is accomplishing anything besides giving the Men's Rights Movement a bad name?
/r/MensRights12/04/13 04:28 PM
4

Moderates who don't already agree with most of what they say. They read an article about false rape accusations and think that his horrible. So they do some more research and find this site called avoiceformen.com. But then they see this site and get turned off of the entire movement.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 04:26 PM
3

Why can't you understand that moderates who look at the site will be turned off? Do you honestly think they will agree with him putting up these people? Especially since we live in a sexist society and this is a middle aged man posting the information of women, some of whom are college aged. Not to mention the fact that it is register-her.com and some people will take that as belying the idea that the Men's Rights Movement is not against women?
/r/MensRights12/04/13 04:18 PM
5

No it doesn't. At least not to people we are trying to convince to support our cause. Don't you see that?
/r/MensRights12/04/13 04:14 PM
6

Why on earth are you calling me an idiot?
/r/MensRights12/04/13 04:13 PM
1

Register-her.com is different from youtube because it is a site devoted to doing this, it is an MRA site and it is horrible PR for the Men's Rights Movement. Can't you see that even if you agree with what he is doing that right now it only hurts the Men's Rights Movement?
/r/MensRights12/04/13 04:07 PM
6

That is fine. But what about how it looks?
/r/MensRights12/04/13 04:06 PM
7

What I meant by reversed would be MRAs names and faces on a public website labeling them as criminals/bigots etc. Why are you not addressing the main point? Can't you see that the issue is much more about how this affects the Men's Rights Movement than if what he is doing is good or not?
/r/MensRights12/04/13 04:05 PM
7

That is just not true. Many of the sites which actually agree with us still mention this as an example of MRAs acting badly. And if people lie about us we can correct them and in some cases publicly showing them to be a liar will be very beneficial. Just look at this video: http://www.sunnewsnetwork.ca/video/2280480616001 And this isn't appeasing a critic. This is doing the smart move which is taking down an ineffective extrajudicial punishment tool which is terrible for PR. I mean, besides this…
/r/MensRights12/04/13 04:00 PM
4

If the situation was reversed we would be outraged(well, I would at least) that feminists were doing this. But that doesn't matter. What really matters is how it looks. And it looks terrible.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 03:57 PM
0

No. The other work people on his website are doing is getting media attention and there are many other better things MRAs could do do get positive media attention.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 03:46 PM
5

I was explaining how other people see him. That is not creep shaming. Do you understand that the existence of the site is terrible for MRAs' public image?
/r/MensRights12/04/13 03:45 PM
2

I don't agree with punishing people who have not been found guilty. But it doesn't matter whether you agree with the site or not, it is obvious that it is terrible for PR. This is a clear case where you need to be patient. Maybe when the Men's Rights Movement is a major force in politics this would make sense but right now it only serves to hurt the movement.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 03:43 PM
3

I didn't creep shame anyone. I merely showed how someone of his age is perceived doing that. And if people like him are the only ones who matter then doesn't that make it more important that they don't do idiotic things?
/r/MensRights12/04/13 03:06 PM
1

What's your point? MRAs still suffer the consequences.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 02:59 PM
2

This should be shown to Paul Elam. His register-her project is retarded and gets the Men's Rights Movement nothing but bad press.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 02:27 PM
4

This is not shitredditsays.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 01:46 PM
4

Slutwalks are fighting something which doesn't exist(rape culture) using sloppy statistics and meaningless yelling. They should stop embarrassing themselves.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 03:56 AM
8

You miss the point so badly it is physically painful.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 01:27 AM
3

I don't think this belongs in either of those places. Go post it to some feminist subreddit.
/r/MensRights11/04/13 03:32 AM
3

The predominant view of the Men's Rights Movement is that men are being discriminated against in which that women aren't, that this should be addressed and that no one is currently doing anything about it. Men's Rights has been around a long time in various forms. The first evidence I can see about it are some snippets in the early 20th century. Random people arguing that men are discriminated against by the draft, by being forced to die on sinking ships etc. But those people were far and few be…
/r/MensRights11/04/13 03:30 AM
0

No, what offends me is that the group this woman is a part of is a bigoted, violent, ignorant bunch of thugs who don't understand the world. I am for her right to protest in whatever state of undress she wants and against physical violence directed at anyone but her group is not one I can support. Also, when there are key ways in which men are discriminated against and women are not then that shows a clear need for Men's Rights.
/r/MensRights11/04/13 03:24 AM
4

Talk to a lawyer. Ignore everyone else's advice, especially that of random, anonymous people on the internet.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 11:07 PM
1

Sidebar.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 09:06 PM
2

But this evidence does not support the conclusion. In fact, it is terrible evidence for nearly anything.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 06:58 AM
3

What are the laws about recording in your state? If it is legal I would start carrying a hidden recorder to all my interviews.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 06:56 AM
1

"Of course you didn't because that would require an approach which is intersectional and not trying to make "men" as a whole into the victims of society. As a man, your race, your class, your sexuality are all bigger sources of discrimination than just being male if you go against the white-hetero norms." That is simply not true. Did you not read the list I gave you about ways men are discriminated against? As for the black analogy, black people make up a large percentage of the some of the best…
/r/MensRights10/04/13 04:39 AM
6

Why do you care?
/r/MensRights10/04/13 04:19 AM
1

My viewpoint is not a straight white viewpoint. First of all, I'm not straight even though that is neither any of your business or relevant to this. My viewpoint is a political viewpoint based upon my political beliefs and statistics I have researched. It is incredibly silly to dismiss it because of who I am. My viewpoint is that of a person who cares about equality's viewpoint. "With that block of lies you've lost all credibility. Homeless people make up a small portion of those who are in pove…
/r/MensRights10/04/13 03:49 AM
1

Subreddits are not the best representation of an entire social movement.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 03:37 AM
-1

I don't really know anything about this man but it seemed to me like pretty much everything he said was a joke and this was no different. I thought that was hilarious. Also, I think the responsible thing to do would be to talk with him about what he meant before slandering him like this.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 03:36 AM
1

Are women the most represented in poverty? What about at the different levels of poverty? At the very bottom(the homeless and especially the unsheltered homeless) men make up the vast majority. And in America, women are not the most represented people in abuse or illiteracy and it is doubtful they are anywhere close to the majority of the victims of rape. It is pretty obvious that you are trying to "shout" me into submission by insulting me because you can't support your position. That is sad. I…
/r/MensRights10/04/13 03:28 AM
1

Seriously, show me the statistics. I just don't understand how, when men are the majority of prison inmates, homeless, mental patients etc. women are on the bottom of society. That's not to say that there are no women there but it is clear that this is a gendered issue. Do you understand now why I reject the feminist idea of a patriarchy?
/r/MensRights10/04/13 02:24 AM
1

I think that when you remove race from the picture(which does not make sense on the face of it, black men are men just as much as white men are) the statistics are not as skewed but they clearly show that men are at the bottom. Can you show me statistics about all the women on the bottom of society?
/r/MensRights10/04/13 12:25 AM
1

The Men's Rights crowd is not anti-women because we love our mothers, we are not anti-women because we are not anti-women.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 12:23 AM
1

I don't know how much of this is conspiracy or not but many of the things Professor Philpott says can be backed up.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 08:38 PM
1

Except that men are constantly the subject of stereotyping and generations of discrimination. And we are talking about gender, not race. As for the people at the bottom, it is men. Males make up the majority of the homeless and the vast majority of the unsheltered homeless, the majority of injury victims, violent crime victims, accidental deaths, mental illness, military deaths, workplace deaths, suicides, school dropouts, students with low GPAs, students diagnosed with ADD, prison inmates etc. …
/r/MensRights09/04/13 03:03 PM
0

That is not even close to true. The vast majority of people denied privilege in white countries are white people. You can't argue that just because an incredibly small percentage of a group has a lot of power that the entire group is somehow privileged. Especially when it is clear that that group comprises the underclass of society(men, not white people). Men compose most of the top and the bottom and it makes no sense to say that the men at the bottom are privileged because there are men at the…
/r/MensRights09/04/13 02:41 PM
185

So she is angry that older women are treated like men always are?
/r/MensRights09/04/13 01:58 PM
6

In this case there is a clear problem with being high as it has obviously clouded your senses. Come back when you come down and be embarrassed.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 12:55 PM
7

How high are you right now?
/r/MensRights09/04/13 12:09 PM
1

But they're not. They don't seem themselves as part of the same group in any way more than the very barest. The men that aren't in control receive absolutely no benefit from the men who are in control and are often hurt more than women by the men.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 07:26 AM
4

This is not what /r/mensrights is about.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 06:02 AM
4

You have been reading too much Socrates. This argument is retarded. Things wrong with it: I don't know what measurement or standards you mean when you say quality. And I don't know if I would agree that in all aspects men and women are of equal quality. Men and women aren't equally moral and immoral. And that doesn't necessarily follow from #1. And how would you measure that? Assuming your points above were correct it would be quite easy to say that women do a lot of small things which all add u…
/r/MensRights09/04/13 06:00 AM
0

But what you are missing is that just because they are white men that does not mean they help other white men. The vast majority of the invisibles in our society are men as well.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 04:24 AM
18

I have seen it depressing often and it is utter bullshit. The only people I have ever heard say those things are feminists. There is no patriarchy and they are just trying to co-opt a growing social movement.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 01:16 AM
16

It isn't men who are in control of every single industry and institution, it is a very small, select group of powerful men. The vast, vast majority of men see no benefit from this whatsoever and many see quite a few detriments. Men are more variable and are more inclined to sacrifice for success. That is why more men than women are on top.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 07:27 PM
3

In my experience most feminists are actually against Male Genital Mutilation but feel there are more important issues. There are some who are for it but they are a minority and I don't think it would be incorrect to say that many of the major voices in the intactivist movement are actually feminists. You need to do more research about this topic. I agree that if feminists really cared about equality they would address this huge issue of gender inequality but you need to really see their multitud…
/r/MensRights08/04/13 05:17 AM
3

Come on dude, not only is that not true but it is really, really stupid.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 05:06 AM
3

Just ignore them.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 11:21 PM
1

This is not /r/shitredditsays
/r/MensRights07/04/13 10:48 PM
2

No one cares.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 08:12 PM
4

Jeezus christ, this isn't shitredditsays. Come on.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 07:51 PM
2

Jeezus christ just ignore them
/r/MensRights07/04/13 07:22 PM
1

They don't seem to understand what the original bakesales were about....
/r/MensRights07/04/13 04:42 AM
5

http://www.reddit.com/r/mensrants
/r/MensRights07/04/13 03:33 AM
3

Don't care. This is not the place for that.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 03:05 AM
2

What is wrong with you?
/r/MensRights07/04/13 03:05 AM
1

This is not /r/shitredditsays.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 03:04 AM
1

Who cares? Don't be an idiot.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 03:03 AM
21

The rapist is whoever is the man.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 01:22 AM
1

No, I believe that intelligent arguments should be given more merit than retarded ones regardless if I disagree with them. And I use the downvote arrow to show my opinion on how intelligent an argument is. I don't downvote things I disagree with, I downvote retarded, ignorant shit.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 10:04 PM
7

If you have been subbed here for a while then you already know the answer.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 09:42 PM
3

I use the downvote arrow quite a bit here to downvote retarded things. I would not like it if every idea were given equal merit no matter how intelligent it is.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 09:42 PM
3

Because we are better than they are.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 09:03 PM
2

Just ignore it.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 08:10 PM
9

Normal.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 05:25 PM
2

Your meaning was the same as his, that people who do something you don't are stupid. You should take a few hours and think about what you are saying.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 09:20 AM
2

Okay, how is what you are doing different than what he did?
/r/MensRights06/04/13 09:13 AM
2

Why on earth are you so hostile? All I am saying is that you are doing the exact same thing he did after criticizing him for it.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 09:05 AM
1

You are correct. You only insulted people who like children. I stand corrected. And it is clearly an insult, you claim that their brain is a little dead inside. This is surreal....
/r/MensRights06/04/13 08:33 AM
1

It's bizarre because you wrote so much about a topic know one else seems to care about here and you are writing all that in response to a few sentences from someone we don't really care about. Not only that but you are doing the exact same thing that Mr. Rogan is doing. I mean, you even took his words to use as your own. Insulting people for not wanting children is not any worse than insulting people for wanting children. But when one side just says the insult and the other gives and entire para…
/r/MensRights06/04/13 08:27 AM
1

I don't think either of the positions which were posted here recently would qualify him as an MRA.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 07:45 AM
5

This comment is bizarre..... And much worse than what Mr. Rogan said.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 07:43 AM
6

This is not /r/shitredditsays.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 04:57 AM
1

No. But I have read articles by her.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 11:06 PM
1

The latter.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 10:04 PM
7

If people were using "women's rights activist" as an insult maybe you would have a point. A small one, because meanings of words change especially when groups co-opt them, but a point. Since that isn't true, you don't.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 09:46 PM
1

No, this is an idiotic women who has no idea what she is talking about being sexist for the hell of it.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 09:44 PM
4

Dude, c'mon, don't be an asshole. Do the slightest bit of research please. FSAC is the Free Speech Alliance of Canada.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 06:35 PM
2

The lesson here is that this needs to be happening at other places as well. We need to expand this to the USA.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 06:20 PM
11

It isn't that only women are killed by a domestic partner, it is the fact that it doesn't matter when men are killed.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 05:56 AM
2

I couldn't care less about whether he cheated or not but the fact that he did knowing the ramifications shows incredibly poor judgement which would incline me not to vote for him.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 09:40 PM
4

You are wrong about the goal of the MRM. It should be about convincing people on the fence, not the other side. Unless you have an audience it is pretty pointless to debate(unless you are doing it for fun or practice).
/r/MensRights03/04/13 09:37 PM
11

They ban people all the time. It doesn't matter in the slightest.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 06:28 AM
0

I think that is quite interesting from a societal perspective. It will be even more interesting to see how courts adapt to the reversal of roles in alimony payments.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 03:40 AM
1

Pretty sure that Sarah Palin's name is spelled with an H and that Hillary Clinton said that quote.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 03:25 AM
10

That woman has absolutely no idea what she is talking about. I mean, she doesn't understand genetics, evolution or the basics of DNA and sex. I mean wow. I only have a Bachelors in biology but she is an utter idiot.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 10:22 PM
1

We get this question every week. Seriously, every week. Use the search bar, that's what it's for.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 09:49 PM
1

What are they attempting to accomplish?
/r/MensRights02/04/13 08:31 PM
6

That line about feminist perspectives really rubs me the wrong way. I am slightly afraid of what this study will say now that I can see the ideological bias behind it.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 06:40 AM
7

You enter your email in at the end so it isn't confidential that you entered, only what your answers were.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 03:28 AM
1

It's not midnight where I live yet so this had me confused for a few seconds....
/r/MensRights01/04/13 05:21 AM
3

Why should we care?
/r/MensRights01/04/13 02:31 AM
1

http://www.reddit.com/r/intactivists
/r/MensRights30/03/13 11:45 PM
0

Are you talking about the difference in being for abortion to be legal and being for it?
/r/MensRights30/03/13 02:07 AM
0

Source?
/r/MensRights30/03/13 02:07 AM
1

Don't those statistics say that the country is pretty much evenly divided?
/r/MensRights30/03/13 12:56 AM
0

I am not pro life but I doubt that the vast majority of the country is pro abortion. Do you have any figures to back that up?
/r/MensRights30/03/13 12:27 AM
0

Which country are you talking about?
/r/MensRights30/03/13 12:24 AM
5

No. Just because we are MRAs does not mean that we are pro abortion.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 11:31 PM
2

Start here: http://arclaw.org/
/r/MensRights26/03/13 06:02 PM
2

No it isn't. In undeveloped countries it is and both Male Genital Mutilation are performed in the desert with a razor blade. But in developed countries where it is legal it is performed in just as sterile conditions as Male Genital Mutilation.
/r/MensRights26/03/13 06:02 PM
2

Holy crap that woman is evil. Go to her kickstarter page and report this scamming cunt: http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/susanwilson/9-year-old-building-an-rpg-to-prove-her-brothers-w
/r/MensRights25/03/13 08:26 AM
0

It is a new, more subtle, way to blame all men for rape and an attempt for feminists to regain their quickly fading relevance. I personally believe it is a combination of feminist victimhood and coldly calculating how to best drum up support.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 01:05 PM
8

This is not /r/shitredditsays
/r/MensRights24/03/13 07:34 AM
1

This is not /r/shitredditsays
/r/MensRights24/03/13 07:33 AM
2

It doesn't matter what the issue is, so long as a woman does it that makes it okay.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 12:14 AM
1

What you don't understand is that they think the opposite way. We should strive to be better than the worst at the very least. I was only comparing the method, not the intent by the way.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 11:49 PM
1

How is the way it is done different? Can't you see that to any outsider you look exactly like SRS?
/r/MensRights23/03/13 11:41 PM
1

How is it a strawman? Isn't that exactly what you want to do? Go to other subreddits and argue with them?
/r/MensRights23/03/13 11:33 PM
1

SRS is the embodiment of what you are advocating. And everyone hates them. You are doing what SRS does. And it has only had negative effects.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 11:29 PM
1

Look at /r/shitredditsays. Their entire reason for being is doing what you want to do. How do normal people view them?
/r/MensRights23/03/13 10:35 PM
2

He decided to get the personal information of several of the most outrageous protesters and got censured by the University. Edit: He managed to turn a situation where MRAs were unequivocally the good guys into MRAs being the bad guys and stalking innocent college students.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 02:47 PM
1

You need to calm down a bit. Don't attack people on your side.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 01:44 PM
1

But what about arguing on other parts of reddit? I wasn't talking about /r/mensrights.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 12:37 PM
1

But with that reach comes very, very low impact, especially if you are on a part of the internet that no one cares about. Like random subreddits on a random site called reddit.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 12:31 PM
1

If you feel that way then you shouldn't argue with people on the internet.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 11:59 AM
1

No, because what we do here is help each other and post things to help teach about Men's Rights. But I do think that arguing amongst ourselves is counter productive.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 11:55 AM
-2

If you convince one person about anything by arguing with them on reddit I will eat my computer.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 11:43 AM
6

This is getting far to personal for me.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 11:09 AM
-3

Okay, that's fine. But how is going to random subreddits to argue with people you disagree with going to achieve that goal?
/r/MensRights23/03/13 11:08 AM
0

I don't think people on reddit will think any more kindly of us if we go in and downvote/comment everywhere. They see it as invading. Not to mention having internet arguments hardly does anything to make people know what the Men's Rights Movement is. Better to focus on real life. Have you talked to your friends?
/r/MensRights23/03/13 10:42 AM
5

You remember when those protesters made total asses of themselves at Warren Farrell's event and then avoiceformen.com squandered a ton of the goodwill that got us? Yeah, don't do that.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 10:32 AM
0

People say retarded shit on reddit all the time, what is your point?
/r/MensRights23/03/13 10:28 AM
-6

This is getting dangerously close to stalker territory....
/r/MensRights23/03/13 10:26 AM
-2

This kind of stuff doesn't really belong in /r/mensrights
/r/MensRights23/03/13 08:07 AM
3

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRightsMeta/comments/tnwn8/faq_suggestion_antimale_legislation_roundup/ http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/uwekw/facts_and_statistics_detailing_male_oppression/ http://www.mensrightswiki.org/index.php?title=Main_Page Go crazy.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 07:23 AM
3

This is not /r/shitredditsays.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 07:19 AM
3

Look at the sidebar.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 07:17 AM
3

Actually, much of the fight about equal pay was about women afraid they would have to work with men and work just as hard.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 04:28 AM
2

Nope, it is obvious that they meant some men who happen to be rapists, not all men. Good attempt, try again next time faggot. And it is not moving the goalposts because all sorts of retarded things happen in third world countries. It is obvious that most of the Men's Rights Movement is about things in first world countries and it should be assumed that that is what we are talking about. The fact that you didn't know this reveals much. Faggot. You obviously didn't read my comment. Good job faggot…
/r/MensRights23/03/13 04:19 AM
4

No, they are making the argument that rapists can't help but rape when they see women in provocative clothing. But you are correct in your estimation of what a third world country politician thinks about mini skirts. It is a shame that we are talking about a first world country. As for all men are rapists, how about this? "I claim that rape exists any time sexual intercourse occurs when it has not been initiated by the woman, out of her own genuine affection and desire." -- Robin Morgan, in 1974…
/r/MensRights23/03/13 03:31 AM
2

What is your point? I do not believe your quotations prove that these people think all men are rapists.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 02:59 AM
6

The only people I have heard calling all men rapists are feminists. And yeah, I was offended by that.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 12:10 AM
1

What rules did she break?
/r/MensRights22/03/13 06:10 AM
0

If she was representing her company when she said those things then I have no problem with her being fired but do you have any proof of that?
/r/MensRights22/03/13 06:10 AM
5

If a woman rapes you and then has a child you would be liable for child support. Does that answer your question?
/r/MensRights22/03/13 01:01 AM
-14

What justification do we have? She took a picture in a public place and tweeted it. Why are you so hostile to me? Why don't we work towards positive things instead of negative things?
/r/MensRights21/03/13 12:49 PM
0

This is slightly different than facing jailtime...
/r/MensRights21/03/13 12:42 PM
-17

That makes us no better than she is. Better to sign the petition to get the techie hired/unfired.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 12:14 PM
5

That person is so incredibly off the wall crazy that I don't know what to say. Best not to give her any pageviews.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 08:22 AM
3

Just don't give them any pageviews.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 02:20 AM
-1

Opening a conversation is not trolling. Opening a conversation, using continuous logical fallacies and then posting it to SRS is trolling. Stop claiming I said things I haven't.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 11:14 PM
3

I think that a key part to equality is not only to get rid of wrong laws, but to not make any new wrong laws in the process.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 01:34 PM
3

I might be interested in having a discussion about this if you weren't an SRS troll. But you aren't interested in anything other than being an ass. Please go away you limp wristed, maladjusted, petulant, malodorous excuse for a person.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 01:33 PM
2

Get out troll.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 01:11 PM
1

You should block out your name and picture.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 08:30 AM
3

Go tell them what you think and request equal treatment.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 08:08 AM
3

If it bothers you that they were fired for something so stupid, why not contact their previous employer and tell them that?
/r/MensRights20/03/13 06:51 AM
5

This is bullshit and you know it. How does making it so that women can't be convicted of rape help reduce rape? And the death penalty sickens me. Edit: This person is posting your responses to SRS. Please ignore. And mods do your damn job.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 04:27 AM
0

That is not a Men's Rights issue unless it is about men getting raped and not be treated equally.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 03:08 AM
5

Suppose I weigh 20lbs more than I should for my height, should I get a 10 minute head start?
/r/MensRights18/03/13 12:30 PM
1

Who here is telling us that we are wrong about feminism? Go do something besides preaching to the choir.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 05:11 AM
6

There was. Larry Summers.
/r/MensRights17/03/13 01:42 AM
0

http://www.exed.hbs.edu/Pages/default.aspx
/r/MensRights17/03/13 01:20 AM
4

It's just more feminist idiocy. Ignore and move on. Every reasonable person can see how retarded that poster is.
/r/MensRights17/03/13 12:40 AM
2

She is arguing that women have this instinct and that women have some sort of special wisdom that men don't have. Come on now, if this weren't an intactivist there is no way you would be defending her.
/r/MensRights16/03/13 11:53 PM
6

She talks about innate wisdom that women somehow have and men don't. And then she says that the feminine is life giving? And then she goes on about how this ritual is damaging to women and somehow disempowers women. By mutilating boy children we are making it so women can't trust their own feelings? I mean come on, surely you recognize that as sexist. And it is much different than when we bring up Male Genital Mutilation. What would be the same is if someone brought up female circumcision and th…
/r/MensRights16/03/13 09:43 AM
8

Read the article. "Womb-wisdom"? "On a meta-historical and biological level, circumcision acts to rename, remap, and invert our fundamental and primal relationship to the feminine. It is not coincidental that this ritual of tribal belonging necessitates the cutting, blood-letting, and altering -- in a public ceremony -- of the male child's sexual organ. As Glick points out, "Female blood contaminates, male blood sanctifies." " "Circumcision subverts the community's relationship to the life-givin…
/r/MensRights16/03/13 08:56 AM
7

We shouldn't tolerate sexism from people we agree with any more than we should tolerate sexism from being we disagree with.
/r/MensRights16/03/13 07:17 AM
18

The only people I have heard saying those things are feminists...
/r/MensRights15/03/13 08:29 AM
4

I absolutely love the fact that what looks like a mainstream news source is calling feminism controversial.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 08:19 AM
3

This is not /r/shitredditsays
/r/MensRights15/03/13 06:28 AM
1

This is not /r/shitredditsays
/r/MensRights14/03/13 08:50 PM
6

This is not /r/shitredditsays
/r/MensRights14/03/13 08:49 PM
-1

This trend of women wanting things exclusively for them boggles my mind....
/r/MensRights14/03/13 08:48 PM
1

I don't even know what this graphic is supposed to mean.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 11:57 PM
6

It's both.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 09:44 PM
86

There is a lot to dislike in that article but the idea that rape investigations should proceed with the assumption that men are guilty isn't in there. Please don't just make stuff up.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 01:42 PM
8

It is obvious that feminism's definition of sexism is wrong so they are desperately trying to change the appearance of it. Anyone who has any sort of sense(and hasn't been indoctrinated) can see that this definition is just as much bullshit as the last one.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 05:31 AM
1

I really hate it when people say that 40% of gamers are female(or whatever lie is popular at the moment). That statistic doesn't take into account what type of games they play. My mother is the person who plays the most computer games in my family. What game does she play? Solitaire. Anyway, why are you here? You are for mutilating children solely because of their gender.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 10:52 PM
5

Start by not giving them extra pageviews.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 08:08 AM
8

Is the suicide rate higher in Afganistan for men or women? Also, I think this is absolutely bizarre. Isn't there a war going on there with thousands of men being killed?
/r/MensRights12/03/13 07:50 AM
10

In a public forum where people post things they only expect to be seen by their friends of course some people are going to say retarded shit. This is not news. If this was an important person or major feminist I would care but as it is, random people being stupid on the internet does not warrant my attention.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 04:15 AM
1

If you want hope you should try to accomplish something real, not this bullshit. Talk to real life feminists and MRAs.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 02:19 AM
2

What will ending the "war" between two anonymous internet communities do to help what you are talking about?
/r/MensRights12/03/13 12:57 AM
1

I think your view of the matter is naive. We will need to have a good public image, at least in the beginning, to accomplish our goals.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 10:38 AM
2

I don't use facebook. What's the difference?
/r/MensRights11/03/13 06:00 AM
2

The moderators really needed to do a better job in the question and answer section. Too many speeches and not enough questions.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 02:16 AM
21

Please ignore everything else which was posted here. You need to talk to your wife if you are having a problem with what she is saying on her facebook wall.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 09:05 PM
1

I believe that as we start becoming a real life social movement how we present ourselves will become more and more important so we won't be able to afford being blunt and aggressive.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 06:45 PM
10

Just so you know, you can click on "other discussions" at the top of the page to show you other places the same link has been posted.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 06:44 PM
4

Feminists use humor? In my experience they are among the most humorless people around....
/r/MensRights10/03/13 06:10 PM
1

I guess what I meant by similar was to edit wikipedia to accurately reflect reality instead of biases which is the opposite of what the feminists seem to want to do. Why are you attacking me?
/r/MensRights10/03/13 09:35 AM
3

If you want to, go start one. Why are you posting this here?
/r/MensRights10/03/13 06:28 AM
7

No. That is clearly a feminist man. I hate to use the word mangina but these fucking manginas are even worse than most feminists. I would prefer to deal with a misandrist female than a misandrist male any day.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 06:25 AM
0

No, because it is people using female sexual privilege to get money from men.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 06:23 AM
6

Just ignore her. The only reason anyone cares about what she has to say is that too many people didn't ignore her when they should have.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 06:23 AM
6

Pretty sure that that is a feminist man.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 06:20 AM
3

If everyone started calling things which were triangular "cylindrical" how quickly do you think the dictionary definition would change?
/r/MensRights10/03/13 05:10 AM
1

First of all, it's not censoring, what they are doing is basically lying. Second of all, if we respond and don't lie then that is a good thing yes?
/r/MensRights10/03/13 01:35 AM
12

If you want to change your name. If you don't want to don't do it. Unless you have a ridiculously stupid or awesome name(or your husband does) the whole "debate" is idiotic.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 12:22 AM
35

This woman makes a living out of making purposely inflammatory statements and then playing the victim card when people get angry. Please just ignore her because you are doing exactly what she wants.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 11:05 PM
6

This woman makes a living out of making purposely inflammatory statements and then playing the victim card when people get angry. Please just ignore her because you are doing exactly what she wants.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 11:05 PM
3

The definitions of words change. When we are talking about what something means it makes no sense to refer to a dictionary because that is just what someone else thinks it means and I happen to disagree with that person.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 10:48 PM
5

No you can't. There are so many "feminists" who claim to be for equal rights yet aren't. What if most feminists were for more rights for women than for men? Would you still call them feminists?
/r/MensRights09/03/13 10:13 PM
0

I think it objectifies both. But it exploits men.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 10:09 PM
7

How do we know they are not feminists? What makes you the arbiter of what feminism is?
/r/MensRights09/03/13 10:00 PM
8

The simple fact of the matter is that feminism is whatever whoever is using it for political gain wants it to be. The problem I have with it is that it clearly does not help men no matter what definition you are using.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 09:41 PM
0

It was banned because it was about bestiality, not because it was about men....
/r/MensRights09/03/13 06:48 PM
1

I am not talking about lying, I am talking about correcting the propaganda, lies, deceit, vandalism and violence used by the feminists.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 06:20 PM
1

Who is talking about censorship?
/r/MensRights09/03/13 06:19 PM
-2

We should do something similar.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 05:01 AM
6

Don't comment here. Go comment on the article and let her(and her editor) what you think.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 03:14 AM
0

The fact that you said that the wage gap is bullshit with no evidence to support your claim and the fact that you didn't google it first. It is easy to find. And I believe there is a link in the sidebar about it. And your response to another person who directed you towards google and the sidebar did not endear me to you.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 03:13 AM
14

Nothing. It is just another meaningless feminist term to shut down discussion they don't like.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 03:10 AM
0

When asking for help it makes sense not to be a jerk.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 12:35 AM
2

I don't think that's correct. Some stereotypes about women, both positive and negative are created by feminists though.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 12:35 AM
3

http://consad.com/index.php?page=an-analysis-of-reasons-for-the-disparity-in-wages-between-men-and-women
/r/MensRights09/03/13 12:20 AM
2

Calling out government funded sexism is misogyny?
/r/MensRights08/03/13 09:27 PM
10

Come on dude, read his name.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 05:00 AM
0

That is what youtube comment sections are. She is just trying to funnel all the "hate" into money for her.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 03:01 AM
2

Taken from here: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=432740420134937&set=pb.399617766780536.-2207520000.1362706293&type=3&theater
/r/MensRights08/03/13 01:33 AM
6

Comments are disabled. What a surprise...
/r/MensRights07/03/13 10:04 PM
3

Read the article.
/r/MensRights07/03/13 06:30 AM
21

I thought that way about the atheist community and look where they are now.
/r/MensRights07/03/13 03:33 AM
11

Debunking lies and negative stereotypes about males is a part of the Men's Rights Movement but terrible, misguided articles shouldn't be.
/r/MensRights07/03/13 02:57 AM
3

You should try to fix it instead of leaving.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 06:27 PM
0

When it is okay to perform an abortion if at all.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 06:34 AM
0

I think what is black and white is that we need more research to be done before arriving at an answer.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 04:06 AM
0

The simple fact of the matter is we don't know when it should be banned or allowed and there needs to be much study and research done to find out. The problem is what if we are wrong? If we are wrong about banning abortions and they should be legal then we made a major mistake and caused a lot of pain to a lot of people. But if we don't ban them and they should be banned then we just allowed the killing of millions of children. See my point?
/r/MensRights06/03/13 03:35 AM
-3

I think this is a good idea and should be followed by other states. It is pretty obvious that abortions after the 20th week should be banned and we should get a lot more information making a decision on other ones.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 03:27 AM
1

Yes.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 03:11 AM
4

Look at some third world countries. I guess, in America, women can't go topless in some places.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 12:56 AM
2

Come on now. In order to prove what you are trying to prove you would have to have several ads all showing only women hitting only men.
/r/MensRights05/03/13 06:53 AM
2

This is not /r/shitredditsays.
/r/MensRights05/03/13 06:52 AM
-5

Why? They have tons of subreddits and billions of dollars dedicated to that.
/r/MensRights05/03/13 12:25 AM
3

I don't care that much about gender roles. If you want to conform to a gender role, go ahead. If not, I don't care. What I care about is actual discrimination like the lifespan gap, the Selective Service and Male Genital Mutilation. Your problem seems to be that you can't see that.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 12:20 AM
3

Please kill yourself.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 12:19 AM
2

That's not the point. Men die 5-7 years earlier in the USA and yet women get far, far more specific healthcare benefits(excluding pregnancy and related things).
/r/MensRights03/03/13 04:12 AM
6

Please go to hell. If you don't like what people post or comment here then downvote them or comment on them. If you feel the subreddit is losing quality then start posting interesting things and help to create a better atmosphere. Complaining about what other people say doesn't do that. Don't make annoying posts about how you don't like what some anonymous person said on the internet. Do something positive instead.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 10:03 PM
3

Who is ignoring this?
/r/MensRights02/03/13 04:30 AM
4

Both.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 06:32 AM
8

I upvote things which contribute to discussion no matter what the views espoused are. Same with downvotes.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 01:46 AM
15

First of all, we should strive to be better than feminists(it isn't hard). Second of all, what are the Men's Rights Movement's underlying philosophies? The only one I can think of is that everyone deserves equality no matter what gender they are. Third of all, we should periodically examine our positions to see if it holds up under scrutiny. The best people to do that are probably people who disagree because if they can't beat it then it is a strong position.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 11:58 PM
6

Except the application is different. Where are most of the funds going?
/r/MensRights28/02/13 10:11 PM
1

The question is stupid.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 07:28 PM
0

You seem to be misunderstanding my point. The "public forum" I was talking about was /r/todayilearned and what is a waste of time is defending an incredibly small part of the internet from random, anonymous people who verbally attack it. I have no idea what your talk about bravery and peers is getting at.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 06:46 PM
0

What on earth are you talking about?
/r/MensRights24/02/13 06:31 PM
-1

If this was a public forum and many people could see it then I would agree with you. But since it isn't you are basically wasting your time.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 08:44 AM
2

This is not /r/shitredditsays
/r/MensRights24/02/13 03:44 AM
14

It should be illegal to discriminate against you no matter what your gender is.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 09:18 PM
2

Your analogy is reeeeeeeally stretching it.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 02:45 PM
3

What you are suggesting is pretty much the definition of discrimination.... That is not to say that I agree with either of the things you claim /r/mensrights says. But your evidence does not support your premise.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 06:15 AM
1

Well, first of all, he is asking for money. Second of all, I would really hate for this place to be where men down on their luck come to solicit advice and tell their stories. It should be more about the discrimination against men. If he is telling the truth then the best thing to do is obviously to talk to a free lawyer which I directed him to. Taking advice from random people on the internet seems like a good way to screw everything up horribly.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 04:50 AM
7

If men are naturally more competitive and resilient that in no ways implies that they should be discriminated against.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 04:45 AM
1

Are porn stars actresses?
/r/MensRights22/02/13 06:31 PM
10

Who the fuck cares?
/r/MensRights22/02/13 03:12 PM
-2

We have no proof that any of this is true. Talk to a lawyer who works pro bono cases: http://www.justice.gov/eoir/probono/states.htm and stop posting about it online.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 02:06 PM
-1

I don't believe I am going to agree with feminists on this. From what I can gather, feminists agree with him that violence against women is worse than the same violence against men.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 03:21 PM
2

Then you should shut up about it until you get his advice. And stop posting on internet forums.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 10:06 PM
1

Lawyer. Now.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 10:04 PM
1

I don't think that in order to get the right to vote men should undergo significantly more danger than women. A man who gets a woman pregnant is not affecting his ability to fight. A woman who gets pregnant can't fight. That is the reason for the difference. And women have far more options in preventing pregnancy than men do.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 10:02 PM
0

We should correct some differences and not correct others.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 08:09 PM
1

No one should be drafted into the military but I am unsure of my position on mandatory civil service. If we do have the draft both men and women should be drafted and be subject to the same requirements. Women should be in combat like men provided they can perform adequately and equally. If they cannot then they should not be promoted over men who can perform adequately. The stuff about men instinctually saving women is bunk. Getting pregnant should be grounds for a dishonorable discharge.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 04:46 PM
16

The point is that it is presented as an issue which solely affects women and girls. This is obviously not the case.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 05:59 PM
42

Chivalry is fine so long as it is not expected and laws are not based off of it. I am not against female rights activists or feminists. They are sometimes right and sometimes wrong and we should judge them on their positions on the issues. No one person can represent all Men's Rights Activists about any issue though.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 03:07 AM
1

Maybe they realized that people make mistakes and thought that these specific mistakes were not worth ending the relationship over.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 01:21 AM
3

It obviously isn't nut the point is that there are two sides to every story.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 09:17 PM
1

If you didn't want people to go and downvote you should have created a screenshot. But yes, I believe that the evidence shows that whatserface hit Chris Brown first.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 05:48 PM
5

This woman has a history of posting sexist bullshit. I have no idea how she managed to swindle CNN into giving her voice for her sexism.
/r/MensRights15/02/13 04:18 PM
1

The issue of where to place our attention(there is so much we need to work on) is an interesting one that has no clear answer. It is good that we have people who are fighting against all different types of misandry though even if I feel that their efforts would be better put to use elsewhere.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 09:12 PM
15

I personally believe that the Men's Rights Movement should be more about eradicating legal and governmental discrimination against men. I would like it to be more of the type you are thinking about but other things may be more important. That is not to say what you mentioned is not important but maybe we should focus on other things. But yes, shaming rape victims is disgusting no matter what gender they are.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 06:01 PM
2

Damn. Fucking destroyed.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 12:07 PM
7

Your problem is that you are coming off as too polemical. Pretty much every reasonable person agrees with the ideals of Men's Rights but because of the massive misinformation campaign waged against Men's Rights they are turned off by the name. You should not come out against feminism or for Men's Rights at this juncture. You should focus on the issues instead.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 03:35 PM
1

Thanks dude.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 11:24 PM
6

That is the most fun but oftentimes the least effective. It is like I am attacking them instead of engaging in an intellectual discussion when I do that.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 05:34 PM
8

Everything in good time my friend.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 05:21 PM
1

I would say you should take what you can get. I was exactly like him for a while until I started doing more research. Slowly ease him into it and he may come around. But don't immediately say "You are wrong and your cherished beliefs about how the world works are bullshit." Say "We can agree on some things and that is what we should focus on. Here is some more information on those things." And every so often bring up another thing with little insinuations about the real causes.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 05:13 PM
3

The point is not to convince feminists or attack them, it is to show another side of the debate which is often not heard. Standing outside with a sign will only give her more power. Writing an editorial in a newspaper will definitely get his ideas heard.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 05:12 PM
26

A bit but not as much as I would like.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 05:10 PM
-2

Only feminists think men's natural state is being a rapist. This poster does what feminists love to do which is conflate male criminals with men as a whole. Criminals cause rape, not men. This is something feminists can't understand.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 05:09 PM
106

I would really love to know who this woman is. Please post her name or something so I can do more research(currently having a debate with a friend about feminism in France).
/r/MensRights12/02/13 02:40 PM
1

And how many people will watch that?
/r/MensRights12/02/13 02:08 PM
1

What would you suggest?
/r/MensRights12/02/13 02:07 PM
3

It would not be helpful at all when she(or people who support her) are controlling the discussion.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 06:18 AM
19

The best idea is not to debate. Try to find things you agree upon and go from there. Every once in a while bring up an article which shows some aspect of Men's Rights. Like the recent one about the woman who hired a hitman to kill her husband or the one where the state sued a lesbian's sperm donor for child support. You don't want to beat him in a stupid argument, you want him to understand where you are coming from and eventually agree with you.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 06:05 AM
1

Cool. Good luck.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 04:59 AM
2

Yeah, I have heard that. But asking her about it will only give her more time to spout shit.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 04:59 AM
1

I am pretty sure there has been a recent update promising videos in late February or March.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 04:26 AM
11

"I have more of a problem that she gives a biased picture and would like questions that illustrate that better" Don't ask questions. Write your local newspaper with a critique of her talk after she does it.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 03:51 AM
22

There isn't really anything you can do. You shouldn't go and you certainly shouldn't ask questions. Anything you say will be turned around for her benefit. She is very, very good at appearing to be a victim and will almost certainly paint you out to be a misogynist and thus delegitimize any questions or statements you might make. I would recommend writing your college newspaper or the sponsors of the event. Be courteous, polite and don't mention Men's Rights or anything similar. Calmly explain y…
/r/MensRights12/02/13 03:33 AM
2

Whenever both a man and a woman accuse the other of doing something the woman is always right. Edit: Whenever you have to choose between a man's story and a woman's story, choose the woman.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 01:00 AM
7

I don't see anything wrong with this. I have no problem with women specifying things they want in a man and putting out ads for men which fit those requirements. It is unlikely anyone will take her up on it 'cause she comes off kinda like a bitch but his response is unjustified.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 11:05 PM
9

It is written by that circumfetishist Edgar Schoen. Just reading his name makes me feel dirty.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 08:18 PM
14

You are forgetting three things: Only women can be raped When a man and a woman both commit a crime the man made her do it.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 04:49 PM
2

The major problem I have with it is that it focuses on comparatively minor western(mostly white) women's issues while ignoring larger Men's and non western women's issues. It takes a long of money and much needed attention away from those issues. And it can be quite sexist. Read some Mary Daly or Andrea Dworkin.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 06:10 AM
2

http://www.justice.gov/eoir/probono/states.htm http://apps.americanbar.org/legalservices/probono/directory.html He needs to talk with someone at the very least. And it may be that even though he is not the father, if she puts his name on the birth certificate, he will be forced to pay child support.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 02:08 AM
7

Only on the internet.
/r/MensRights09/02/13 11:52 PM
8

Lawyer. Now.
/r/MensRights09/02/13 10:54 PM
0

This is not /r/shitredditsays.
/r/MensRights09/02/13 07:59 PM
3

I think you may be right. I was caught up in the excitement and got my hopes up so high they clouded my judgement. But we shall see.
/r/MensRights09/02/13 07:29 PM
3

I saw the other post about UIUC and randomly came across this. Does anyone have any more information about it?
/r/MensRights09/02/13 05:10 PM
3

If I were you I would be very careful about attaching my name to this movement at this juncture.
/r/MensRights09/02/13 06:04 AM
2

The real question is what did you do? Did you keep your place in line or let other people go in front of you?
/r/MensRights09/02/13 04:49 AM
43

He didn't even link to anything by a real MRA.....
/r/MensRights08/02/13 04:29 PM
0

You should have just linked to the study in question. Not only is that significantly better than linking to an article about it written by someone with no experience in the field the study is on but you give more support to the authors. And advocating things based on flawed studies isn't too much better than advocating things based on no study. Furthermore, by going to that site and reading that article you are implicitly supporting a sexist. Why not just link to someone who not only has much mo…
/r/MensRights08/02/13 03:48 AM
1

Glancing is not good enough to evaluate a study. You need to read it because the authors obviously want to convince you of their position. Amanda Marcotte is one of the most prominent sexists of our generation and linking to her makes her seem more popular and gives the site which employs her more revenue.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 03:28 AM
2

Don't link to anything by that harpy Marcotte please. Second of all, okay takedown here: http://www.reddit.com/r/AskMen/comments/183br9/study_finds_men_and_women_are_not_psychologically/c8b86a2
/r/MensRights08/02/13 03:05 AM
22

Sidebar.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 05:51 PM
1

If you harshly tell someone that men are discriminated against in this country and feminism isn't actually about equality they will immediately shut down. But if you slowly lead them into it they might actually agree with you.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 02:46 PM
1

When trying to talk to feminists the truth can actually hurt our cause. It isn't that we aren't allowed to criticize, it is just that it may be more advantageous to not do so.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 09:45 AM
0

It doesn't really matter what the truth of the matter is (I personally disagree with your definition of feminism) what you are saying is good advice. We should avoid saying stuff like that about feminism because it will immediately turn many people who otherwise agree with us against us. This isn't that important while our movement is mostly on the internet but will get more important as we grow.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 06:40 AM
2

"He told her she looked cold and needed a hug before wrapping his arms around her. Police say the man then sexually assaulted the woman before walking away." Read the article.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 02:14 AM
1

This is actually a really good idea. Hopefully it will stop people from posting this bullshit in /r/mensrights.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 01:22 AM
2

It just so happens that the true and my position are one in the same here so yeah...
/r/MensRights05/02/13 04:34 PM
2

That article is 3 years old....
/r/MensRights05/02/13 05:20 AM
6

You know that police will often arrest the man even if he is the victim.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 11:09 PM
9

It was okay up until the end.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 07:51 PM
6

She hit him first if I recall correctly. But the larger problem is that you are looking for consistency and logic within feminism....
/r/MensRights04/02/13 07:11 PM
7

Oh god, I only got 2 paragraphs in before I couldn't take anymore.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 04:54 PM
3

Even though most reasonable people agree with most of our positions, the name MRA has bad connotations. It may be best to just not mention it at all until you are quite a ways down the road in the conversation.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 08:18 PM
0

But that was before the internet. You are shouting into a void. Edit: Definitely talk to people. Do what they did, talk to people in real life.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 07:19 PM
1

If this blog was run by a government office, or a well known politician/celebrity then you would have a point. But it isn't. It could be a stupid 10 yr. kid trying to troll for all you know. It is better to do something productive.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 07:09 PM
6

Um.... who cares? This is just another meaningless internet squabble for you to feel good. You aren't going to convince her of anything. Anyone who read her article could easily tell you that. This isn't going to do a damn thing besides stroke your obviously overinflated ego. Do something meaningful instead of this bullshit. Volunteer at a Men's shelter, write your congressman, start a Men's Rights group. Also, why do you keep making different accounts? It is weird.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 08:17 AM
0

Yeah, I am sure a whole lot of Men's Rights Activists are totally unaware of the fact that women like this exist.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 03:41 AM
3

This is not /r/shitredditsays.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 07:23 PM
1

This is not /r/shitredditsays
/r/MensRights02/02/13 07:23 PM
4

I meant people who currently post here, who are not banned but should be.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 05:52 AM
5

Yeah....I really believe what you are saying.... You are certainly not coming across as more intelligent than me. You may want to work on that.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 05:38 AM
6

I don't know you, why should I trust you? Does the shift key on your computer work?
/r/MensRights02/02/13 04:30 AM
20

Defending free speech doesn't really mean anything until you are faced with speech you disagree with. If people are calling for hurting of other people then they should be banned but otherwise it is a little more tricky. Could you give me some links of people who should be banned and what their bannable offenses were?
/r/MensRights02/02/13 04:29 AM
9

Are critics of MRA thought banned? I mean, besides the people who come here just to make trouble? And does this subreddit represent MRAs to the world? And is putting out a whitewashed image to the "world" worth censorship?
/r/MensRights02/02/13 04:28 AM
11

I disagree. They are assholes and the movement would be better off without them but one of the things I like about the MRA movement is the freedom of speech.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 04:01 AM
12

Um.... okay..... Just don't pretend to represent me or MRAs at large.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 04:00 AM
69

There are a lot of things I don't like about it either. But the solution isn't to throw a fit and leave, the solution is to make it better. You don't like what is posted? Use the upvote and downvote buttons. Submit better things.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 09:37 PM
3

No one cares.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 04:49 PM
3

They serve no purpose other than to get people's emotions flowing and the emotion most of them use is anger. We would be better off without them. If there was actual proof of a powerful or famous person being sexist(or on the receiving end of some sexism) then I might care but random people? Not so much.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 03:53 PM
6

If you ignore them they become much less annoying.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 02:40 PM
5

This is random....
/r/MensRights31/01/13 05:42 AM
5

The former applies to all three, the latter probably does as well.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 03:18 PM
5

But that author isn't.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 04:52 AM
22

This is one of the stupidest and laziest things I have ever seen. I hope they didn't pay her for that.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 01:20 AM
6

This is not /r/shitredditsays.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 12:04 AM
1

This is not /r/shitredditsays.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 07:27 AM
1

Yes. Beyond being rich I have no idea who he is.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 04:18 PM
0

That player is horrible.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 05:12 AM
1

This is not /r/shitredditsays.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 10:05 PM
15

This wasn't very funny but really, anyone who reads the news can see it is not true. Just look at all the talk about when Gore started growing a beard.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 06:47 PM
4

Lawyer.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 06:00 PM
1

Talk to no one about this before you talk with a lawyer. Take no advice from anyone besides your lawyer.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 12:54 AM
9

This, fucking this, is why I hate it when people confuse /r/mensrights with /r/shitredditsays.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 12:53 AM
1

Lawyer. NOW.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 11:45 PM
2

You are retarded.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 09:44 PM
1

Why should we care? Maybe if this was someone important or powerful this would be worth posting here but as it is we have no evidence that this is even real.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 08:22 PM
0

Why do you say that? I am not looking for a fight, I honestly want to know.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 06:41 PM
-11

People like you are the reason that I am thinking censorship in the Men's Rights Movement might actually not be that bad. There is no point in getting all worked up over a (probably imaginary) facebook conversation between anonymous, powerless people. If you posted something like this which included Joe Biden or something then I would care. But as it is you are posting useless shit which brings down the level of the subreddit, distracts people from real activism and does more harm than good. You…
/r/MensRights26/01/13 04:41 PM
-12

Or, since you know what you are posting is bullshit and doesn't do any good or help anyone, you could just not post it. Just a suggestion though.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 04:37 PM
-11

Okay. I guess I should have said, no one should give a fuck. And you know what, sharing anecdotes and stupid facebook pictures are not activism and don't actually do any good.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 04:35 PM
-5

Stop posting this shit here. No ones gives a fuck about your stupid facebook arguments.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 04:26 PM
3

Stop posting this type of shit here.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 04:02 AM
2

Why should we care? You don't like it make another account or don't go to that place anymore.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 11:05 PM
1

This is not shitredditsays
/r/MensRights25/01/13 09:09 PM
4

Yeah, those posts suck. Downvote them and move on. One of the things I like about Men's Rights is that usually we have significantly more freedom of speech than feminists. Just look at SRS. In order to fix the problem we would probably be creating a larger one. Try submitting better content to try to change the tone if you think it is worth it.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 08:24 AM
6

I don't need a piece of paper to proclaim my love for someone.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 05:20 PM
5

I see. Can you give me a source for why you dislike it so much?(not debating with you, genuinely curious as I have been recommending it quite a bit and maybe I should stop).
/r/MensRights23/01/13 11:46 PM
6

You should try to look at all the evidence, not just things which support your position. Look up the National Interpersonal Sexual Victimization Survey.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 11:35 PM
6

I don't think that is a good thing. What would be a good thing would be if no one was registered for the draft.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 11:33 PM
8

I think you should stop because it looks silly as if you don't know what you're talking about.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 05:53 PM
1

I see. If I were you I would separate out the different facts onto different posters and include the sources in very tiny print at the very bottom. And I would make my pictures representative of the fact I was portraying. 97% of workplace deaths are male? Put up that famous picture of the guys sitting on a skyscraper. Stuff like that. No offense but I believe you are overestimating people on the internet's intelligence and attention span.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 02:55 PM
2

First of all, thank you for making these. I know nothing about poster making but it looks as though you put in a lot of work. As for the content, maybe you should split the posters up into three different ones? And on posters you have limited space to both grab a person's attention and tell them what you want. If you don't do the first you can't do the second so maybe a few less words and a larger pictures. But I think it is fantastic you are doing this. Thank you.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 02:46 PM
6

I'm not going to comment about how I feel about the message but is this really what passes for journalism these days? I mean, really?
/r/MensRights23/01/13 02:22 AM
7

Serious question, could you read the sidebar?
/r/MensRights22/01/13 07:09 PM
1

I don't understand your point.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 06:23 AM
22

See if you can put up better posters. Go to your school's administration and ask for permission first. And if you don't have a recording device for when you are putting up the posters I would get one before I start.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 06:12 AM
3

Jackson Katz is an asshat. The more I read of him the more I dislike him.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 05:58 AM
1

Well, they could be thinking more about relationships instead of sex. And the effort they put in is not a sure indicator of how high their sex drive is. I would prefer more studies on this though.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 03:52 PM
2

A study on television would be evidence. It would help support your position but not prove it. Telling me to watch random television shows however, is not evidence.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 06:15 AM
2

Tv is not evidence.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 06:01 AM
2

And you have evidence of what you are saying?
/r/MensRights21/01/13 05:46 AM
2

Maybe. Maybe you are just naive. I don't get your point.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 05:40 AM
2

Personal experience. Yours may be different but I think that if you examine what you have seen close enough you will come to similar conclusions.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 05:18 AM
0

I don't. I might if I understood the point. Is this saying it is a good thing to hate all feminists? Or is it a bad thing? Or is it only a good thing when you are on drugs?
/r/MensRights20/01/13 11:00 PM
16

The definition I think feminists use is "Men rule the country and prop men up while putting women down." The problems with that are Men don't rule the country. A very small group of men do. Men don't automatically favor people of their own gender in the same way that feminists do.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 08:45 PM
1

Having a higher sex drive is different than thinking of sex/relationships more.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 06:51 PM
3

This is retarded.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 07:12 AM
-11

I'm cool. You know the almost daily posts about how this subreddit is going down the tubes? It is posts like this that are why. As for what didn't happen, I have no evidence that this did and it is pitifully easy to fake this kind of thing. And even if it was real, unless it was some public, well known figure, I wouldn't care.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 03:31 AM
-16

I can't believe you posted this here. Of course there are idiotic sexists in the world but if we complain about them all the time we will never get anything done. And it is doubtful this even happened.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 03:15 AM
18

There is nothing preventing them from swimming besides their own insane religion. If they don't like it they can swim in a private swimming pool. I don't see the problem.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 10:17 PM
79

Except that the female swimming time is longer and at a much more ideal time than the Men's. I don't understand why having sex separated swimming times is necessary.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 08:52 PM
3

No, this is a stupid idea. A large part of the reason I come to this subreddit is to get news about Men's Rights and related issues. If you don't like it I have an even simpler solution. The idea of reddit is that people submit content and there are these two buttons by which other people can show approval or disapproval. They are usually located to the left of the submission. By using these buttons people can tailor the content of the website to want they want. So, my idea is, try upvoting cont…
/r/MensRights19/01/13 07:25 AM
2

I think that if the wage gap is caused by actual discrimination(from what I have read it isn't) then it should most certainly be fixed. And here we have a case of clear discrimination against boys which directly contributes to their graduation rates. Also, if a group of children is doing worse in some area than another for any reason then we need to fix it. If I am misinterpreting what you are saying please don't hesitate to correct me though.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 04:30 AM
7

But if we want to see who is the stronger person we would need to do many tests in order to determine their relative abilities and then attach a certain weigh to each test to accurately reflect how much each one is worth. And an alien wouldn't be able to tell you that black people had it worse than white people in Alabama in the 20s. He would need some sort of evidence to show that. If you want to show that men do indeed have it worse than women then you do need provide some sort of evidence and…
/r/MensRights19/01/13 04:13 AM
3

No. I just means that you need to have some evidence before you claim something like that.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 04:09 AM
3

Off the top of my head there are two major problems with this. There are almost certainly more though. First of all, these are children who are affected and we should try to make everything as equal as possible for children. Adults can make different choices but children cannot. The second one is that teachers grade boys more harshly than girls. http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/eliminating-feminist-teacher-bias-erases-boys-falling-grades-study-finds
/r/MensRights19/01/13 02:55 AM
13

It is true that both men and women have different things to deal with. But in order to claim that neither gender has it worse you must do several things. You must first make a list of all the things each gender faces. Then you must find some way to quantify how bad each thing is. Then you have to somehow quantify how it affects them. Then, in order for this to be true, the numbers you come up with must be similar enough to be considered equal. Otherwise it is just meaningless assertions.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 02:51 AM
1

It's Katz. 'nough said.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 01:37 AM
1

Pretty sure that men have a higher sex drive than women.....
/r/MensRights18/01/13 06:00 AM
4

Don't see why this is surprising, you will get similar results in most sports. I am just surprised that the score difference wasn't larger.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 07:58 AM
23

The trick is not to do it. Don't talk about feminism. If a person is a feminist it is likely that their belief is as strong as a christian's in god. So anything you say which criticizes it is automatically wrong. It doesn't matter if they agree with every position you hold, as soon as you start talking about feminism they will disregard what you say. Talk about various Men's Rights issues which feminism has touched upon without mentioning the f-word. You will probably have much better results th…
/r/MensRights17/01/13 04:35 AM
1

I tried a bit of my cat once. It didn't taste good. And the aftermath was significantly more painful for me than it was for him.....
/r/MensRights16/01/13 07:19 PM
1

I don't follow any mainstream sports so I don't know about the popularity of women's tennis vs. men's. But when we start seeing women get special scholarships for tennis which more skilled men aren't getting that is a problem.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 06:57 PM
1

Dude, there were millions of Nazis. Until these crazies gain any real power(not going to happen. It is easy to see that feminism is losing strength in the west) they can be ignored.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 06:56 PM
4

If you get cancer on your arm and have to get it cut off are you an incomplete person? The arm removal was necessary to save your life but that doesn't mean we should remove everyone's arm.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 06:16 AM
1

You know you share the same basic DNA with Hitler right?
/r/MensRights16/01/13 06:12 AM
1

But we do know that no one takes them seriously. It doesn't matter if they are trolling or not, they have no power. We know it, they know it and everyone who is aware of their existence(very, very few people) knows it.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 06:06 AM
5

Are you trolling or not? I can't tell.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 06:05 AM
1

I believe where we differ is that no one actually takes them seriously. If you could get Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama saying things like that then I would care. But anonymous people on the internet? I mean come on, we don't even know if they are trolling or not. Best to ignore and focus your effort on more important things.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 06:03 AM
1

That is true but I believe the analogy is still useful. You understand my reasoning?
/r/MensRights16/01/13 05:50 AM
-4

I do know something you don't. The people there are like monkeys and reddit is the zoo. When monkeys through their shit through the bars at you what do you do? Do you throw yours at them or do you laugh it off and ignore it?
/r/MensRights16/01/13 05:45 AM
-3

Why do you care?
/r/MensRights16/01/13 05:35 AM
6

You shouldn't look for things to support your position, you should look at the evidence and change your position as necessary.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 12:32 AM
3

I am against adoption. I am also against kittens and candy which tastes good.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 08:49 PM
34

It doesn't look like you ignored it at all. It looks like you posted it here. Random internet sexists saying retarded things are incredibly unimportant. Of course there will be sexists on the internet. But unless they are someone important, powerful or famous I couldn't care less.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 08:42 PM
3

Holy Shit.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 06:04 AM
4

I hope this is real. Do you have any proof?
/r/MensRights15/01/13 06:02 AM
3

Doing something about it is better than complaining though.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 07:31 AM
8

Gloria Steinem is still alive? I thought that witch died a few years ago.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 05:09 AM
21

There are almost 60,000 people who subscribe to this subreddit. You don't like how things are, work to change it. Submit things you think are more appropriate.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 02:58 AM
6

No one is really against circumcision. What people are against is non consensual genital mutilation. And the studies which purportedly show that Male Genital Mutilation reduces the chance of HIV are ludicrously poorly done. Not to mention that babies don't have sex. And if you read the article 2 out of the three medical organizations listed(and every one besides American ones) do not think the benefits outweigh the risks.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 12:52 AM
9

You are wrong. A woman pursuing an unwilling man is "empowered". Not a creep.
/r/MensRights12/01/13 10:56 PM
1

What is a male slut?
/r/MensRights11/01/13 09:42 PM
6

This really shows the hypocrisy of the pro abortion movement. You should be able to abort your fetus if you don't want to raise a child because are feeling lazy but not if you don't want to raise a child of a specific gender. The mental gymnastics are utterly bizarre. Also, does anyone else find it troubling that they didn't mention the rates of sex selective abortion for other groups in Britain? Lastly, fetuses are not women. By these people's beliefs they are not people. So how can this be a w…
/r/MensRights11/01/13 03:06 AM
3

Why post things by that horrid woman? You already know what she is going to say. "Man bad, woman good and anyone who disagrees is a misogynist(or a creep)."
/r/MensRights11/01/13 12:55 AM
2

It depends on what your last name is.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 09:13 PM
1

You are misinterpreting what they want. They only want women who share their opinion to have a say in abortion.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 08:08 PM
5

This is a common idea that feminists have. The problem is that men don't think like feminists do. Men don't support men just because they are men, unlike feminists who support women just because they are women. It is true that men control much of the entertainment industry and government but that in no way implies that women are subordinate. In fact, women are granted not a small amount of special privileges by the men feminists think hate women. Edit: And don't lie. This wasn't an honest questi…
/r/MensRights10/01/13 07:37 PM
4

In many cases you simply can't. In my experience feminists do not care if the facts contradict their position. The facts must be wrong, or the authors misogynist or you are an idiot etc. I would probably say to be as gentle as possible and use logic instead of facts. Things like "would companies hire men if they did the same work for more money?" and whatnot. Take it slow.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 08:45 AM
2

The only people I have heard assuming that all Men's natural state is rapist are feminists.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 06:24 AM
2

I don't watch tv but I think the answer is most of them.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 03:52 AM
2

Men don't stay home to raise their children because our culture tells them they must sacrifice to provide for their family. I know which one I would choose.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 10:25 PM
1

Probably not many. The point I was making was the feminism is like a religion....
/r/MensRights09/01/13 09:20 PM
3

It is quite interesting how so many feminists clamor for female only spaces just like this. Only these have their basis in religion.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 08:57 PM
8

Feminists are scared that people are realizing that being a stay at home mother is not as difficult as breaking your back for 8 hours a day in the hot sun.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 04:51 PM
3

They aren't exclusive but they are retarded.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 03:57 PM
5

We get this a lot with gay men as well. Men's Rights is for the rights of any male who is discriminated against or oppressed because of their gender. But some types of discrimination are worse than others. If you feel that the Men's Rights Movement is ignoring important problems specifically pertaining to being an Asian male(and not just an Asian) you should do your part in creating more awareness for them.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 05:49 AM
10

In some countries women can have their husbands fined for not having sex with them enough. http://www.connexionfrance.com/Fine-10,000-sex-Louis-B-Aix-divorce-view-article.html
/r/MensRights08/01/13 10:01 PM
1

"So if men are doing something that we deem unethical, then as men we should work towards reducing that. " Wrong.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 08:44 PM
11

Don't agree with everything he says but he is one of the few people doing something. And that is better than nothing.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 06:35 AM
0

Is the point of this to show that the other one used utterly made up statistics?
/r/MensRights08/01/13 05:06 AM
5

I prefer the term "made up".
/r/MensRights08/01/13 04:29 AM
8

Does it come as a surprise to anyone that none of the biggest names mentioned in "questioning science" are not scientists?
/r/MensRights07/01/13 11:33 PM
16

That is so disgusting it makes my head spin.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 06:13 AM
0

This isn't shitredditsays.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 04:55 AM
0

Or you could go out into the real world and make a real difference instead of arguing on the internet. In the vast, vast majority of cases arguing on the internet doesn't win any converts. And the converts that it does win are most likely going to stay on the internet and not do anything in real life. If the Men's Rights Movement is going to accomplish anything it needs to move off of the internet and into the real world.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 12:56 AM
15

In all honestly, meaningless internet fights are meaningless. Learn how to pick your battles. Besides practicing for when you actually need to defend your position(in real life) I don't see much point in responding.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 08:36 AM
7

They aren't because the feminist movement has had a lot of success in expanding women's gender roles.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 07:13 PM
3

I don't watch television but I keep hearing about how every tv show shows boys in a negative light. I used to watch The Simpsons and the comparison between Lisa and Bart is pretty disgusting.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 04:10 PM
2

I do not know if I agree with you. In my experience, republicans put more stock in women's safety than Men's.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 07:31 AM
-1

You seem to have some sort of misunderstanding about what qualitative data is. It isn't "I'm so oppressed. I know I'm oppressed but I can't give you any reason why." It is "I'm so oppressed. I know I'm oppressed because I was called a fag 37 times last week alone." As for quantifying inequality. Maslow's hierarchy of needs is quite useful but it should be blindingly obvious that not being able to marry who you choose isn't anywhere close to the discrimination that is having your genitals mutilat…
/r/MensRights04/01/13 07:23 AM
-1

This is obviously not a question which can be answered with subjective analysis. What we need are hard cold facts of which he presented none. Someone may feel the are oppressed but no one will believe them unless they present evidence. Same thing with being abducted by aliens and being the second coming of christ. Furthermore, people claim to be things they aren't all the time on the internet. Unless they show definitive proof that they are what they say they are it is usually a safe bet to assu…
/r/MensRights04/01/13 06:44 AM
-1

An argument is a logical premise based upon statistics. Or it should be. If you don't have the first part it is very difficult to have the second one.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 05:15 AM
5

But justifying single motherhood by saying the children will grow up better because of the hardship they faced because of their lack of a father?
/r/MensRights04/01/13 01:26 AM
0

Yes. His spelling and lack of good writing skills alone tell me that. Not to mention his utter lack of presenting any evidence whatsoever(something a sociologist should easily be able to do in the form of peer reviewed papers) and the absence of logic and cohesion in his points.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 01:21 AM
1

It isn't. Look around. Who's sexuality is valued? Who's isn't?
/r/MensRights04/01/13 01:20 AM
1

One of the reasons at any rate.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 01:18 AM
7

It isn't. Not even close. The studies that "prove" that are so poorly done they are laughable.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 11:24 PM
14

What the Fuck? This article is disgusting. The first part, disliking facts published in journal so getting anecdotes to contradict them? What on earth is wrong with these people? The second part, saying that hardship is better because it makes children better people? Ew.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 07:53 PM
36

A few societies are recognizing that it is genital mutilation. Germany for one. And I don't have a problem with female or male circumcision if it is done with consent on people who are 18 or older.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 07:40 PM
0

No he didn't. He didn't support a single one and flat out lied about being a sociologist.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 07:03 PM
-1

You are retarded. I never said I was anti feminist. Furthermore, you can stop lying about being a sociologist. Seriously, if you actually are I will eat my hat. Your long wall of text is almost entirely gibberish. You literally said nothing, presented no evidence and just rambled on about things you don't understand. Do some research and come back with statistics. Check out the sidebar for a start.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 08:15 AM
1

"s an academic sociologists I am quiet disappointed at what I am seeing today." Yep. I sure do believe that. So I guess you are talking to the feminists to stop doing things in the first world too right? I supported my claims. You didn't. Then you tell me I am hurting the movement. And what have I said that makes you think I am an anti-feminist?
/r/MensRights03/01/13 04:59 AM
1

My list is first world because I specifically stated these were ways males are discriminated against in the country I live in. For men dying earlier: I think that the fact that women receive far more healthcare funding might have something to do with it. But I dunno, what do you think? Additionally, why is it that when girls were doing worse in school and making less than men it was immediately assumed to be discrimination against girls but when boys live shorter lives it isn't discrimination? I…
/r/MensRights03/01/13 04:04 AM
0

First of all, historical trends do not determine the presentHere are some of the ways in which men are discriminated against in the first world country I live in: Male Genital Mutilation without anesthetic and then fellating the infant is legal. Men die 5 years earlier. Men must register for the selective service. More healthcare goes to women. Far more domestic violence money goes to women even though a nearly equal amount of domestic violence is committed against men. Men are the majority of v…
/r/MensRights03/01/13 02:54 AM
16

"Homelessness and incarceration are awful, but being unable to feed your family on a shoe string budget might be just as bad." This is retarded. You should be ashamed of yourself.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 02:48 AM
0

How so? Why don't you compare how gay people are discriminated against in this country and how men are discriminated against in this country.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 02:18 AM
1

Read the article.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 02:17 AM
5

Do you believe he is lying? If so, what do you think the real reasons are?
/r/MensRights03/01/13 01:10 AM
-1

Oh, redditor for 15 minutes. I guess I should have checked that before responding.....
/r/MensRights02/01/13 11:44 PM
-1

You are insane.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 11:35 PM
65

But the GOP is against it for the wrong reasons.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 08:30 PM
0

That is true. But the getting married part.... And the hate crime part....
/r/MensRights02/01/13 08:06 PM
5

I personally think that the discrimination gay men go through in this country is disgusting. But the discrimination they face for being gay pales in comparison to the discrimination they face for being men. And it is terrible that gay men are treated much worse than gay women.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 09:05 AM
14

This is not r/shitredditsays.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 05:53 AM
-1

This meaningless internet bickering gets us nowhere.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 10:35 PM
-1

This is not r/shitredditsays.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 07:04 PM
-8

If this were happening in real life both they and you would have a point. But both of them are happening online. So it just seems like internet squabbling.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 04:29 AM
210

Because women's sexuality is beautiful and Men's sexuality is disgusting.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 12:17 AM
5

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17378847
/r/MensRights31/12/12 04:31 AM
14

This is not r/shitredditsays
/r/MensRights30/12/12 07:43 PM
-2

If some major political figure said this then sure, I would get pissed off. But on the internet, where everyone is anonymous, getting pissed off at what random people say is retarded. Just accept that there are sexists in the world and move on. Getting angry at them through your keyboard does nothing.
/r/MensRights30/12/12 04:42 AM
3

This is not r/shitredditsays
/r/MensRights30/12/12 04:39 AM
14

In this situation he can't come out ahead. If he wins he was too rough on a girl. If he loses he was beaten by a girl. If he refuses to play he is a misogynist. This is almost a microcosm of the situation that many young men are in today in America.
/r/MensRights30/12/12 04:37 AM
12

Welp, this is one of the stupider things I have seen.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 05:58 AM
3

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2011/09/did_feminist_groups_derail_the_stimulus_bill.html
/r/MensRights29/12/12 05:21 AM
1

If you don't frame it as Men's Rights and more as "here are some ways in which men are discriminated against" most people will be on your side. At least that has been my experience. It is the feminists' and sexists' efforts to slander Men's Rights Activism which make people shy away from the name.
/r/MensRights28/12/12 09:47 PM
21

It is satire. Probably from the feminismrising blog.
/r/MensRights28/12/12 07:31 AM
5

This kind of stuff terrifies me. Obama already directed the vast majority of the stimulus money to women even though men lost the vast majority of jobs in the recession. Now he is basically planning to destroy America's science education for a special interest group? Scary.
/r/MensRights28/12/12 06:16 AM
2

Look at the sidebar.
/r/MensRights28/12/12 02:40 AM
1

Yeah probably. But the Men's Rights Movement is still in it's infancy. Give it 10-20 years.
/r/MensRights27/12/12 06:00 AM
2

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1311004/Judges-ordered-mercy-women-criminals-deciding-sentences.html
/r/MensRights25/12/12 11:03 PM
11

Everyone involved is horrible.
/r/MensRights25/12/12 09:12 PM
0

I read the one about Harriet Tubman and it reads as though an elementary schoolchild wrote it. Really, really bad. And I still don't understand why Harriet Tubman was on a list of inventors.
/r/MensRights25/12/12 07:25 PM
2

No they didn't. But they caused the stimulus which was originally going mostly to male jobs to go to female jobs instead. The stimulus was designed to help those who suffered most during the recession(men) but because of feminist shrieking wound up going to further the cause of "gender equality" instead.
/r/MensRights25/12/12 06:52 PM
3

Seeing as the jobs for which his degree would have been useful were pretty close to the jobs originally in the stimulus I think it is pretty well supported.
/r/MensRights25/12/12 08:55 AM
9

I wonder how much of this ruling was caused by the fact that judges in Britain are ordered to treat female criminals less harshly?
/r/MensRights25/12/12 08:31 AM
2

That is true. But 99/100 that is not going to happen at a live debate. And it will happen with even less frequency online.
/r/MensRights25/12/12 04:33 AM
0

How would forming a group to fundraise for MRA issues not accomplish things?
/r/MensRights25/12/12 04:31 AM
2

No it doesn't. It is just meaningless online squabbling with no purpose other than to make yourself feel good. You want to make a real difference? Do things in real life.
/r/MensRights24/12/12 11:40 PM
6

I don't think you understood my request.
/r/MensRights24/12/12 11:40 PM
5

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2011/09/did_feminist_groups_derail_the_stimulus_bill.html Just google it if you want more information.
/r/MensRights24/12/12 11:39 PM
13

If you could direct me towards them I would be much obliged. And please remember that blaming feminists is much different than blaming women. And that you have to look at which posts are well supported by the community and which aren't.
/r/MensRights24/12/12 09:06 PM
5

I can't think of any MRAs who actually hate women. I can think of more than a few feminists who hate men.
/r/MensRights24/12/12 08:51 PM
9

I don't think it is too much of a stretch to say that the feminists' diverting of most of the stimulus money towards female jobs and away from male jobs (even though most jobs lost in the recession were male) had something to do with this.
/r/MensRights24/12/12 08:07 PM
9

What is easily the largest thing dragging the MRM down is feminist and sexist lies about the Men's Rights Movement. It is similar to how sexist reacted when women were fighting for suffrage except now people who claim to be for equality are doing it. The best thing to change our public face would be more activism. Much more real life activism. Get a real movement going. It is already clear that feminists are kind of scared of the MRM. They won't take the rise of a truly egalitarian movement lyin…
/r/MensRights24/12/12 06:06 AM
2

First of all, MRAs do not blindly side with men the same way feminists blindly side with women. Second of all, if you want anything other than ignorant answers to your question go ask some lawyers. Third of all, the fact that it is an all male court shouldn't matter. They are elected to represent the people and constantly bringing up their gender is no less sexist than constantly talking about how the vast, vast majority of scientists, engineers and important people in the world are men and ther…
/r/MensRights24/12/12 04:53 AM
1

This has nothing to do with Men's Rights.
/r/MensRights24/12/12 02:28 AM
10

This list is so stupid that it boggles my mind.
/r/MensRights24/12/12 12:42 AM
4

You think that arguing on reddit actually accomplishes something. Why?
/r/MensRights24/12/12 12:32 AM
5

This is not r/shitredditsays
/r/MensRights23/12/12 10:11 PM
10

That is the only popular sport I can think of where a female can compete with males so I guess it is only right that it should go to a horse. But having sportsmen of the year is stupid anyway and I have no idea why anyone should care.
/r/MensRights23/12/12 05:52 AM
3

You mean hitting women? I doubt it. Actually it was kind of refreshing to see an ad where the woman was the target of violence instead of every single other one where the man is.
/r/MensRights23/12/12 02:01 AM
-1

"Religion is an insult to human dignity. With or without it you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion." Steven Weinberg
/r/MensRights22/12/12 11:04 PM
5

This is not r/shitredditsays.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 11:02 PM
4

This is not /shitredditsays.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 10:10 PM
1

Who cares what this woman says? I mean, why should anyone take anything she says to be worth anything more than the oxygen she expelled saying it? I would trust my nextdoor neighbor(who happens to be a minimum wage worker at a fast food restaurant who doesn't have a high school diploma) as much if not more than this woman.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 09:28 PM
3

It is a tool to evaluate an almost entirely nonissue. And, like most feminist things, it stops far short of being a useful tool to evaluate gender.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 08:30 PM
8

Whoops. If you want to read it on that website just type the title into google. Otherwise here is the article: Results prove education system favours girls, yet we do nothing by: ANGELA SHANAHAN From: The Australian December 22, 2012 12:00AM IT is an experience I have relived eight times, the stomach-churning anticipation as we wait in agony for the tertiary entrance results. But today the boy, my last at school, is not like that. No one waits for the post, twisting their hanky and muttering Hai…
/r/MensRights22/12/12 08:28 AM
15

It bears noting that this despicable woman has a son.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 05:02 AM
4

You should also be made aware of the fact that feminists have repeatedly tried to take over the growing Men's Rights Movement to fit their own needs. Things like that make us wary of things like this.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 03:17 AM
3

How long have you been reading either?
/r/MensRights22/12/12 03:09 AM
8

r/mensrights has a lot of anti feminism stuff it is true. But what it doesn't have is a lot of anti woman stuff. r/feminism has less anti mensrights stuff but more anti man stuff.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 02:57 AM
8

Go read r/feminism for a while. You will very quickly see how silly your idea is.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 02:49 AM
7

Because we rely on statistics and you are talking about anecdotal evidence. Not everyone experiences everything we talk about. But if we look at the overarching society patterns start to emerge. Either that or you haven't been paying close enough attention.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 02:42 AM
4

What is wrong with you?
/r/MensRights20/12/12 07:31 PM
1

I just want to say that I fully support this. I also support banning and media that make a woman look bad in any way because that is sexism and is bad.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 08:16 AM
2

That is a stupid reason.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 07:27 PM
3

The criminals who are on that show should be punished to the fullest extent of the law. I don't really think putting them up on national tv does anyone any good.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 07:51 AM
13

You just keeping digging yourself deeper into your hole. If someone disagrees with you you should explain your position. let them explain theirs and try to come to an understanding. Not insult them. Especially the few people who agree with you on so many other issues. You seem to have really gone off the deep end. Can you truly not tell the difference between your friends and your "enemies"? I mean come on.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 12:58 AM
2

I admit I don't read his website but the only thing I have seen that was disagreeable from him was his naming of those stupid protesters at the University of Toronto. If you wouldn't mind could you link me to some of the more objectionable things he has said? Much obliged.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 10:07 PM
2

So long as I'm not paying for it there can be a rule that says only black women can be on teams in a sports league. But if I am paying for it then I wouldn't want any artificial separations. Everyone plays on the field with everyone else.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 09:36 PM
1

Relation to Men's Rights?
/r/MensRights14/12/12 07:17 AM
-3

Maybe if we had crazies who were an integral part of our movement your analogy would be valid. But we don't so I guess that is too bad. The two people I can think of who feminists constantly use to discredit MRAs are Marc Lepine and Anders Breivik, neither of whom I would consider MRAs. Not because they are embarrassing but because I(a nobody on the internet) have contributed more to the Men's Rights Movement than they did. If Valerie Solanas and Andrea Dworkin didn't have huge influences on fem…
/r/MensRights14/12/12 06:00 AM
-3

They don't subscribe to the major tenets of the Men's Rights Movement like equality. Feminists will look for anything that even remotely ties a horrible person to the Men's Rights Movement and say "He was definitely a Men's Rights Movement leader and this proves all of them are bad." If you have been reading Men's Rights websites for a while you should be aware that sexists will do almost anything to discredit the Men's Rights Movement and that includes lying. Also, feminists and sexists(often t…
/r/MensRights14/12/12 02:29 AM
2

This is not shitredditsays.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 02:25 AM
-2

The MRM doesn't have anyone close to the crazy of Andrea Dworkin or Valerie Solanas. The only people who are considered extremist MRAs weren't actually Men's Rights Activists. They are just lumped together with us to discredit us.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 12:00 AM
8

Start from the evidence and come to conclusions instead of starting from conclusions and finding "evidence". Actively work for real equality.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 10:01 PM
3

There are at least two things wrong with this. This has absolutely nothing to do with Men's Rights. You should do your own thinking. You shouldn't form your opinions and then ask people to support them for you, look at the evidence and draw your conclusions from it.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 07:33 AM
1

Why was this posted here?
/r/MensRights13/12/12 05:40 AM
2

I don't think very many of those points were valid at all.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 03:29 AM
5

This isn't really that different from the feminist who want to take rights away from men. This woman wants all the benefits of being equal(voting, equal pay etc.) and wants to keep all the benefits of being a woman(the stupidly named "benevolent sexism"). What about the men?
/r/MensRights13/12/12 03:28 AM
2

There are different subreddits devoted to feminism. Some are pretty good, some are not so much.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 04:27 AM
4

The thing about the higher GPA bothers me a bit. Men are found much more than women in STEM fields and these have much more difficult classes and lower GPAs.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 03:33 AM
8

It's Jessica Valenti. The facts don't matter, the only thing which does is that women are discriminated against in pretty much every way.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 10:31 PM
3

This is the best, short explanation I have heard. There are better, longer ones out there. Men's Rights Activists are fighting against anyone being discriminated against because of their gender. We care about (and many of us are actively working against) the subjugation of women in places like Saudi Arabia. Feminists do not see issues where men are discriminated against as worth fighting against. Many of them don't acknowledge that men can be discriminated against because they are male. Can you …
/r/MensRights11/12/12 04:29 AM
1

No it really isn't biological as far as we know. The lifespan difference can almost entirely be explained by differences in healthcare spending and different cultural attitudes.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 05:41 PM
0

Why do you feel the need to justify yourself to random people on the internet?
/r/MensRights10/12/12 05:41 AM
1

It does? I thought that violated the spirit of the Olympics. Aren't they all supposed to be amateurs? Well that sucks.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 05:37 AM
1

Doesn't matter in the slightest to me so long as the taxpayers aren't paying for it.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 04:48 AM
2

I see. First of all the lifespan is probably not biological. It is more likely to come from the vast differences in healthcare spending. This is shown by the increase in the difference in life expectancies in the 20th century. Second of all, there are many more people who will vote for a woman just because she is a woman then people who will vote for a man just because he is a man. Men don't really have any cultural benefits that even come close to what women have. And that's not even touching t…
/r/MensRights10/12/12 04:10 AM
2

Your war analogy is hyperbolic to say the least. Feminists are mostly good people who care about equality. They have just been told some wrong things. If we can show them the right facts then maybe they will be on our side. Feminism is not the enemy. Misandry is the enemy and feminism happens to cause some of it.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 04:07 AM
11

Most of the perks men have are biological. Men are stronger, faster, bigger and if they want to have children they are not the ones who have to carry the child and give birth to it.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 12:28 AM
3

I think that some courtesy and respect is called for at least from people on the same side. And we aren't trying to convince feminists, we are trying to convince people who are on the fence. If they see angry feminists and calm MRAs what will they think? If they see angry feminists and MRAs who are trying to get those feminists personal information to post publicly what are they going to think?
/r/MensRights09/12/12 06:37 PM
26

It's satire.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 06:16 AM
3

I was specifically referencing her asking the people she contacted to provide the information about games which would fit her project.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 03:37 AM
1

Unless I ask for it any abuse towards me in a relationship is domestic violence. I wouldn't dump them on the spot but would make it a requirement for our continued relationship that they get help.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 01:03 AM
3

You aren't too bright are you?
/r/MensRights08/12/12 09:43 PM
8

I am all for this but they seem to be missing half of the picture. Why is there no analyzing of male roles on tv and in film?
/r/MensRights08/12/12 09:43 PM
1

Just link to Wired intead.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 09:41 PM
48

First of all, formatting and proper grammar. Please. Second of all, pretty much everyone here who read your post is already on your side. These aren't the people who assaulted you with box cutters, these are people who watched your videos about it with disgust and empathized with you. Know your audience. Different approaches for different people. Furthermore you should realize who you are trying to convince in a public forum. The people you are talking about already have their minds made up but …
/r/MensRights08/12/12 05:28 AM
39

Yup, that's how you win friends. By insulting them. I don't really think it should matter what your message is, your message of delivery needs some work.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 04:38 AM
0

I should mention that the comments I specifically mentioned were ones I heard about bronies, not about my umbrella. I am finding more and more feminists who are like you(i.e. not sexist). I just wish they were more vocal.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 01:45 AM
5

Whether you agree or disagree with this it seems silly to ignore what people will think. And people will think the worst. MRAs have to be squeaky clean and stuff like this doesn't help.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 01:27 AM
1

Sidebar.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 12:48 AM
3

I see. I didn't notice that. Thanks for pointing it out.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 11:50 PM
1

I can't give you any links (and random people shaming people on the internet isn't evidence of a widespread phenomenon) but in my personal experience feminist women shame men who go outside the gender binary a LOT. For instance, I have a polka dot umbrella. I like polka dots. I am also a man. Who were the only people to comment on my umbrella? Feminists. There are little comments like "what a nerd" and "he'll have a lot of trouble getting laid" which get thrown around a lot as well. Just spend t…
/r/MensRights07/12/12 11:49 PM
2

I thought that thinkprogress.org was a general liberal site, not a solely LGBT one. Also, I was commenting on how the article presented the news, not the actual news itself when I was talking about the LGBT stuff.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 11:36 PM
16

This is good. Prison rape is a huge problem. But the article focuses on LGBT people when they make up such a small percentage of people in prison and people raped in prison.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 10:23 PM
2

Who cares? There are sexists all over the internet and if you spend more time on r/twoxchromosomes you will see that they are far from being the worst. They are actually pretty good on most issues.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 07:17 PM
2

I have no idea but it seems like a reasonable guess. Feminists don't exactly have the best history in this regard. Hugo Schwyzer recently tweeted about how Mr. Lepine was some sort of Men's Rights hero and I have been seeing a not insignificant number of articles claiming the same thing.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 07:14 PM
2

This is not r/shitredditsays
/r/MensRights07/12/12 06:42 PM
5

This is stupid. Pretty sure no one in the Men's Rights Movement thinks what Mr. Lepine did was good. It is just something feminists do to discredit people fighting for real equality.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 06:11 PM
6

I'm not going to answer this but I think you are looking at this the wrong way. Simply put, If you think pornography is degrading to women then you shouldn't watch it. Otherwise you are a bad person. We shouldn't come up with our position then back it up with facts. We should look at the facts and base our position off of that.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 08:21 AM
13

I don't think many MRAs will look down upon you for liking a kids show. Most of them don't care what you like so long as it is legal/doesn't hurt anyone else. In my experience it is mostly feminists who start the shaming of people who like that show.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 07:13 AM
2

But the issues are very different. And I would say that the degree of discrimination each gender faces in developed countries is very different. Feminists focus on getting equal pay for different work. MRAs focus on preventing the mutilation of babies.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 11:41 PM
3

First of all, why should we care about what this person has to say? She doesn't seem to have any qualifications to speak on this matter. Second of all, almost all of what she has to say is pure gibberish. "How is man to recognize his full self, his full power through the eye’s of an incomplete woman? The woman who has been stripped of Goddess recognition" "I am sure the men, who restructured our societies from cultures that honored woman, " Not only gibberish but incredibly ignorant as well. It …
/r/MensRights06/12/12 11:39 PM
0

First of all you have to realize that a ton of discrimination that was common even 50 years ago just doesn't exist anymore. If we go back even further the changes which have been made look better and better. So it isn't a pendulum like you describe it. It is more like a pendulum that loses most of it's swing each time it goes around. It will eventually stop at 0. A large part of the reason that Men's Rights Acitivists don't fight for women's rights is because feminists have all the power. It wou…
/r/MensRights06/12/12 11:06 PM
-37

No, no one here did it, that is just gibberish. You seem to really care a lot about this. That is good even though I don't quite understand it. How are you going to get the most mileage out of it?
/r/MensRights06/12/12 10:42 PM
4

Look at the sidebar. Can you think of any way white people are discriminated against(in America) which comes even close to some of the ways men are discriminated against? I think feminism did some wonderful things for society. I support half of the population having equality over no one. Men's Rights is necessary(as feminism was and still is in some parts of the world) because a certain subgroup of people is still discriminated against.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 10:40 PM
2

Things like this make me wish Hitchens was still writing for Salon.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 02:33 AM
6

This is not r/shitredditsays.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 12:17 AM
7

How did you respond? People are sexist all the time. What would make me care about this would be someone actually standing up to it.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 12:02 AM
1

National defense is rationed. If it weren't we would be spending much, much more than our already bloated defense budget currently is. Part of the reason for having a government is to protect the weak and helpless. And there isn't really any way to do that other than to take something about from the strong in order to give it to the weak. In pretty much every other area of public good(schools, policemen, firemen etc) there is no controversy about this. Why is there then this debate about free pu…
/r/MensRights05/12/12 10:28 PM
4

If you posted more things like this I might actually take up reading that website. But you have a long way to go.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 10:22 PM
4

This is just stupid.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 08:04 PM
5

I think this kinda goes over the top. These people are stupid college kids.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 06:12 PM
1

What rights do people have that aren't rationed?
/r/MensRights05/12/12 06:08 PM
0

This question is kind of silly. Every crime happens in different circumstances to different people with different results. And if you really want women's opinions on this you should ask r/twoxchromosomes. But I think in many circumstances rape is worse than physical assault but not as bad as permanent, disfiguring injury or death. Edit: This is a related video from Reginal D Hunter. Related bit is at 3:35 but you should watch the entire thing. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N5bfHJKgBkA And anyo…
/r/MensRights05/12/12 07:25 AM
3

That guy is an idiot. Of course he is going to say stupid, bigoted shit. That's not exactly newsworthy.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 05:56 AM
11

Men are less likely to report it.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 05:53 AM
2

Prostitution is one of those things I am morally opposed to but am for legalizing. Like drugs. Just because you disagree with it doesn't mean you get the right to force your opinion on other people.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 05:24 AM
1

If you are correct about treating goods as rights why hasn't the cost of policemen or firemen ran amuck? The goal is not to make healthcare affordable for the most number of people. The goal is to give everyone who needs it free healthcare. I think that goal outweighs the negatives you mention. Also I should mention that we are moving very quickly outside of my comfort and knowledge zone. I also think that this talk about wastefulness and bureaucracy is besides the point of giving everyone free …
/r/MensRights05/12/12 05:20 AM
5

No it isn't. I couldn't care less if random people on the internet disagree with me. If you find prominent feminists or politicians saying sexist things please post them here. But people on the internet are stupid and bigoted and focusing on that at best distracts from real activism and progress.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 05:17 AM
2

Sidebar.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 05:15 AM
32

Because male sexuality is disgusting and female sexuality is beautiful.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 04:26 AM
1

The ridiculous insurance situation in America already wastes a disgusting amount of resources as it is. There are several compelling arguments that government sponsored healthcare will streamline things. Even if it didn't I would still say it would be a necessary price to pay to make sure everyone got the healthcare they need. What is the point of your position? It seems you are saying that having a simple payer system would be worse because it would make things more wasteful and allow people wh…
/r/MensRights05/12/12 04:03 AM
1

Well I think that there shouldn't be a price. But if there is one health insurance is so necessary that people who can't afford it shouldn't have to pay even though people who can do.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 03:45 AM
1

That is true but I think it is pretty obvious that some things should be free to those who can't pay for them.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 03:37 AM
15

This is not r/shitredditsays
/r/MensRights05/12/12 03:30 AM
4

I think the random "this woman on facebook did something sexist" posts are silly but when major feminist say something sexist it is important to post here. A part of Men's Rights is knowledge of the opposition to men being equal with women and I think that is why those posts are here.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 12:25 AM
2

This is not r/shitredditsays
/r/MensRights04/12/12 11:41 PM
1

Necessities don't exist? Or free health insurance doesn't exist? If it is the latter I was thinking more of government paid health insurance.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 09:39 PM
1

This is not SRS.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 09:25 AM
19

"This report argues that there needs to be a shift in thinking from ‘men and boys as part of the problem’ to ‘men and boys as part of the solution’." This kind of thinking terrifies me. They need to switch from "men and boys are part of the problem" to "men and boys as people too". I am for a lot of what these people are for: equal rights and schools for women, ending domestic violence etc. but this sexist report frightens me.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 08:42 AM
1

I really don't like her snarky attitude or the labeling of people who write things she doesn't agree with as villains but I pretty much agree with the points she made.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 07:47 AM
2

Let's not make this SRS.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 05:27 AM
0

Feminists only really care about ending female gender roles. And then women being able to pick and choose which gender roles they want. I have a question for you: Why is it so much more acceptable for women to wear pants than a man to wear a skirt?
/r/MensRights04/12/12 05:21 AM
1

The only problem is that I haven't seen a real "radical masculinist" say anything close to the things on the right side of the venn diagram. True misogynists do exist but I think they are pretty far away from Men's Rights Activists. In my experience they want to go back to traditional gender roles which is something most MRAs are against. And the worst misogynists I have ever heard of can't even come close in their sexism to people like Valerie Solanas or other radical feminists.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 05:15 AM
2

I think that commercial was awesome. If my husband(or wife) decided to buy something as large as a car without consulting me that would cause major problems. But this is a fantasy. It is fantastic.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 05:12 AM
10

This is actually pretty cool. Cooking is an important skill that pretty much everyone should learn. This is incredibly, incredibly minor but still a step in the right direction.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 05:09 AM
1

When I see those I make much the same comment.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 05:02 AM
6

That purple suit. Pimpin'
/r/MensRights04/12/12 04:56 AM
2

Posts like this make us look like r/shitredditsays.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 04:43 AM
5

If it is a necessity(as I believe health insurance is) then it should be illegal to charge different people different amounts. In fact, I think it should be free. In some areas driving a car is also necessary and should therefore cost the same for both genders. One of the government's jobs is to protect people. Part of that is making sure they are treated equally under the law. I have no problem with the government making sure that people's necessary insurance isn't sexist. But if you read the a…
/r/MensRights04/12/12 03:33 AM
3

Maybe it is just because I am in college but I have experienced it mostly the other way. Women's voices are privileged over Men's because they bring "diversity" to the discussion. Look at how many special scholarships and job opportunities are for women only. It is true that sometimes women's voices get disregarded because they are women. But that in no way justifies disregarding Men's voices or privileging women's voices over Men's voices.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 11:10 PM
1

If I recall correctly corrective rape has happened only in third world countries where in many cases gay people(mostly men if I recall correctly) getting murdered for being gay seems to be a bigger issue.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 08:38 PM
1

I didn't mean that gay males are immune from mutilation. I was saying that the mutilation that all males are potential victims of is more important in my eyes than fighting for equality in marriage.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 08:37 PM
1

I just looked up it and you are partially right. In most games the protagonist is 10 or 11 but in Black and White the protagonist is 16. I feel much better about a 16 year old going off by himself than a 10 year old.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 08:35 PM
15

So the answer to discrimination is more discrimination? I have had my opinion disregarded because I am a male and that in no way makes the times when women's voices get disregarded because they are female less discriminatory. And vice versa.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 07:50 PM
1

Economic abuse? Feminists are doing the exact same thing they did to rape to domestic violence. They are making the terms almost meaningless. How is not giving my wife $20 to get her nails done the same as hitting her?
/r/MensRights03/12/12 07:37 PM
8

I am beginning to realize more and more that the patriarchy is just one big conspiracy theory. A group of people secretly controlling the world in the shadows to make it worse for certain people they don't like. You would have more luck convincing moon hoaxers that there is actually a moon.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 07:06 PM
4

I was a feminist for most of the years I was aware of gender issues. I wouldn't join feminism if they started fighting for Men's Rights because that is silly. I don't think you can really "join" feminism. I would join a feminist group if they started fighting for the Men's Rights I am fighting for.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 02:43 AM
2

What is this?
/r/MensRights03/12/12 12:38 AM
35

This will become more and more common as the Men's Rights Movement grows. They are co-opting issues to try to work against their public image of man- haters.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 12:37 AM
-14

Gay Men's Rights is a very small part of Men's Rights. Yeah it sucks that they can't get married but that really can't compare to having your genitals mutilated with no anesthetic or dying 5 years earlier. But I really don't think we should fight at all for gay women. Compared to gay men they have it really, really easy.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 09:50 PM
4

I honestly can't tell if this is satire or not.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 10:17 AM
1

If I recall correctly the protagonist in those games is 10. That might have factored in. But I recently made a reference to a man by saying "her" and no one really cared.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 10:12 AM
5

Schroedinger's rapist can be applied to pretty much anything. This banana I'm eating is Schroedinger's food poisoning. The apartment I am living in is Schroedinger's missile target. It is just gibberish.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 09:16 AM
8

I need feminism because it is easier to see things in black and white that try to fight for real equality.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 07:50 AM
6

Talk to them about this sexism. If they refuse to fix it stop patronizing that establishment.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 07:45 AM
-1

If I hear it in real life I do call it out. But what on earth does bringing attention to anonymous people saying stupid things on the internet do?
/r/MensRights02/12/12 12:50 AM
2

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iARHCxAMAO0&feature=plcp
/r/MensRights02/12/12 12:44 AM
-3

Eh, stupid people on the internet are stupid. It seems kind of silly to get outraged whenever someone on the internet says something bigoted.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 12:39 AM
3

What I see are mostly people correcting the purposely misrepresentation of what this man is saying.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 11:02 PM
11

Most of these are incredibly stupid but one stood out at me: I need feminism because I don't know how to cook and I don't want to. Cooking is a basic skill that everyone, no matter what race, religion or gender you are, should have. This whole thing is an embarrassment to people fighting for real equality.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 11:01 PM
20

If gender based violence is violence which disproportionately affects one gender than isn't nearly every single crime gender based violence against men?
/r/MensRights01/12/12 09:49 PM
5

Feminists want equality when it suits them and special privileges when it doesn't.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 09:48 PM
5

Saying one stupid thing(if it was truly stupid) does not invalidate a person's entire viewpoint nor should it be used to physically prevent them from speaking.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 09:10 PM
1

I only posted what I saw on twitter, If you go to twitter and use the appropriate hashtags you should be able to find things.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 09:03 PM
2

Thanks, I missed that. If you would like to watch a better video of the event I submitted one a little while ago or I can link it here.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 09:02 PM
1

If you talk to feminists one on one you mostly get reasonable people. If you talk to them in a group you get this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TLyRvmrdsJI
/r/MensRights01/12/12 12:42 PM
17

This woman claims to have a graduate degree. If I were her I would be looking to get my money back.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 12:30 PM
5

Pretty much no sources. What I have come to expect from feminists.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 06:39 AM
119

Another big thing that went down was that they condemned Canada's role in the war of 1812. Am I totally off base here or are these people beyond being irrelevant?
/r/MensRights01/12/12 03:55 AM
16

Two things: MRAs don't blame women for the problems men have in society. We do blame feminists for some of the problems(in my mind too many) but feminists is a category which is very distinct from women. Also, please look at the sidebar. Much of what you want to know will be found there.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 03:10 AM
2

You really need to do some more research on gender roles. Also, even if gender roles are biological(the ones you specifically mention cannot, at this moment, be proved to be so) that doesn't make them not sexist. To be totally honest, I have no problem with gender roles. If you want to pay for someone else's dinner because they are a women, or they are white or whatever, I don't care. It is when it is enforced or expected that it bothers me. Any woman who expects me to pay for her dinner won't b…
/r/MensRights01/12/12 01:57 AM
11

Why post things by that woman? You already know what it is going to say: "Woman good, man bad anyone who disagrees is the evilest of evil, a misogynist."
/r/MensRights30/11/12 07:26 PM
1

Not having respect for someone is quite a bit different than this.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 07:16 PM
-1

You aren't right in the head. You need to take a few steps back and calm down.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 02:35 AM
4

Maybe if the good men project had good articles I would read it. And don't expect anyone to take you seriously when you call Jessica Valenti a respected writer.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 02:31 AM
7

It's by that asshat Michael Kimmel. I would expect nothing less from such an outstanding example of male feminism.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 12:42 AM
2

In theory it sounds great but I went over and read NOW's paperwork on it and it is clear that the ERA is not about equality, only benefits for women. Title IX supposedly protects both boys and girls. Yet how many female centered activities have been cut to make way for boys(who are failing at every level of school)?
/r/MensRights29/11/12 11:58 PM
1

Being a stupid cunt doesn't mean she deserves this.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 11:31 PM
1

This is stupid. Feminists do overestimate the number of women who have been raped but they aren't claiming to be the victims of some crime because they are bored.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 11:01 PM
2

Because she made some stupid remarks she deserves to have painful surgery? That is sick.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 10:59 PM
5

Oh my god, I never realized that on twitter, where anyone can post pretty much anything they want, some people are idiots. Oh the humanity!
/r/MensRights29/11/12 07:27 PM
2

It is actually a really interesting field of study. Did you know that most genotypically normal women have most of one of their X chromosomes inactivated? So if you stretch the definition enough they could join two!
/r/MensRights29/11/12 08:26 AM
2

Your title is stupid. People with one X chromosome and no others are mostly phenotypically female. What makes men different isn't the absence of one of the X chromosomes it is the presence of a Y chromosome.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 05:05 AM
10

Wow, it would be really hard for me to care less about this!
/r/MensRights28/11/12 11:30 PM
7

It's Amanda Marcotte. 'nough said.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 06:54 PM
1

You are really looking far too much into this.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 08:26 PM
1

Please explain how what I said makes it sound as though I hate women.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 05:13 PM
3

This is kind of silly.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 05:09 PM
0

Proper punctuation.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 08:25 AM
1

I never said anything about feminists and there is no possible way what I said could be interpreted by a reasonable person as me hating women.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 08:12 AM
-1

You need to ask yourself what you are trying to accomplish? Will arguing with these people really do anything?
/r/MensRights25/11/12 01:56 AM
3

The importance is nothing. It is for meaningless internet points.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 04:28 AM
11

Cheezus Crackers, feminists are really scraping the bottom of the barrel for things to be pissed off about.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 02:34 AM
1

Oh, darn. Well, talk to someone in real life and you will accomplish more.
/r/MensRights23/11/12 10:17 PM
31

Um, isn't it obvious? The victim is a man and the perpetrator is a woman.
/r/MensRights23/11/12 10:06 PM
0

Who cares? These are anonymous people on the internet What you need to is talk to people in real life. Does your university have a Title IX officer? Talk to him instead.
/r/MensRights23/11/12 08:53 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter