This post may be pretty long, but I think it's important that I go into detail in order for people to fully understand the context, and not misinterpret me. So if this post is too long for you, you don't have to read it. This is related to men's rights and double standards against men from government policy.

I'll start this off by saying I'm not here to promote labour. I'll be honest and admit that I did vote labour last election, but I didn't do it enthusiastically. It was such an unenthusiastic vote that I was actually happy that they didn't win even though I voted for them, because I felt like it was ultimately going to be just as bad, regardless of wether conservatives or labour got in.

I just felt like Corbyn came across as a less cruel person than his opposition from what I'd heard from him, although I really didn't trust the man at all, and I also strongly disagreed with many of the things he said openly anyway, I just felt like I agreed with conservatives even less, and some of the things that Corbyn said I did think were pretty brave, and actually encouraged me to have the confidence to state some opinions that I didn't feel comfortable stating previously. Ultimately though I was not in full support, of either party or candidate, and next election I'll be surprised if I even bother voting at all judging by how politics in this country is looking at the minute.

I have criticized labour, and I will continue to, however I feel on this forum it is important that I put an emphasis on criticising the conservative party, because I feel like some people have been decieved into viewing this party as pro mens rights.

I'm just here to give evidence of child abuser defending misandrist policy, that has been produced with these people in power, and point out that if these people had been more honest about their policy during the last election, that in my opinion much less people would have voted for them, and much less people would be reffering to them as "pro mens rights / equality".

When Johnson was running for pm, one of his big claims that he used to try to convince the public into for voting for him was that he was going to put people who kill children in prison for "life" -

https://www.politicshome.com/news/article/boris-johnson-vows-sentencing-crackdown-for-child-killers-as-number-10-relaunches-domestic-agenda

And as you can you can see, someone in these articles even called for Johnson to get a handle on tougher sentencing -

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-kent-49370253#:~:text=A%20mother%20who%20drowned%20her,father%20Steven%20Ford%20left%20her

https://www.kentonline.co.uk/thanet/news/she-wants-me-to-suffer-she-has-no-remorse-212422/

Eventually, after the election, we get this - 

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/police-crime-sentencing-and-courts-bill-2021-equality-statements/changes-to-release-and-sentencing-policy-governing-serious-and-dangerous-offenders-equalities-impact-assessment#policy-d-ensure-whole-life-orders-are-the-sentencing-starting-point-for-premeditated-murder-of-a-child

straight out of a gov website itself. Now this is unlikely to have been read by too many people in my opinion, and the child abuser defending misandrist policy is sandwiched between some massive walls of text, so I certainly doubt that as many people who heard Johnson's claims of putting people in prison for "life" who kill children will read this entire policy statement.

Let me narrow it down for you - go to policy D, and read the last paragraph (just under where it says equality considerations), then go to policy E, and read that last paragraph also, you'll see a very interesting display, a combination of defense of female child killers, followed in the very next section by a misandrist attack on majority male offenders, making the exact same point in reverse during both sections. So next time someone tries to act as if the conservatives are "good for mens rights" remember what you have read from this policy that was produced while they are in power.

So basically, if Johnson had instead come out and said during his pre election speech "I will put people who kill children in prison for life, but by the way I'll make sure that women have a special law in place that can get them a massively reduced sentence if they commit this crime, and give judges the ability, backed by government policy, to sentence women more leniently for killing children" I wonder how many people would have voted for conservatives then.

The point of the matter is, in my opinion the government of this country only gets away with misandry, when they do it quietly, in a sly, dictatorial manner. Which is why I'm making this post, and pointing out the little things, that the misandrist media, conveniently for them and the misandrist government, keep out of frequently, if ever, highlighting in the headlines. They've got plenty of time to type out article after article about prince Andrew, or a politician crossing her legs, or an MP watching adult content in parliament, but seemingly very little time, to write articles about the government of England, producing misandrist, discriminatory, child abuser in the most extreme form, defending policy.

After all of this big public display of saying that child killers will get "life" sentences under conservatives, check out the length of this sentence (that was handed out while conservatives are in power)

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9826239/Care-worker-mother-24-spared-jail-killing-newborn-crushing-skull.html

So I'm just trying to raise some public awareness, because I'd like to live in a country, where the public is a bit better informed about the true nature of who they are voting for.

There is more I want to say, a few more points I want to make, but I think I'm just about reaching the post length limit. So if anyone has a question, an agreement, or an argument, please ask it in the comments, and if relevant to the question or statement, I will try to fit my additional points into my response, granted most of my additional points I have discussed on this subreddit before, on comments on other posts.

I hope this post can enlighten some people, because I think the audience of this subreddit will be interested in this information if they are given the opportunity to read it. I certainly don't think that the general public are going to have this information highlighted to them by the mainstream misandrist media, so hopefully I can help point this out to some of the people on this subreddit at the very least.