NOW, you can cry me a river . . .

surfnsound · 2011-07-19T02:15:47+00:00

So a guy was falsely accused of sexual assault, was never convicted, and yet that can be used as evidence. A women tells a friend "I'll fuck anything with a dick" before pulling a train of like 20 guys and that's not allowed to be mentioned?

BolshevikMuppet · 2011-07-19T15:11:20+00:00

While I agree everyone should be concerned with 413, 414, and 415, your presentation of the issue is petulant at best.

I'll also note, funny enough, that you choose to single out 413, and ignore the same problem that exists in 414. Why the distinction?

Kuonji · 2011-07-18T21:40:13+00:00

And of course the RAINN president has to chime in there. They are the poster child organization for the quote "There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics."

NUMBERS2357 · 2011-07-18T23:07:48+00:00

WRT to the "chilling effect" thing, it seems that if you're worried about that, a good idea would be to ask what you can do to alleviate the effect, or stop it from happening in the future. One thing might be to not make such a big hoopla when a famous person is arrested for rape, if you're not gonna have a good enough case against him to convict. Nobody seems to suggest that, but I bet someone will (and people have) suggest removing presumption of innocence, or some other unconstitutional shit.

Title	NOW, you can cry me a river . . .
Author	PierceHarlan
Upvotes	4
Comments	9
Date	July 18, 2011 7:48 PM UTC (15 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/it3ns/now_you_can_cry_me_a_river/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/now-you-can-cry-me-a-river.1037111 https://theredarchive.com/post/1037111

Comments