Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.
It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.
I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.
Support the archive
[+]DuckHorseDuck1 points [recovered] (5 children) | Copy Link
999 men were asked questions concerning their circumcision status, their satisfaction with it, and a series of 10 true or false questions about circumcision and the foreskin. The questions were approved by two outside experts, one pro- and the other anti-circumcision, as having only one objectively correct answer.
Questions included:
The most, actually.
None do.
At birth, the foreskin is fused to the glans. Attempting to retract would be painful and harmful.
Maybe 1% would require it.
Good old John Harvey Kellogg.
For circumcised men, as the proportion of false beliefs increased, so did their degree of satisfaction with their circumcised state. That is to say, the less someone knows about the foreskin, the happier they are to not have one.
[–]KMKEEPS 4 points5 points6 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]_Mellex_ 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]KMKEEPS 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]_Mellex_ 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Mackeroy 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link