~ archived since 2018 ~

Testosterone Administration Induces A Red Shift in Democrats

antifeminist3

November 25, 2022

13 upvotes

/r/MensRights

https://www.openicpsr.org/openicpsr/project/155441/version/V1/view

Archived from /r/MensRights

r/MensRights is a community advocating for the social and legal equality of men and boys since 2008.

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill subreddits and blogs. This page is our copy of the original post.

/r/MensRights archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB

Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Post Information

Title	Testosterone Administration Induces A Red Shift in Democrats
Author	antifeminist3
Upvotes	13
Comments	9
Date	November 25, 2022 2:29 AM UTC (3 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/z41hjh/testosterone_administration_induces_a_red_shift/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/testosterone-administration-induces-a-red-shift-in.1144460 https://theredarchive.com/post/1144460

Comments

[–]rm-rd 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]ArgKyckling 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]antifeminist3[S] 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]ArgKyckling 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Confident_Notice975 -4 points-3 points-2 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[–]antifeminist31 points 3 years ago* [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]F-U-Political-Humor 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

First, what does this post have to do with Men’s rights?

Second, how is this self publishing research blatantly suggesting Democrats have less testosterone accurate, when in 2011 political affiliation after a president has already served a term can shift? It’s a well known fact people start blaming and showing dissatisfaction after Republicans leave a mess for a Democratic president to clean up, then make it impossible for anything to get done on their second term. Almost all presidents in history have the highest approval rating when they first get elected and rarely get higher on second term.

Kind of like how Biden has no control of how gas prices go up after all the bs Trump caused so Republicans put their cute little “I did that” stickers. However, where are the “I did that” stickers when unemployment hit an all time low and jobs created was at it’s peak since the 80’s?

That being said, to suggest people with higher testosterone are more peaceful is also pretty idiotic 😂 Good one, OP! Here’s a fun fact, all large cities and states with higher education are blue. Maybe let that sink in before flexing over a research with fluctuating political candidates. 😂

[–]antifeminist31 points 3 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]F-U-Political-Humor 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

“To provide scientific evidence countering feminists' narrative that gender is a social construct and to provide evidence contradicting 'there is no difference between men and women'”

What have you been smoking? The description does not even mention women, women are not even a focus on this study. It had nothing to do with any narrative about gender being a social construct or ANY disparity in men and women. It was a study on men and their political preference in correlation to their testosterone levels. So you’re overreaching, you basically posted this here because it’s about men but has nothing to do with men’s rights.

“The study does not claim Democrats have lower testosterone. The study showed that weakly affiliated Democrats with lower testosterone become more right wing with supplement…”

Yeah, forgive me but has the meaning of English changed in the last couple of days? This study clearly insinuates that democrats shift to republican sentiment the more testosterone they have, even if they are just with, “supplements”.

The study even has the audacity to claim that, “weakly affiliated Democrats had 19% higher basal testosterone than those who identified strongly with the party”. Suggesting the higher your testosterone the more right winged you are. Which is fucking hilarious and illogical, a vast majority of conservatives are fat out of shape red necks with very low testosterone, so there’s that.

https://www.salon.com/2014/04/18/10_most_obese_states_in_america_and_the_right_wing_policies_that_enable_them_partner/

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-human-beast/202011/why-red-states-suffer-greater-obesity?amp

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3955331/

Maybe your reading comprehension is faulty.