For example, the ethics of the technology itself and how in the hands of a certain individual/ individuals could use it for ulterior/ overt motives to progress/ regress society.

Using your own sperm for the fertilisation process, from certain perspectives this could very well seem like vanity; however, if gene editing becomes a factor you can practically create your own baby which would no doubt come with the benefit of no detrimental health concerns (speaking solely in terms of hereditary, genetic traits) and something originally considered vanity would now be both a healthy mix of vanity and selflessness by virtue of omitting the chronic conditions.

In saying that, vanity would once again be brought to light if gene editing was being used to impart "desirable" or "undesirable" traits. The question of how much individuals should be allowed to modify in this process is another thing to consider.

It goes without saying that the research of this nature could very well require many more centuries to flesh out the theoretical foundations of this scientific field before any practical elements are even considered or even deemed ethical for humans.

I'm a layman so take this with a heaping of salt but the discussion surrounding artificial human is interesting, more so on the conceptualisation side of it and the ethical considerations.