Biggest complaint so far as been that the red pill ideas (let's be honest, there are no blue pill ideas; it envelopes everything and anything that disagrees with something a self identified red piller states) aren't falsifiable because they aren't in any way codified. Even worse, a lot of the things talked about in TRP aren't really part of the model; they either explanations for why certaint tenets exist (evo psych, usually), applications of the red pill model (spinning plates, the 3:2 ratio, text game, pickup game, LTR game), or implications of the red pill model (decline of civilization, class warfare, misogyny/misandry)

What I'd propose is a weekly core tenet post from a TRP mod on a subject agreed and reviewed before posting by the other TRP mods, expressing another core tenet that introduces a single aspect, and any supporting evidence for that proposition including the previous passed tenets.

Floor is open in that thread for discussion from any and all sides, which can be edited by the submitting TRP mod for six days. TBP mods can vote to approve or disapprove the tenet, on the seventh day, which at the end a purplepill mod declares the tenet approved or disapproved based on the simple majority of TBP mod votes, with zero votes being a disapprove and a tie otherwise going to red pill (you have >60 mods. Split down the middle should be more than enough).

On one hand, it allows the red pill to step by step keep the debate focused on a particular aspect without it going everywhere. It will give the detractors a specific aspect to approve or disapprove, and in the event one is found that is disapproved, we're done; if red pill starts with the wider, overlying aspects, and narrows it down over the course of time, we'll know the root source of disagreement between the two sides and the argument will reach stasis. The weekly process can continue if desired, but if those further tenets are based on precepts not recognized, it could easily be considered moot. It will give those who follow us a chance to see that we disagree on, say, 'Women and men have different sexual strategies' rather than the 'red pillers are misogynists' hyperbole. It will also help give both sides a clear indication of the red pill model, which would be beneficial to everyone.

Opinions? Because without a recognized debate model agreed upon, we're not going anywhere.