Hey I ain’t defending roman catholicism. Just saying that isn't it very similar to eastern orthodox though? ( I think technically in the nitty gritty they are both the same church but went through a schism).

Anyhoo I noticed a lot of folk I know IRL from apalachia grew up evangelical but become eastern orthodox. Their tends to be a bias in the south against catholics (I FULLY understand especially after the abuse scandals)

But one theory I heard is that Protestantism does not talk about apostolic succession/church hierarchy as often while Catholicism does. However due to the bias in the south it seems that by being eastern orthodox you fulfill those but you are not REALLY roman catholic thus it is ok. Ie an “indirect way” to be catholic and support apostolic succession/hierarchy.

Ie how Medeval chrisrtians would “indirectly” accept loans if a jew lent them money rather than a fellow Christian. (that is how the jewish banker stereotype started)

-OBJECTIVELY if you want a more hierarchal form of christianity wouldn’t it simply make more sense to cut out the middle man and just be catholic despite the problems of the current Catholic Church?

(YES! Catholicism is paganism but Russian orthodox is not much better and adopts pagan rituals from the byzantine. If you are going to want apostolic succession/church hierarchy OBJECTIVELY why not just be catholic?

-protestant to orthodox converts would you mind explaining this phenomena I might be missing something thank you :) (Sorry if I am being offensive)