Don't you think the red pill wives' ideology and the red pill ideology bear contradictions in achieving the most convenient mating strategy?

For instance, females enter their smv (sexual market value) early in life (14-16) whilst their male counterparts reach this stage by the time they're in their 30s. I've read posts from alpha widows who claim to no longer bear options on the smp (sexual market place) compared to their prime years (16-23). The manosphere, however, stresses the frustration of boys/men in their teens and early 20s who feel neglected by their female counter parts within their appropriate age. They feel the need to commit to their girlfriends, on a long term basis, only for their proposal to be declined. When men enter their smv, in their 30s, they no longer find these girls (alpha widows) attractive since a man's attraction is greatly found on a woman's physical appearance. This article (http://www.therulesrevisited.com/2012/12/female-game-for-girls-in-their-20s.html) discourages women to date men 8 years their elder.

Now, women are discouraged to date significantly older men whilst men want, and are advised, to date younger women who are unavailable. Could there be a compromise that could better both the male and female mating strategy?