TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • A Voice for Men
    • Dalrock
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Heartiste
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • Return of Kings
    • The Power Moves
    • The Rational Male
    • The Spearhead
    • Other

      • Alpha Game
      • Archwinger
      • Artful Prudence
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • Illimitable Men
      • In Mala Fide
      • Justice for Men and Boys
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • KillToParty
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • Mensactivism
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Rian Stone
      • RooshV
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Woujo
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Support

Agree & Amplify is essentially Sarcasm?

[deleted]

May 29, 2014
5 upvotes
/r/TheRedPill
Archived from /r/TheRedPill

r/TheRedPill is a subreddit for discussion of sexual strategy in a culture increasingly lacking a positive identity for men.

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill subreddits and blogs. This page is our copy of the original post.

/r/TheRedPill archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Agree & Amplify is essentially Sarcasm?
Author

[deleted]

Upvotes 5
Comments 11
Date May 29, 2014 4:33 PM UTC
(12 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/TheRedPill
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/26sqev/agree_amplify_is_essentially_sarcasm/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/TheRedPill/agree-amplify-is-essentially-sarcasm.16035
https://theredarchive.com/post/16035
Red Pill terms in post
the red pill

Comments

[–]TRP VanguardArchwinger 10 points11 points12 points 12 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Essentially yes, though your example is terrible.

A "good" use of agreeing and amplifying will be subtle enough that the woman actually wonders if there's a grain of truth in it. And it's rarely self-depreciating.

Example:

"You were totally flirting with [other woman]! Admit it!"

"Well, it's really awkward having sex if I don't flirt a little bit first."

In your example, if a woman asks "Are you jealous about me going to [other guy]'s house?", a better response would be: "Nope."

Just no. Not "I trust you." Not "As long as you stay faithful." Not "I don't see that guy as a threat." Not "I don't really care that much about you." Just no.

Let her wonder what you meant by that and whether you care.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Absolutely. It drives them bitches crazy when you just say "nope" to shit tests like that.

[–]jacobman 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Could say "no need to". I feel like that makes the ambiguity even more salient. The problem at that point is that it's so clearly ambiguous that she'll probably ask you about it.

[–]1KyfhoMyoba 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Perfect. I'd add a muffled snort of laughter to the 'No.' Just for the 'amused' part of the Amused Mastery. Let her wonder why I'm amused.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 12 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Agree and amplify is just an easy way to handle shit tests. It is sarcasm cause it's meant to be preposterous. It lets the girl know you don't take her too seriously and it handles shit in a comedic way. So as long as you hold frame and are certain in what you say, then the shit test is handled.

[–]TRP VanguardArchwinger 6 points7 points8 points 12 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

It lets the girl know you don't take her too seriously and it handles shit in a comedic way.

This part is key. What you are communicating isn't, "I'm a witty, funny guy! Love me for that!"

What you're communicating is, "I don't take you or your stupidass question seriously, and I'm not validating you by sinking to your level and responding or having a discussion. I'm being funny for your sake, to soften the sting of me being dismissive of your stupid, stupid shit test."

[–][deleted] 1 points1 points1 points 12 years ago | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Turkerthelurker 6 points6 points6 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Assuming you are secure with your sexuality, you could try:

"Hell yeah I'm jealous, I thought he was into me."

[–]Jasmene2012 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And negging is nothing but teasing. Everybody knows that.

[–]FortunateBum 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Or comic exaggeration. Hyperbole.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Just be aware of your tone. Most people sound annoyed when they try to express sarcasm and it comes off as more of an attack than a joke.

Either play it straight-faced or goofy. Never annoyed.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter