TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/seduction
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

      • Artful Prudence
      • A Voice for Men
      • Alpha Game
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Good Looking Loser
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • In Mala Fide
      • KillToParty
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • Married Man Sex Life
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Power Moves
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • The Spearhead
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

"All men are rapists"

[deleted]

March 11, 2015
2 upvotes
/r/TheRedPill
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title "All men are rapists"
Author

[deleted]

Upvotes 2
Comments 7
Date March 11, 2015 1:43 PM UTC
(11 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/TheRedPill
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/2yod48/all_men_are_rapists/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/TheRedPill/all-men-are-rapists.30099
https://theredarchive.com/post/30099
Red Pill terms in post
the red pill

Comments

[–]Endorsed ContributorObio16 points7 points8 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Would it be okay for someone to claim that all black people are criminals?

There would (justifiably) be an enormous uproar.

But slander men the same way, and legions of feminazi's take it as wisdom.

[–]StubbornGorilla0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If you got bitten by an unknown species of snake would you go to the "snake expert" to have it checked out?

There would (justifiably) be a huge uproar in the snake community when you assume all snakes are venomous.

Nature doesn't care if it pisses some people off, you act to survive in situations like that. Nature, our instincts, aren't politically correct.

[–]wantonton 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

Your logic is fallacious.

You're conflating the treatment of two separate animals, the species specific traits of which are well known and documented, according to those animal's well documented behavioral tendencies to illustrate why it's appropriate to NOT treat a third animal, whose behaviors is also well know and documented, according to said well documented behavioral tendencies of that third species.

You're using these animals because, to a high degree of probability, their conduct can be predicted. You're then using that as a basis to argue why it's acceptable to prepare against a course of action which the probability of occurring is extremely improbable "99.9% of all men are not rapists." It doesn't make sense.

Additionally, you're conflating species with gender, which is interesting. When exhibiting money's tendencies to be harmless, you didn't distinguish between male and female monkeys. Likewise with the jaguar's tendencies for predation. But, you distinguish between men and women when discussing humans. By your guideline references, women should be as dangerous to men as men are to women as the traits must necessarily be a species trait and not a gender trait.

You're also trying to sneak in an argument for preparing for the unknown, such as not knowing what's in the bush. But, your example doesn't address that either. In your example, the woman knows it's a man she's looking at.

What you're trying to infer is that what she doesn't know is the nature of the man, but you've clearly shown that isn't true either. You've already said 99.9% of men aren't rapists and established an example where in we ought to treat others according to their known behavioral tendencies (monkeys as harmless, because they are, and jaguars as dangerous also because they are). So, by your own logic, she should be confident the man poses no danger to her at all.

What she's doing is projecting upon another a fear and a prejudice which is not based on anything other than a complete disregard for the known facts and sexist belief that all men are in fact contrary to that which they are (i.e., although only a fraction of a percent of men rape, all men are potential rapists.)

[–]StubbornGorilla0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You make a good argument and I admit my logic is flawed. Thanks!

[–]ErikTheRedPill 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Giving into fear in what is a safe place 99.999% of the time is a pathetic way to live your life. If you don't take risks, you'll be bored, afraid, and unhappy. If a woman thinks that being on the same side of the street as a man is a risk, then she is boring, afraid, and not worth interacting with.

[–]sealteamaus 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

i just wouldnt get it up if she didnt want me

[–]kpgfisty-1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Unless she is Ronda Rousey.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter