Briffaults Law vs. altruism?

IliadsTangent · 2016-03-10T19:08:35+00:00

For women, social advancement is its own currency.

MentORPHEUS · 2016-03-10T17:58:55+00:00

Briffault's Law specifically refers to provisioning vis a vis female mating strategy. Once a benefit has been provided to/consumed by a female, it conveys no value to the male who provided it to her.

Charitable and philanthropic donations are only getting started at the moment the donation is made. Afterward, there is a long gratification tail that includes the carrying out of the philanthropic program and its ongoing effects, and recognition of the generosity of the donor by others. Charitable donations can bring recognition to a previously unnoticed person, or help rehabilitate the image of one with an established bad reputation.

NeoreactionSafe · 2016-03-10T18:57:59+00:00

Keep in mind that these globalist elite types have literally billions of dollar to use buying politicians through lobbying and donations so they aren't exactly hurting when they do these things.

It's the little guy who gets suckered into a Blue Pill beta slave "provider" mindset who gives money he really can't afford to give. (the altruistic fool)

If you spend your day plotting to depopulate the planet it's a good idea to throw some money at seemingly innocent charities to hide yourself from others.

TRParents · 2016-03-10T17:30:04+00:00

It provides access hence an association is created

trp_angry_dwarf · 2016-03-11T04:56:41+00:00

Its all relative and subjective. For someone like Bill Gates, donating a billion dollars is 1% of his net worth.

My net worth might be 1 million, maybe. So that adds up to me donating 10k.

The difference is, I need a higher % of my net worth to "maintain". So Bill pays 3k a year for electricity, I pay 2k. In real $, he pays more, but as a % of income he pays nothing. For me to maintain my net worth, I have to spend 50 hours a week at work. Bill has passive income from royalties, shares, whatever.

So after living expenses and maintaining his net worth, he can afford to pay way more than a billion without "loss" compared to me paying 10k.

So to get the same feelz he NEEDS to pay many factors more than I do.

A homeless guy paying $5 to his mate is a way bigger deal for both of them than Bill giving a billion dollars to all homeless people, or me giving 10k to a homeless charity.

sir_wankalot_here · 2016-03-11T12:52:27+00:00

Altruism is a way to show you have a surplus of resources. There is per say nothing altaistic about it.

MasterUm · 2016-03-13T07:25:24+00:00

Briffaults law in its most general formulation is an utter bullshit. It was somewhat popular in TRP as a first step to unplug the very, very plugged, the utterly clueless newcomers. You can reverse the genders, you can make both be male or female, it stays abstract bullshit.

People, if brought up without childhood trauma, are freaking amazing. People who have lived a good live among good people are even better. We are cooperative, need each other for psychological support and are happy when others are happy.

Briffault law is there to deconstruct basic BP-conditioned belief coming from an old tale where man proves his worth and gets the princess. This is obviously not true for unplugged, but plugged have to shown it into their faces: past success means nothing. "There is no relationship equity", as Rollo Tomassi goes on and on about. Whatever you did to her back then, even if you bought her a house or saved her dying mother means nothing in face of her hypergamous pull.

Hope that helps :)

Title	Briffaults Law vs. altruism?
Author	Chinchilla_the_Hun
Upvotes	6
Comments	9
Date	March 10, 2016 5:05 PM UTC (10 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/TheRedPill
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/49uc2z/briffaults_law_vs_altruism/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/TheRedPill/briffaults-law-vs-altruism.56888 https://theredarchive.com/post/56888

Comments