TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/seduction
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

      • Artful Prudence
      • A Voice for Men
      • Alpha Game
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Good Looking Loser
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • In Mala Fide
      • KillToParty
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • Married Man Sex Life
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • RooshV
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Power Moves
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • The Spearhead
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Could it be that Feminism is Capitalist propaganda? A kind of thought control to keep specialized intellectual labor cheap?

highlivin

March 26, 2015
0 upvotes
/r/TheRedPill
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Could it be that Feminism is Capitalist propaganda? A kind of thought control to keep specialized intellectual labor cheap?
Author

highlivin

Upvotes 0
Comments 19
Date March 26, 2015 4:34 AM UTC
(11 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/TheRedPill
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/30c8ow/could_it_be_that_feminism_is_capitalist/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/TheRedPill/could-it-be-that-feminism-is-capitalist-propaganda.30651
https://theredarchive.com/post/30651
Red Pill terms in post
feminismthe red pill
Top posts by highlivin

New father, horrified by what our current mainstream American society wants my son to become.

470 upvotes
March 24, 2015
/r/TheRedPill

Take Sabbaticals

69 upvotes
March 25, 2015
/r/TheRedPill

Being alpha, beta or omega is irrelevant—it's getting what you want that matters.

43 upvotes
March 24, 2015
/r/TheRedPill

Decide to be a father or not—but don't let blue pill pussification dictate your fate

32 upvotes
March 25, 2015
/r/TheRedPill

Is it me, or is there too much system-building in TheRedPill/manosphere?

29 upvotes
March 16, 2015
/r/TheRedPill

Is Going to College Worthwhile? Depends . . .

15 upvotes
March 27, 2015
/r/TheRedPill

Tipping: A Guide for Young Men

11 upvotes
March 29, 2015
/r/MGTOW

From “‘Culture of Rape’? Shouldn't it be ‘Culture of Lies’?”, re. the three fake rape stories of the past year: “So long as a ‘rape victim’ is made out to be a hero on a college campus, there will always be someone unscrupulous enough to lie in order to bask in that victim-glory.”

5 upvotes
April 7, 2015
/r/MGTOW

Comments

[–][deleted] 13 points13 points13 points 11 years ago | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]684616748970514549805 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

this OP has a lot of logical disconnects and some kind of weird victim mentality, but here are a few of the weirder points

They don’t see that it is to Capitalism’s advantage to encourage these high-economic value women to have abortions and practice constant birth-control

there is no 'capitalism guy' sitting up on a mountain manipulating people. it allows men & women to pursue their self interest. why would a 'high economic value woman', one who paid a good amount for an education, why would they drop out of the work force to have a kid? And even when they have them, they usually are not a full-time parent as they have a lucrative job which makes working + paying for someone to help raise the kid more profitable than staying at home to raise the kid.

Notice how Feminism encourages abortion and constantly polices women to exercise birth control—but most especially among the best educated women

same point as above.

No, Feminism pushes abortion and birth control among top-tier college women most especially.

yes, a girl 3 years in to a degree that's cost $150,000... her options would be have the kid and put her graduation at risk, or abort and have a kid later.

Also you make feminism seem like some abstract concept or something, and it's being pushed on to white college girls. Who do you think is coming up with this feminism shit? Poor black girls working at mcdonalds? So of course the people peddling this BS will be the first to follow it. Not to mention there are lots of feminists against abortion, because feminism has no real perspective and is just a concept used by women to justify a belief in something.

There's no grand scheme or plot by "the man". It allows a person to pursue their own self-interests. If they want kids, great have kids. If they want a job, then ok get one and compete in a fair and balanced jobs market.

But then don't complain about your choices later, which is what modern feminists do. ('I couldn't have a career i was just a baby machine for the patriarchy' or 'i was tricked by the patriarchy to follow my career and now i'm too old to have kids')

[–]1oldredder-2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There's no grand scheme or plot by "the man".

There is in fact but that "man" (the men) are all in Central Banks of the world.

[–]theHangedGod2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Alright, this is ridiculous.

First, capitalism has no propaganda. There isn't a group of men calling themselves "The Capitalists" and pulling the strings of what women want and don't want. Capitalism is a way of doing business, it's about free market economy. In a capitalist economy, the market dictates what businesses exist and don't exist. Society gets the businesses it pays for.

Feminism isn't driving down the cost of labor, the world's population blowing up in the last 50 years is what's causing that. Compared to the amount of young men entering the work force in the last couple of years, feminism is small potatoes.

The problem with feminism is its affect of the expectations of women. When feminists says to a young girl "Focus on your career, then no man can make you feel worthless." or "Use college to find yourself, don't let your inhibitions stop you from experiencing what you want." they make young girls feel empowered by riding the CC and neglecting personal relationships/health to focus on a career.

Basically Feminism is an attempt to destabilize gender roles in society, not capitalist propaganda.

[–]ayn-ahuasca 7 points7 points7 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

You've subscribed to the illusion that women are actually good at these jobs, and that companies want to hire more of them. If this were true then it would have happened without policy incentives such as hiring so many women/minorities to qualify for federal contracts, or the threat of lawsuits for discrimination etc.

The truth is that they hire women in order to win government contracts and avoid lawsuits. Then they do their darndest to put them in positions such as middle management, night shifts, or other brain dead roles where they can do the least harm.

Societal planning of any sort, including feminism, is completely antithetical to capitalism, or rather laissez faire, as defined by Smith et al. If you mean "capitalism" as in "whatever the US is doing", then yes, feminism is part and parcel of the whole disaster.

[–]MrFritzH1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago [recovered] (0 children) | Copy Link

"Child-rearing is not an “economically efficient activity”, in the parlance of mainstream economics. Check the Samuelson book, it’s right there in black and white."

Samuelson is not a good reference for what "capitalism" is. He is the defining the economist of the post-war welfare state and all sorts of social engineering projects such as Feminism.

You are confusing modern Corporatism or Social democracy with private property ie Capitalism. A purely private property society would not have any of the levels of feminism that we currently have. Child-rearing is definitely an economically efficient activity, FOR WOMEN. That is why all these impositions had to be made upon society to create equality..

Most women anyway end up working in child care or similiar care-taking roles anyhow, its just that under modern social democracy they end up working to take care of and teach other peoples kids, instead of taking care of their own kids at home.

[–][deleted] -2 points-2 points-2 points 11 years ago | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]ayn-ahuasca 6 points6 points6 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Sure. If you need someone to express brutality, attention to detail, and adherence to the rules with total moral abandon, a woman is your best bet. Especially one who has already been programmed with victim mentality.

If you actually want to produce value in a free society, there's not much use for such talent.

[–]1oldredder-3 points-2 points-1 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No, bullshit you are pushing hurts everything red pill - what you're pushing is bluepill hypernonsense.

[–]BowDown2Anthony 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

BS Article. Capitalism is the enemy of "the system." Feminism is its best friend

[–]Piroko 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Consumerism? Maybe.

Capitalism? No.

Feminism requires the state to transfer wealth, but capitalism is opposed to the state doing so because it penalizes success at capitalism. A capitalist utopia has absolutely no social safety net, and consequently will be extremely traditionalist because women will overwhelmingly choose the optimal survival strategy (traditional monogamous marriage with the man as head of household).

[–]1oldredder3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

This is an utter misunderstanding of what capitalism even is much less how to adjust it.

Feminism is a way of forcing men to such desperation they must work, therefore it is slavery. Forced labour isn't capitalism. Not working when faced with child support = jail. Prison for non-participation to your own robbery is anti-capitalism at its finest.

This is why zerohedge.com not reddit is the source of the red pill.

Shame. This post is like a giant hammer hitting your own skull as if that would somehow make us all smarter. It won't.

But they don’t see it. They don’t see that it is to Capitalism’s advantage to encourage these high-economic value women to have abortions and practice constant birth-control—all for the sake of their careers

Also ludicrous: a man lead to trust what he should not, by the pill "working", will mean he's more prone to getting an STD from a cheating girlfriend or wife, or there being an oops-pregnancy when she stops taking the pill & lies so his finances are ruined and hers are enriched by robbery enforced by courts - none of that is capitalism.

Capitalism requires consenting, informed trade, not robbery using the state.

To use the state's laws avoids all economic models period. The nearest is Fascism with it being the merger of corporation & government, but certainly not capitalism, where we have individual trade & ownership of the means of production, and certainly not socialism where people collectively own the means of production,

and people are not owned as they are not the means of production. They are the owners & consumers, the traders, sellers, buyers. Means of production is animals, factories, tools, land, etc.

[–]oldmantrp1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Capitalism is insensitive to feminism. It doesn't care who is doing work, so long as there are profits and the ability to generate profits grows across the macro economy.

When the cost of goods and services decreases, the cost of labor also decreases. This puts less wages in the pockets of the average worker. Families needed two incomes, starting around the 1970s, to handle the consumer surplus created by the beginning of globalization.

Women have always worked. They worked on farms along side men for thousands of years. There was a period during industrialization where most of the work was done by men and women became homemakers - factories were physically very demanding. One the information age hit and work became less physically intensive, women went to work, this time outside of the homestead.

The economy was able to grow because there were a thriving middle class that could earn and and redeploy their earnings in to the economy by spending the majority of wages.

[–]mykonos_rm0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

In pure capitalism, business operate within their own interest for profit. Company's have no motive to delve into culture and politics unless it aligns in with their profit motive. I'm not sure what corporate America's role is in pushing feminism beyond marketing and pr strategy, but....

We have the tech industry lobbying for immigration reform under the guise of diversity, and with the change in visa requirements these tech companies are also able to access a cheaper source of labor that they can import. News outlets are already reporting stories of IT staff training their foreign replacements before being let go.

[–]Senior Endorsed Contributormax_peenor0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Capitalism is largely dead in the west. It's been replaced by virtually risk-free enterprise funded by giant central banks and endless debt facilities. Among many retarded behaviors this fosters, I will agree it definitely promotes a society where there are no consequences for actions... and therein you find the core of modern western feminism.

[–]DerMef 1 points1 points1 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

the average price of the labor in those inelastic labor markets goes up quickly

That makes no sense. "Inelastic" means that there aren't going to be any quick changes.

In any case, I find it disappointing how many people completely miss the point when it comes to jobs and the labor market. Work is there to create value. If more people work in productive jobs, more people create value and everyone benefits from that increased amount of available wealth.

Yes, if there were no women in high-paying jobs (e.g. doctors), then these jobs would pay more. But that's only because the result of those jobs (e.g. going to the doctor) would be less available, so its price increases to reduce the amount of people that can use it.

Unless you want poor people to have less access to doctors, you can't be against more people working as doctors.

[–]highlivin[S] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

That makes no sense. "Inelastic" means that there aren't going to be any quick changes.

In economics, an inelastic market is one where demand is not much affected by changes in price.

[–]DerMef1 point 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Elasticity exists both for demand and supply.

It seemed weird to me to use "inelastic" together with "goes up quickly", but I guess what was meant was that both supply and demand are inelastic, so if supply were to drop suddenly, prices would rise more dramatically as supply and demand couldn't adjust quickly enough.

Still, that gives even more of a legitimate reason to support higher supply. I don't see how you can call it "propaganda" unless you don't want people to have access to lawyers or doctors.

[–]selfsufficientnigga1 point 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Feminism isn't a 'capitalist' propaganda per se, but it was coopted by the top that exploits the rest of us for 1) lowering the price of the labor 2) having one more wedge that they can use to divide us and make us not see the real problem

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter