If you read the title, you probably already knew the trend. I don't have to tell you. Of course there is no data on this, because anyone collecting it would be lynched, but we all know it's true. When we look at extreme feminists, the ones that associate with more extreme ideologies associated with the far left (e.g antifa, SJW's, and things with gender identity issues), almost all of them are quite unattractive. And we are not talking borderline attractive, such as 5-6, or even 3-4; these women are bona-fide 1's and 2's. Now I won't get into their personalities, which in themselves are perhaps the only thing more unattractive than their body mass which has it's own fucking weather system, instead I just wanted to focus on looks.

Keep in mind that a lot of women who define themselves as 'feminists', I find, are somewhat reasonable. These are the women that will claim to be a feminist who wants equality, and when you poke holes in their theories, they reconcile their beliefs somewhat. I've seen some good looking women in this group.

But when it comes to the extremists, the one's that are aggressively touting feminism, becoming dysregulated by the slightest thing, and showing an extreme lack of logic in their day to day thoughts, they are almost exclusively the absolute ugliest people out there. Now there are a lot of very ugly women that don't have extremists beliefs, but it would be insane to deny the existence of a strong correlation between extreme attractiveness and strong feminist beliefs.

So how do we explain the correlation? Anyone who has ever taken a science course knows that correlation doesn't mean shit by itself, as there are multiple routes of causality. Do extreme feminist beliefs cause you to become incredibly unattractive? Well that could explain the weight gain, but it wouldn't account for the facial ugliness. Uglyness tends to occur throughout life. Could being overweight and ugly cause women to develop more feminist beliefs? This seems very plausible. Finally, could a third variable independently predict both ugliness and extreme feminist beliefs? This also seems plausible, although less obvious. I'll focus on the second one, because it offers a rather logical explanation.

Here's what I believe. In early childhood, immediately people can be discriminated on based on looks; many of these change trajectories significantly, but in a kindergarten class, there are going to be some kids that are uglier than others. As these kids get over, and start to hit puberty, the pretty girls get lots of attention from the males while the ugly ones do not; in fact, many will even be bullied by other alpha females over their looks. This results in resentment towards both males in general, none of which have shown interest, as well as high SMV women who had bullied them. Their anti-male and anti-high-smv female traits start to develop. As they get older their male views become more extreme, as they are validated by life experiences. High SMV women are considered 'sluts' by many of these hippos, and they develop views of high status women meeting male needs as something that as a direct attack on themselves, and other women. Thus, the extremely illogical arguments that occur from extreme feminists arise out of a lifetime of experience of resentment towards men for ignoring them, and high status women for early life bullying and jealousy over their attainment of what they will never have. At this point they completely give up on any desire to take care of themselves, as this is associated with the whore smv women who spend 16 hours a day trying to look good and impress their loser partner. They become fatter, less healthy, and more undesirable. They find other rejected women like themselves, and form alliances, sharing their extreme ideas and building off of each other. These women then form strong identities as a 'feminist', declaring other feminists as 'fake', despite the fact that this group is a small minority. This loud group internalizes this identity, and becomes the voice for 'millions' of women, as most self identifying feminists cringe at who is now associating with their once reasonable movement.

Additional theories:(they don't contradict, just a different perspective) Extreme low SMV women would almost have to come from at least 2 reasonably low SMV parents. Two high SMV parents will produce a high quality offspring most of the time. In order to get a 1/10, you'll need both parents trading at <3/10 in order to have that even possible, compounded by a lifetime of poor choices. So when you have two very low SMV parents, you almost always will find a dominating women and beta father. So from a young age, this woman is conditioned in an environment where women dominate, and control the dialogue. She develops an extreme female egocentricity as the male perspective is not allowed, so she doesn't understand the other side.

After a lifetime of no attention from males, they find creative and elaborate 'shocking' ways of getting attention.

Oh, and if I get shit for posting a theory thread on a Saturday night, maybe leave your rock and consider that not everyone has a princess Mon-Fri 9-5 schedule.

Any thoughts?